PreprintCited by 98Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaDark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

The VIMOS Public Extragalactic Redshift Survey (VIPERS). Gravity test from the combination of redshift-space distortions and galaxy-galaxy lensing at $0.5 < z < 1.2$

Open access

Abstract

We carry out a joint analysis of redshift-space distortions and galaxy-galaxy lensing, with the aim of measuring the growth rate of structure; this is a key quantity for understanding the nature of gravity on cosmological scales and late-time cosmic acceleration. We make use of the final VIPERS redshift survey dataset, which maps a portion of the Universe at a redshift of $z \simeq 0.8$, and the lensing data from the CFHTLenS survey over the same area of the sky. We build a consistent theoretical model that combines non-linear galaxy biasing and redshift-space distortion models, and confront it with observations. The two probes are combined in a Bayesian maximum likelihood analysis to determine the growth rate of structure at two redshifts $z=0.6$ and $z=0.86$. We obtain measurements of $fσ_8(0.6) = 0.48 \pm 0.12$ and $fσ_8(0.86) = 0.48 \pm 0.10$. The additional galaxy-galaxylensing constraint alleviates galaxy bias and $σ_8$ degeneracies, providing direct measurements of $[f(0.6),σ_8(0.6)] = [0.93 \pm 0.22, 0.52 \pm 0.06]$ and $f(0.86),σ_8(0.86)] = [0.99 \pm 0.19, 0.48 \pm 0.04]$. These measurements are statistically consistent with a Universe where the gravitational interactions can be described by General Relativity, although they are not yet accurate enough to rule out some commonly considered alternatives. Finally, as a complementary test we measure the gravitational slip parameter, $E_G$ , for the first time at $z>0.6$. We find values of $\smash{\overline{E}_G}(0.6) = 0.16 \pm 0.09$ and $\smash{\overline{E}_G}(0.86) = 0.09 \pm 0.07$, when $E_G$ is averaged over scales above $3 h^{-1} \rm{Mpc}$. We find that our $E_G$ measurements exhibit slightly lower values than expected for standard relativistic gravity in a ΛCDM background, although the results are consistent within $1-2σ$.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1612.05647

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • de la Torre et al. (2016) joint analysis obtained measurements of f sigma8 and related quantities.

    “The joint analysis obtained measurements of and .”

    From Testing general relativity in cosmology (2019) · cites this paper as de la Torre et al. (2016)

  • de la Torre et al. (2016) constraints are separated as f sigma8 and related quantities in consistency with GR but with error bars large enough to allow other MG models.

    “This allows the constraints to be separated as and in consistency with GR but again with errors bars large enough to allow for other MG models.”

    From Testing general relativity in cosmology (2019) · cites this paper as de la Torre et al. (2016)

  • de la Torre et al. (2016) found that galaxy-galaxy lensing does not add improvement in constraining these values but alleviates degeneracies with galaxy bias and sigma8.

    “The galaxy-galaxy lensing does not add any improvement in constraining these values but alleviates the degeneracies with galaxy bias and .”

    From Testing general relativity in cosmology (2019) · cites this paper as de la Torre et al. (2016)

  • de la Torre et al. (2016) measurement of E_G gives values slightly lower than expected for the standard ΛCDM model of GR, but consistent with GR within uncertainties.

    “As they comment, this measurements of gives values that are slightly lower than expected for the standard CDM model of GR, but the results are consistent with GR within .”

    From Testing general relativity in cosmology (2019) · cites this paper as de la Torre et al. (2016)

