The DOI matches its DataCite record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MOT16: A Benchmark for Multi-Object Tracking
Open accessAbstract
Standardized benchmarks are crucial for the majority of computer vision applications. Although leaderboards and ranking tables should not be over-claimed, benchmarks often provide the most objective measure of performance and are therefore important guides for reseach. Recently, a new benchmark for Multiple Object Tracking, MOTChallenge, was launched with the goal of collecting existing and new data and creating a framework for the standardized evaluation of multiple object tracking methods. The first release of the benchmark focuses on multiple people tracking, since pedestrians are by far the most studied object in the tracking community. This paper accompanies a new release of the MOTChallenge benchmark. Unlike the initial release, all videos of MOT16 have been carefully annotated following a consistent protocol. Moreover, it not only offers a significant increase in the number of labeled boxes, but also provides multiple object classes beside pedestrians and the level of visibility for every single object of interest.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“We evaluate TrackFormer on the MOT17 [30] and MOT20 [13] benchmarks where it achieves state-of-the-art performance for public and private detections.”
From TrackFormer: Multi-Object Tracking with Transformers (2022) · cites this paper as [30]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Girshick, R. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.169 · Cited by 28,105
Are we ready for autonomous driving? The KITTI vision benchmark suite
Geiger, A., Lenz, P., & Urtasun, R. (2012) · 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2012.6248074 · Cited by 14,897 · cited 2×
“Recently, the KITTI benchmark [19] was introduced for challenges in autonomous driving, which included stereo/flow, odometry, road and lane estimation, object detection and orientation estimation, as well as tracking.”
BackgroundObject Detection with Discriminatively Trained Part-Based Models
Felzenszwalb, P. F., Girshick, R. B., McAllester, D., & Ramanan, D. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2009.167 · Cited by 9,853 · cited 1×
“Note that the deformable part-based model (DPM) v5 [15], [22] outperforms the other detectors in the task of pedestrian detection.”
BackgroundThe Pascal Visual Object Classes Challenge: A Retrospective
Everingham, M., Eslami, S. M. A., Van Gool, L., Williams, C. K. I., Winn, J., & Zisserman, A. (2015) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-014-0733-5 · Cited by 7,139
A Taxonomy and Evaluation of Dense Two-Frame Stereo Correspondence Algorithms
Scharstein, D., & Szeliski, R. (2002) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/a:1014573219977 · Cited by 6,740 · cited 1×
“…past, the computer vision community has developed centralized benchmarks for numerous tasks including object detection [14], pedestrian detection [12], 3D reconstruction [39], optical flow [7], [19], visual odometry [19], single-object short-term tracking [26], and stereo estimation [19], [37].”
BackgroundLabeled Faces in the Wild: A Database forStudying Face Recognition in Unconstrained Environments
Huang, G. B., Mattar, M., Berg, T. L., & Miller, E. G. (2008) · HAL · Cited by 4,445
Evaluating Multiple Object Tracking Performance: The CLEAR MOT Metrics
Bernardin, K., & Stiefelhagen, R. (2008) · EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing · doi:10.1155/2008/246309 · Cited by 2,918
A Comparison and Evaluation of Multi-View Stereo Reconstruction Algorithms
Seitz, S. M., Curless, B., Diebel, J., Scharstein, D., & Szeliski, R. (2006) · 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition - Volume 1 (CVPR'06) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2006.19 · Cited by 2,457 · cited 1×
“…past, the computer vision community has developed centralized benchmarks for numerous tasks including object detection [14], pedestrian detection [12], 3D reconstruction [39], optical flow [7], [19], visual odometry [19], single-object short-term tracking [26], and stereo estimation [19], [37].”
BackgroundTorralba, A., & Efros, A. A. (2011) · CVPR 2011 · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2011.5995347 · Cited by 2,440 · cited 1×
“[42]), they have proven to be extremely helpful to advance the state of the art in the respective area.”
