Cited by 481Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesCardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Multi-Centre, Multi-Vendor and Multi-Disease Cardiac Segmentation: The M&Ms Challenge

Open access
Campello, Victor M., Gkontra, Polyxeni, Izquierdo, Cristian, Martin-Isla, Carlos, Sojoudi, Alireza, Full, Peter M., Maier-Hein, Klaus, Zhang, Yao +39 more·2021·IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging

Abstract

The emergence of deep learning has considerably advanced the state-of-the-art in cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) segmentation. Many techniques have been proposed over the last few years, bringing the accuracy of automated segmentation close to human performance. However, these models have been all too often trained and validated using cardiac imaging samples from single clinical centres or homogeneous imaging protocols. This has prevented the development and validation of models that are generalizable across different clinical centres, imaging conditions or scanner vendors. To promote further research and scientific benchmarking in the field of generalizable deep learning for cardiac segmentation, this paper presents the results of the Multi-Centre, Multi-Vendor and Multi-Disease Cardiac Segmentation (M&Ms) Challenge, which was recently organized as part of the MICCAI 2020 Conference. A total of 14 teams submitted different solutions to the problem, combining various baseline models, data augmentation strategies, and domain adaptation techniques. The obtained results indicate the importance of intensity-driven data augmentation, as well as the need for further research to improve generalizability towards unseen scanner vendors or new imaging protocols. Furthermore, we present a new resource of 375 heterogeneous CMR datasets acquired by using four different scanner vendors in six hospitals and three different countries (Spain, Canada and Germany), which we provide as open-access for the community to enable future research in the field.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tmi.2021.3090082

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • M&Ms Challenge is a publicly available cardiac MRI dataset containing 375 participants from 6 hospitals in Spain, Canada, and Germany, acquired by 4 different scanners.

    “Multi-Center, Multi-Vendor, and Multi-Disease Cardiac Segmentation (M&Ms) Challenge [112] 10 is a publicly available cardiac MRI dataset.”

    From Federated learning for medical image analysis: A survey (2024) · cites this paper as [112]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. P. Radau, Y. Lu, K. Connelly, G. Paul, A. J. W. G. Dick, and G. Wright, "Evaluation framework for algorithms segmenting short axis cardiac MRI," MIDAS J.-Cardiac MR Left Ventricle Segmentation Challenge, 2009. [Online]. Available: http://hdl.handle.net/10380/3070
  2. O. Ronneberger, P. Fischer, and T. Brox, "U-Net: Convolutional net- works for biomedical image segmentation," in Proc. Int. Conf. Med. Image Comput. Comput.-Assist. Intervent., in Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2015, pp. 234-241.
  3. D. Shanmugam, D. Blalock, G. Balakrishnan, and J. Guttag, "When and why test-time augmentation works," 2020, arXiv:2011.11156. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2011.11156 · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Campello, V. M., Gkontra, P., Izquierdo, C., Martin-Isla, C., Sojoudi, A., Full, P. M., Maier-Hein, K., Zhang, Y., He, Z., Ma, J., Parreno, M., Albiol, A., Kong, F., Shadden, S. C., Acero, J. C., Sundaresan, V., Saber, M., Elattar, M., Li, H., Menze, B., Khader, F., Haarburger, C., Scannell, C. M., Veta, M., Carscadden, A., Punithakumar, K., Liu, X., Tsaftaris, S. A., Huang, X., Yang, X., Li, L., Zhuang, X., Vilades, D., Descalzo, M. L., Guala, A., Mura, L. L., Friedrich, M. G., Garg, R., Lebel, J., Henriques, F., Karakas, M., Cavus, E., Petersen, S. E., Escalera, S., Segui, S., Rodriguez-Palomares, J. F., & Lekadir, K.
Affiliations
  • Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
  • Circle Cardiovascular Imaging (CA)
  • German Cancer Research Center (DE)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Lenovo (China) (CN)
  • Nanjing University of Science and Technology (CN)
  • Universitat Politècnica de València (ES)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Nile University (EG)
  • Technical University of Munich (DE)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • The Alan Turing Institute (GB)
  • Shenzhen University (CN)
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
  • Fudan University (CN)
  • Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
  • University of Naples Federico II (IT)
  • McGill University (CA)
  • German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DE)
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
Published
2021-12
Volume
40
Issue
12
Pages
3543-3554
ISSN
  • 0278-0062 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-254X
OpenAlex
W3172614365
Cited by
481
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 73 · 2025: 128 · 2024: 102 · 2023: 84 · 2022: 79 · 2021: 15
FWCI
25.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program (825903)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
domain adaptation, benchmarking
MeSH terms
Heart, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cardiac Imaging Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review