PreprintCited by 142Fault Detection and Control SystemsMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesAnomaly Detection Techniques and Applications

Multivariate Industrial Time Series with Cyber-Attack Simulation: Fault Detection Using an LSTM-based Predictive Data Model

Open access
Filonov, Pavel, Lavrentyev, Andrey, Vorontsov, Artem·2016·arXiv

Abstract

We adopted an approach based on an LSTM neural network to monitor and detect faults in industrial multivariate time series data. To validate the approach we created a Modelica model of part of a real gasoil plant. By introducing hacks into the logic of the Modelica model, we were able to generate both the roots and causes of fault behavior in the plant. Having a self-consistent data set with labeled faults, we used an LSTM architecture with a forecasting error threshold to obtain precision and recall quality metrics. The dependency of the quality metric on the threshold level is considered. An appropriate mechanism such as "one handle" was introduced for filtering faults that are outside of the plant operator field of interest.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1612.06676

Cites

7 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The dataset distribution for sensor-correlation-based methods shows heavy evaluation on SWaT, WADI, GHL, HAI, TE, and power-system benchmarks (IEEE bus systems), with additional evidence from gas-pipeline, GRFICSv2/Factory I/O, and aNormalies-based testbeds.

    “Finally, the dataset distribution indicates that sensor-correlation-based methods are heavily evaluated on SWaT, WADI, GHL, HAI, TE, and power-system benchmarks (IEEE bus systems), with additional evidence from gas-pipeline, GRFICSv2/Factory I/O, and aNormalies-based testbeds [88-96,98-102,104-110].”

    From AI-Based Anomaly Detection in Industrial Control and Cyber–Physical Systems: A Data-Type-Oriented Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [89]

    Section 2 (p. 3) describes the GHL dataset and evaluates fault detection on its multivariate time series, supporting GHL as an evaluation dataset. The paper does not establish the claimed distribution of evaluations across the listed benchmarks, or characterize its LSTM-based approach as sensor-correlation-based. Its Conclusion (p. 7) mentions Tennessee Eastman only as a comparison for dataset features. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Pankaj Malhotra, Anusha Ramakrishnan, Gaurangi Anand, Lovekesh Vig, Puneet Agarwal, and Gautam Shroff. Lstm-based encoder-decoder for multi-sensor anomaly detection. CoRR , abs/1607.00148, 2016. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1607.00148 . · arXiv
  2. Nitish Srivastava, Geoffrey Hinton, Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Ruslan Salakhutdinov. Dropout: A simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. Journal of Machine Learning Research , 15:1929-1958, 2014. URL http://jmlr.org/papers/v15/srivastava14a.html .

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Filonov, P., Lavrentyev, A., & Vorontsov, A.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2016
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2583164363
Cited by
140
References
7
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Fault Detection and Control Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Keywords
fault detection, multivariate time series, industrial process monitoring, LSTM, cyberattack simulation, predictive maintenance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review