Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network
Open accessAbstract
A very simple way to improve the performance of almost any machine learning algorithm is to train many different models on the same data and then to average their predictions. Unfortunately, making predictions using a whole ensemble of models is cumbersome and may be too computationally expensive to allow deployment to a large number of users, especially if the individual models are large neural nets. Caruana and his collaborators have shown that it is possible to compress the knowledge in an ensemble into a single model which is much easier to deploy and we develop this approach further using a different compression technique. We achieve some surprising results on MNIST and we show that we can significantly improve the acoustic model of a heavily used commercial system by distilling the knowledge in an ensemble of models into a single model. We also introduce a new type of ensemble composed of one or more full models and many specialist models which learn to distinguish fine-grained classes that the full models confuse. Unlike a mixture of experts, these specialist models can be trained rapidly and in parallel.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Both cross-entropy and L2 distillation formulations should be equivalent in the limit of a high smoothing factor for logits.
“According to [19], both formulations should be equivalent in the limit of a high smoothing factor for logits (cf. § 3.2), but our choice of not smoothing leads to this different behavior.”
From Incremental Learning of Object Detectors without Catastrophic Forgetting (2017) · cites this paper as [19]
Section 2.1 (p. 3) states that high-temperature cross-entropy distillation is equivalent to minimizing squared differences between logits, but only when the logits are zero-meaned separately for each transfer case. The citing sentence omits that condition. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredPrior imitation learning and policy distillation methods are highly effective on individual tasks, but they are not few-shot learners, require privileged access to datasets of human demonstrations or a target policy, and struggle to generalise to held-out tasks.
“These prior methods are highly effective on individual tasks, but they are not few-shot learners, require privileged access to datasets of human demonstrations or a target policy, and struggle to generalise to held-out tasks 25 .”
From Learning few-shot imitation as cultural transmission (2023) · cites this paper as [23]
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredLLMs contain hidden knowledge, latent representations within their weights not fully accessible through standard inference.
“The key insight lies in the hypothesis that LLMs contain hidden knowledge (Hinton et al., 2015), latent representations within their weights that are not fully accessible through standard inference.”
From TT-SI: Self-Improving LLM Agents with Test-Time Training (2026) · cites this paper as Hinton et al., 2015
The Introduction (pp. 1–2) says a trained model’s probabilities for incorrect classes carry information about what it has learned that a single hard prediction does not convey. But the paper discusses classification models, not LLMs, and describes knowledge as a learned input–output mapping rather than specifically as latent representations within weights. It does not establish that such representations are inaccessible through standard LLM inference. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredKD technology originated from transferring knowledge from large models to small models and was formally proposed by Hinton et al. in 2015.
“KD technology originated from the concept of transferring knowledge from large models to small models, and was formally proposed by (Hinton et al. 2015) in 2015.”
From Survey: federated learning data security and privacy-preserving in edge-Internet of Things (2024) · cites this paper as Hinton et al. 2015
The Introduction (p. 1) calls the transfer of knowledge from a cumbersome model to a small model “distillation,” supporting the description of Hinton et al.’s 2015 work. But it also says a version of the strategy had already been pioneered by Rich Caruana and collaborators, so it does not support attributing the strategy’s origin solely to Hinton et al. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredResearchers have proposed techniques for reducing transformers' size, latency and energy consumption for efficient inference for a wide range of applications.
“These challenges have motivated researchers to propose techniques for reducing transformers' size, latency and energy consumption for efficient inference for a wide range of applications.”
From A Survey of Techniques for Optimizing Transformer Inference (2023) · cites this paper as [45]
The Introduction (p. 1) proposes distillation to make large neural-network models smaller and more suitable for deployment under latency and computational constraints. The paper does not address transformers or establish reduced energy consumption, so it supports the general efficiency rationale but not those transformer-specific claims. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Fine-tuning a model on step-by-step reasoning traces generated by a teacher model can transfer much of the latter's reasoning capability, substantially outperforming fine-tuning on final answers alone.
“During training, finetuning a model on step-by-step reasoning traces generated by a teacher model can transfer much of the latter's reasoning capability, substantially outperforming fine-tuning on final answers alone (Hinton et al., 2015;Gou et al., 2021;Shridhar et al., 2023;Chen et al., 2025b).”
From How to Steal Reasoning Without Reasoning Traces (2026) · cites this paper as Hinton et al., 2015
Section 6 (pp. 7–8) reports that training on a teacher model’s soft targets outperformed training on hard targets in a speech-model experiment, supporting the general idea of transferring knowledge through teacher-generated training signals. The paper does not study step-by-step reasoning traces, reasoning capability, or a comparison with fine-tuning on final answers alone. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredKnowledge distillation can be expressed as a cross-entropy loss.
