PreprintCited by 296Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsTopic ModelingImage Retrieval and Classification Techniques

Order-Embeddings of Images and Language

Open access
Vendrov, Ivan, Kiros, Ryan, Fidler, Sanja, Urtasun, Raquel·2015·arXiv

Abstract

Hypernymy, textual entailment, and image captioning can be seen as special cases of a single visual-semantic hierarchy over words, sentences, and images. In this paper we advocate for explicitly modeling the partial order structure of this hierarchy. Towards this goal, we introduce a general method for learning ordered representations, and show how it can be applied to a variety of tasks involving images and language. We show that the resulting representations improve performance over current approaches for hypernym prediction and image-caption retrieval.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1511.06361

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Experiments show significant improvements of the method over strong recent baselines both in terms of representational capacity and generalization, including on hypernymy link prediction for word embeddings over Nickel & Kiela (2017) and Vendrov et al. (2015).

    “Experiments show significant improvements of our method over strong recent baselines both in terms of representational capacity and generalization.”

    From Hyperbolic Entailment Cones for Learning Hierarchical Embeddings (2018) · cites this paper as Vendrov et al., 2015

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Baroni, Marco, Bernardi, Raffaella, Do, Ngoc-Quynh, and Shan, Chung-chieh. Entailment above the word level in distributional semantics. In EACL , 2012.
  2. Bordes, Antoine, Weston, Jason, Collobert, Ronan, and Bengio, Yoshua. Learning structured embeddings of knowledge bases. In AAAI , 2011.
  3. Bowman, Samuel R., Angeli, Gabor, Potts, Christopher, and Manning, Christopher D. A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inference. In EMNLP , 2015.
  4. Cho, Kyunghyun, Van Merri¨ enboer, Bart, Gulcehre, Caglar, Bahdanau, Dzmitry, Bougares, Fethi, Schwenk, Holger, and Bengio, Yoshua. Learning phrase representations using rnn encoderdecoder for statistical machine translation. In EMNLP , 2014.
  5. Chopra, Sumit, Hadsell, Raia, and LeCun, Yann. Learning a similarity metric discriminatively, with application to face verification. In CVPR , 2005.
  6. Deng, Jia, Dong, Wei, Socher, Richard, Li, Li-Jia, Li, Kai, and Fei-Fei, Li. Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. In CVPR , 2009.
  7. Frome, Andrea, Corrado, Greg S, Shlens, Jon, Bengio, Samy, Dean, Jeff, Mikolov, Tomas, et al. Devise: A deep visual-semantic embedding model. In NIPS , 2013.
  8. Kingma, Diederik and Ba, Jimmy. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. In ICLR , 2015.
  9. Kiros, Ryan, Salakhutdinov, Ruslan, and Zemel, Richard S. Unifying visual-semantic embeddings with multimodal neural language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1411.2539 , 2014. · arXiv
  10. Kiros, Ryan, Zhu, Yukun, Salakhutdinov, Ruslan, Zemel, Richard S, Torralba, Antonio, Urtasun, Raquel, and Fidler, Sanja. Skip-thought vectors. NIPS , 2015.
  11. Klein, Benjamin, Lev, Guy, Sadeh, Gil, and Wolf, Lior. Associating neural word embeddings with deep image representations using fisher vectors. In CVPR , 2015.
  12. Krizhevsky, Alex, Sutskever, Ilya, and Hinton, Geoffrey E. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In NIPS , 2012.
  13. Lin, Dahua, Fidler, Sanja, Kong, Chen, and Urtasun, Raquel. Visual semantic search: Retrieving videos via complex textual queries. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , 2014a.
  14. Lin, Tsung-Yi, Maire, Michael, Belongie, Serge, Hays, James, Perona, Pietro, Ramanan, Deva, Doll´ ar, Piotr, and Zitnick, C Lawrence. Microsoft coco: Common objects in context. In ECCV , 2014b.
  15. Mao, Junhua, Xu, Wei, Yang, Yi, Wang, Jiang, and Yuille, Alan. Deep captioning with multimodal recurrent neural networks (m-rnn). In ICLR , 2015.
  16. Mikolov, Tomas, Yih, Wen-tau, and Zweig, Geoffrey. Linguistic regularities in continuous space word representations. In HLT-NAACL , pp. 746-751, 2013.
  17. Miller, George A. Wordnet: a lexical database for english. Communications of the ACM , 1995.
  18. Norouzi, Mohammad, Mikolov, Tomas, Bengio, Samy, Singer, Yoram, Shlens, Jonathon, Frome, Andrea, Corrado, Greg S, and Dean, Jeffrey. Zero-shot learning by convex combination of semantic embeddings. In ICLR , 2014.
  19. Plummer, Bryan, Wang, Liwei, Cervantes, Chris, Caicedo, Juan, Hockenmaier, Julia, and Lazebnik, Svetlana. Flickr30k entities: Collecting region-to-phrase correspondences for richer image-tosentence models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1505.04870 , 2015. · arXiv
  20. Rockt¨ aschel, Tim, Grefenstette, Edward, Hermann, Karl Moritz, Koˇ cisk` y, Tom´ aˇ s, and Blunsom, Phil. Reasoning about entailment with neural attention. arXiv preprint arXiv:1509.06664 , 2015. · arXiv
  21. Simonyan, K. and Zisserman, A. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. In ICLR , 2015.
  22. Socher, Richard, Chen, Danqi, Manning, Christopher D, and Ng, Andrew. Reasoning with neural tensor networks for knowledge base completion. In NIPS , 2013.
  23. Socher, Richard, Karpathy, Andrej, Le, Quoc V, Manning, Christopher D, and Ng, Andrew Y. Grounded compositional semantics for finding and describing images with sentences. TACL , 2014.
  24. Van der Maaten, Laurens and Hinton, Geoffrey. Visualizing data using t-sne. Journal of Machine Learning Research , 9(2579-2605):85, 2008.
  25. Vilnis, Luke and McCallum, Andrew. Word representations via gaussian embedding. In ICLR , 2015.
  26. Young, Peter, Lai, Alice, Hodosh, Micah, and Hockenmaier, Julia. From image descriptions to visual denotations: New similarity metrics for semantic inference over event descriptions. TACL , 2014.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vendrov, I., Kiros, R., Fidler, S., & Urtasun, R.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2015
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2172888184
Cited by
296
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 63 · 2018: 51 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
Keywords
order embeddings, partially ordered sets, natural language inference, image captioning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review