The DOI matches its DataCite record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sim-to-Real Robot Learning from Pixels with Progressive Nets
Open accessAbstract
Applying end-to-end learning to solve complex, interactive, pixel-driven control tasks on a robot is an unsolved problem. Deep Reinforcement Learning algorithms are too slow to achieve performance on a real robot, but their potential has been demonstrated in simulated environments. We propose using progressive networks to bridge the reality gap and transfer learned policies from simulation to the real world. The progressive net approach is a general framework that enables reuse of everything from low-level visual features to high-level policies for transfer to new tasks, enabling a compositional, yet simple, approach to building complex skills. We present an early demonstration of this approach with a number of experiments in the domain of robot manipulation that focus on bridging the reality gap. Unlike other proposed approaches, our real-world experiments demonstrate successful task learning from raw visual input on a fully actuated robot manipulator. Moreover, rather than relying on model-based trajectory optimisation, the task learning is accomplished using only deep reinforcement learning and sparse rewards.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“However, the authors assume that, when the consequences of a control input applied in simulation differ from those applied on the real robot, real observations should match simulated ones, and that is not always true.”
From Crossing the Reality Gap: A Survey on Sim-to-Real Transferability of Robot Controllers in Reinforcement Learning (2021) · cites this paper as [49]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Christiano et al. [49] adopted TL to perform sim-to-real control input adaptation.”
From Crossing the Reality Gap: A Survey on Sim-to-Real Transferability of Robot Controllers in Reinforcement Learning (2021) · cites this paper as [49]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Results highlight the effectiveness of such method and the relatively low number of samples required for convergence.”
From Crossing the Reality Gap: A Survey on Sim-to-Real Transferability of Robot Controllers in Reinforcement Learning (2021) · cites this paper as [49]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“The methods of imitation learning can be broadly classified into two key areas: behaviour cloning where an agent learns a mapping from observations to actions given demonstrations [26], [27] and inverse reinforcement learning where an agent attempts to estimate a reward function that describes the given demonstrations [28].”
From Sim-to-Real Transfer in Deep Reinforcement Learning for Robotics: a Survey (2020) · cites this paper as [26]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Research works printed but not linked: 25
- [1][1] S. Levine and P. Abbeel. Learning neural network policies with guided policy search under unknown dynamics. In Z. Ghahramani, M. Welling, C. Cortes, N. D. Lawrence, and K. Q. Weinberger, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 27 , pages 1071-1079. Curran Associates, Inc., 2014. URL http://papers.nips.cc/paper/ 5444-learning-neural-network-policies-with-guided-policy-search-under-unknown-dynamics. pdf . -
- [2][2] J. Schulman, S. Levine, P. Moritz, M. I. Jordan, and P. Abbeel. Trust region policy optimization. In Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) , 2015. -
- [3][3] N. Heess, G. Wayne, D. Silver, T. P. Lillicrap, T. Erez, and Y. Tassa. Learning continuous control policies by stochastic value gradients. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 28: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2015, December 7-12, 2015, Montreal, Quebec, Canada , pages 2944-2952, 2015. URL http://papers.nips.cc/paper/ 5796-learning-continuous-control-policies-by-stochastic-value-gradients . -
- [4][4] T. P. Lillicrap, J. J. Hunt, A. Pritzel, N. Heess, T. Erez, Y . Tassa, D. Silver, and D. Wierstra. Continuous control with deep reinforcement learning. Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , 2016. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1509.02971 . - · arXiv
- [5][5] J. Schulman, P. Moritz, S. Levine, M. Jordan, and P. Abbeel. High-dimensional continuous control using generalized advantage estimation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , 2016. -
- [6][6] V. Mnih, A. P. Badia, M. Mirza, A. Graves, T. P. Lillicrap, T. Harley, D. Silver, and K. Kavukcuoglu. Asynchronous methods for deep reinforcement learning. In Int'l Conf. on Machine Learning (ICML) , 2016. -
- [7][7] S. Gu, T. P. Lillicrap, I. Sutskever, and S. Levine. Continuous deep q-learning with model-based acceleration. In ICML 2016 , 2016. -
- [8][8] A. Rusu, N. Rabinowitz, G. Desjardins, H. Soyer, J. Kirkpatrick, K. Kavukcuoglu, R. Pascanu, and R. Hadsell. Progressive neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.04671 , 2016. - · arXiv
