The DOI matches its DataCite record; 24 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Complex Embeddings for Simple Link Prediction
Open accessAbstract
In statistical relational learning, the link prediction problem is key to automatically understand the structure of large knowledge bases. As in previous studies, we propose to solve this problem through latent factorization. However, here we make use of complex valued embeddings. The composition of complex embeddings can handle a large variety of binary relations, among them symmetric and antisymmetric relations. Compared to state-of-the-art models such as Neural Tensor Network and Holographic Embeddings, our approach based on complex embeddings is arguably simpler, as it only uses the Hermitian dot product, the complex counterpart of the standard dot product between real vectors. Our approach is scalable to large datasets as it remains linear in both space and time, while consistently outperforming alternative approaches on standard link prediction benchmarks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The traditional semantic-based models focus only on the information of the triple itself and do not fuse any additional information, as DistMult [20] and Complex [21] do.”
From A Survey on Knowledge Graph Embeddings for Link Prediction (2021) · cites this paper as [21]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The second group of multiplicative models includes DistMult [20] and Complex [21], which can outperform the additive models by capturing more semantic information [19].”
From A Survey on Knowledge Graph Embeddings for Link Prediction (2021) · cites this paper as [21]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Deterministic KG embedding models TransE (Bordes et al., 2013), DistMult (Yang et al., 2015), ComplEx (Trouillon et al., 2016), RotatE (Sun et al., 2019), and TuckER (Balazevic et al., 2019) have demonstrated high performance on reasoning tasks for deterministic KGs, and we also include them as baselines.”
From Probabilistic Box Embeddings for Uncertain Knowledge Graph Reasoning (2021) · cites this paper as Trouillon et al., 2016
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“We also show that the function used in ComplEx [39, 40], a state-of-the-art approach for link prediction, involves redundant computations.”
From SimplE Embedding for Link Prediction in Knowledge Graphs (2018) · cites this paper as [39]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Tensor factorization approaches have proved to be an effective SRL approach for KG completion [29, 4, 39, 26].”
From SimplE Embedding for Link Prediction in Knowledge Graphs (2018) · cites this paper as [39]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Given that we use the same data splits and objective function as ComplEx, we report the results of CP, TransE, DistMult, and ComplEx from [39].”
From SimplE Embedding for Link Prediction in Knowledge Graphs (2018) · cites this paper as [39]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Negative sampling has been proved quite effective for both learning knowledge graph embedding (Trouillon et al., 2016) and word embedding (Mikolov et al., 2013).”
From RotatE: Knowledge Graph Embedding by Relational Rotation in Complex Space (2019) · cites this paper as Trouillon et al., 2016
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“ComplEx [61], similarly to DistMult, forces each relation embedding to be a diagonal matrix, but extends such formulation in the complex space: 𝒉 ∈ C 𝑑 , 𝒕 ∈ C 𝑑 , 𝒓 ∈ C 𝑑 × 𝑑 . In the complex space, the bilinear product becomes a Hermitian product, where in lieu of the traditional 𝒕 , its conjugate-transpose 𝒕 is employed. This disables the commutativeness above mentioned for the scoring function”
From Knowledge Graph Embedding for Link Prediction (2021) · cites this paper as [61]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Examples of models that have been demonstrated to be fully expressive are SimplE [27], TuckER [6], ComplEx [61] and HolE [60].”
