CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 44Astro and Planetary ScienceStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesSpace Satellite Systems and Control

Observational Constraints on Planet Nine: Cassini Range Observations

Open access
Holman, Matthew J., Payne, Matthew J.·2016·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1604.03180arXiv 1604.03180
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

We significantly constrain the sky position, distance, and mass of a possible additional, distant planet in the solar system by examining its influence on the distance between Earth and the Cassini Spacecraft. Our preferred region is approximately centered on (RA, Dec) = ($40\arcdeg$, $-15\arcdeg$), extending approximately 20 degrees in all directions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1604.03180

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Planet Nine near perihelion would cause such a large effect on the Earth-Saturn distance that the Fienga et al. (2016) analysis and an extension by Holman & Payne (2016) can rule out any of the Planet Nine solutions near perihelion over the range of R.A. > 255° and R.A. < 2°.

    “At its the nearest possible locations, in particular, Planet Nine would cause such a large effect on the Earth-Saturn distance that the Fienga et al. (2016) analysis and an extension by Holman & Payne (2016) (which assumes the same residuals) can rule out any of the Planet Nine solutions near perihelion over the range of R.A. of R.A. > 255 9 , R.A. < 2 9 deg.”

    From Observational constraints on the orbit and location of Planet Nine in the outer solar system (2016) · cites this paper as Holman & Payne (2016)

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Adams, J. C. 1846, MNRAS, 7, 149 · DOI
  2. Batygin, K., & Brown, M. E. 2016, AJ, 151, 22 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Bernstein, G., & Khushalani, B. 2000, AJ, 120, 3323 · DOI
  4. Brown, M. E., & Batygin, K. 2016, ApJL, 824, 23 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Brown, M. E., Trujillo, C., & Rabinowitz, D. 2004, ApJ, 617, 645 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Chen, J., & Kipping, D. M. 2016, arXiv:1603.08614 · arXiv
  7. de la Fuente Marcos, C., & de la Fuente Marcos, R. 2014, MNRAS, 443, L59 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Fienga, A., Laskar, J., Kuchynka, P., et al. 2011, CeMDA, 111, 363 · DOI
  9. Fienga, A., Laskar, J., Manche, H., & Gastineau, M. 2016, A&A, 587, L8 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Ford, E. B. 2005, AJ, 129, 1706 · DOI
  11. Fortney, J. J., Marley, M. S., Laughlin, G., et al. 2016, ApJL, 824, 25 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Gelman, A., & Rubin, D. B. 1992, Statistal Sciences, 4, 457 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Ginzburg, S., Sari, R., & Loeb, A. 2016, arXiv:1603.02876 · arXiv
  14. Gladman, B., Holman, M., Grav, T., et al. 2002, Icar, 157, 269 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Gladman, B., Kavelaars, J. J., Petit, J.-M., et al. 2001, AJ, 122, 1051 · DOI
  16. Gomes, R. S., Soares, J. S., & Brasser, R. 2015, Icar, 258, 37 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Górski, K. M., Hivon, E., Banday, A. J., et al. 2005, ApJ, 622, 759 · DOI
  18. Hogg, D. W., Quinlan, G. D., & Tremaine, S. 1991, AJ, 101, 2274 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Holman, M. J., & Payne, M. J. 2016, arXiv:1603.09008 · arXiv
  20. Holman, M. J., Winn, J. N., Fuentes, C. I., et al. 2007, ApJ, 655, 1103 · DOI
  21. Jewitt, D., & Luu, J. 1993, Natur, 362, 730 · DOI
  22. Kuchynka, P., & Folkner, W. M. 2013, Icar, 222, 243 · DOI
  23. Linder, E. F., & Mordasini, C. 2016, A&A, 589, 134 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Luhman, K. L. 2014, ApJ, 781, 4 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Malhotra, R., Volk, K., & Wang, X. 2016, ApJL, 824, 22 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Oort, J. H. 1950, BAN, 11, 91 Press, W. H., Flannery, B. P., & Teukolsky, S. A. 1986, Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press)
  27. Santos-Sanz, P., Lellouch, E., Fornasier, S., et al. 2012, A&A, 541, A92 · DOI
  28. Sheppard, S. S., & Jewitt, D. C. 2002, AJ, 124, 1757 · DOI
  29. Standish, E. M., & Fienga, A. 2002, A&A, 384, 322 · DOI
  30. Tegmark, M., Strauss, M. A., Blanton, M. R., et al. 2004, PhRvD, 69, 103501 · DOI
  31. Trujillo, C. A., & Sheppard, S. S. 2014, Natur, 507, 471 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Holman, M. J., & Payne, M. J.
Affiliations
Center for Astrophysics Harvard & Smithsonian (US)
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2016
Volume
152
Issue
4
Pages
94-94
ISSN
0004-6256 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1604.03180
arXiv
1604.03180
OpenAlex
W2340625833
Cited by
44
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5
FWCI
4.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • The Astronomical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Smithsonian Institution
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NNX13A124G, NNX16AD69G, NNX10AH40G)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Satellite Systems and Control
Keywords
Planet Nine, tidal perturbations, Cassini spacecraft, orbital constraints, planetary mass, solar system dynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review