Factorization tricks for LSTM networks
Open accessAbstract
We present two simple ways of reducing the number of parameters and accelerating the training of large Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks: the first one is "matrix factorization by design" of LSTM matrix into the product of two smaller matrices, and the second one is partitioning of LSTM matrix, its inputs and states into the independent groups. Both approaches allow us to train large LSTM networks significantly faster to the near state-of the art perplexity while using significantly less RNN parameters.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The fundamental constraint of sequential computation remains despite recent improvements in computational efficiency through factorization tricks and conditional computation.
“Recent work has achieved significant improvements in computational efficiency through factorization tricks [21] and conditional computation [32], while also improving model performance in case of the latter. The fundamental constraint of sequential computation, however, remains.”
From Attention Is All You Need (2017) · cites this paper as [21]
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474 · see citing works
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The partition of layer into parallel groups have been introduced by Krizhevsky et al. (2012) in AlexNet, where some convolutional layers have been divided into two groups to split the model between two GPUs.”
MethodHochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318 · cited 2× · see citing works
“To address this issue, the LSTM cell has been introduced by Hochreiter & Schmidhuber (1997), with the following recurrent computations: LSTM : (1) where x t is input, h t is cell’s state, and c t is cell’s memory.”
MethodVery Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition
Simonyan, K., & Zisserman, A. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.1556 · Cited by 74,248 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The idea of factorization of large convolutinal layer into the stack of layers with smaller filters was used, for example, in VGG networks (Simonyan & Zisserman, 2014), and in ResNet “bottleneck design” (He et al., 2016).”
MethodXception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutions
Chollet, F. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.195 · Cited by 20,380 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This multi-group approach was extended to the extreme in Xception architecture by Chollet (2016).”
MethodLearning long-term dependencies with gradient descent is difficult
Bengio, Y., Simard, P., & Frasconi, P. (1994) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/72.279181 · Cited by 8,542 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Learning long-range dependencies with Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN) is challenging due to the vanishing and exploding gradient problems (Bengio et al., 1994; Pascanu et al., 2013).”
BackgroundConvolutional LSTM Network: A Machine Learning Approach for Precipitation Nowcasting
Shi, X., Chen, Z., Wang, H., Yeung, D.-Y., Wong, W.-K., & Woo, W.-C. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1506.04214 · Cited by 7,709 · cited 2× · see citing works
“In case of LSTM networks, ConvLSTM (Shi et al., 2015), has been introduced to better exploit possible spatiotemporal correlations, which is conceptually similar to grouping.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialGoogle's Neural Machine Translation System: Bridging the Gap between Human and Machine Translation
Wu, Y., Schuster, M., Chen, Z., Le, Q. V., Norouzi, M., Macherey, W., Krikun, M., Cao, Y., Gao, Q., Macherey, K., et al. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1609.08144 · Cited by 5,319 · cited 1× · see citing works
“LSTM networks (Hochreiter & Schmidhuber, 1997) have been successfully used in language modeling (Jozefowicz et al., 2016; Shazeer et al., 2017), speech recognition (Xiong et al., 2016), machine translation (Wu et al., 2016), and many other tasks.”
MethodOn the difficulty of training recurrent neural networks
Pascanu, R., Mikolov, T., & Bengio, Y. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1211.5063 · Cited by 4,310 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Learning long-range dependencies with Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN) is challenging due to the vanishing and exploding gradient problems (Bengio et al., 1994; Pascanu et al., 2013).”
BackgroundRecurrent Neural Network RegularizationPreprint
Zaremba, W., Sutskever, I., & Vinyals, O. (2014) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.2329 · Cited by 3,086 · cited 1× · see citing works
“We consider LSTM cell with projection of size p , LSTMP, where Equation 1 is computed as follows (Sak et al., 2014; Zaremba et al., 2014).”