From Knowledge Graph Embedding for Link Prediction (2021) · cites this paper as [61]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Matrix Factorization Techniques for Recommender Systems
Koren, Y., Bell, R. M., & Volinsky, C. (2009) · Computer · doi:10.1109/mc.2009.263 · Cited by 11,232
(2010) · Cited by 8,261
(2013) · Cited by 5,726
Freebase: a collaboratively created graph database for structuring human knowledge
Bollacker, K., Evans, C., Paritosh, P., Sturge, T., & Taylor, J. (2008) · Proceedings of the 2008 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data · doi:10.1145/1376616.1376746 · Cited by 4,852
DBpedia: A Nucleus for a Web of Open Data
Auer, S., Bizer, C., Kobilarov, G., Lehmann, J., Cyganiak, R., & Ives, Z. (2007) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-76298-0_52 · Cited by 2,454
Embedding Entities and Relations for Learning and Inference in Knowledge Bases
Yang, B., Yih, W.-T., He, X., Gao, J., & Deng, L. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6575 · Cited by 2,252
A Three-Way Model for Collective Learning on Multi-Relational Data
Nickel, M., Tresp, V., & Kriegel, H. (2011) · Cited by 1,806
A Review of Relational Machine Learning for Knowledge Graphs
Nickel, M., Murphy, K. P., Volker Tresp, C., & Gabrilovich, E. (2015) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2015.2483592 · Cited by 1,780
Reasoning With Neural Tensor Networks for Knowledge Base Completion
Socher, R., Chen, D., Manning, C. D., & Ng, A. Y. (2013) · Cited by 1,656
Knowledge vault: a web-scale approach to probabilistic knowledge fusion
Dong, X., Gabrilovich, E., Heitz, G., Horn, W., Lao, N., Murphy, K., Strohmann, T., Sun, S., & Zhang, W. (2014) · Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/2623330.2623623 · Cited by 1,533
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Beltrami, Eugenio. Sulle funzioni bilineari. Giornale di Matematiche ad Uso degli Studenti Delle Universita , 11 (2):98-106, 1873.
- Bergstra, James, Breuleux, Olivier, Bastien, Fr´ ed´ eric, Lamblin, Pascal, Pascanu, Razvan, Desjardins, Guillaume, Turian, Joseph, Warde-Farley, David, and Bengio, Yoshua. Theano: a CPU and GPU math expression compiler. In Proceedings of the Python for Scientific Computing Conference (SciPy) , June 2010. Oral Presentation.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 1,004
Is Visual Context Really Helpful for Knowledge Graph? A Representation Learning Perspective
Wang, M., Wang, S., Yang, H., Zhang, Z., Chen, X., & Qi, G. (2021) · ACM International Conference on Multimedia (ACM MM) · doi:10.1145/3474085.3475470 · Cited by 146
A2N: Attending to Neighbors for Knowledge Graph Inference
Bansal, T., Juan, D.-C., Ravi, S., & McCallum, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1431 · Cited by 135
Adaptive Attentional Network for Few-Shot Knowledge Graph Completion
Sheng, J., Guo, S., Chen, Z.-Y., Yue, J., Wang, L., Liu, T., & Xü, H. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.131 · Cited by 150
Embedding Uncertain Knowledge Graphs
Chen, X., Chen, M., Shi, W., Sun, Y., & Zaniolo, C. (2019) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33013363 · Cited by 132
A comprehensive survey of entity alignment for knowledge graphs
Zeng, K., Li, C., Hou, L., Li, J., & Feng, L. (2021) · AI Open · doi:10.1016/j.aiopen.2021.02.002 · Cited by 139
Question Answering Over Temporal Knowledge Graphs
Saxena, A., Chakrabarti, S., & Talukdar, P. (2021) · Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.520 · Cited by 91
ChronoR: Rotation Based Temporal Knowledge Graph Embedding
Sadeghian, A., Armandpour, M., Colas, A., & Wang, D. Z. (2021) · AAAI Publications (The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)) · doi:10.1609/aaai.v35i7.16802 · Cited by 139
OGB-LSC: A Large-Scale Challenge for Machine Learning on GraphsPreprint
Hu, W., Fey, M., Ren, H., Nakata, M., Dong, Y., & Leskovec, J. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.09430 · Cited by 381
Zheng, D., Song, X. H., Ma, C., Tan, Z., Ye, Z., Dong, J. S., Xiong, H., Zhang, Z., & Karypis, G. (2020) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/3397271.3401172 · Cited by 130
Spatial Origin-Destination Flow Imputation Using Graph Convolutional Networks
Yao, X., Gao, Y. C., Zhu, D., Manley, E., Wang, J., & Liu, Y. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2020.3003310 · Cited by 135
Knowledge Embedding Based Graph Convolutional Network
Yu, D., Yang, Y., Zhang, R., & Wu, Y. (2021) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3442381.3449925 · Cited by 135
