PreprintCited by 2,100Advanced Graph Neural NetworksTopic ModelingRecommender Systems and Techniques

Complex Embeddings for Simple Link Prediction

Open access
Trouillon, Théo, Welbl, Johannes, Riedel, Sebastian, Gaussier, Éric, Bouchard, Guillaume·2016·arXiv

Abstract

In statistical relational learning, the link prediction problem is key to automatically understand the structure of large knowledge bases. As in previous studies, we propose to solve this problem through latent factorization. However, here we make use of complex valued embeddings. The composition of complex embeddings can handle a large variety of binary relations, among them symmetric and antisymmetric relations. Compared to state-of-the-art models such as Neural Tensor Network and Holographic Embeddings, our approach based on complex embeddings is arguably simpler, as it only uses the Hermitian dot product, the complex counterpart of the standard dot product between real vectors. Our approach is scalable to large datasets as it remains linear in both space and time, while consistently outperforming alternative approaches on standard link prediction benchmarks.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1606.06357

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Traditional semantic-based models focus only on the information of the triple itself and do not fuse any additional information.

    “The traditional semantic-based models focus only on the information of the triple itself and do not fuse any additional information, as DistMult [20] and Complex [21] do.”

    From A Survey on Knowledge Graph Embeddings for Link Prediction (2021) · cites this paper as [21]

  • The second group of multiplicative models includes DistMult and Complex, which can outperform additive models by capturing more semantic information.

    “The second group of multiplicative models includes DistMult [20] and Complex [21], which can outperform the additive models by capturing more semantic information [19].”

    From A Survey on Knowledge Graph Embeddings for Link Prediction (2021) · cites this paper as [21]

  • Deterministic KG embedding models TransE, DistMult, ComplEx, RotatE, and TuckER have demonstrated high performance on reasoning tasks for deterministic KGs.

    “Deterministic KG embedding models TransE (Bordes et al., 2013), DistMult (Yang et al., 2015), ComplEx (Trouillon et al., 2016), RotatE (Sun et al., 2019), and TuckER (Balazevic et al., 2019) have demonstrated high performance on reasoning tasks for deterministic KGs, and we also include them as baselines.”

    From Probabilistic Box Embeddings for Uncertain Knowledge Graph Reasoning (2021) · cites this paper as Trouillon et al., 2016

  • The function used in ComplEx involves redundant computations.

    “We also show that the function used in ComplEx [39, 40], a state-of-the-art approach for link prediction, involves redundant computations.”

    From SimplE Embedding for Link Prediction in Knowledge Graphs (2018) · cites this paper as [39]

  • Tensor factorization approaches have proved to be an effective statistical relational learning approach for knowledge graph completion.

    “Tensor factorization approaches have proved to be an effective SRL approach for KG completion [29, 4, 39, 26].”

    From SimplE Embedding for Link Prediction in Knowledge Graphs (2018) · cites this paper as [39]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 25 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Beltrami, Eugenio. Sulle funzioni bilineari. Giornale di Matematiche ad Uso degli Studenti Delle Universita , 11 (2):98-106, 1873.
  2. Bergstra, James, Breuleux, Olivier, Bastien, Fr´ ed´ eric, Lamblin, Pascal, Pascanu, Razvan, Desjardins, Guillaume, Turian, Joseph, Warde-Farley, David, and Bengio, Yoshua. Theano: a CPU and GPU math expression compiler. In Proceedings of the Python for Scientific Computing Conference (SciPy) , June 2010. Oral Presentation.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Trouillon, T., Welbl, J., Riedel, S., Gaussier, É., & Bouchard, G.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • Université Grenoble Alpes (FR)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2016
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2432356473
Cited by
2,100
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 157 · 2024: 345 · 2023: 310 · 2022: 281 · 2021: 379 · 2020: 297 · 2019: 204 · 2018: 87 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 5
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
Keywords
link prediction, statistical relational learning, knowledge base structure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review