“As noted in [19], knowledge distillation can also be expressed as a cross-entropy loss.”
From Incremental Learning of Object Detectors without Catastrophic Forgetting (2017) · cites this paper as [19]
Distilling logits without smoothing is not necessary to stabilize learning because most proposals already produce a smooth distribution of scores and the old and new networks are similar with almost the same parameters at the beginning.
“We distill logits without any smoothing, unlike [19], because most of the proposals already produce a smooth distribution of scores. Moreover, in our case, both the old and the new networks are similar with almost the same parameters (in the beginning), and so smoothing the logits distribution is not necessary to stabilize the learning.”
From Incremental Learning of Object Detectors without Catastrophic Forgetting (2017) · cites this paper as [19]
Knowledge distillation facilitates knowledge transfer from a large teacher model to a smaller student model.
“Knowledge distillation, introduced by Hinton et al. [1], facilitates knowledge transfer from a large, cumbersome 'teacher' model to a smaller and more compact 'student' model.”
From Efficient and Controllable Model Compression through Sequential Knowledge Distillation and Pruning (2023) · cites this paper as [1]
Knowledge distillation provides a degree of controllable compression by allowing knowledge transfer from a larger model to a smaller one.
“Knowledge distillation provides a degree of controllable compression by allowing us to transfer knowledge from a larger model to a smaller one.”
From Efficient and Controllable Model Compression through Sequential Knowledge Distillation and Pruning (2023) · cites this paper as [1]
The authors' approach enables greater compression of the teacher model compared to previous methods that relied on pruning, knowledge distillation, or both.
“Our approach provides a clear advantage by enabling a greater compression of the teacher model compared to the previous methods that relied on pruning [10-15], knowledge distillation (KD) [1,3,5,7,8], and the combination of both [16-20].”
From Efficient and Controllable Model Compression through Sequential Knowledge Distillation and Pruning (2023) · cites this paper as [1]
Knowledge distillation involves training a smaller "student" model to replicate the behavior of a larger "teacher" model, requiring less computational power while retaining performance.
“Knowledge distillation is another approach that involves training a smaller “student” model to replicate the behavior of a larger “teacher” model, requiring less computational power while retaining performance [161].”
From Multimodal Large Language Models in Health Care: Applications, Challenges, and Future Outlook. (2024) · cites this paper as [161]
In action recognition, prior missing modality studies follow transfer learning via knowledge distillation.
“In the context of action recognition (Tran et al. 2015; Wang et al. 2016; Carreira and Zisserman 2017; Feichtenhofer et al. 2019), there are handful of studies towards this end (Hoffman, Gupta, and Darrell 2016; Luo et al. 2018; Garcia, Morerio, and Murino 2018, 2019; Garcia et al. 2019; Stroud et al. 2020), all of which follow transfer learning scheme via knowledge distillation (Hinton et al. 201”
From Towards Good Practices for Missing Modality Robust Action Recognition (2023) · cites this paper as Hinton et al. 2015
Fine-Tuning based methods often use a distillation term to reduce catastrophic forgetting.
“Fine-Tuning (FT) based methods form a group which often uses a distillation [27] term to reduce catastrophic forgetting [44].”
From A Comprehensive Study of Class Incremental Learning Algorithms for Visual Tasks (2020) · cites this paper as [27]
Feature maps and logits of a network are widely used as knowledge in knowledge distillation.
“Feature maps [8, 9, 10] and logits of a network [11, 12] are widely used as knowledge.”
From PQK: Model Compression via Pruning, Quantization, and Knowledge Distillation (2021) · cites this paper as [11]
Temperature scaling is commonly used in settings such as knowledge distillation and statistical mechanics.
“Temperature scaling is commonly used in settings such as knowledge distillation (Hinton et al., 2015) and statistical mechanics (Jaynes, 1957).”
From On calibration of modern neural networks (2017) · cites this paper as Hinton et al., 2015
Training on the teacher distribution q(y|x;θT) is attractive because it gives more information about other classes and has less variance in gradients.
“Training on q(y | x; θ T ) is attractive since it gives more information about other classes for a given data point (e.g.similarity between classes) and has less variance in gradients (Hinton et al., 2015).”
From Sequence-Level Knowledge Distillation (2016) · cites this paper as Hinton et al., 2015
Knowledge distillation approaches have proven successful for reducing the size of neural models in other domains.
“In this paper we consider applying knowledge distillation approaches (Bucila et al., 2006;Hinton et al., 2015) that have proven successful for reducing the size of neural models in other domains to the problem of NMT.”
From Sequence-Level Knowledge Distillation (2016) · cites this paper as Hinton et al., 2015
Knowledge distillation improves the performance of the student model.
