CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 67Robotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationAdvanced Vision and ImagingAutonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety

DeepVO: A Deep Learning approach for Monocular Visual Odometry

Open access
Mohanty, Vikram, Agrawal, Shubh, Datta, Shaswat, Ghosh, Arna, Sharma, Vishnu Dutt, Chakravarty, Debashish·2016·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1611.06069arXiv 1611.06069
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Deep Learning based techniques have been adopted with precision to solve a lot of standard computer vision problems, some of which are image classification, object detection and segmentation. Despite the widespread success of these approaches, they have not yet been exploited largely for solving the standard perception related problems encountered in autonomous navigation such as Visual Odometry (VO), Structure from Motion (SfM) and Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM). This paper analyzes the problem of Monocular Visual Odometry using a Deep Learning-based framework, instead of the regular 'feature detection and tracking' pipeline approaches. Several experiments were performed to understand the influence of a known/unknown environment, a conventional trackable feature and pre-trained activations tuned for object classification on the network's ability to accurately estimate the motion trajectory of the camera (or the vehicle). Based on these observations, we propose a Convolutional Neural Network architecture, best suited for estimating the object's pose under known environment conditions, and displays promising results when it comes to inferring the actual scale using just a single camera in real-time.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1611.06069

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DeepVO and D3VO integrate convolutional and recurrent neural networks for end-to-end ego-motion and depth estimation.

    “Model,s like DeepVO [20] and D3VO [132] exemplify the integration of convolutional and recurrent neural networks, enabling end-to-end estimation of ego-motion and depth.”

    From Multimodal fusion and vision–language models: A survey for robot vision (2026) · cites this paper as [20]

    The Introduction (p. 2) says DeepVO uses CNN features to estimate the transformation between successive scenes and reconstruct the vehicle’s trajectory, supporting the ego-motion portion. But Future Work (p. 7) proposes recurrent connections as a possible improvement rather than part of the model, and the paper does not report depth estimation by DeepVO. This verdict concerns the claim attributed to DeepVO, not D3VO. (LLM, conf=0.91)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. [10][10] C. Forster, M. Pizzoli, and D. Scaramuzza. Svo: Fast semidirect monocular visual odometry. In 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) , pages 1522. IEEE, 2014. -
  2. [12][12] X. Glorot and Y. Bengio. Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks. In Aistats , volume 9, pages 249-256, 2010. -
  3. [13][13] C. Harris and M. Stephens. A combined corner and edge detector. In Alvey vision conference , volume 15, page 50. Citeseer, 1988. -
  4. [20][20] A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and G. E. Hinton. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In Advances in neural information processing systems , pages 1097-1105, 2012. -
  5. [21][21] A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and G. E. Hinton. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In Advances in neural information processing systems , pages 1097-1105, 2012. -
  6. [22][22] Y. LeCun and Y. Bengio. Convolutional networks for images, speech, and time series. The handbook of brain theory and neural networks , 3361(10):1995, 1995. -
  7. [27][27] T. Moore and D. Stouch. A generalized extended kalman filter implementation for the robot operating system. In Intelligent Autonomous Systems 13 , pages 335-348. Springer, 2016. -
  8. [30][30] D. Nist´ er. An efficient solution to the five-point relative pose problem. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence , 26(6):756-770, 2004. -
  9. [35][35] E. Rublee, V. Rabaud, K. Konolige, and G. Bradski. Orb: An efficient alternative to sift or surf. pages 2564-2571, 2011. -
  10. [39][39] G. Silveira, E. Malis, and P. Rives. An efficient direct approach to visual slam. IEEE transactions on robotics , 24(5):969-979, 2008. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Mohanty, V., Agrawal, S., Datta, S., Ghosh, A., Sharma, V. D., & Chakravarty, D.
Affiliations
Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur (IN)
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2016
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1611.06069
arXiv
1611.06069
OpenAlex
W2555820268
Cited by
67
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
Keywords
monocular visual odometry, deep learning, convolutional neural networks, camera pose estimation, autonomous navigation, scale estimation, real-time odometry, structure from motion, SLAM

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review