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 94

  1. Alam, S., Ata, M., Bailey, S., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 470, 2617 · DOI
  2. Alcock, C., & Paczynski, B. 1979, Nature, 281, 358 · DOI
  3. Anderson, L., Aubourg, É., Bailey, S., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 441, 24 · DOI
  4. Baldauf, T., Smith, R. E., Seljak, U., & Mandelbaum, R. 2010, Phys. Rev. D, 81, 063531 · DOI
  5. Ballinger, W. E., Peacock, J. A., & Heavens, A. F. 1996, MNRAS, 282, 877 · DOI
  6. Benjamin, J., Van Waerbeke, L., Heymans, C., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 431, 1547 · DOI
  7. Bernardeau, F., Colombi, S., Gaztañaga, E., & Scoccimarro, R. 2002, Phys. Rep., 367, 1 · DOI
  8. Beutler, F., Blake, C., Colless, M., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 416, 3017 · DOI
  9. Beutler, F., Blake, C., Colless, M., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 423, 3430 · DOI
  10. Beutler, F., Saito, S., Seo, H.-J., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 443, 1065 · DOI
  11. Blake, C., Brough, S., Colless, M., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 425, 405 · DOI
  12. Blake, C., Joudaki, S., Heymans, C., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 456, 2806 · DOI
  13. Cabré, A., & Gaztañaga, E. 2009, MNRAS, 393, 1183 · DOI
  14. Cacciato, M., van den Bosch, F. C., More, S., Mo, H., & Yang, X. 2013, MNRAS, 430, 767 · DOI
  15. Cappi, A., Marulli, F., Bel, J., et al. 2015, A&A, 579, A70 · DOI
  16. Chan, K. C., Scoccimarro, R., & Sheth, R. K. 2012, Phys. Rev. D, 85, 083509 · DOI
  17. Chuang, C.-H., Prada, F., Pellejero-Ibanez, M., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 461, 3781 · DOI
  18. Cole, S. 2011, MNRAS, 416, 739 · DOI
  19. Cole, S., Percival, W. J., Peacock, J. A., et al. 2005, MNRAS, 362, 505 · DOI
  20. Colless, M., Dalton, G., Maddox, S., et al. 2001, MNRAS, 328, 1039 · DOI
  21. Colless, M., Peterson, B. A., Jackson, C., et al. 2003, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:astro-ph/0306581] · arXiv
  22. Coupon, J., Arnouts, S., van Waerbeke, L., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 449, 1352 · DOI
  23. de la Torre, S., & Guzzo, L. 2012, MNRAS, 427, 327 · DOI
  24. de la Torre, S., & Peacock, J. A. 2013, MNRAS, 435, 743 · DOI
  25. de la Torre, S., Guzzo, L., Peacock, J. A., et al. 2013, A&A, 557, A54 · DOI
  26. Di Porto, C., Branchini, E., Bel, J., et al. 2016, A&A, 594, A62 · DOI
  27. Dodelson, S., & Schneider, M. D. 2013, Phys. Rev. D, 88, 063537 · DOI
  28. Eisenstein, D. J., Zehavi, I., Hogg, D. W., et al. 2005, ApJ, 633, 560 · DOI
  29. Erben, T., Hildebrandt, H., Miller, L., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 433, 2545 · DOI
  30. Fisher, K. B., Davis, M., Strauss, M. A., Yahil, A., & Huchra, J. P. 1994, MNRAS, 267, 927 · DOI
  31. Garilli, B., Guzzo, L., Scodeggio, M., et al. 2014, A&A, 562, A23 · DOI
  32. Gil-Marín, H., Wagner, C., Noreña, J., Verde, L., & Percival, W. 2014, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys., 12, 029 · DOI
  33. Gil-Marín, H., Percival, W. J., Brownstein, J. R., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 460, 4188 · DOI
  34. Gil-Marín, H., Percival, W. J., Verde, L., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 465, 1757 · DOI
  35. Giocoli, C., Jullo, E., Metcalf, R. B., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 461, 209 · DOI
  36. Goroff, M. H., Grinstein, B., Rey, S.-J., & Wise, M. B. 1986, ApJ, 311, 6 · DOI
  37. Granett, B. R., Branchini, E., Guzzo, L., et al. 2015, A&A, 583, A61 · DOI
  38. Guzzo, L., Pierleoni, M., Meneux, B., et al. 2008, Nature, 451, 541 · DOI
  39. Guzzo, L., Scodeggio, M., Garilli, B., et al. 2014, A&A, 566, A108 · DOI
  40. Hamilton, A. J. S. 1993, ApJ, 417, 19 · DOI
  41. Hartlap, J., Simon, P., & Schneider, P. 2007, A&A, 464, 399 · DOI