BackgroundA Database and Evaluation Methodology for Optical Flow
Baker, S., Scharstein, D., Lewis, J. P., Roth, S., Black, M. J., & Szeliski, R. (2011) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-010-0390-2 · Cited by 2,205 · cited 1×
“In the recent past, the computer vision community has developed centralized benchmarks for numerous tasks including object detection [14], pedestrian detection [12], 3D reconstruction [39], optical flow [7], [19], visual odometry [19], singleobject short-term tracking [26], and stereo estimation [19], [37].”
BackgroundSelf-citationFast Feature Pyramids for Object Detection
Dollár, P., Appel, R., Belongie, S., & Perona, P. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2014.2300479 · Cited by 1,959 · cited 1×
“valuation metrics that we provide in our benchmark. 7 Recall 0 0.5 1 Precision 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Rcll: 24.2 % Prc: 65.7 % Rcll: 22.0 % Prc: 60.1 % Detector Performance Training Set Test Set (a) ACF [11] Recall 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Precision 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Rcll: 41.2 % Prc: 17.5 % Rcll: 47.2 % Prc: 27.3 % Detecto…”
InfluentialA Consistent Metric for Performance Evaluation of Multi-Object Filters
Schuhmacher, D., Vo, B.-T., & Vo, B. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tsp.2008.920469 · Cited by 1,901 · cited 1×
“In the past, a large number of metrics for quantitative evaluation of multiple target tracking have been proposed [8], [30], [38], [40], [41], [46].”
BackgroundPedestrian detection: A benchmark
Dollár, P., Wojek, C., Schiele, B., & Perona, P. (2009) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206631 · Cited by 1,351 · cited 1×
“Related work Benchmarks and challenges. In the recent past, the computer vision community has developed centralized benchmarks for numerous tasks including object detection [14], pedestrian detection [12], 3D reconstruction [39], optical flow [7], [19], visual odometry [19], singleobject short-term tracking [26], and s…”
BackgroundMOTChallenge 2015: Towards a Benchmark for Multi-Target TrackingPreprint
Leal-Taixé, L., Milan, A., Reid, I. D., Roth, S., & Konrad Schindler, B. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1504.01942 · Cited by 1,034 · cited 2×
“used metrics introduced in that work: mostly tracked, mostly lost, and partially tracked pedestrians. These numbers give a very good intuition on the performance of the method. We refer the reader to [28] for more formal definitions. A key parameter in both families of metrics is the intersection-over-union threshold,…”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationGlobal data association for multi-object tracking using network flows
Zhang, L., Li, Y., & Nevatia, R. (2008) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2008.4587584 · Cited by 945
UA-DETRAC: A New Benchmark and Protocol for Multi-Object Detection and Tracking
Wen, L., Du, D., Cai, Z., Lei, Z., Chang, M.-C., Qi, H., Lim, J., Yang, M.-H., & Lyu, S. (2020) · Computer Vision and Image Understanding · doi:10.1016/j.cviu.2020.102907 · Cited by 804
Globally-optimal greedy algorithms for tracking a variable number of objects
Pirsiavash, H., Ramanan, D., & Fowlkes, C. C. (2011) · CVPR 2011 · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2011.5995604 · Cited by 790 · cited 2×
“Here we use two solvers: (i) the successive shortest paths approach [35] that employs dynamic programming with non-maxima suppression, termed DP NMS ; (ii) a linear programming solver that appears as a baseline in [27].”
MethodA mobile vision system for robust multi-person tracking
Ess, A., Leibe, B., Schindler, K., & Van Gool, L. (2008) · 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2008.4587581 · Cited by 721 · cited 2×
“7 moving medium sunny [13] MOT16-07 30 1920x1080 500 (00:17) 55 16,322 32.”
