The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Ups and Downs: Modeling the Visual Evolution of Fashion Trends with One-Class Collaborative Filtering
Open accessAbstract
Building a successful recommender system depends on understanding both the dimensions of people's preferences as well as their dynamics. In certain domains, such as fashion, modeling such preferences can be incredibly difficult, due to the need to simultaneously model the visual appearance of products as well as their evolution over time. The subtle semantics and non-linear dynamics of fashion evolution raise unique challenges especially considering the sparsity and large scale of the underlying datasets. In this paper we build novel models for the One-Class Collaborative Filtering setting, where our goal is to estimate users' fashion-aware personalized ranking functions based on their past feedback. To uncover the complex and evolving visual factors that people consider when evaluating products, our method combines high-level visual features extracted from a deep convolutional neural network, users' past feedback, as well as evolving trends within the community. Experimentally we evaluate our method on two large real-world datasets from Amazon.com, where we show it to outperform state-of-the-art personalized ranking measures, and also use it to visualize the high-level fashion trends across the 11-year span of our dataset.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Don’t Stop Pretraining: Adapt Language Models to Domains and Tasks
Gururangan, S., Marasović, A., Swayamdipta, S., Lo, K., Beltagy, I., Downey, D., & Smith, N. A. (2020) · Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.740 · Cited by 2,103
Deep Interest Evolution Network for Click-Through Rate Prediction
Zhou, G., Mou, N., Fan, Y., Pi, Q., Bian, W., Zhou, C., Zhu, X., & Gai, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33015941 · Cited by 1,099
Confident Learning: Estimating Uncertainty in Dataset Labels
Northcutt, C., Jiang, L., & Chuang, I. (2021) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.1.12125 · Cited by 795
ABCDM: An Attention-based Bidirectional CNN-RNN Deep Model for sentiment analysis
Basiri, M. E., Nemati, S., Abdar, M., Cambria, E., & Acharya, U. R. (2021) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2020.08.005 · Cited by 745
Time Interval Aware Self-Attention for Sequential Recommendation
Li, J., Wang, Y., & McAuley, J. (2020) · Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3336191.3371786 · Cited by 649
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- He, R., & McAuley, J.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2016
- Pages
- 507-517
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1602.01585
- OpenAlex
- W2294501066
- Cited by
- 186
- References
- 0
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ups and Downs: Modeling the Visual Evolution of Fashion Trends with One-Class Collaborative Filtering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.1602.01585
- The paper
- He, R., & McAuley, J. (2016). Ups and Downs: Modeling the Visual Evolution of Fashion Trends with One-Class Collaborative Filtering. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1602.01585
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.