Multi-Task Learning for Knowledge Graph Completion with Pre-trained Language Models
Kim, B., Hong, T., Ko, Y., & Seo, J. (2020) · International Conference on Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.coling-main.153 · Cited by 141
Ali, M., Berrendorf, M., Hoyt, C. T., Vermue, L., Galkin, M., Sharifzadeh, S., Fischer, A., Volker Tresp, C., & Lehmann, J. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2021.3124805 · Cited by 167
HittER: Hierarchical Transformers for Knowledge Graph Embeddings
Chen, S., Liu, X., Gao, J., Jiao, J., Zhang, R., & Ji, Y. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.812 · Cited by 149
Knowledge graph and knowledge reasoning: A systematic review
Tian, L., Xue, Z., Wu, Y., Zhou, W.-T., Zhang, J., & Zhang, T. (2022) · Journal of Electronic Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.jnlest.2022.100159 · Cited by 133
Tucker decomposition-based temporal knowledge graph completion
Shao, P., Zhang, D., Yang, G., Tao, J., Che, F., & Liu, T. (2022) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2021.107841 · Cited by 116
Improving Knowledge Graph Embedding Using Simple Constraints
Ding, B., Wang, Q., Wang, B., & Guo, L. (2018) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p18-1011 · Cited by 151
Deep graph embedding for prioritizing synergistic anticancer drug combinations
Jiang, P., Huang, S., Fu, Z., Sun, Z., Lakowski, T. M., & Hu, P. (2020) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2020.02.006 · Cited by 123
Temporal Knowledge Graph Completion using a Linear Temporal Regularizer and Multivector Embeddings
Xu, C., Chen, Y.-Y., Nayyeri, M., & Lehmann, J. (2021) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.202 · Cited by 134
Hypernetwork Knowledge Graph Embeddings
Balažević, I., Allen, C., & Hospedales, T. M. (2019) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-30493-5_52 · Cited by 229
Link Prediction on N-ary Relational Data
Guan, S., Jin, X., Wang, Y., & Cheng, X. (2019) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3308558.3313414 · Cited by 131
Search from History and Reason for Future: Two-stage Reasoning on Temporal Knowledge Graphs
Li, Z., Jin, X., Guan, S., Li, W., Guo, J., Wang, Y., & Cheng, X. (2021) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.365 · Cited by 124
Exploring High-Order User Preference on the Knowledge Graph for Recommender Systems
Wang, H., Zhang, F., Wang, J., Zhao, M., Li, W., Xie, X., & Guo, M. (2019) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3312738 · Cited by 125
Neural, symbolic and neural-symbolic reasoning on knowledge graphs
Zhang, J., Chen, B., Zhang, L., Ke, X., & Ding, H. (2021) · AI Open · doi:10.1016/j.aiopen.2021.03.001 · Cited by 136
Complex Knowledge Base Question Answering: A Survey
Lan, Y., He, G., Jiang, J., Jiang, J., Zhao, W. X., & Wen, J.-R. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2022.3223858 · Cited by 154
Differentiating Concepts and Instances for Knowledge Graph Embedding
Lv, X., Hou, L., Li, J., & Liu, Z. (2018) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d18-1222 · Cited by 129
Multi-hop Attention Graph Neural Networks
Wang, G., Ying, R., Huang, J., & Leskovec, J. (2021) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2021/425 · Cited by 195
Shi, J., Cao, S., Hou, L., Li, J., & Zhang, H. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.341 · Cited by 123
End-to-End Differentiable ProvingPreprint
Rocktäschel, T., & Riedel, S. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1705.11040 · Cited by 152
Self-citationYou CAN Teach an Old Dog New Tricks! On Training Knowledge Graph Embeddings
Ruffinelli, D., Broscheit, S., & Gemulla, R. (2020) · MADOC (University of Mannheim) · Cited by 123
Knowledge graph fusion for smart systems: A Survey
Nguyen, H. L., Vu, D. T., & Jung, J. J. (2020) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2020.03.014 · Cited by 121
Temporal Knowledge Graph Completion Using Box Embeddings
Messner, J., Abboud, R., & Ceylan, İ. İ. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v36i7.20746 · Cited by 117
Probabilistic Logic Neural Networks for ReasoningPreprint
Qu, M., & Tang, J. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1906.08495 · Cited by 120
A survey on neural-symbolic learning systems
Yu, D., Yang, B. X., Liu, D., Wang, H., & Pan, S. (2023) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2023.06.028 · Cited by 150
CoDEx: A Comprehensive Knowledge Graph Completion Benchmark