Self-citationLearning to associate: HybridBoosted multi-target tracker for crowded scene
Li, Y., Huang, C., & Nevatia, R. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206735 · Cited by 633 · cited 3×
“accuracy evaluates how many distinct errors such as missed targets, ghost trajectories, or identity switches are made. Another set of measures that is widely used in the tracking community is that of [30]. There are three widely used metrics introduced in that work: mostly tracked, mostly lost, and partially tracked p…”
BackgroundInfluentialThe Visual Object Tracking VOT2014 Challenge Results
Kristan, M., Pflugfelder, R. P., Leonardis, A., Matas, J., Zajc, L. Č., Nebehay, G., Vojíř, T., Fernández, G., Lukežič, A., Dimitriev, A., et al. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-16181-5_14 · Cited by 606 · cited 1×
“…past, the computer vision community has developed centralized benchmarks for numerous tasks including object detection [14], pedestrian detection [12], 3D reconstruction [39], optical flow [7], [19], visual odometry [19], single-object short-term tracking [26], and stereo estimation [19], [37].”
BackgroundKasturi, R., Goldgof, D., Soundararajan, P., Manohar, V., Garofolo, J. S., Bowers, R., Boonstra, M., Korzhova, V., & Zhang, J. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2008.57 · Cited by 580
ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge
Russakovsky, O., Deng, J., Su, H., Krause, J., Satheesh, S., Ma, S., Huang, Z., Karpathy, A., Khosla, A., Bernstein, M., et al. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.0575 · Cited by 567 · cited 1×
“asets organized in this fashion: the Labeled Faces in the Wild [23] for unconstrained face recognition, the PASCAL VOC [14] for object detection, the ImageNet large scale visual recognition challenge [35], or the Reconstruction Meets Recognition Challenge (RMRC) [1]. Recently, the KITTI benchmark [18] was introduced f…”
MethodContinuous Energy Minimization for Multitarget Tracking
Milan, A., Roth, S., & Schindler, K. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2013.103 · Cited by 556 · cited 3×
“The easiest sequence for tracking (S2L1) consisted of a scene with few pedestrians, and for that sequence state-of-the-art methods perform extremely well with accuracies of over 90% given a good set of initial detections [23], [33], [47].”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationFace Detection without Bells and Whistles
Mathias, M., Benenson, R., Pedersoli, M., & Gool, L. V. (2014) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10593-2_47 · Cited by 508 · cited 1×
“For all these cases where the class is very similar to our target class (see Figure 5), we adopt a similar strategy as in [32].”
MethodDeformable part models are convolutional neural networks
Girshick, R., Iandola, F., Darrell, T., & Malik, J. (2015) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298641 · Cited by 430
Bae, S., & Yoon, K. (2014) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2014.159 · Cited by 417 · cited 1×
“Following a recent trend [6], [33], [45], we employ two sets of measures that have established themselves in the literature: The CLEAR metrics proposed by Stiefelhagen et al.”
Method3D Traffic Scene Understanding From Movable Platforms
Geiger, A., Lauer, M., Wojek, C., Stiller, C., & Urtasun, R. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2013.185 · Cited by 397
GMCP-Tracker: Global Multi-object Tracking Using Generalized Minimum Clique Graphs
Zamir, A., Dehghan, A., & Shah, M. A. (2012) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-33709-3_25 · Cited by 360 · cited 1×
“The easiest sequence for tracking (S2L1) consisted of a scene with few pedestrians, and for that sequence state-of-the-art methods perform extremely well with accuracies of over 90% given a good set of initial detections [23], [33], [47].”
BackgroundJoint Probabilistic Data Association Revisited
Rezatofighi, S. H., Milan, A., Zhang, Z., Shi, Q., Dick, A., & Reid, I. D. (2015) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.349 · Cited by 357 · cited 2×
“ment hypotheses to be considered. It has thus long been considered impractical for computer vision applications, especially in crowded scenes. Recently, an efficient approximation to JPDA was proposed [36]. The main idea is to approximate the full joint probability distribution by mstrongest hypotheses. It turns out th…”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationMulti-target tracking using joint probabilistic data association
Fortmann, T. E., Bar‐Shalom, Y., & Scheffe, M. M. (1980) · IEEE Conference on Decision and Control including the Symposium on Adaptive Processes (CDC) · doi:10.1109/cdc.1980.271915 · Cited by 327 · cited 1×
“Joint Probabilistic Data Association (JPDA) [17] is one of the oldest techniques for global data association.”
