CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 14Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsRelativity and Gravitational TheoryNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories

Comparing Dualities and Gauge Symmetries

Open access
De Haro, Sebastian, Teh, Nicholas, Butterfield, Jeremy N.·2016·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1603.08334arXiv 1603.08334
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

We discuss some aspects of the relation between dualities and gauge symmetries. Both of these ideas are of course multi-faceted, and we confine ourselves to making two points. Both points are about dualities in string theory, and both have the 'flavour' that two dual theories are 'closer in content' than you might think. For both points, we adopt a simple conception of a duality as an 'isomorphism' between theories: more precisely, as appropriate bijections between the two theories' sets of states and sets of quantities. The first point (Section 3) is that this conception of duality meshes with two dual theories being 'gauge related' in the general philosophical sense of being physically equivalent. For a string duality, such as T-duality and gauge/gravity duality, this means taking such features as the radius of a compact dimension, and the dimensionality of spacetime, to be 'gauge'. The second point (Sections 4, 5 and 6) is much more specific. We give a result about gauge/gravity duality that shows its relation to gauge symmetries (in the physical sense of symmetry transformations that are spacetime-dependent) to be subtler than you might expect. For gauge theories, you might expect that the duality bijections relate only gauge-invariant quantities and states, in the sense that gauge symmetries in one theory will be unrelated to any symmetries in the other theory. This may be so in general; and indeed, it is suggested by discussions of Polchinski and Horowitz. But we show that in gauge/gravity duality, each of a certain class of gauge symmetries in the gravity/bulk theory, viz. diffeomorphisms, is related by the duality to a position-dependent symmetry of the gauge/boundary theory.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1603.08334

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • According to AdS-CFT, the gravitational theory in the spacetime region M with boundary ∂M is dual to a quantum field theory on the boundary ∂M.

    “According to AdS-CFT, the gravitational theory in the spacetime region M with boundary ∂M is dual to a quantum field theory on the boundary, ∂M .”

    From Noether's Theorems and Energy in General Relativity (2021) · cites this paper as De Haro et al. (2016)

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 36 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Fefferman, C. and Graham, C.R. (2012). 'The Ambient Metric', Annals of Mathematics Studies, number 178. Princeton University Press: Princeton and Oxford; (and at: http://arxiv.org/abs/0710.0919). · arXiv
  2. McGreevy, J. (2010). 'Holographic duality with a view to many-body physics'. Advances in High Energy Physics ; arXiv:hep-th/0909.0518.
  3. Weinberg, S. (1995). 'The Quantum Theory of Fields', volume I. Cambridge University Press (Cambridge and NY).
  4. Witten, E. (2001). 'Multitrace operators, boundary conditions, and AdS / CFT correspondence,' hep-th/0112258. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
De Haro, S., Teh, N., & Butterfield, J. N.
Affiliations
University of Notre Dame (US)
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2016
Volume
59
Pages
68-80
ISSN
1355-2198 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1603.08334
arXiv
1603.08334
OpenAlex
W2323107622
Cited by
13
References
36
Citations by year
2023: 8 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PhilSci-Archive (University of Pittsburgh) (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Apollo
Funders
John Templeton Foundation (28929)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
Keywords
string duality, gauge invariance, T-duality, gauge/gravity duality, gauge/gravity correspondence, diffeomorphism symmetry, compactification radius, spacetime dimensionality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review