Safavi, T., & Koutra, D. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.669 · Cited by 126
Explainable Subgraph Reasoning for Forecasting on Temporal Knowledge Graphs
Han, Z., Chen, P., Ma, Y., & Tresp, V. (2021) · International Conference on Learning Representations · Cited by 108
Su, X., You, Z., Huang, D.-S., Wang, L., Wong, L., Ji, B., & Zhao, B.-W. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2022.3154792 · Cited by 110
RNNLogic: Learning Logic Rules for Reasoning on Knowledge GraphsPreprint
Qu, M., Chen, J., Xhonneux, L.-P., Bengio, Y., & Tang, J. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.04029 · Cited by 157
Orthogonal Relation Transforms with Graph Context Modeling for Knowledge Graph Embedding
Tang, Y., Huang, J., Wang, G., He, X., & Zhou, B. (2020) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.241 · Cited by 110
Learning to Walk across Time for Interpretable Temporal Knowledge Graph Completion
Jung, J., Jung, J., & Kang, U. (2021) · Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3447548.3467292 · Cited by 82
Niu, G., Li, Y., Tang, C., Geng, R., Dai, J., Liu, Q., Wang, H., Sun, J., Huang, F., & Si, L. (2021) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/3404835.3462925 · Cited by 105
Murali, L., Gopakumar, G., Viswanathan, D. M., & Nedungadi, P. (2023) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2023.104403 · Cited by 93
Geometry Interaction Knowledge Graph Embeddings
Cao, Z., Xu, Q., Yang, Z., Cao, X., & Huang, Q. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v36i5.20491 · Cited by 103
Knowledge graph informed fake news classification via heterogeneous representation ensembles
Koloski, B., Stepišnik-Perdih, T., Robnik‐Šikonja, M., Pollak, S., & Škrlj, B. (2022) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2022.01.096 · Cited by 101
Mixed-Curvature Multi-Relational Graph Neural Network for Knowledge Graph Completion
Wang, S., Wei, X., dos Santos, C. N. N., Wang, Z., Nallapati, R. M., Arnold, A. O., Xiang, B., Yu, P. S., & Cruz, I. F. (2021) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3442381.3450118 · Cited by 101
MRGAT: Multi-Relational Graph Attention Network for knowledge graph completion
Dai, G., Wang, X., Zou, X., Liu, C., & Cen, S. (2022) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2022.07.014 · Cited by 98
A Review of Knowledge Graph Completion
Zamini, M., Reza, H., & Rabiei, M. (2022) · Information · doi:10.3390/info13080396 · Cited by 108
From Discrimination to Generation: Knowledge Graph Completion with Generative Transformer
Xie, X. Y., Zhang, N., Li, Z., Deng, S., Chen, H., Xiong, F., Chen, M., & Chen, H. (2022) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3487553.3524238 · Cited by 102
KICGPT: Large Language Model with Knowledge in Context for Knowledge Graph Completion
Wei, Y., Huang, Q., Zhang, Y., & Kwok, J. T.-Y. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.580 · Cited by 143
How Does Knowledge Graph Embedding Extrapolate to Unseen Data: A Semantic Evidence View
Li, R., Cao, Y., Zhu, Q., Bi, G., Fang, F., Liu, Y., & Li, Q. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v36i5.20521 · Cited by 92
Hierarchical Losses and New Resources for Fine-grained Entity Typing and Linking
Murty, S., Verga, P. W., Vilnis, L., Radovanovic, I., & McCallum, A. (2018) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p18-1010 · Cited by 91
Generalized Translation-Based Embedding of Knowledge Graph
Ebisu, T., & Ichise, R. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2019.2893920 · Cited by 92
Megnn: Meta-path extracted graph neural network for heterogeneous graph representation learning
Chang, Y., Chen, C., Hu, W., Zheng, Z., Zhou, X., & Chen, S. (2021) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2021.107611 · Cited by 89
Machine learning approaches to predict drug efficacy and toxicity in oncology
Badwan, B. A., Liaropoulos, G., Kyrodimos, E., Skaltsas, D., Tsirigos, A., & Gorgoulis, V. G. (2023) · Cell Reports Methods · doi:10.1016/j.crmeth.2023.100413 · Cited by 92
Shokrzadeh, Z., Feizi‐Derakhshi, M., Balafar, M. A., & Bagherzadeh, J. (2023) · Ain Shams Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.asej.2023.102263 · Cited by 106
Contrastive Learning of Structured World ModelsPreprint
Kipf, T., van der Pol, E., & Welling, M. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1911.12247 · Cited by 180
Cai, L., Yan, B., Mai, G., Janowicz, K., & Zhu, R. (2019) · International Conference on Knowledge Capture · doi:10.1145/3360901.3364441 · Cited by 85