BackgroundMulti-target tracking by continuous energy minimization
Andriyenko, A., & Konrad Schindler, B. (2011) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2011.5995311 · Cited by 316 · cited 1×
“Here, we use the basic approach [5] without explicit occlusion reasoning or appearance model.”
MethodSelf-citationThe Way They Move: Tracking Multiple Targets with Similar Appearance
Dicle, C., Camps, O., & Sznaier, M. (2013) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2013.286 · Cited by 316 · cited 1×
“The Similar Multi-Object Tracking ( SMOT ) approach [10] specifically targets situations where target appearance is ambiguous and rather concentrates on using the motion as a primary cue for data association.”
BackgroundLearning an Image-Based Motion Context for Multiple People Tracking
Leal-Taixé, L., Fenzi, M., Kuznetsova, A., Rosenhahn, B., & Savarese, S. (2014) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2014.453 · Cited by 281
Multi-target Tracking by Lagrangian Relaxation to Min-cost Network Flow
Butt, A. A., & Collins, R. T. (2013) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2013.241 · Cited by 271 · cited 1×
“Since its original publication [49], a large number of methods that are based on the network flow formulation have appeared in the literature [9], [29], [31], [35], [43].”
Tracking of Multiple, Partially Occluded Humans based on Static Body Part Detection
Wu, B., & Nevatia, R. (2006) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2006.312 · Cited by 227 · cited 2×
“In the past, a large number of metrics for quantitative evaluation of multiple target tracking have been proposed [8], [30], [38], [40], [41], [46].”
BackgroundSocially-Aware Large-Scale Crowd Forecasting
Alahi, A., Ramanathan, V., & Fei-Fei, L. (2014) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2014.283 · Cited by 218 · cited 1×
“Another work that is worth mentioning is [4], in which the authors collected a very large amount of data with 42 million pedestrian trajectories.”
BackgroundMultiple Target Tracking Based on Undirected Hierarchical Relation Hypergraph
Wen, L., Li, W., Yan, J., Lei, Z., Yi, D., & Li, S. Z. (2014) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2014.167 · Cited by 174 · cited 1×
“Following a recent trend [6], [33], [45], we employ two sets of measures that have established themselves in the literature: The CLEAR metrics proposed by Stiefelhagen et al .”
MethodEvaluating Multi-Object Tracking
Smith, K., Gática-Pérez, D., Odobez, J., & Ba, S. (2006) · 2009 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2005.453 · Cited by 165 · cited 1×
“In the past, a large number of metrics for quantitative evaluation of multiple target tracking have been proposed [8], [30], [38], [40], [41], [46].”
BackgroundStiefelhagen, R., Bernardin, K., Bowers, R., Garofolo, J. S., Mostefa, D., & Soundararajan, P. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-69568-4_1 · Cited by 159 · cited 5×
“In the past, a large number of metrics for quantitative evaluation of multiple target tracking have been proposed [8], [30], [38], [40], [41], [46].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialGlobally optimal solution to multi-object tracking with merged measurements
Henriques, J. F., Caseiro, R., & Batista, J. P. (2011) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2011.6126532 · Cited by 133 · cited 1×
“The easiest sequence for tracking (S2L1) consisted of a scene with few pedestrians, and for that sequence state-of-the-art methods perform extremely well with accuracies of over 90% given a good set of initial detections [23], [33], [47].”
BackgroundPETS2010: Dataset and Challenge
Ferryman, J. M., & Ellis, A. (2010) · IEEE International Conference on Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance (AVSS) · doi:10.1109/avss.2010.90 · Cited by 121 · cited 1×
“One of the few exceptions is the well known PETS dataset [16], targeted primarily at surveillance applications.”
BackgroundTracking Sports Players with Context-Conditioned Motion Models
Liu, J., Carr, P., Collins, R. T., & Liu, Y. (2013) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2013.239 · Cited by 112 · cited 1×
“Since its original publication [49], a large number of methods that are based on the network flow formulation have appeared in the literature [9], [29], [31], [35], [43].”