  42. Hawken, A. J., Granett, B. R., Iovino, A., et al. 2017, A&A, 607, A54 · DOI
  43. Heymans, C., Van Waerbeke, L., Miller, L., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 427, 146 · DOI
  44. Heymans, C., Grocutt, E., Heavens, A., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 432, 2433 · DOI
  45. Hildebrandt, H., Erben, T., Kuijken, K., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 421, 2355 · DOI
  46. Hildebrandt, H., Viola, M., Heymans, C., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 465, 1454 · DOI
  47. Howlett, C., Ross, A. J., Samushia, L., Percival, W. J., & Manera, M. 2015, MNRAS, 449, 848 · DOI
  48. Kaiser, N. 1987, MNRAS, 227, 1 · DOI
  49. Kaufman, C. G., Schervish, M. J., & Nychka, D. W. 2008, J. Am. Statist. Ass., 103, 1545 · DOI
  50. Klypin, A., Yepes, G., Gottlöber, S., Prada, F., & Heß, S. 2016, MNRAS, 457, 4340 · DOI
  51. Landy, S. D., & Szalay, A. S. 1993, ApJ, 412, 64 · DOI
  52. Laureijs, R., Amiaux, J., Arduini, S., et al. 2011, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:1110.3193] · arXiv
  53. Le Fèvre, O., Saisse, M., Mancini, D., et al. 2003, in Proc. SPIE 4841, eds.
  54. M. Iye, & A. F. M. Moorwood, 1670 Lesgourgues, J. 2011, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:1104.2932] · arXiv
  55. Mandelbaum, R., Slosar, A., Baldauf, T., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 432, 1544 · DOI
  56. Marulli, F., Bolzonella, M., Branchini, E., et al. 2013, A&A, 557, A17 · DOI
  57. Matsubara, T., & Suto, Y. 1996, ApJ, 470, L1 · DOI
  58. McDonald, P., & Roy, A. 2009, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys., 8, 020 · DOI
  59. Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A. W., Rosenbluth, M. N., Teller, A. H., & Teller, E. 1953, J. Chem. Phys., 21, 1087 · DOI
  60. Micheletti, D., Iovino, A., Hawken, A. J., et al. 2014, A&A, 570, A106 · DOI
  61. Miller, L., Heymans, C., Kitching, T. D., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 429, 2858 · DOI
  62. Miyatake, H., More, S., Mandelbaum, R., et al. 2015, ApJ, 806, 1 · DOI
  63. More, S., Miyatake, H., Mandelbaum, R., et al. 2015, ApJ, 806, 2 · DOI
  64. Nakajima, R., Mandelbaum, R., Seljak, U., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 420, 3240 · DOI
  65. Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. 1996, ApJ, 462, 563 · DOI
  66. Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. 1997, ApJ, 490, 493 · DOI
  67. Okumura, T., Hikage, C., Totani, T., et al. 2016, PASJ, 68, 38 · DOI
  68. Paz, D. J., & Sánchez, A. G. 2015, MNRAS, 454, 4326 · DOI
  69. Peacock, J. A., Cole, S., Norberg, P., et al. 2001, Nature, 410, 169 · DOI
  70. Percival, W. J., Reid, B. A., Eisenstein, D. J., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 401, 2148 · DOI
  71. Percival, W. J., Ross, A. J., Sánchez, A. G., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 439, 2531 · DOI
  72. Pezzotta, A., de la Torre, S., Bel, J., et al. 2017, A&A, 604, A33 · DOI
  73. Planck Collaboration XIII. 2016, A&A, 594, A13 · DOI
  74. Pope, A. C., & Szapudi, I. 2008, MNRAS, 389, 766 · DOI
  75. Pullen, A. R., Alam, S., He, S., & Ho, S. 2016, MNRAS, 460, 4098 · DOI
  76. Reyes, R., Mandelbaum, R., Seljak, U., et al. 2010, Nature, 464, 256 · DOI
  77. Rota, S., Granett, B. R., Bel, J., et al. 2017, A&A, 601, A144 · DOI
  78. Saito, S., Baldauf, T., Vlah, Z., et al. 2014, Phys. Rev. D, 90, 123522 · DOI
  79. Samushia, L., Percival, W. J., & Raccanelli, A. 2012, MNRAS, 420, 2102 · DOI
  80. Samushia, L., Reid, B. A., White, M., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 439, 3504 · DOI
  81. Scoccimarro, R., Couchman, H. M. P., & Frieman, J. A. 1999, ApJ, 517, 531 · DOI
  82. Scodeggio, M., Franzetti, P., Garilli, B., Le Fèvre, O., & Guzzo, L. 2009, The Messenger, 135, 13 · DOI
  83. Scodeggio, M., Guzzo, L., Garilli, B., et al. 2017, A&A, in press, DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201630114 · DOI