MethodLong short-term memory recurrent neural network architectures for large scale acoustic modeling
Sak, H., Senior, A., & Beaufays, F. (2014) · Interspeech 2014 · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2014-80 · Cited by 2,973 · cited 4× · see citing works
“We consider LSTM cell with projection of size p , LSTMP, where Equation 1 is computed as follows (Sak et al., 2014; Zaremba et al., 2014).”
MethodInfluentialExploring the Limits of Language ModelingPreprint
Józefowicz, R., Vinyals, O., Schuster, M., Shazeer, N., & Wu, Y.-H. (2016) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1602.02410 · Cited by 1,202 · cited 3× · see citing works
“As a baseline, we used BIGLSTM model without CNN inputs described by Jozefowicz et al. (2016).”
MethodOutrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layer
Shazeer, N., Mirhoseini, A., Maziarz, K., Davis, A., Le, Q., Hinton, G., & Dean, J. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1701.06538 · Cited by 933 · cited 2× · see citing works
“LSTM networks (Hochreiter & Schmidhuber, 1997) have been successfully used in language modeling (Jozefowicz et al., 2016; Shazeer et al., 2017), speech recognition (Xiong et al., 2016), machine translation (Wu et al., 2016), and many other tasks.”
BackgroundMethodPredicting Parameters in Deep Learning
Denil, M., Shakibi, B., Dinh, L., Ranzato, M., & de Freitas, N. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1306.0543 · Cited by 853 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Denil et al. (2013) have shown that it is possible to train several different deep architectures by learning only a small number of weights and predicting the rest.”
BackgroundConvolutional networks for fast, energy-efficient neuromorphic computing
Esser, S., Merolla, P., Arthur, J., Cassidy, A., Appuswamy, R., Andreopoulos, A., Berg, D. J., McKinstry, J. L., Melano, T., Barch, D., et al. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · doi:10.1073/pnas.1604850113 · Cited by 780 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Multi-group convnets have been widely used to reduce network weights and required compute, for example by Esser et al. (2016).”
MethodOne billion word benchmark for measuring progress in statistical language modeling
Chelba, C., Mikolov, T., Schuster, M., Ge, Q., Brants, T., Koehn, P., & Robinson, T. (2014) · Interspeech 2014 · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2014-564 · Cited by 627 · cited 1× · see citing works
“We test F-LSTM and G-LSTM architectures on the task of language modeling using One Billion Word Benchmark (Chelba et al., 2013).”
MethodAchieving Human Parity in Conversational Speech RecognitionPreprint
Xiong, W., Droppo, J., Huang, X.-D., Seide, F., Seltzer, M., Stolcke, A., Yu, D., & Zweig, G. (2016) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1610.05256 · Cited by 600 · cited 1× · see citing works
“LSTM networks (Hochreiter & Schmidhuber, 1997) have been successfully used in language modeling (Jozefowicz et al., 2016; Shazeer et al., 2017), speech recognition (Xiong et al., 2016), machine translation (Wu et al., 2016), and many other tasks.”
MethodMulti-column Deep Neural Networks for Image Classification
Cireşan, D., Meier, U., & Schmidhuber, J. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1202.2745 · Cited by 53 · cited 2× · see citing works
“, 2017) or multi-tower (Ciregan et al., 2012) models, the key differences are: (1) input to different groups is different and assumed independent, and (2) instead of computing ensemble output, it is concatenated into independent pieces.”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · Cited by 120,404 · see citing works
“Recent work has achieved significant improvements in computational efficiency through factorization tricks [18] and conditional computation [26], while also improving model performance in case of the latter.”