- [9][9] X. Peng, B. Sun, K. Ali, and K. Saenko. Learning deep object detectors from 3d models. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, ICCV 2015, Santiago, Chile, December 7-13, 2015 , pages 1278-1286, 2015. -
- [10][10] H. Su, C. R. Qi, Y. Li, and L. J. Guibas. Render for CNN: viewpoint estimation in images using cnns trained with rendered 3d model views. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, ICCV 2015, Santiago, Chile, December 7-13, 2015 , pages 2686-2694, 2015. -
- [11][11] M. Long, Y. Cao, J. Wang, and M. I. Jordan. Learning transferable features with deep adaptation networks. In Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2015, Lille, France, 6-11 July 2015 , pages 97-105, 2015. -
- [12][12] E. Tzeng, J. Hoffman, T. Darrell, and K. Saenko. Simultaneous deep transfer across domains and tasks. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, ICCV 2015, Santiago, Chile, December 7-13, 2015 , pages 4068-4076, 2015. -
- [14][14] E. Tzeng, C. Devin, J. Hoffman, C. Finn, X. Peng, S. Levine, K. Saenko, and T. Darrell. Towards adapting deep visuomotor representations from simulated to real environments. CoRR , abs/1511.07111, 2015. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1511.07111 . - · arXiv
- [15][15] Y. Ganin, E. Ustinova, H. Ajakan, P. Germain, H. Larochelle, F. Laviolette, M. Marchand, and V. Lempitsky. Domain-adversarial training of neural networks. Journal of Machine Learning Research , 17(59):1-35, 2016. -
- [16][16] H. Ajakan, P. Germain, H. Larochelle, F. Laviolette, and M. Marchand. Domain-adversarial neural networks. CoRR , abs/1412.4446, 2014. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.4446 . - · arXiv
- [17][17] K. Bousmalis, G. Trigeorgis, N. Silberman, D. Krishnan, and D. Erhan. Domain separation networks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , pages 343-351, 2016. -
- [18][18] S. Barrett, M. E. Taylor, and P. Stone. Transfer learning for reinforcement learning on a physical robot. In Ninth International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Adaptive Learning Agents Workshop (AAMAS - ALA) , 2010. -
- [19][19] S. James and E. Johns. 3D Simulation for Robot Arm Control with Deep Q-Learning. ArXiv e-prints , 2016. -
- [20][20] Y. Zhu, R. Mottaghi, E. Kolve, J. J. Lim, A. Gupta, L. Fei-Fei, and A. Farhadi. Target-driven visual navigation in indoor scenes using deep reinforcement learning. In Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2017 IEEE International Conference on , pages 3357-3364. IEEE, 2017. -
- [21][21] S. Levine, C. Finn, T. Darrell, and P. Abbeel. End-to-end training of deep visuomotor policies. Journal of Machine Learning Research , 17(39):1-40, 2016. -
- [22][22] S. Levine, N. Wagener, and P. Abbeel. Learning contact-rich manipulation skills with guided policy search. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA 2015, Seattle, WA, USA, 26-30 May, 2015 , pages 156-163, 2015. -
- [23][23] L. Pinto and A. Gupta. Supersizing self-supervision: Learning to grasp from 50k tries and 700 robot hours. In ICRA 2016 , 2016. -
- [24][24] S. Levine, P. Pastor, A. Krizhevsky, J. Ibarz, and D. Quillen. Learning hand-eye coordination for robotic grasping with deep learning and large-scale data collection. The International Journal of Robotics Research , page 0278364917710318, 2016. -
- [25][25] V. Mnih, K. Kavukcuoglu, D. Silver, A. Rusu, J. Veness, M. Bellemare, A. Graves, M. Riedmiller, A. Fidjeland, G. Ostrovski, S. Petersen, C. Beattie, A. Sadik, I. Antonoglou, H. King, D. Kumaran, D. Wierstra, S. Legg, and D. Hassabis. Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning. Nature , 518(7540):529-533, 2015. -
- [26][26] E. Todorov, T. Erez, and Y. Tassa. Mujoco: A physics engine for model-based control. In International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems IROS , 2012.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–403 of 403
Deep learning-based collision avoidance techniques in multi-UAV networks: A survey
Aoyon, R. S., & Moh, S. (2026) · Computer Science Review · doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2026.101045
A Survey of Deep Reinforcement Learning Approaches in Robotic Manipulation
Sachidananda, M. H., Prashanth Kumar, R., & R, D. P. (2026) · International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology · doi:10.22214/ijraset.2026.84647
Shoura, A. A., Awad, M. I., Maged, S. A., & Fattah, D. E. A. (2026) · International Journal of Intelligent Robotics and Applications · doi:10.1007/s41315-026-00575-2
Metadata
- Authors
- Rusu, A. A., Vecerik, M., Rothörl, T., Heess, N., Pascanu, R., & Hadsell, R.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2016
- Pages
- 262-270
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1610.04286
- OpenAlex
- W2534269850
- Cited by
- 385
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 68 · 2019: 72 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Conference on Robot Learning
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- sim-to-real transfer, robotic manipulation, visual features, policy transfer, reality gap, deep reinforcement learning, sparse rewards, end-to-end learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
