The DOI matches its DataCite record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift
Open accessAbstract
Training Deep Neural Networks is complicated by the fact that the distribution of each layer's inputs changes during training, as the parameters of the previous layers change. This slows down the training by requiring lower learning rates and careful parameter initialization, and makes it notoriously hard to train models with saturating nonlinearities. We refer to this phenomenon as internal covariate shift, and address the problem by normalizing layer inputs. Our method draws its strength from making normalization a part of the model architecture and performing the normalization for each training mini-batch. Batch Normalization allows us to use much higher learning rates and be less careful about initialization. It also acts as a regularizer, in some cases eliminating the need for Dropout. Applied to a state-of-the-art image classification model, Batch Normalization achieves the same accuracy with 14 times fewer training steps, and beats the original model by a significant margin. Using an ensemble of batch-normalized networks, we improve upon the best published result on ImageNet classification: reaching 4.9% top-5 validation error (and 4.8% test error), exceeding the accuracy of human raters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“This method ensures the performance of the output activations [81]. This performance follows a unit Gaussian distribution.”
From Review of deep learning: concepts, CNN architectures, challenges, applications, future directions (2021) · cites this paper as [81]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Since the addition of three branches introduces the covariate shift issue (Ioffe and Szegedy 2015)”
From Make RepVGG Greater Again: A Quantization-Aware Approach (2024) · cites this paper as Ioffe and Szegedy 2015
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“SGD can be applied naively to the federated optimization problem, where a single batch gradient calculation (say on a randomly selected client) is done per round of communication. This approach is computationally efficient, but requires very large numbers of rounds of training to produce good models (e.g., even using an advanced approach like batch normalization, Ioffe and Szegedy [21] trained MNI”
From Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Data (2016) · cites this paper as [21]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“It mitigates the internal covariate shift that occurs as the distribution of each hidden layer's inputs changes during the training (as the parameters of the preceding layers change) and slows down the learning process.”
From Empirical asset pricing via machine learning: evidence from the European stock market (2021) · cites this paper as Ioffe and Szegedy (2015)
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Second, we adopt the batch normalization algorithm introduced by Ioffe and Szegedy (2015).”
From Empirical asset pricing via machine learning: evidence from the European stock market (2021) · cites this paper as Ioffe and Szegedy (2015)
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“It occurs throughout training, because the weight updates to deeper layers result in a continuously changing distribution of signal at higher layers, which hinders the convergence of their weights.”
From Efficient multi-scale 3D CNN with fully connected CRF for accurate brain lesion segmentation (2017) · cites this paper as Ioffe and Szegedy, 2015
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Batch normalization standardizes intermediate outputs of the network to zero mean and unit variance for a batch of training examples [Ioffe and Szegedy, 2015].”
From Deep learning with convolutional neural networks for EEG decoding and visualization (2017) · cites this paper as Ioffe and Szegedy, 2015
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Batch normalization is a type of supplemental layer which adaptively normalizes the input values of the following layer, mitigating the risk of overfitting, as well as improving gradient flow through the network, allowing higher learning rates, and reducing the dependence on initialization [28].”
From Convolutional neural networks: an overview and application in radiology (2018) · cites this paper as [28]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Unlike BatchNorm [Ioffe and Szegedy, 2015], commonly used in CNNs, LayerNorm cannot be folded into the previous layer due to its dynamic computational property, so we have to quantize it separately.”
From FQ-ViT: Post-Training Quantization for Fully Quantized Vision Transformer (2022) · cites this paper as [Ioffe and Szegedy, 2015]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“However, in integer-only quantization, all the operations are performed using low-precision integer arithmetic [113,132,154,193,267], as illustrated in Figure 6 (Right).This permits the entire inference to be carried out with efficient integer arithmetic, without any floating point dequantization of any parameters or activations.”