  84. Simpson, F., Heymans, C., Parkinson, D., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 429, 2249 · DOI
  85. Smith, R. E., Peacock, J. A., Jenkins, A., et al. 2003, MNRAS, 341, 1311 · DOI
  86. Takahashi, R., Sato, M., Nishimichi, T., Taruya, A., & Oguri, M. 2012, ApJ, 761, 152 · DOI
  87. Taruya, A., Nishimichi, T., & Saito, S. 2010, Phys. Rev. D, 82, 063522 · DOI
  88. Taylor, A., & Joachimi, B. 2014, MNRAS, 442, 2728 · DOI
  89. Tegmark, M., Blanton, M. R., Strauss, M. A., et al. 2004, ApJ, 606, 702 · DOI
  90. Tinker, J., Kravtsov, A. V., Klypin, A., et al. 2008, ApJ, 688, 709 · DOI
  91. Tinker, J. L., Robertson, B. E., Kravtsov, A. V., et al. 2010, ApJ, 724, 878 · DOI
  92. Velander, M., van Uitert, E., Hoekstra, H., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 437, 2111 · DOI
  93. Xu, X., Cuesta, A. J., Padmanabhan, N., Eisenstein, D. J., & McBride, C. K. 2013, MNRAS, 431, 2834 · DOI
  94. Zhang, P., Liguori, M., Bean, R., & Dodelson, S. 2007, Phys. Rev. Lett., 99, 141302 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
de la Torre, S., Jullo, E., Giocoli, C., Pezzotta, A., Bel, J., Granett, B. R., Guzzo, L., Garilli, B., Scodeggio, M., Bolzonella, M., Abbas, U., Adami, C., Bottini, D., Cappi, A., Cucciati, O., Davidzon, I., Franzetti, P., Fritz, A., Iovino, A., Krywult, J., Brun, V. L., Fèvre, O. L., Maccagni, D., Małek, K., Marulli, F., Polletta, M., Pollo, A., Tasca, L. A. M., Tojeiro, R., Vergani, D., Zanichelli, A., Arnouts, S., Branchini, E., Coupon, J., De Lucia, G., Ilbert, O., Moutard, T., Moscardini, L., Peacock, J. A., Metcalf, R. B., Prada, F., & Yepes, G.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Brera Astronomical Observatory (IT)
  • University of Milan (IT)
  • Istituto di Astrofisica Spaziale e Fisica Cosmica di Milano (IT)
  • Osservatorio astronomico di Bologna (IT)
  • Osservatorio Astrofisico di Torino (IT)
  • Jan Kochanowski University (PL)
  • National Centre for Nuclear Research (PL)
  • Aix-Marseille Université (FR)
  • Jagiellonian University (PL)
  • University of St Andrews (GB)
  • Istituto di Astrofisica Spaziale e Fisica Cosmica di Bologna (IT)
  • Istituto di Radioastronomia di Bologna (IT)
  • Roma Tre University (IT)
  • University of Geneva (CH)
  • Royal Observatory (GB)
  • University of Bologna (IT)
  • Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
  • Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (ES)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2016
Volume
608
Pages
A44-A44
ISSN
0004-6361 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2561318022
Cited by
98
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 3
FWCI
7.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
  • Jagiellonian University Repository (Jagiellonian University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (Universita Degli Studi Di Milano) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial Research Information System (University of Genoa) (submittedVersion)
  • Iris (Roma Tre University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-11-IDEX-0001, ANR11IDEX000102, ANR-11-IDEX, ANR-13-BS05-0005, IDEX-0001-02, ANR-11-LABX-0060)
  • Partnership for Advanced Computing in Europe AISBL
  • Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca (PRIN 2008, 2010-2011)
  • Gauss Centre for Supercomputing
  • Science and Technology Facilities Council (ST/M001229/1)
  • Leibniz-Gemeinschaft
  • Leibniz-Rechenzentrum
  • H2020 European Research Council (670193)
  • FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (291521, 268107, 202781, 202686)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
Keywords
structure growth, redshift-space distortions, galaxy-galaxy lensing, VIPERS survey, CFHTLenS, galaxy bias, fσ8, sigma_8, modified gravity, late-time cosmic acceleration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review