BackgroundTransformer-XL: Attentive language models beyond a fixed-length context
Dai, Z., Yang, Z., Yang, Y., Carbonell, J., Le, Q., & Salakhutdinov, R. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1285 · Cited by 3,169 · see citing works
“…Inan et al. (2016); Press & Wolf (2016); Merity et al. (2017); Gal & Ghahramani (2016), speeding up the Softmax computation (Morin & Bengio, 2005; Kuchaiev & Ginsburg, 2017; Grave et al., 2016a; Jozefowicz et al., 2016), and enriching the output distribution family (Yang et al., 2017; Kanai et…”
BackgroundLanguage Modeling with Gated Convolutional NetworksPreprint
Dauphin, Y., Fan, A., Auli, M., & Grangier, D. (2016) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1612.08083 · Cited by 3,097 · see citing works
“…2013) 51.3 24 GPUs LSTM-2048-512 (Jozefowicz et al., 2016) 43.7 32 GPUs 2-layer LSTM-8192-1024 (Jozefowicz et al., 2016) 30.6 32 GPUs BIG GLSTM-G4 (Kuchaiev & Ginsburg, 2017) 23.3 ∗ 8 GPUs LSTM-2048 (Grave et al., 2016a) 43.9 1 GPU 2-layer LSTM-2048 (Grave et al., 2016a) 39.8 1 GPU GCNN-13 38.1 1…”
InfluentialMobileBERT: a Compact Task-Agnostic BERT for Resource-Limited DevicesPreprint
Sun, Z., Yu, H., Song, X.-D., Liu, R.-J., Yang, Y., & Zhou, D. (2020) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.02984 · Cited by 1,128 · see citing works
“In the NLP literature, the most relevant work can be group LSTMs (Kuchaiev and Ginsburg, 2017; Gao et al., 2018), which employs the idea of group convolution (Zhang et al., 2017, 2018) into Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN).”
BackgroundModel Compression and Hardware Acceleration for Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Survey
Deng, B. L., Li, G., Han, S., Shi, L., & Xie, Y. (2020) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2020.2976475 · Cited by 996 · see citing works
“Factorized LSTM [53] fac-torizes each weight matrix of an LSTM into two smaller matrices and feeds them with two subvectors.”
BackgroundMobileBERT: a Compact Task-Agnostic BERT for Resource-Limited Devices
Sun, Z., Yu, H., Song, X., Liu, R., Yang, Y., & Zhou, D. (2020) · Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.195 · Cited by 757 · see citing works
Efficient Acceleration of Deep Learning Inference on Resource-Constrained Edge Devices: A Review
Shuvo, M. M. H., Islam, S. K., Cheng, J., & Morshed, B. I. (2023) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2022.3226481 · Cited by 436 · see citing works
“The weight matrix of LSTM can be factorized into matrices, and results can be concatenated for faster convergence and parameter reduction [90].”
BackgroundIntelligent Waste Classification System Using Deep Learning Convolutional Neural Network
Adedeji, O., & Wang, Z.-H. (2019) · Procedia Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2019.05.086 · Cited by 366 · see citing works
Depthwise Separable Convolutions for Neural Machine TranslationPreprint
Kaiser, L., Gomez, A. N., & Chollet, F. (2017) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03059 · Cited by 344 · see citing works
“We use the idea from group convolutions and the recent separable-LSTM paper [12] to further reduce this size by factoring the final 1× 1 convolution, and we call the result a super-separable convolution.”
MethodSimple Recurrent Units for Highly Parallelizable Recurrence
Lei, T., Zhang, Y., Wang, S. I., Dai, H., & Artzi, Y. (2017) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d18-1477 · Cited by 315 · see citing works
“, 2017) and to speed up recurrent networks (Diamos et al., 2016; Shazeer et al., 2017; Kuchaiev and Ginsburg, 2017).”
BackgroundMethodExploring Interpretable LSTM Neural Networks over Multi-Variable DataPreprint
Guo, T., Lin, T., & Antulov-Fantulin, N. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.12034 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
“Kuchaiev & Ginsburg (2017); Neil et al. (2016); Koutnik et al. (2014) proposed to partition the hidden layer into separated modules with different updates.”
BackgroundLei, T., Zhang, Y., & Artzi, Y. (2017) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1709.02755 · Cited by 179
“, 2017) and to speed up recurrent networks (Diamos et al., 2016; Shazeer et al., 2017; Kuchaiev and Ginsburg, 2017).”