“Such a training improves the performance of the student model (alternatively, it can be regarded as a form of compression of the teacher model into a smaller one - the student).”
From Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attention (2020) · cites this paper as [24]
Distillation is a more effective method for obtaining interpretable models.
“Distillation turns out to be a more effective method for obtaining interpretable models.”
From Interpreting Black-Box Models: A Review on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (2024) · cites this paper as [102]
The Introduction (p. 1) describes distillation as transferring knowledge to a smaller model suited to deployment, and the Discussion (p. 8) says the resulting model is easier to deploy. Neither passage addresses whether distilled models are more interpretable; a search for interpretability and interpretable models found no passage making that comparison. (LLM, conf=0.74)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredOur improvement compared to the implementation of [15] can be explained by the use of a larger projection head (3-layer, use of batchnormalizations and projection dimension of 256).
“Our improvement compared to the implementation of [15] can be explained by the use of a larger projection head (3-layer, use of batchnormalizations and projection dimension of 256 ).”
From Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformers (2021) · cites this paper as [15]
The MNIST experiments (Section 3, p. 3) describe distilled networks, and the speech-recognition experiments (Section 4, pp. 4–5) describe another implemented model. Neither establishes the projection-head implementation used as the citing paper’s comparator or tests whether a larger head explains its improvement. Searches for projection heads, batch normalization, and a 256-dimensional projection found no relevant passage. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredWe obtain 71.1% for MoCo after 300 epochs of training while [15] report 71.1% after 800 epochs of training.
“We obtain 71 . 1% for MoCo after 300 epochs of training while [15] report 71 . 1% after 800 epochs of training.”
From Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformers (2021) · cites this paper as [15]
The cited paper’s speech-recognition results (p. 5) report frame accuracy and word-error rate, not a MoCo result. Searches for MoCo, 71.1%, and 800 training epochs found no passage in our copy supporting the attributed comparison. (LLM, conf=0.77)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155 · see citing works
Self-citation(2014) · Cited by 33,419 · see citing works
Hinton, G., Deng, L., Yu, D., Dahl, G., Mohamed, A.-R., Jaitly, N., Senior, A., Vanhoucke, V., Nguyen, P., Sainath, T., et al. (2012) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2012.2205597 · Cited by 10,260 · see citing works
Self-citationEnsemble methods in machine learning
Dietterich, T. G. (2000) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-45014-9_1 · Cited by 8,408 · see citing works
Improving neural networks by preventing co-adaptation of feature detectors
Hinton, G. E., Srivastava, N., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Salakhutdinov, R. R. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1207.0580 · Cited by 6,382 · see citing works
Self-citationAdaptive Mixtures of Local Experts
Jacobs, R. A., Jordan, M. I., Nowlan, S. J., & Hinton, G. E. (1991) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1991.3.1.79 · Cited by 5,384 · see citing works
Self-citationLarge Scale Distributed Deep Networks
Dean, J. B., Corrado, G. S., Monga, R., Chen, K., Devin, M., Mao, M., Ranzato, M., Senior, A., Tucker, P. A., Yang, K., et al. (2012) · Cited by 3,189 · see citing works
Self-citationBuciluǎ, C., Caruana, R., & Niculescu-Mizil, A. (2006) · Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/1150402.1150464 · Cited by 2,068 · see citing works
Learning small-size DNN with output-distribution-based criteria
Li, J., Zhao, R., Huang, J.-T., & Gong, Y. (2014) · Interspeech (USB) · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2014-432 · Cited by 252 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Xception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutions
Chollet, F. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.195 · Cited by 20,380 · see citing works
Encoder-Decoder with Atrous Separable Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentation
Chen, L.-C., Zhu, Y., Papandreou, G., Schroff, F., & Adam, H. (2018) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01234-2_49 · Cited by 20,054 · see citing works
Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer
Raffel, C., Shazeer, N., Roberts, A., Lee, K., Narang, S., Matena, M., Zhou, Y., Li, W., & Liu, P. J. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.10683 · Cited by 10,929 · see citing works
Barredo Arrieta, A., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Del Ser, J., Bennetot, A., Tabik, S., Barbado, A., Garcia, S., Gil-Lopez, S., Molina, D., Benjamins, R., et al. (2020) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2019.12.012 · Cited by 10,423 · see citing works
“In addition, several works addressed the distillation of knowledge from an ensemble of models into a single model [80,289,290] .”
Howard, A., Sandler, M., Chen, B., Wang, W., Chen, L.-C., Tan, M., Chu, G., Vasudevan, V., Zhu, Y., Pang, R., et al. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00140 · Cited by 9,708 · see citing works
“Finally, knowledge distillation [4, 17] offers an additional complementary method to generate small accurate ”student” networks with the guidance of a large ”teacher” network.”
