The DOI matches its DataCite record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MOT16: A Benchmark for Multi-Object Tracking
Open accessAbstract
Standardized benchmarks are crucial for the majority of computer vision applications. Although leaderboards and ranking tables should not be over-claimed, benchmarks often provide the most objective measure of performance and are therefore important guides for reseach. Recently, a new benchmark for Multiple Object Tracking, MOTChallenge, was launched with the goal of collecting existing and new data and creating a framework for the standardized evaluation of multiple object tracking methods. The first release of the benchmark focuses on multiple people tracking, since pedestrians are by far the most studied object in the tracking community. This paper accompanies a new release of the MOTChallenge benchmark. Unlike the initial release, all videos of MOT16 have been carefully annotated following a consistent protocol. Moreover, it not only offers a significant increase in the number of labeled boxes, but also provides multiple object classes beside pedestrians and the level of visibility for every single object of interest.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“We evaluate TrackFormer on the MOT17 [30] and MOT20 [13] benchmarks where it achieves state-of-the-art performance for public and private detections.”
From TrackFormer: Multi-Object Tracking with Transformers (2022) · cites this paper as [30]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Girshick, R. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.169 · Cited by 28,105
Are we ready for autonomous driving? The KITTI vision benchmark suite
Geiger, A., Lenz, P., & Urtasun, R. (2012) · 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2012.6248074 · Cited by 14,897 · cited 2×
“Recently, the KITTI benchmark [19] was introduced for challenges in autonomous driving, which included stereo/flow, odometry, road and lane estimation, object detection and orientation estimation, as well as tracking.”
BackgroundObject Detection with Discriminatively Trained Part-Based Models
Felzenszwalb, P. F., Girshick, R. B., McAllester, D., & Ramanan, D. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2009.167 · Cited by 9,853 · cited 1×
“Note that the deformable part-based model (DPM) v5 [15], [22] outperforms the other detectors in the task of pedestrian detection.”
BackgroundThe Pascal Visual Object Classes Challenge: A Retrospective
Everingham, M., Eslami, S. M. A., Van Gool, L., Williams, C. K. I., Winn, J., & Zisserman, A. (2015) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-014-0733-5 · Cited by 7,139
A Taxonomy and Evaluation of Dense Two-Frame Stereo Correspondence Algorithms
Scharstein, D., & Szeliski, R. (2002) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/a:1014573219977 · Cited by 6,740 · cited 1×
“…past, the computer vision community has developed centralized benchmarks for numerous tasks including object detection [14], pedestrian detection [12], 3D reconstruction [39], optical flow [7], [19], visual odometry [19], single-object short-term tracking [26], and stereo estimation [19], [37].”
BackgroundLabeled Faces in the Wild: A Database forStudying Face Recognition in Unconstrained Environments
Huang, G. B., Mattar, M., Berg, T. L., & Miller, E. G. (2008) · HAL · Cited by 4,445
Evaluating Multiple Object Tracking Performance: The CLEAR MOT Metrics
Bernardin, K., & Stiefelhagen, R. (2008) · EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing · doi:10.1155/2008/246309 · Cited by 2,918
A Comparison and Evaluation of Multi-View Stereo Reconstruction Algorithms
Seitz, S. M., Curless, B., Diebel, J., Scharstein, D., & Szeliski, R. (2006) · 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition - Volume 1 (CVPR'06) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2006.19 · Cited by 2,457 · cited 1×
“…past, the computer vision community has developed centralized benchmarks for numerous tasks including object detection [14], pedestrian detection [12], 3D reconstruction [39], optical flow [7], [19], visual odometry [19], single-object short-term tracking [26], and stereo estimation [19], [37].”
BackgroundTorralba, A., & Efros, A. A. (2011) · CVPR 2011 · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2011.5995347 · Cited by 2,440 · cited 1×
“[42]), they have proven to be extremely helpful to advance the state of the art in the respective area.”
BackgroundA Database and Evaluation Methodology for Optical Flow
Baker, S., Scharstein, D., Lewis, J. P., Roth, S., Black, M. J., & Szeliski, R. (2011) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-010-0390-2 · Cited by 2,205 · cited 1×
“In the recent past, the computer vision community has developed centralized benchmarks for numerous tasks including object detection [14], pedestrian detection [12], 3D reconstruction [39], optical flow [7], [19], visual odometry [19], singleobject short-term tracking [26], and stereo estimation [19], [37].”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- [2][2] [1st Workshop on Benchmarking Multi-Target Tracking, 2015. http: //www.igp.ethz.ch/photogrammetry/bmtt2015/home.html.](http://www.igp.ethz.ch/photogrammetry/bmtt2015/home.html) -
- [4][4] A. Alahi, V. Ramanathan, and L. Fei-Fei. Socially-aware largescale crowd forecasting. In CVPR , 2014. -
- [20][20] R. Girshick. Fast R-CNN. In ICCV 2015 , 2015. -
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Deep High-Resolution Representation Learning for Human Pose Estimation
Sun, K., Xiao, B., Liu, D., & Wang, J. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00584 · Cited by 5,984
“and multiperson pose tracking. Pose estimation is evaluated by the mean Average Precision (mAP) as done in [51,28]. Multiperson pose tracking is evaluated by the multi-object tracking accuracy (MOTA) [38,28]. Details are given in [28]. Training. We train our HRNet-W48 for single person pose estimation on the PoseTrack…”
MethodSimple online and realtime tracking with a deep association metric
Wojke, N., Bewley, A., & Paulus, D. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) · doi:10.1109/icip.2017.8296962 · Cited by 5,286
“Table 2: Tracking results on the MOT16 [15] challenge.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBDD100K: A Diverse Driving Dataset for Heterogeneous Multitask Learning
Yu, F., Chen, H., Wang, X., Xian, W., Chen, Y., Liu, F., Madhavan, V., & Darrell, T. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00271 · Cited by 2,641
“…be feasible to label a large number of images with simple annotations such as drivable areas and object bounding boxes [11, 19], it remains challenging to obtain more complicated annotations such as instance segmentation [3], not to mention multi-object detection and segmentation tracking [31, 22].”
BackgroundGOT-10k: A Large High-Diversity Benchmark for Generic Object Tracking in the Wild
Huang, L., Zhao, X., & Huang, K. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2019.2957464 · Cited by 1,809
“A number of large-scale video datasets for classification [24], [25], object detection [20], [23] and multiple object tracking [26], [27], [28] have been proposed.”
BackgroundZhou, X., Koltun, V., & Krähenbühl, P. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58548-8_28 · Cited by 1,428
Metadata
- Authors
- Milan, A., Leal-Taixe, L., Reid, I., Roth, S., & Schindler, K.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2016
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1603.00831
- OpenAlex
- W2291627510
- Cited by
- 1,309
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 178 · 2023: 192 · 2022: 179 · 2021: 219 · 2020: 192 · 2019: 135 · 2018: 96 · 2017: 55 · 2016: 12
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Keywords
- MOT16, multi-target tracking, benchmark, pedestrian tracking, video annotation, object visibility, evaluation protocol
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