MethodTracklet Association with Online Target-Specific Metric Learning
Wang, B., Wang, G., Chan, K. L., & Wang, L. (2014) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2014.161 · Cited by 106 · cited 1×
“Since its original publication [49], a large number of methods that are based on the network flow formulation have appeared in the literature [9], [29], [31], [35], [43].”
Challenges of Ground Truth Evaluation of Multi-target Tracking
Milan, A., Schindler, K., & Roth, S. (2013) · IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw.2013.111 · Cited by 96 · cited 1×
“Evaluating and comparing multi-target tracking meth-ods is not trivial for numerous reasons ( cf. e.g. [34]).”
BackgroundSelf-citationUnderstanding High-Level Semantics by Modeling Traffic Patterns
Zhang, H., Geiger, A., & Urtasun, R. (2013) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2013.379 · Cited by 87 · cited 1×
“This two-stage tracking-by-detection (TBD) approach [18], [48] is part of a larger traffic scene understanding framework and employs a rather simple data association technique.”
Branch-and-price global optimization for multi-view multi-target tracking
Leal-Taixé, L., Pons‐Moll, G., & Rosenhahn, B. (2012) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2012.6247901 · Cited by 84
DETRAC: A New Benchmark and Protocol for Multi-Object TrackingPreprint
Wen, L., Du, D., Cai, Z., Lei, Z., Chang, M., Qi, H., Lim, J., Yang, M., & Lyu, S. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 37
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- [2][2] [1st Workshop on Benchmarking Multi-Target Tracking, 2015. http: //www.igp.ethz.ch/photogrammetry/bmtt2015/home.html.](http://www.igp.ethz.ch/photogrammetry/bmtt2015/home.html) -
- [4][4] A. Alahi, V. Ramanathan, and L. Fei-Fei. Socially-aware largescale crowd forecasting. In CVPR , 2014. -
- [20][20] R. Girshick. Fast R-CNN. In ICCV 2015 , 2015. -
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Deep High-Resolution Representation Learning for Human Pose Estimation
Sun, K., Xiao, B., Liu, D., & Wang, J. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00584 · Cited by 5,984
“and multiperson pose tracking. Pose estimation is evaluated by the mean Average Precision (mAP) as done in [51,28]. Multiperson pose tracking is evaluated by the multi-object tracking accuracy (MOTA) [38,28]. Details are given in [28]. Training. We train our HRNet-W48 for single person pose estimation on the PoseTrack…”
MethodSimple online and realtime tracking with a deep association metric
Wojke, N., Bewley, A., & Paulus, D. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) · doi:10.1109/icip.2017.8296962 · Cited by 5,286
“Table 2: Tracking results on the MOT16 [15] challenge.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBDD100K: A Diverse Driving Dataset for Heterogeneous Multitask Learning
Yu, F., Chen, H., Wang, X., Xian, W., Chen, Y., Liu, F., Madhavan, V., & Darrell, T. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00271 · Cited by 2,641
“…be feasible to label a large number of images with simple annotations such as drivable areas and object bounding boxes [11, 19], it remains challenging to obtain more complicated annotations such as instance segmentation [3], not to mention multi-object detection and segmentation tracking [31, 22].”
BackgroundGOT-10k: A Large High-Diversity Benchmark for Generic Object Tracking in the Wild
Huang, L., Zhao, X., & Huang, K. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2019.2957464 · Cited by 1,809
“A number of large-scale video datasets for classification [24], [25], object detection [20], [23] and multiple object tracking [26], [27], [28] have been proposed.”
BackgroundZhou, X., Koltun, V., & Krähenbühl, P. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58548-8_28 · Cited by 1,428
Metadata
- Authors
- Milan, A., Leal-Taixe, L., Reid, I., Roth, S., & Schindler, K.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2016
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1603.00831
- OpenAlex
- W2291627510
- Cited by
- 1,309
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 178 · 2023: 192 · 2022: 179 · 2021: 219 · 2020: 192 · 2019: 135 · 2018: 96 · 2017: 55 · 2016: 12
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Keywords
- MOT16, multi-target tracking, benchmark, pedestrian tracking, video annotation, object visibility, evaluation protocol
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