MethodTowards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networks
Carlini, N., & Wagner, D. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) · doi:10.1109/sp.2017.49 · Cited by 8,859 · see citing works
Review of deep learning: concepts, CNN architectures, challenges, applications, future directions
Alzubaidi, L., Zhang, J., Humaidi, A. J., Al-Dujaili, A., Duan, Y., Al-Shamma, O., Santamaría, J., Fadhel, M. A., Al-Amidie, M., & Farhan, L. (2021) · Journal of Big Data · doi:10.1186/s40537-021-00444-8 · Cited by 7,906 · see citing works
ArcFace: Additive Angular Margin Loss for Deep Face Recognition
Deng, J., Guo, J., Xue, N., & Zafeiriou, S. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00482 · Cited by 7,781 · see citing works
On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big? 🦜
Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445922 · Cited by 6,988 · see citing works
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Adadi, A., & Berrada, M. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2870052 · Cited by 6,294 · see citing works
“Distillation is a model compression to transfer information (dark knowledge) from deep networks (the ‘‘teacher’’) to shallow networks (the ‘‘student’’) [121], [122].”
Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformers
Caron, M., Touvron, H., Misra, I., Jegou, H., Mairal, J., Bojanowski, P., & Joulin, A. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.00951 · Cited by 5,638 · see citing works
“However, our method shares also similarities with knowledge distillation [28] and we present it under this angle.”
InfluentialGhostNet: More Features From Cheap Operations
Han, K., Wang, Y., Tian, Q., Guo, J., Xu, C., & Xu, C. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00165 · Cited by 5,222 · see citing works
Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning Models
Shokri, R., Stronati, M., Song, C., & Shmatikov, V. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) · doi:10.1109/sp.2017.41 · Cited by 4,754 · see citing works
DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter
Sanh, V., Debut, L., Chaumond, J., & Wolf, T. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.01108 · Cited by 4,653 · see citing works
Efficient Processing of Deep Neural Networks: A Tutorial and Survey
Sze, V., Chen, Y.-H., Yang, T.-J., & Emer, J. S. (2017) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2017.2761740 · Cited by 4,215 · see citing works
iCaRL: Incremental Classifier and Representation Learning
Rebuffi, S.-A., Kolesnikov, A., Sperl, G., & Lampert, C. H. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.587 · Cited by 3,988 · see citing works
Knowledge Distillation: A Survey
Gou, J., Yu, B., Maybank, S. J., & Tao, D. (2021) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-021-01453-z · Cited by 3,931 · see citing works
Unsupervised Feature Learning via Non-parametric Instance Discrimination
Wu, Z., Xiong, Y., Yu, S. X., & Lin, D. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00393 · Cited by 3,664 · see citing works
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Image Classification: A Comprehensive Review
Rawat, W., & Wang, Z. (2017) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco_a_00990 · Cited by 3,503 · see citing works
On calibration of modern neural networks
Guo, C., Pleiss, G., Sun, Y., & Weinberger, K. Q. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.04599 · Cited by 3,435 · see citing works
“Temperature scaling is commonly used in settings such as knowledge distillation (Hinton et al., 2015) and statistical mechanics (Jaynes, 1957).”
MethodGrad-CAM++: Generalized Gradient-Based Visual Explanations for Deep Convolutional Networks
Chattopadhay, A., Sarkar, A., Howlader, P., & Balasubramanian, V. N. (2018) · 2018 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) · doi:10.1109/wacv.2018.00097 · Cited by 3,639 · see citing works
Continual lifelong learning with neural networks: A review
Parisi, G. I., Kemker, R., Part, J. L., Kanan, C., & Wermter, S. (2019) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2019.01.012 · Cited by 3,117 · see citing works
Deep Learning for Generic Object Detection: A Survey
Liu, L., Ouyang, W., Wang, X., Fieguth, P., Chen, J., Liu, X., & Pietikäinen, M. (2020) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-019-01247-4 · Cited by 2,965 · see citing works
Deformable ConvNets V2: More Deformable, Better Results
Zhu, X., Hu, H., Lin, S., & Dai, J. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00953 · Cited by 2,943 · see citing works
On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models
Bommasani, R., Hudson, D. A., Adeli, E., Altman, R., Arora, S., von Arx, S., Bernstein, M. S., Bohg, J., Bosselut, A., Brunskill, E., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.07258 · Cited by 2,676 · see citing works
Self-Training With Noisy Student Improves ImageNet Classification
Xie, Q., Luong, M.-T., Hovy, E., & Le, Q. V. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.01070 · Cited by 2,393 · see citing works
Tokens-to-Token ViT: Training Vision Transformers from Scratch on ImageNet
Yuan, L., Chen, Y., Wang, T., Yu, W., Shi, Y., Jiang, Z., Tay, F. E. H., Feng, J., & Yan, S. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.00060 · Cited by 2,415 · see citing works