BackgroundMethodA Complete Process of Text Classification System Using State-of-the-Art NLP Models
Dogra, V., Verma, S., Kavita, K., Chatterjee, P., Shafi, J., Choi, J., & Ijaz, M. F. (2022) · Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience · doi:10.1155/2022/1883698 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
“Recent work, through factorization tricks [148] and conditional computation [149], has achieved substantial improvements in computational efficiency while also improving model output in the case of the latter. authors have presented two simple ways of reducing the number of parameters and speeding up…”
BackgroundFederated Learning Meets Natural Language Processing: A SurveyPreprint
Liu, M., Ho, S., Wang, M., Gao, L., Jin, Y., & Zhang, H. (2021) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.12603 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
“Still, they use CIFG and group-LSTM (GLSTM) [32] for approximation.”
MethodLightweight and Efficient End-To-End Speech Recognition Using Low-Rank Transformer
Winata, G. I., Cahyawijaya, S., Lin, Z., Liu, Z., & Fung, P. (2019) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp40776.2020.9053878 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
“In this work, we extend idea of the in-training compression method proposed in [9] by implementing low-rank units on the transformer model [5], which is suitable for effectively shrinking the whole network size and at the same time, reducing the computational cost in training and evaluation, with improvements in the e…”
Federated Learning of N-Gram Language Models
Chen, M.-Q., Suresh, A., Mathews, R., Wong, A., Allauzen, C., Beaufays, F., & Riley, M. (2019) · Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning · doi:10.18653/v1/k19-1012 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
“For 4K word-piece models, GLSTM is in general on-par with its P 4K-L counterpart.”
MethodInfluentialRecurrent Neural Network from Adder's Perspective: Carry-lookahead RNNPreprint
Jiang, H., Qin, F.-W., Cao, J., Peng, Y., & Shao, Y. (2021) · Neural Networks · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.12901 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
“Although some recent works have somewhat optimized the efficiency through factorization techniques [22], conditional operations [23], etc.”
A new hope for network model generalization
Dietmüller, A., Ray, S., Jacob, R., & Vanbever, L. (2022) · ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks · doi:10.1145/3563766.3564104 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Multimodal Sentiment Analysis via RNN variants
Agarwal, A., Yadav, A., & Vishwakarma, D. (2019) · International Conference on Big Data, Cloud Computing, Data Science & Engineering · doi:10.1109/bcd.2019.8885108 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Automated Assertion Generation via Information Retrieval and Its Integration with Deep learning
Yu, H., Lou, Y., Sun, K., Ran, D.-Z., Xie, T., Hao, D., Li, Y., Li, G., & Wang, Q.-X. (2022) · International Conference on Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/3510003.3510149 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
“Second, approaches based on sequence-to-sequence DL models suffer from the exposure bias [36] and disappearance of the gradient [23, 24], resulting in poor effectiveness in generating a long sequence of tokens as an assertion.”
Gondal, A. U., Sadiq, M. I., Ali, T., Irfan, M., Shaf, A., Aamir, M., Shoaib, M., Głowacz, A., Tadeusiewicz, R., & Kańtoch, E. (2021) · Italian National Conference on Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21144916 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
“The Residual Network (ResNet-50) is a little different from a normal CNN and it can handle the problem of the vanishing gradient [15].”
BackgroundHande, A., Hegde, S. U., Priyadharshini, R., Ponnusamy, R., Kumaresan, P. K., Thavareesan, S., & Chakravarthi, B. R. (2021) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.03867 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
“While factorisation and conditional computational approaches [59, 60] have improved the efficiency of the model, however, the underlying issue of computing it sequentially persists.”
