PreprintCited by 144Quantum and electron transport phenomenaTopological Materials and PhenomenaAdvanced Condensed Matter Physics

Lectures on the Quantum Hall Effect

Open access
Tong, David·2016·arXiv

Abstract

The purpose of these lectures is to describe the basic theoretical structures underlying the rich and beautiful physics of the quantum Hall effect. The focus is on the interplay between microscopic wavefunctions, long-distance effective Chern-Simons theories, and the modes which live on the boundary. The notes are aimed at graduate students in any discipline where $\hbar=1$. A working knowledge of quantum field theory is assumed. Contents: 1. The Basics (Landau levels and Berry phase). 2. The Integer Quantum Hall Effect. 3. The Fractional Quantum Hall Effect. 4. Non-Abelian Quantum Hall States. 5. Chern-Simons Theories. 6. Edge Modes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1606.06687

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Laughlin states are not expected to be a good approximation for large systems.

    “These states have high overlaps with the true ground states of the Hamiltonian (2.42) for small numbers of particles, but are not expected to be a good approximation for large systems [17].”

    From Anyons, Zitterbewegung and dynamical phase transitions in topologically nontrivial systems (2022) · cites this paper as [17]

    Section 3.1, p. 78, reports high overlap with the true ground state for small particle numbers and predicts essentially zero overlap for systems of about 10¹¹ particles. That supports a poor approximation in terms of wavefunction overlap, but the same section says the Laughlin wavefunction captures all the relevant physics; it does not say the state is generally a poor approximation for large systems. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The remaining extended states will be perturbed, but their energies will tend to shift less, so they will tend to occupy the central regions of their respective bands in the density of states.

    “The remaining extended states will be perturbed, but their energies will tend to shift less [17], so they will tend to occupy the central regions of their respective bands in the density of states (fig. 2.7).”

    From Anyons, Zitterbewegung and dynamical phase transitions in topologically nontrivial systems (2022) · cites this paper as [17]

    Section 2.2 (pp. 48–50) says weak disorder splits and broadens Landau levels, while extended states lie near the centre of each band. It does not say that extended states undergo smaller energy shifts than localised states, which is the specific point attached to this citation. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Upward curving of Landau levels near the edges leads to net azimuthal currents.

    “Furthermore, the upward curving of the Landau levels near the edges leads to the appearance of net azimuthal currents [17,19].”

    From Anyons, Zitterbewegung and dynamical phase transitions in topologically nontrivial systems (2022) · cites this paper as [17]

    Section 2.1 (pp. 44–46) says the rising edge potential gives edge states a drift along the boundary, supporting the link between edge bending and circulating currents. But it says the two edges carry currents in opposite directions, so the net current vanishes in the absence of an electric field. The unqualified claim of a net azimuthal current is therefore not supported. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • For rational values of α = p/q, the topologically trivial lowest Bloch band decomposes into q subbands with nontrivial Chern numbers; for irrational α, the spectrum fractalizes.

    “For rational values of α = p q , p and q being coprime integers, the topologically trivial lowest Bloch band decomposes into q subbands with nontrivial Chern numbers, while for irrational values of α , the spectrum fractalizes [17,21].”

    From Anyons, Zitterbewegung and dynamical phase transitions in topologically nontrivial systems (2022) · cites this paper as [17]

    Section 2.3.3 (pp. 68–72) says rational flux p/q splits the lattice spectrum into q bands for generic p and q, gives their Chern numbers, and describes the irrational-flux spectrum as a Cantor set. But the claim is too broad about nontrivial Chern numbers: the same section says that at integer flux (q = 1) there is one band and its Hall conductivity vanishes. The source also does not specifically identify the starting band as the 'lowest' Bloch band. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Typically, TRS is broken by a magnetic field, and σ_H is a function of the field characterized by wide plateaus corresponding to quantized values, connected by transition regions.

    “Typically, the TRS is broken by a magnetic field, and σ H is a function of the field characterized by wide plateaus corresponding to the quantized values, connected by transition regions [17] (see fig. 2.1).”

    From Anyons, Zitterbewegung and dynamical phase transitions in topologically nontrivial systems (2022) · cites this paper as [17]

    Section 2.2 (pp. 50–51) describes constant Hall conductivities over a range of magnetic field, while Section 2.2 (p. 43) describes sharp jumps between quantized plateaus. The cited passages do not state that the magnetic field breaks time-reversal symmetry, so that part of the attributed claim is not supported by our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tong, D.
Affiliations
Institute of Mathematical Statistics (US)
Corresponding author
Tong, David
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2016
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2472348288
Cited by
144
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Tata Institute of Fundamental Research
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum and electron transport phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Topological Materials and Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Advanced Condensed Matter Physics
Keywords
quantum Hall effect, integer quantum Hall effect, fractional quantum Hall effect, non-Abelian quantum Hall states, Chern-Simons theory, edge states, Berry phase, Landau levels, effective field theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review