Opportunities and obstacles for deep learning in biology and medicine
Ching, T., Himmelstein, D. S., Beaulieu-Jones, B. K., Kalinin, A. A., Do, B. T., Way, G. P., Ferrero, E., Agapow, P.-M., Zietz, M., Hoffman, M. M., et al. (2018) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2017.0387 · Cited by 2,310 · see citing works
Deep visual domain adaptation: A survey
Wang, M., & Deng, W. (2018) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2018.05.083 · Cited by 2,209 · see citing works
Interpreting Black-Box Models: A Review on Explainable Artificial Intelligence
Hassija, V., Chamola, V., Mahapatra, A., Singal, A., Goel, D., Huang, K., Scardapane, S., Spinelli, I., Mahmud, M., & Hussain, A. (2024) · Cognitive Computation · doi:10.1007/s12559-023-10179-8 · Cited by 2,062 · see citing works
Machine Learning Interpretability: A Survey on Methods and Metrics
Carvalho, D. V., Pereira, E. M., & Cardoso, J. S. (2019) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics8080832 · Cited by 1,842 · see citing works
Adversarial Examples: Attacks and Defenses for Deep Learning
Yuan, X., He, P., Zhu, Q., & Li, X. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2018.2886017 · Cited by 1,733 · see citing works
Ali, S., Abuhmed, T., El-Sappagh, S., Muhammad, K., Alonso-Moral, J. M., Confalonieri, R., Guidotti, R., Del Ser, J., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., & Herrera, F. (2023) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101805 · Cited by 1,762 · see citing works
Towards Total Recall in Industrial Anomaly Detection
Roth, K., Pemula, L., Zepeda, J., Scholkopf, B., Brox, T., & Gehler, P. (2022) · 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.01392 · Cited by 1,810 · see citing works
“via student-teacher knowledge distillation [24] such as in [6, 45] or normalizing flows [17, 30] trained on top of pretrained network features [42].”
Bag of Tricks for Image Classification with Convolutional Neural Networks
He, T., Zhang, Z., Zhang, H., Zhang, Z., Xie, J., & Li, M. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00065 · Cited by 1,680 · see citing works
A primer in BERTology: What we know about how BERT works
Rogers, A., Kovaleva, O., & Rumshisky, A. (2020) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00349 · Cited by 1,552 · see citing works
Deep Learning With Edge Computing: A Review
Chen, J., & Ran, X. (2019) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2019.2921977 · Cited by 1,540 · see citing works
Pre-trained models for natural language processing: A survey
Qiu, X., Sun, T., Xu, Y., Shao, Y., Dai, N., & Huang, X. (2020) · Science China Technological Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11431-020-1647-3 · Cited by 1,591 · see citing works
The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networks
Frankle, J., & Carbin, M. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1803.03635 · Cited by 1,529 · see citing works
Federated Learning for Healthcare Informatics
Xu, J., Glicksberg, B. S., Su, C., Walker, P., Bian, J., & Wang, F. (2021) · Journal of Healthcare Informatics Research · doi:10.1007/s41666-020-00082-4 · Cited by 1,542 · see citing works
“, sparse, low-rank [58], or more specifically, pruning the least useful connections in a network [37, 113], weight quantization [17, 89], and model distillation [43].”
BackgroundConvergence of Edge Computing and Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Survey
Wang, X., Han, Y., Leung, V. C. M., Niyato, D., Yan, X., & Chen, X. (2020) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2020.2970550 · Cited by 1,498 · see citing works
“, Knowledge Distillation (KD) [86] emerges.”
How to backdoor federated learning
Bagdasaryan, E., Veit, A., Hua, Y., Estrin, D., & Shmatikov, V. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1807.00459 · Cited by 1,495 · see citing works
A Survey on Federated Learning Systems: Vision, Hype and Reality for Data Privacy and Protection
Li, Q., Wen, Z., Wu, Z., Hu, S., Wang, N., Li, Y., Liu, X., & He, B. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2021.3124599 · Cited by 1,407 · see citing works
Weight Uncertainty in Neural Networks
Blundell, C., Cornebise, J., Kavukcuoglu, K., & Wierstra, D. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1505.05424 · Cited by 1,342 · see citing works
Exploiting Cloze-Questions for Few-Shot Text Classification and Natural Language Inference
Schick, T., & Schütze, H. (2021) · Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Main Volume · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-main.20 · Cited by 1,305 · see citing works
Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructions
Wang, Y., Kordi, Y., Mishra, S., Liu, A., Smith, N. A., Khashabi, D., & Hajishirzi, H. (2023) · Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.754 · Cited by 1,243 · see citing works
A Survey of Quantization Methods for Efficient Neural Network Inference
Gholami, A., Kim, S., Dong, Z., Yao, Z., Mahoney, M. W., & Keutzer, K. (2022) · Low-Power Computer Vision · doi:10.1201/9781003162810-13 · Cited by 1,219 · see citing works
“Model distillation [3, 94, 148, 173, 189, 200, 260, 262, 280] is a method in which a large model with higher accuracy is used as a teacher to help the training of a compact student model.”