BackgroundEfficient Sequence Learning with Group Recurrent Networks
Gao, F., Wu, L., Zhao, L., Qin, T., Cheng, X.-Q., & Liu, T.-Y. (2018) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1073 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
“In the RNN literature, there is only one paper (Kuchaiev and Ginsburg, 2017), to our best knowledge, exploiting the group strategy.”
BackgroundTransformer-Based Graph Convolutional Network for Sentiment Analysis
AlBadani, B., Shi, R., Dong, J., Al-Sabri, R., & Moctard, O. B. (2022) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app12031316 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
“[42,43] proposed factorization tricks, and conditional computation, respectively, notably increase the computational efficiency.”
BackgroundEfficient online learning with improved LSTM neural networks
Mirza, A., Kerpicci, M., & Kozat, S. (2020) · Digit. Signal Process. · doi:10.1016/j.dsp.2020.102742 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Tan, K., & Lim, B.-O.-P. (2018) · APSIPA Transactions on Signal and Information Processing · doi:10.1017/atsip.2018.6 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
A Neural Attention Model for Real-Time Network Intrusion Detection
Tan, M., Iacovazzi, A., Cheung, N.-M., & Elovici, Y. (2019) · IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks · doi:10.1109/lcn44214.2019.8990890 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
“term dependencies, and poor sequential computation efficiency [19], [20], may hinder the detection performance of these models.”
BackgroundFaster Neural Network Training with Approximate Tensor OperationsPreprint
Adelman, M., Levy, K., Hakimi, I., & Silberstein, M. (2018) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1805.08079 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
“Another approach enforces low-rank structure on the layers, resulting in lower computational cost both for training and inference[5, 6].”
BackgroundOn the Effectiveness of Low-Rank Matrix Factorization for LSTM Model Compression
Winata, G. I., Madotto, A., Shin, J., Barezi, E. J., & Fung, P. (2019) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1908.09982 · Cited by 32
Compressing RNNs for IoT devices by 15-38x using Kronecker Products
Thakker, U., Beu, J., Gope, D., Zhou, C., Fedorov, I., Dasika, G., & Mattina, M. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1906.02876 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
“Hyperparameters : Table 6 shows the hyperparameters used for training the MNIST-LSTM baseline and the MNIST network compressed using pruning, LMF, KPLSTM and a smaller baseline with the number of parameters equivalent to the compressed network.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialEnergy-Efficient LSTM Networks for Online Learning
Ergen, T., Mirza, A., & Kozat, S. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2019.2935796 · Cited by 29
“To mitigate the complexity issues, [24] applies a matrix factorization method to the parameters of the LSTM network.”
MethodInfluentialBoosting Neural Machine Translation
Zhang, D., Kim, J., Crego, J., & Senellart, J. (2016) · International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1612.06138 · Cited by 29
“Kuchaiev and Ginsburg (2017) focus on how to reduce the computational cost through patitioning or factorizing LSTM matrix.”
BackgroundDaily Human Activity Recognition Using Non-Intrusive Sensors
Ramos, R. G., Domingo, J. D., Zalama, E., & Gómez‐García‐Bermejo, J. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21165270 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
“Because these types of networks have millions of parameters in their architecture, a large computation time is required using multi-GPU systems [41].”
BackgroundLow-Rank RNN Adaptation for Context-Aware Language Modeling
Jaech, A., & Ostendorf, M. (2017) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00035 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
“al., 2011; Hutchinson et al., 2015), but these are less powerful than the RNN. A somewhat different use of low-rank factorization has previously been used to reduce the parameter count in an LSTM LM (Kuchaiev and Ginsburg, 2017), finding that the reduced number of parameters leads to faster training. There is a long hi…”
MethodLightFormer: Light-weight Transformer Using SVD-based Weight Transfer and Parameter Sharing
Lv, X., Zhang, P., Li, S., Gan, G., & Sun, Y.-H. (2023) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.656 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
“Low-rank factorization (Kuchaiev and Ginsburg, 2017; Noach and Goldberg, 2020; Hsu et al., 2022) is a widely used model compression technique.”