MoSE: Modality Split and Ensemble for Multimodal Knowledge Graph Completion
Zhao, Y. Q., Cai, X., Wu, Y., Zhang, H., Zhang, Y., Zhao, G., & Jiang, N. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.719 · Cited by 100
Accurate Text-Enhanced Knowledge Graph Representation Learning
An, B., Chen, B., Han, X., & Sun, L. (2018) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1068 · Cited by 88
DyERNIE: Dynamic Evolution of Riemannian Manifold Embeddings for Temporal Knowledge Graph Completion
Han, Z., Chen, P., Ma, Y., & Volker Tresp, C. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.593 · Cited by 98
Reinforcement Learning on Graphs: A Survey
Nie, M., Chen, D., & Wang, D. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tetci.2022.3222545 · Cited by 99
Knowledge Graph Embedding with Hierarchical Relation Structure
Zhang, Z., Zhuang, F., Qu, M., Lin, F., & He, Q. (2018) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d18-1358 · Cited by 89
Temporal Knowledge Base Completion: New Algorithms and Evaluation Protocols
Jain, P., Rathi, S., Mausam, M., & Chakrabarti, S. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.305 · Cited by 85
Efficiently embedding dynamic knowledge graphs
Wu, T., Khan, A., Yong, M., Qi, G., & Wang, M. (2022) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2022.109124 · Cited by 91
CSKG: The CommonSense Knowledge Graph
Ilievski, F., Szekely, P. A., & Zhang, B. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-77385-4_41 · Cited by 92
JointE: Jointly utilizing 1D and 2D convolution for knowledge graph embedding
Zhou, Z., Wang, C., Feng, Y., & Chen, D. (2022) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2021.108100 · Cited by 82
Representation Learning for Natural Language Processing
Liu, Z., Lin, Y., & Sun, M. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-5573-2 · Cited by 103
DEAP-FAKED: Knowledge Graph based Approach for Fake News Detection
Mayank, M., Sharma, S., & Sharma, R. R. (2022) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM) · doi:10.1109/asonam55673.2022.10068653 · Cited by 93
Encoding word order in complex embeddingsPreprint
Wang, B., Zhao, D., Lioma, C., Li, Q., Zhang, P., & Simonsen, J. G. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1912.12333 · Cited by 101
TransT: Type-Based Multiple Embedding Representations for Knowledge Graph Completion
Ma, S., Ding, J., Weijia Jia, B., Wang, K., & Guo, M. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-71249-9_43 · Cited by 82
An Open-World Extension to Knowledge Graph Completion Models
Shah, H., Villmow, J., Ulges, A., Schwanecke, U., & Faisal Shafait, B. (2019) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33013044 · Cited by 81
Metapath-aggregated heterogeneous graph neural network for drug–target interaction prediction
Mei, L., Cai, X., Xu, S., & Ji, H. (2023) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbac578 · Cited by 81
Efficient Probabilistic Logic Reasoning with Graph Neural NetworksPreprint
Zhang, Y., Chen, X., Yang, Y., Ramamurthy, A., Li, B., Qi, Y., & Song, L. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2001.11850 · Cited by 102
Data Poisoning Attack against Knowledge Graph Embedding
Zhang, H., Zheng, T., Gao, J., Miao, C., Su, L., Li, Y., & Ren, K. (2019) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2019/674 · Cited by 101
RAGAT: Relation Aware Graph Attention Network for Knowledge Graph Completion
Liu, X., Tan, H., Chen, Q., & Lin, G. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3055529 · Cited by 78
Heinzerling, B., & Inui, K. (2021) · Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Main Volume · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-main.153 · Cited by 78
Temporal inductive path neural network for temporal knowledge graph reasoning
Dong, H., Wang, P., Xiao, M., Ning, Z., Wang, P., & Zhou, Y. (2024) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2024.104085 · Cited by 83
Walsh, B., Mohamed, S. K., & Nováček, V. (2020) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/3340531.3412776 · Cited by 86
Detection of Relation Assertion Errors in Knowledge Graphs
Melo, A., & Paulheim, H. (2017) · International Conference on Knowledge Capture · doi:10.1145/3148011.3148033 · Cited by 76
Network representation learning: a systematic literature review
Li, B., & Pi, D. (2020) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-020-04908-5 · Cited by 78
Fusing topology contexts and logical rules in language models for knowledge graph completion