Improved Knowledge Distillation via Teacher Assistant
Mirzadeh, S. I., Farajtabar, M., Li, A., Levine, N., Matsukawa, A., & Ghasemzadeh, H. (2020) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v34i04.5963 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
“The teacher network is sometimes deeper and wider (Hinton, Vinyals, and Dean 2015), of similar size (Anil et al. 2018; Zhang et al. 2017), or shallower but wider (Romero et al. 2014).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialRiemannian Walk for Incremental Learning: Understanding Forgetting and Intransigence
Chaudhry, A., Dokania, P. K., Ajanthan, T., & Torr, P. H. S. (2018) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01252-6_33 · Cited by 1,091 · see citing works
Align before Fuse: Vision and Language Representation Learning with Momentum Distillation
Li, J., Selvaraju, R. R., Gotmare, A. D., Joty, S., Xiong, C., & Hoi, S. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.07651 · Cited by 1,078 · see citing works
Efficient transformers: A survey
Tay, Y., Dehghani, M., Bahri, D., & Metzler, D. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3530811 · Cited by 1,267 · see citing works
DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervision
Oquab, M., Darcet, T., Moutakanni, T., Vo, H., Szafraniec, M., Khalidov, V., Fernandez, P., Haziza, D., Massa, F., El-Nouby, A., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2304.07193 · Cited by 1,078 · see citing works
“7.”
Recent advances in deep learning for object detection
Wu, X., Sahoo, D., & Hoi, S. C. H. (2020) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2020.01.085 · Cited by 1,047 · see citing works
Big Transfer (BiT): General Visual Representation Learning
Kolesnikov, A., Beyer, L., Zhai, X., Puigcerver, J., Yung, J., Gelly, S., & Houlsby, N. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58558-7_29 · Cited by 1,039 · see citing works
Importance Estimation for Neural Network Pruning
Molchanov, P., Mallya, A., Tyree, S., Frosio, I., & Kautz, J. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.01152 · Cited by 983 · see citing works
Pre-trained models: Past, present and future
Han, X., Zhang, Z., Ding, N., Gu, Y., Liu, X., Huo, Y., Qiu, J., Yao, Y., Zhang, A., Zhang, L., et al. (2021) · AI Open · doi:10.1016/j.aiopen.2021.08.002 · Cited by 994 · see citing works
Compressing Neural Networks with the Hashing Trick
Chen, W., Wilson, J. T., Tyree, S., Weinberger, K. Q., & Chen, Y. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1504.04788 · Cited by 974 · see citing works
BirdNET: A deep learning solution for avian diversity monitoring
Kahl, S., Wood, C. M., Eibl, M., & Klinck, H. (2021) · Ecological Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101236 · Cited by 903 · see citing works
Hands-On Bayesian Neural Networks—A Tutorial for Deep Learning Users
Jospin, L. V., Laga, H., Boussaid, F., Buntine, W., & Bennamoun, M. (2022) · IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine · doi:10.1109/mci.2022.3155327 · Cited by 879 · see citing works
Linformer: Self-Attention with Linear Complexity
Wang, S., Li, B. Z., Khabsa, M., Fang, H., & Ma, H. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.04768 · Cited by 867 · see citing works
Transfer Learning in Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Survey
Zhu, Z., Lin, K., Jain, A. K., & Zhou, J. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2023.3292075 · Cited by 861 · see citing works
A Survey of Model Compression and Acceleration for Deep Neural Networks
Cheng, Y., Wang, D., Zhou, P., & Zhang, T. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1710.09282 · Cited by 857 · see citing works
Sequence-Level Knowledge Distillation
Kim, Y., & Rush, A. M. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1139 · Cited by 836 · see citing works
Cheng, Y., Wang, D., Zhou, P., & Zhang, T. (2018) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2017.2765695 · Cited by 817 · see citing works
BitFit: Simple Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning for Transformer-based Masked Language-models
Ben Zaken, E., Goldberg, Y., & Ravfogel, S. (2022) · Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-short.1 · Cited by 765 · see citing works
Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Del Ser, J., Coeckelbergh, M., López de Prado, M., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2023) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101896 · Cited by 800 · see citing works
Yang, G., Ye, Q., & Xia, J. (2022) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2021.07.016 · Cited by 717 · see citing works
MobileBERT: a Compact Task-Agnostic BERT for Resource-Limited Devices
Sun, Z., Yu, H., Song, X., Liu, R., Yang, Y., & Zhou, D. (2020) · Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.195 · Cited by 757 · see citing works