From A Survey of Quantization Methods for Efficient Neural Network Inference (2022) · cites this paper as [113]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“CMSIS-NN [136] is a library from ARM that helps quantizing and deploying NN models onto the ARM Cortex-M cores.Specifically, the library leverages fixed-point quantization [113,154,267] with power-oftwo scaling factors so that quantization and dequantization processes can be carried out efficiently with bit shifting operations.”
From A Survey of Quantization Methods for Efficient Neural Network Inference (2022) · cites this paper as [113]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“as neural networks have the capability of learning directly from raw data [49].”
From Investigating Enhancements to Contrastive Predictive Coding for Human Activity Recognition (2023) · cites this paper as [49]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Recent advances in light-weight neural network architectures [15,13,14,9,11,10,12] are mostly based on the metric of FLOPs and do not consider these properties above.”
From ShuffleNet V2: Practical Guidelines for Efficient CNN Architecture Design (2018) · cites this paper as [13]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Following the common practice [15,13,14], all networks in comparison have four levels of computational complexity, i.e. about 40, 140, 300 and 500+ MFLOPs.”
From ShuffleNet V2: Practical Guidelines for Efficient CNN Architecture Design (2018) · cites this paper as [13]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“Our reproduced GoogleNet has center crop top-1 error of 26.4%, close to that reported in [32] (25.2%).”
From Object Detection Networks on Convolutional Feature Maps (2017) · cites this paper as [32]
In the citing paper
“To avoid overfitting, both dropout [116] and batch normalization [33] can help to achieve better regularization.”
From Deep learning for human affect recognition: Insights and new developments (2021) · cites this paper as [33]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition
Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., & Haffner, P. (1998) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.726791 · Cited by 58,805
(2014) · Cited by 33,419
Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classification
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.123 · Cited by 19,741
(2010) · Cited by 14,134
(2010) · International Conference on Machine Learning · Cited by 13,995
Independent component analysis: algorithms and applications
Hyvärinen, A., & Erkki Oja, A. (2000) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/s0893-6080(00)00026-5 · Cited by 8,926
(2010) · Cited by 8,261
On the difficulty of training recurrent neural networks
Pascanu, R., Mikolov, T., & Bengio, Y. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1211.5063 · Cited by 4,310
(2013) · Cited by 3,740
Large Scale Distributed Deep Networks
Dean, J. B., Corrado, G. S., Monga, R., Chen, K., Devin, M., Mao, M., Ranzato, M., Senior, A., Tucker, P. A., Yang, K., et al. (2012) · Cited by 3,202
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
“We do not use dropout [14], following the practice in [16].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialDensely Connected Convolutional Networks
Huang, G., Liu, Z., Van Der Maaten, L., & Weinberger, K. Q. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.243 · Cited by 48,566
Squeeze-and-Excitation Networks
Hu, J., Shen, L., & Sun, G. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00745 · Cited by 35,667
Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Vision
Szegedy, C., Vanhoucke, V., Ioffe, S., Shlens, J., & Wojna, Z. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.308 · Cited by 32,138
Self-citationAn Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale
Dosovitskiy, A., Beyer, L., Kolesnikov, A., Weissenborn, D., Zhai, X., Unterthiner, T., Dehghani, M., Minderer, M., Heigold, G., Gelly, S., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.11929 · Cited by 47,472
Metadata
- Authors
- Ioffe, S., & Szegedy, C.
- Affiliations
- Google (United States) (US)
- ORCID
- Szegedy, Christian
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2015
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1502.03167
- OpenAlex
- W1836465849
- Cited by
- 27,818
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 152 · 2025: 1317 · 2024: 2504 · 2023: 3465 · 2022: 3990 · 2021: 4698 · 2020: 4028 · 2019: 3832 · 2018: 2356 · 2017: 1153 · 2016: 273 · 2015: 43
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- batch normalization, internal covariate shift, deep neural network training, training speed, learning rate, parameter initialization, regularization, dropout, image classification, ensemble learning, ImageNet
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
