The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tying Word Vectors and Word Classifiers: A Loss Framework for Language Modeling
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
Glove: Global Vectors for Word Representation
Pennington, J., Socher, R., & Manning, C. (2014) · Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1162 · Cited by 34,071
Self-citationDistilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network
Hinton, G., Vinyals, O., & Dean, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1503.02531 · Cited by 14,204
Building a Large Annotated Corpus of English: The Penn Treebank
Marcus, M. (1993) · doi:10.21236/ada273556 · Cited by 7,405
On the Properties of Neural Machine Translation: Encoder–Decoder Approaches
Cho, K., van Merrienboer, B., Bahdanau, D., & Bengio, Y. (2014) · Proceedings of SSST-8, Eighth Workshop on Syntax, Semantics and Structure in Statistical Translation · doi:10.3115/v1/w14-4012 · Cited by 7,099
Recursive Deep Models for Semantic Compositionality Over a Sentiment Treebank
Socher, R., Perelygin, A., Wu, J., Chuang, J., Manning, C. D., Ng, A., & Potts, C. (2013) · Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d13-1170 · Cited by 6,878
Self-citationA Neural Probabilistic Language Model
Bengio, Y., Ducharme, R., Vincent, P., Jauvin, C., Jaz, K., Hofmann, T., Poggio, T., & Shawe-Taylor, J. S. (2000) · Cited by 3,479
A Neural Attention Model for Abstractive Sentence Summarization
Rush, A. M., Chopra, S., & Weston, J. (2015) · Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d15-1044 · Cited by 2,656
Recurrent Neural Network Regularization
Zaremba, W., Sutskever, I., & Vinyals, O. (2014) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.2329 · Cited by 2,123
Character-Aware Neural Language Models
Kim, Y., Jernite, Y., Sontag, D., & Rush, A. M. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1508.06615 · Cited by 1,530
Cited by
Neural Architecture Search with Reinforcement Learning
Zoph, B., & Le, Q. V. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1611.01578 · Cited by 3,974
Transformer-XL: Attentive language models beyond a fixed-length context
Dai, Z., Yang, Z., Yang, Y., Carbonell, J., Le, Q., & Salakhutdinov, R. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1285 · Cited by 3,169
How to backdoor federated learning
Bagdasaryan, E., Veit, A., Hua, Y., Estrin, D., & Shmatikov, V. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1807.00459 · Cited by 1,495
A Deep Reinforced Model for Abstractive Summarization
Paulus, R., Xiong, C., & Socher, R. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1705.04304 · Cited by 1,182
Self-citationFederated Learning for Mobile Keyboard Prediction
Hard, A., Rao, K., Mathews, R., Ramaswamy, S., Beaufays, F., Augenstein, S., Eichner, H., Kiddon, C., & Ramage, D. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1811.03604 · Cited by 1,148
Metadata
- Authors
- Inan, H., Khosravi, K., & Socher, R.
- Venue
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Publisher
- Cornell University
- Published
- 2016-11-04
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1611.01462
- OpenAlex
- W2549416390
- Cited by
- 288
- References
- 17
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tying Word Vectors and Word Classifiers: A Loss Framework for Language Modeling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.1611.01462
- The paper
- Inan, H., Khosravi, K., & Socher, R. (2016). Tying Word Vectors and Word Classifiers: A Loss Framework for Language Modeling. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1611.01462
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
