Prioritized Experience Replay
Open accessAbstract
Experience replay lets online reinforcement learning agents remember and reuse experiences from the past. In prior work, experience transitions were uniformly sampled from a replay memory. However, this approach simply replays transitions at the same frequency that they were originally experienced, regardless of their significance. In this paper we develop a framework for prioritizing experience, so as to replay important transitions more frequently, and therefore learn more efficiently. We use prioritized experience replay in Deep Q-Networks (DQN), a reinforcement learning algorithm that achieved human-level performance across many Atari games. DQN with prioritized experience replay achieves a new state-of-the-art, outperforming DQN with uniform replay on 41 out of 49 games.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Prioritized replay improves the performance of Dreamer.
“While prioritized replay 58 is used by some of the expert algorithms we compare to and we found it to also improve the performance of Dreamer, we opt for uniform replay in our experiments for ease of implementation.”
From Mastering Diverse Domains through World Models (2023) · cites this paper as [58]
Prioritized Experience Replay replaces DQN's uniform sampling strategy from the replay memory with a novel sampling strategy to accelerate learning dramatically.
“In addition, we also use the concept of Prioritized Experience Replay [31], which replaced DQN’s uniform sampling strategy from the replay memory with a novel sampling strategy to accelerate learning dramatically.”
From Automatic Inside Point Localization with Deep Reinforcement Learning for Interactive Object Segmentation (2021) · cites this paper as [31]
Applying Prioritized Experience Replay (PER) boosts sample efficiency and improves the performance of the agent.
“During training, we also apply the trick of Prioritized Experience Replay (PER) [31] to boost the sample efficiency and improve the performance for the agent.”
From Automatic Inside Point Localization with Deep Reinforcement Learning for Interactive Object Segmentation (2021) · cites this paper as [31]
Techniques patterned after episodic memory have been explored in machine learning literature.
“Techniques patterned after or inspired by episodic memory have been explored in the machine learning literature.”
From Episodic Memory in AI Agents Poses Risks that Should be Studied and Mitigated (2025) · cites this paper as [17]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 29 · Cited by 3,120
- Authors
- Schaul, T., Quan, J., Antonoglou, I., & Silver, D.
- Affiliations
- Google (United States) (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2015
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1511.05952
- OpenAlex
- W2201581102
- Cited by
- 3,120
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 163 · 2024: 391 · 2023: 410 · 2022: 403 · 2021: 554 · 2020: 470 · 2019: 350 · 2018: 232 · 2017: 78 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 3
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence in Games
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- prioritized experience replay, deep Q-network, online reinforcement learning, replay memory, Atari games, sample efficiency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