MethodHierarchical State Space Models for Continuous Sequence-to-Sequence Modeling
Bhirangi, R. M., Wang, C.-Y., Pattabiraman, V., Majidi, C., Gupta, A., Hellebrekers, T., & Pinto, L. (2024) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.10211 · Cited by 24
“For such data, Transformers quickly run out of memory, as they scale quadratically in complexity with sequence length (Vaswani et al., 2017), while LSTMs require significantly larger hidden states (Kuchaiev & Ginsburg, 2017).”
MethodMulti-task learning in under-resourced Dravidian languages
Hande, A., Hegde, S. U., Priyadharshini, R., Ponnusamy, R., Kumaresan, P. K., Thavareesan, S., & Chakravarthi, B. R. (2022) · Journal of Data Information and Management · doi:10.1007/s42488-022-00070-w · Cited by 59 · see citing works
“While factorization and conditional computational approaches (Shazeer et al. 2017; Kuchaiev and Ginsburg 2017) have improved the efficiency of the model, yet the underlying issue of computing it sequentially persists.”
BackgroundScheduling Computation Graphs of Deep Learning Models on Manycore CPUs
Tang, L., Wang, Y.-D., Willke, T. L., & Li, K. (2018) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1807.09667 · Cited by 24
“Classical neural network like LSTM has many variants such as time-frequency LSTM [49], grid LSTM [31], LSTM with layer normalization [5] and dropout [52], phased LSTM [42], group LSTM [35], etc. Graphi is a generic execution engine, optimized for all variations without specializations.”
BackgroundA Comprehensive Review of Generative AI in Healthcare
Shokrollahi, Y., Yarmohammadtoosky, S., Nikahd, M. M., Dong, P.-F., Li, X.-Q., & Gu, L. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.00795 · Cited by 24
“Nevertheless, recent research has demonstrated considerable enhancements in computational efficiency via factorization methodologies (Kuchaiev and Ginsburg 2017) and conditional computation techniques (Shazeer et al. 2017).”
Xu, Q., Yang, C., Tang, J., & Luo, B. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2022.3207294 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
“To reduce the number of parameters and accelerate the training, inspired by the LSTM factorization technique [57], we propose to divide the sequence x t , t = 1 , 2 , . . . , μ into independent groups.”
MethodGenerative AI Agents in Autonomous Machines: A Safety Perspective
Jabbour, J., & Reddi, V. J. (2024) · International Conference on Computer Aided Design · doi:10.1145/3676536.3698390 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
“However, they struggled with scaling to very long sequences and large datasets due to efficiency limitations [87, 160].”
Topic-guided abstractive multimodal summarization with multimodal output
Rafi, S., & Das, R. (2023) · Neural computing & applications (Print) · doi:10.1007/s00521-023-08821-5 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
“Finally, these inputs with 300-dimensional vectors are passed to the encoder to train the model with the RNN [44] LSTM [45–47] and layers structured in the form of a linear stack.”
Separable Convolutional LSTMs for Faster Video Segmentation
Pfeuffer, A., & Dietmayer, K. (2019) · International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/itsc.2019.8917487 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
“and when to erase or write to it. However, LSTMs are computational costly and memory-excessive. Therefore, there are different approaches in the literature to overcome this problem. For instance, in [10], two different possibilities are introduced to make LSTM cells more computationally efficient and to reduce the numb…”
BackgroundMethodToward Compact Transformers for End-to-End Object Detection With Decomposed Chain Tensor Structure
Zhen, P., Yan, X.-T., Wang, W., Hou, T.-S., Wei, H., & Chen, H.-B. (2023) · IEEE transactions on circuits and systems for video technology (Print) · doi:10.1109/tcsvt.2022.3208062 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
“In the work [41], the large weight matrix in the LSTM model is simply factorized into two small matrices and up to 4.5 × parameters reduction is achieved.”
