PreprintCited by 10,381Adversarial Robustness in Machine LearningSecurity and Verification in ComputingSoftware Testing and Debugging Techniques

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examples

Open access

Abstract

Several machine learning models, including neural networks, consistently misclassify adversarial examples---inputs formed by applying small but intentionally worst-case perturbations to examples from the dataset, such that the perturbed input results in the model outputting an incorrect answer with high confidence. Early attempts at explaining this phenomenon focused on nonlinearity and overfitting. We argue instead that the primary cause of neural networks' vulnerability to adversarial perturbation is their linear nature. This explanation is supported by new quantitative results while giving the first explanation of the most intriguing fact about them: their generalization across architectures and training sets. Moreover, this view yields a simple and fast method of generating adversarial examples. Using this approach to provide examples for adversarial training, we reduce the test set error of a maxout network on the MNIST dataset.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1412.6572

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Bergstra, James, Breuleux, Olivier, Bastien, Fr´ ed´ eric, Lamblin, Pascal, Pascanu, Razvan, Desjardins, Guillaume, Turian, Joseph, Warde-Farley, David, and Bengio, Yoshua. Theano: a CPU and GPU math expression compiler. In Proceedings of the Python for Scientific Computing Conference (SciPy) , June 2010. Oral Presentation.
  2. Chalupka, K., Perona, P., and Eberhardt, F. Visual Causal Feature Learning. ArXiv e-prints , December 2014.
  3. Glorot, Xavier, Bordes, Antoine, and Bengio, Yoshua. Deep sparse rectifier neural networks. In JMLR W&CP: Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS 2011) , April 2011.
  4. Goodfellow, Ian J., Warde-Farley, David, Mirza, Mehdi, Courville, Aaron, and Bengio, Yoshua. Maxout networks. In Dasgupta, Sanjoy and McAllester, David (eds.), International Conference on Machine Learning , pp. 1319-1327, 2013c.
  5. Nguyen, A., Yosinski, J., and Clune, J. Deep Neural Networks are Easily Fooled: High Confidence Predictions for Unrecognizable Images. ArXiv e-prints , December 2014.
  6. Rust, Nicole, Schwartz, Odelia, Movshon, J. Anthony, and Simoncelli, Eero. Spatiotemporal elements of macaque V1 receptive fields. Neuron , 46(6):945-956, 2005.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–500 of 1,082

Metadata

Authors
Goodfellow, I. J., Shlens, J., & Szegedy, C.
Affiliations
Google (United States) (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2014
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1945616565
Cited by
10,381
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 66 · 2025: 843 · 2024: 1806 · 2023: 1966 · 2022: 1649 · 2021: 1599 · 2020: 1112 · 2019: 767 · 2018: 383 · 2017: 124 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • International Conference on Learning Representations
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Security and Verification in Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
Keywords
adversarial examples, adversarial perturbations, neural network vulnerabilities, linearization, adversarial training, MNIST, robustness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review