It’s Not Just Size That Matters: Small Language Models Are Also Few-Shot Learners
Schick, T., & Schütze, H. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.185 · Cited by 747 · see citing works
MiniLM: Deep Self-Attention Distillation for Task-Agnostic Compression of Pre-Trained Transformers
Wang, W., Wei, F., Dong, L., Bao, H., Yang, N., & Zhou, M. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2002.10957 · Cited by 703 · see citing works
Li, Z., & Hoiem, D. (2016) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46493-0_37 · Cited by 659 · see citing works
Three types of incremental learning
van de Ven, G. M., Tuytelaars, T., & Tolias, A. S. (2022) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-022-00568-3 · Cited by 665 · see citing works
Li, Y., Jiang, Y., Li, Z., & Xia, S.-T. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2022.3182979 · Cited by 682 · see citing works
Expert Gate: Lifelong Learning with a Network of Experts
Aljundi, R., Chakravarty, P., & Tuytelaars, T. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.753 · Cited by 619 · see citing works
Towards a Human-like Open-Domain Chatbot
Adiwardana, D., Luong, M.-T., So, D. R., Hall, J., Fiedel, N., Thoppilan, R., Yang, Z., Kulshreshtha, A., Nemade, G., Lu, Y., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2001.09977 · Cited by 614 · see citing works
Evaluating the quality of machine learning explanations: a survey on methods and metrics
Zhou, J., Gandomi, A. H., Chen, F., & Holzinger, A. (2021) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics10050593 · Cited by 606 · see citing works
Decentralized federated learning: Fundamentals, state of the art, frameworks, trends, and challenges
Martínez Beltrán, E. T., Pérez, M. Q., Sánchez, P. M. S., Bernal, S. L., Bovet, G., Pérez, M. G., Pérez, G. M., & Celdrán, A. H. (2023) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2023.3315746 · Cited by 625 · see citing works
“Specifically, it is a procedure to train a model using a second NN as a reference instead of learning directly from the ground truth of the data [141].”
MethodIncremental Learning of Object Detectors without Catastrophic Forgetting
Shmelkov, K., Schmid, C., & Alahari, K. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.368 · Cited by 559 · see citing works
Cross Modal Distillation for Supervision Transfer
Gupta, S., Hoffman, J., & Malik, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.309 · Cited by 530 · see citing works
“In such cases we embed features ψLMd into a space with the same dimension as φ i∗ Ms using an appropriate simple transformation function t (for example a linear or affine function). min W [1...”
MethodRevisiting Knowledge Distillation via Label Smoothing Regularization
Yuan, L., Tay, F. E., Li, G., Wang, T., & Feng, J. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00396 · Cited by 572 · see citing works
The Computational Limits of Deep Learning
Thompson, N. C., Greenewald, K., Lee, K., & Manso, G. F. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.05558 · Cited by 538 · see citing works
Edge Machine Learning for AI-Enabled IoT Devices: A Review
Merenda, M., Porcaro, C., & Iero, D. (2020) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s20092533 · Cited by 523 · see citing works
Federated learning for medical image analysis: A survey
Guan, H., Yap, P.-T., Bozoki, A., & Liu, M. (2024) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2024.110424 · Cited by 518 · see citing works
Generalized ODIN: Detecting Out-of-Distribution Image Without Learning From Out-of-Distribution Data
Hsu, Y.-C., Shen, Y., Jin, H., & Kira, Z. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.01096 · Cited by 499 · see citing works
HAWQ: Hessian AWare Quantization of Neural Networks With Mixed-Precision
Dong, Z., Yao, Z., Gholami, A., Mahoney, M., & Keutzer, K. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00038 · Cited by 492 · see citing works
Progressive Feature Alignment for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation
Chen, C., Xie, W., Huang, W., Rong, Y., Ding, X., Huang, Y., Xu, T., & Huang, J. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00072 · Cited by 481 · see citing works
Data Augmentation Using Random Image Cropping and Patching for Deep CNNs
Takahashi, R., Matsubara, T., & Uehara, K. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology · doi:10.1109/tcsvt.2019.2935128 · Cited by 477 · see citing works
BlockDrop: Dynamic Inference Paths in Residual Networks
Wu, Z., Nagarajan, T., Kumar, A., Rennie, S., Davis, L. S., Grauman, K., & Feris, R. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00919 · Cited by 465 · see citing works
Brain-inspired replay for continual learning with artificial neural networks
van de Ven, G. M., Siegelmann, H. T., & Tolias, A. S. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17866-2 · Cited by 474 · see citing works
