A Fully Convolutional Neural Network for Cardiac Segmentation in Short-Axis MRI
Open accessAbstract
Automated cardiac segmentation from magnetic resonance imaging datasets is an essential step in the timely diagnosis and management of cardiac pathologies. We propose to tackle the problem of automated left and right ventricle segmentation through the application of a deep fully convolutional neural network architecture. Our model is efficiently trained end-to-end in a single learning stage from whole-image inputs and ground truths to make inference at every pixel. To our knowledge, this is the first application of a fully convolutional neural network architecture for pixel-wise labeling in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Numerical experiments demonstrate that our model is robust to outperform previous fully automated methods across multiple evaluation measures on a range of cardiac datasets. Moreover, our model is fast and can leverage commodity compute resources such as the graphics processing unit to enable state-of-the-art cardiac segmentation at massive scales. The models and code are available at https://github.com/vuptran/cardiac-segmentation
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The evaluation shows a sub-pixel cardiac MR image segmentation approach that, in contrast to previous CNN approaches, is robust against slice misalignment and coverage problems.
“Our evaluation shows: (I) A sub-pixel cardiac MR image segmentation approach that, in contrast to previous CNN approaches [44], [2], is robust against slice misalignment and coverage problems;”
From Anatomically constrained neural networks (ACNNS): application to cardiac image enhancement and segmentation (2018) · cites this paper as [44]
Existing state-of-the-art CNN approaches for segmentation and image enhancement perform poorly when input data is not self-consistent.
“As can be seen in Fig. 1, the existing state-of-the-art convolutional neural network (CNN) approaches for segmentation [44], [11] and image enhancement [34] tasks perform poorly when the input data is not self-consistent for the analysis.”
From Anatomically constrained neural networks (ACNNS): application to cardiac image enhancement and segmentation (2018) · cites this paper as [44]
Slice-by-slice analysis significantly under-performs compared to the proposed subpixel and ACNN-Seg segmentation methods.
“Slice by slice analysis [2], [44] significantly under-performs compared to the proposed subpixel and ACNN-Seg segmentation methods.”
From Anatomically constrained neural networks (ACNNS): application to cardiac image enhancement and segmentation (2018) · cites this paper as [44]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155 · see citing works
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1512.03385 · Cited by 4,196 · see citing works
Learning and Transferring Mid-level Image Representations Using Convolutional Neural Networks
Oquab, M., Bottou, L., Laptev, I., & Sivic, J. (2014) · 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2014.222 · Cited by 3,150 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis
Litjens, G., Kooi, T., Bejnordi, B. E., Setio, A. A. A., Ciompi, F., Ghafoorian, M., van der Laak, J. A. W. M., van Ginneken, B., & Sánchez, C. I. (2017) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2017.07.005 · Cited by 15,332 · see citing works
Bernard, O., Lalande, A., Zotti, C., Cervenansky, F., Yang, X., Heng, P.-A., Cetin, I., Lekadir, K., Camara, O., Gonzalez Ballester, M. A., et al. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2018.2837502 · Cited by 2,431 · see citing works
Oktay, O., Ferrante, E., Kamnitsas, K., Heinrich, M., Bai, W., Caballero, J., Cook, S. A., de Marvao, A., Dawes, T., O'Regan, D. P., et al. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2017.2743464 · Cited by 751 · see citing works
“APPROACH (ACNN-SEG) IS COMPARED AGAINST STATE-OF-THE-ART SLICE BY SLICE SEGMENTATION (2D-FCN [44]) METHOD, 3D-UNET”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialMulti-Centre, Multi-Vendor and Multi-Disease Cardiac Segmentation: The M&Ms Challenge
Campello, V. M., Gkontra, P., Izquierdo, C., Martin-Isla, C., Sojoudi, A., Full, P. M., Maier-Hein, K., Zhang, Y., He, Z., Ma, J., et al. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2021.3090082 · Cited by 481 · see citing works
Duan, J., Bello, G., Schlemper, J., Bai, W., Dawes, T. J. W., Biffi, C., de Marvao, A., Doumoud, G., O'Regan, D. P., & Rueckert, D. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2019.2894322 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
Tan, L. K., Liew, Y. M., Lim, E., & McLaughlin, R. A. (2017) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2017.04.002 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Xu, L., Liu, M., Shen, Z., Wang, H., Liu, X., Wang, X., Wang, S., Li, T., Yu, S., Hou, M., et al. (2020) · Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics · doi:10.1016/j.compmedimag.2019.101690 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
- Authors
- Tran, P. V.
- Corresponding author
- Tran, Phi Vu
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2016
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1604.00494
- OpenAlex
- W2337438617
- Cited by
- 323
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 57 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
- Keywords
- cardiac image segmentation, left ventricle segmentation, right ventricle segmentation, fully convolutional network, GPU inference
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