Lin, Q., Mao, R., Liu, J., Xu, F., & Cambria, E. (2022) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2022.09.020 · Cited by 76
NeuInfer: Knowledge Inference on N-ary Facts
Guan, S., Jin, X., Guo, J., Wang, Y., & Cheng, X. (2020) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.546 · Cited by 79
Dai, Y., Guo, C., Guo, W., & Eickhoff, C. (2020) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbaa256 · Cited by 77
Interaction Embeddings for Prediction and Explanation in Knowledge Graphs
Zhang, W., Paudel, B., Zhang, W., Bernstein, A., & Chen, H. (2019) · Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) · doi:10.5167/uzh-162876 · Cited by 74
Ontology-enhanced Prompt-tuning for Few-shot Learning
Ye, H., Zhang, N., Deng, S., Chen, X., Chen, H., Xiong, F., Chen, X., & Chen, H. (2022) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3485447.3511921 · Cited by 80
Language Models as Knowledge Embeddings
Wang, X., He, Q., Liang, J., & Xiao, Y. (2022) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2022/318 · Cited by 97
Bazmi, P., Asadpour, M., & Shakery, A. (2022) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2022.103146 · Cited by 75
On the Equivalence of Holographic and Complex Embeddings for Link Prediction
Hayashi, K., & Shimbo, M. (2017) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p17-2088 · Cited by 73
Li, C., Liu, H., Hu, Q., Que, J., & Yao, J. (2019) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells8090977 · Cited by 73
Wang, S., Du, Z., Ding, M., Rodríguez‐Patón, A., & Song, T. (2021) · Applied Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s10489-021-02454-8 · Cited by 73
Investigating Robustness and Interpretability of Link Prediction via Adversarial Modifications
Pezeshkpour, P., Tian, Y., & Singh, S. (2019) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1337 · Cited by 82
CoKE: Contextualized Knowledge Graph EmbeddingPreprint
Wang, Q., Huang, P., Wang, H., Dai, S., Jiang, W., Liu, J., Lyu, Y., Zhu, Y. T., & Wu, H. R. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1911.02168 · Cited by 116
Generative Adversarial Zero-Shot Relational Learning for Knowledge Graphs
Qin, P., Wang, X. E., Chen, W., Zhang, C., Xu, W., & Wang, W. Y. (2020) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v34i05.6392 · Cited by 75
Complex graph convolutional network for link prediction in knowledge graphs
Zeb, A., Saif, S., Chen, J., Haq, A. U., Gong, Z., & Zhang, D. (2022) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2022.116796 · Cited by 74
Ren, Z.-H., You, Z., Yu, C.-Q., Li, L., Guan, Y.-J., Guo, L.-X., & Pan, J. (2022) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbac363 · Cited by 72
Graph attention network with dynamic representation of relations for knowledge graph completion
Zhang, X., Zhang, C., Guo, J., Peng, C., Niu, Z., & Wu, X. (2023) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2023.119616 · Cited by 73
Differentiable Reasoning on Large Knowledge Bases and Natural Language
Minervini, P., Bošnjak, M., Rocktäschel, T., Riedel, S., & Grefenstette, E. (2020) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v34i04.5962 · Cited by 71
Self-citationXie, Z., Zhou, G., Liu, J., & Huang, J. X. (2020) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.526 · Cited by 72
Knowledge graph representation learning with simplifying hierarchical feature propagation
Li, Z., Zhang, Q., Zhu, F., Li, D., Zheng, C., & Zhang, Y. (2023) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103348 · Cited by 75
LR-GNN: a graph neural network based on link representation for predicting molecular associations
Kang, C., Zhang, H., Liu, Z., Huang, S., & Yin, Y. (2021) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbab513 · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- Trouillon, T., Welbl, J., Riedel, S., Gaussier, É., & Bouchard, G.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- Université Grenoble Alpes (FR)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2016
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1606.06357
- OpenAlex
- W2432356473
- Cited by
- 2,100
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 157 · 2024: 345 · 2023: 310 · 2022: 281 · 2021: 379 · 2020: 297 · 2019: 204 · 2018: 87 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 5
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
- Keywords
- link prediction, statistical relational learning, knowledge base structure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