MethodInfluentialRun-Time Efficient RNN Compression for Inference on Edge Devices
Thakker, U., Beu, J. G., Gope, D., Dasika, G. S., & Mattina, M. (2019) · 2019 2nd Workshop on Energy Efficient Machine Learning and Cognitive Computing for Embedded Applications (EMC2) · doi:10.1109/emc249363.2019.00013 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
“Low Rank Matrix Factorization (LMF) [8] expresses a larger matrix A of dimension m × n as a product of two smaller matrices U and V of dimension m × d and d × n , respectively.”
BackgroundMishra, B., & Shahi, T. B. (2021) · Journal of Applied Remote Sensing · doi:10.1117/1.jrs.15.034520 · Cited by 20
Major–Minor Long Short-Term Memory for Word-Level Language Model
Shuang, K., Li, R., Gu, M.-Y., Loo, J., & Su, S. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2019.2947563 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
“The core idea of MMLSTMs is to divide the output features into two parts and generate them independently with two LSTMs. Reference [33] also splits the output of the LSTM into several groups and utilizes the LSTM with matrix factorization to obtain the output of each group by separated input…”
MethodDeeply Tensor Compressed Transformers for End-to-End Object Detection
Zhen, P., Gao, Z., Hou, T.-S., Cheng, Y., & Chen, H.-B. (2022) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v36i4.20397 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Structured Word Embedding for Low Memory Neural Network Language Model
Shi, K., & Yu, K. (2018) · Interspeech · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2018-1057 · Cited by 19
“[10] explores the independence of neurons in the recurrent layers of LSTM and achieves state-of-the-art results while obtaining 2.”
BackgroundMulti-variable LSTM neural network for autoregressive exogenous modelPreprint
Guo, T., & Lin, T. (2018) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1806.06384 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
“Koutnik et al. (2014); Neil et al. (2016); Kuchaiev & Ginsburg (2017) put forward to partition the hidden layer into separated modules as independent feature groups.”
InfluentialEntropy Rate Estimation for Markov Chains with Large State Space
Han, Y.-J., Jiao, J.-T., Lee, C.-Z., Weissman, T., Wu, Y.-H., & Yu, T. (2018) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1802.07889 · Cited by 19
“More detailed analysis, e.g., the accuracy of the JVHW estimates, is shown in the Appendix E. best known model for PTB [48] best known model for 1BW [26] memory length k e s ti m a t e d c ond . e n t r opy ˆ H ( X The performance of ˆ H opt and ˆ H emp in terms of Shannon entropy estimation is…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialRethinking Full Connectivity in Recurrent Neural NetworksPreprint
Keirsbilck, M. V., Keller, A., & Yang, X.-D. (2019) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.12340 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“A variant of the locally-connected RNN is the “grouped” RNN [8, 20, 42], where a single layer is replaced by several smaller ones in parallel.”
BackgroundSymmetric $k$-Means for Deep Neural Network Compression and Hardware Acceleration on FPGAs
Jain, A., Goel, P., Aggarwal, S., Fell, A., & Anand, S. (2020) · IEEE Journal on Selected Topics in Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/jstsp.2020.2968810 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
“Low-rank matrix factorization based approaches for LSTMs and RNNs are presented in [19] and [20], respectively.”
MethodZhen, P., Chen, H.-B., Cheng, Y., Ji, Z., Liu, B., & Yu, H. (2021) · ACM Trans. Internet Things · doi:10.1145/3464941 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
“Kuchaiev and Ginsburg [29] simply factorize the large weight matrix in the LSTM model into two small matrices and achieve up to 4.5 × parameters reduction.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialDiehl, P. U., Zilly, H., Sattler, F., Singer, Y., Kepp, K., Berry, M., Hasemann, H., Zippel, M., Kaya, M., Meyer-Rachner, P., et al. (2023) · Frontiers in Medical Engineering · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2308.11456 · Cited by 15
“Aside from pruning we also experimented with matrix and tensor decomposition techniques (Lebedev et al., 2015; Kim et al., 2016; Kuchaiev and Ginsburg, 2018) which resulted in a similar reduction in the number of model parameters.”
