Cited by 758Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Software Testing and Debugging TechniquesAdversarial Robustness in Machine Learning

Explainable AI: A Brief Survey on History, Research Areas, Approaches and Challenges

Xu, Feiyu, Uszkoreit, Hans, Du, Yangzhou, Fan, Wei, Zhao, Dongyan, Zhu, Jun·2019·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-32236-6_51

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • XAI has recently become a hot research topic, with new methods developed.

    “Recently, eXplainable-AI (XAI) [179] has become a hot research topic, with new methods developed [180,181].”
  • The reliability and predictive accuracy of an AI model is often inversely correlated with its interpretability; the better the predictive accuracy, the less explainable the model.

    “The reliability and predictive accuracy of an AI model is often inversely correlated with its interpretability as shown in Fig. 9; the better the predictive accuracy, the less explainable the model [45].”
  • ISO/TC 204 is the main standard facilitating the systematic use of autonomous vehicle technology and delivers an extensive manual on the entire system and infrastructure elements of ITS.

    “The main standard facilitating the systematic use of autonomous vehicle technology in this context is ISO/TC 204, which delivers an extensive manual on the entire system and infrastructure elements of ITS [45], [79], [80].”
  • Articulating all of the system's components and operations is a barrier when trying to break the system down into its constituent aspects because all input variables have to be easy to comprehend.

    “Since all of the input variables have to be easy to comprehend, articulating all of the system's components and operations is a barrier when trying to break the system down into its constituent aspects [45], [51].”
  • Explainable AI is proposed as a viable solution to address the challenges posed by the black-box nature of AI, ML, and DL models.

    “In this context, and to address the challenges posed by the black-box nature of AI, ML, and DL models, explainable AI (XAI) is proposed as a viable solution.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xu, F., Uszkoreit, H., Du, Y., Fan, W., Zhao, D., & Zhu, J.
Affiliations
  • Lenovo (China) (CN)
  • German Research Centre for Artificial Intelligence (DE)
  • Peking University (CN)
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
Corresponding author
Xu, Feiyu
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2019
Pages
563-574
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W2975495759
Cited by
758
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 70 · 2025: 185 · 2024: 193 · 2023: 158 · 2022: 76 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 2
FWCI
14.54
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Keywords
explainable AI, explainability, deep neural network, black-box models, expert systems, future research directions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review