Jeong, E., Oh, S., Kim, H., Park, J., Bennis, M., & Kim, S.-L. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1811.11479 · Cited by 465 · see citing works
IntelliCode compose: code generation using transformer
Svyatkovskiy, A., Deng, S. K., Fu, S., & Sundaresan, N. (2020) · Proceedings of the 28th ACM Joint Meeting on European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/3368089.3417058 · Cited by 474 · see citing works
“lue and are most likely lower than the actual user sentiment. Over 150K requests, we have seen a surfacing rate of 9.2% and an acceptance rate of 10%. 11 Knowledge Distillation Knowledge distillation [38] is the model compression technique in which a smaller model – the student network – is trained to reproduce the re…”
InfluentialGQA: Training Generalized Multi-Query Transformer Models from Multi-Head Checkpoints
Ainslie, J., Lee-Thorp, J., de Jong, M., Zemlyanskiy, Y., Lebrón, F., & Sanghai, S. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.13245 · Cited by 447 · see citing works
“Model distillation (Hinton et al., 2015; Gou et al., 2021) instead reduces model size at a given precision, using data generated from the larger model to finetune the smaller model.”
MethodPRADA: Protecting Against DNN Model Stealing Attacks
Juuti, M., Szyller, S., Marchal, S., & Asokan, N. (2019) · 2019 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy (EuroS&P) · doi:10.1109/eurosp.2019.00044 · Cited by 440 · see citing works
“The extraction of information from DNNs has been addressed in non-adversarial settings by compressing DNNs to simpler representations [6], [19] or by obtaining interpretable decisions from ML models [10], [53].”
LOGAN: Membership Inference Attacks Against Generative Models
Hayes, J., Melis, L., Danezis, G., & De Cristofaro, E. (2019) · Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies · doi:10.2478/popets-2019-0008 · Cited by 433 · see citing works
Q-BERT: Hessian Based Ultra Low Precision Quantization of BERT
Shen, S., Dong, Z., Ye, J., Ma, L., Yao, Z., Gholami, A., Mahoney, M. W., & Keutzer, K. (2020) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v34i05.6409 · Cited by 437 · see citing works
Interpretability of machine learning-based prediction models in healthcare
Stiglic, G., Kocbek, P., Fijacko, N., Zitnik, M., Verbert, K., & Cilar, L. (2020) · WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1002/widm.1379 · Cited by 541 · see citing works
“…interpret the decision directly from the model (e.g. extracting all rules from the decision tree) or use some specific technique like knowledge distillation (Hinton, Vinyals & Dean, 2015) to build a simple model that can be interpreted (e.g. a decision tree, set of rules or a regression function).”
MethodEfficient Acceleration of Deep Learning Inference on Resource-Constrained Edge Devices: A Review
Shuvo, M. M. H., Islam, S. K., Cheng, J., & Morshed, B. I. (2023) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2022.3226481 · Cited by 436 · see citing works
“The idea of KD was developed in [181] and generalized in [182].”
BackgroundMethodAvoiding Overfitting: A Survey on Regularization Methods for Convolutional Neural Networks
Santos, C. F. G. D., & Papa, J. P. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3510413 · Cited by 415 · see citing works
“The Bag of Tricks research [18] performs this investigation by combining several known regularization methods, such as Mixup [69], Label Smoothing [53], and Knowledge Destilation [20].”
MethodAI in Health: State of the Art, Challenges, and Future Directions
Wang, F., & Preininger, A. (2019) · Yearbook of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1055/s-0039-1677908 · Cited by 398 · see citing works
FaceNet2ExpNet: Regularizing a Deep Face Recognition Net for Expression Recognition
Ding, H., Zhou, S. K., & Chellappa, R. (2017) · 2017 12th IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face & Gesture Recognition (FG 2017) · doi:10.1109/fg.2017.23 · Cited by 416 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hinton, G., Vinyals, O., & Dean, J.
- ORCID
- Vinyals, Oriol
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2015
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1503.02531
- OpenAlex
- W1821462560
- Cited by
- 14,204
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 356 · 2025: 1286 · 2024: 2002 · 2023: 2430 · 2022: 1865 · 2021: 2483 · 2020: 1751 · 2019: 1033 · 2018: 555 · 2017: 270 · 2016: 115 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 7
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- knowledge distillation, neural network ensembles, model compression, ensemble averaging, mixture of experts, acoustic modeling, speech recognition, MNIST, deployment efficiency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