MethodTroullinou, E., Tsagkatakis, G., Chavlis, S., Turi, G., Li, W.-K., Losonczy, A., Tsakalides, P., & Poirazi, P. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1911.09977 · Cited by 14
“Moreover, RNN and LSTM models require a considerable amount of time when trained with long timeseries data [25], [26], [27].”
Rank and run-time aware compression of NLP Applications
Thakker, U., Beu, J. G., Gope, D., Dasika, G. S., & Mattina, M. (2020) · SUSTAINLP · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.03193 · Cited by 13
“This paper introduces one such scheme – Hybrid Matrix Factorization.”
BackgroundInfluentialPushing the limits of RNN Compression
Thakker, U., Fedorov, I., Beu, J. G., Gope, D., Zhou, C., Dasika, G. S., & Mattina, M. (2019) · 2019 Fifth Workshop on Energy Efficient Machine Learning and Cognitive Computing - NeurIPS Edition (EMC2-NIPS) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.02558 · Cited by 13
“The research in neural network (NN) compression can be roughly categorized into 4 topics: pruning [21], structured matrix based techniques [1], quantization [2, 5] and tensor decomposition [8, 14].”
Pyramidal Recurrent Unit for Language Modeling
Mehta, S., Koncel-Kedziorski, R., Rastegari, M., & Hajishirzi, H. (2018) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d18-1491 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“…further improve generalization abilities while simultaneously enabling the recurrent unit to learn representations at very high dimensional space, we propose to use grouped linear transformation (GLT) instead of standard linear transformation for recurrent connections (Kuchaiev and Ginsburg, 2017).”
BackgroundCahyawijaya, S. (2021) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.10808 · Cited by 12
“Additionally, recent works in matrix factorization [58, 60, 33, 78] apply weight factorization to the model parameter before the model is trained and yield a comparable or even better result with fewer parameters and computational cost.”
MethodAbstractive Text Summarization Using Multimodal Information
Rafi, S., & Das, R. (2023) · 2023 10th International Conference on Soft Computing & Machine Intelligence (ISCMI) · doi:10.1109/iscmi59957.2023.10458505 · Cited by 11
S-ViT: Sparse Vision Transformer for Accurate Face Recognition
Kim, G., Park, G., Kang, S., & Woo, S. S. (2023) · ACM Symposium on Applied Computing · doi:10.1145/3555776.3577640 · Cited by 11
“In order to overcome such an issue, various attempts have been made to increase the efficiency [17, 29].”
BackgroundRafi, S., & Das, R. (2024) · ACM Trans. Asian Low Resour. Lang. Inf. Process. · doi:10.1145/3645029 · Cited by 10
“The summaries generated from the Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) [20] decoder were employed for semantic and contextual similarity matching with the image captions.”
MethodMODE-LSTM: A Parameter-efficient Recurrent Network with Multi-Scale for Sentence Classification
Ma, Q., Lin, Z., Yan, J., Chen, Z., & Yu, L. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.544 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“First, inspired by (Kuchaiev and Ginsburg, 2017), we disentangle the hidden state of LSTM into several independently updated small hidden states, which reduces the number of parameters.”
MethodFast Training and Model Compression of Gated RNNs via Singular Value Decomposition
Dai, R., Li, L.-F., & Yu, W. (2018) · IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Network · doi:10.1109/ijcnn.2018.8489156 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“With the same setting for low-rank factorization, F-LSTM is also used to train the network.”
MethodInfluentialDriving with Data: Modeling and Forecasting Vehicle Fleet Maintenance in Detroit
Gardner, J., Koutra, D., Mroueh, J., Pang, V., Farahi, A., Krassenstein, S., & Webb, J. (2017) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1710.06839 · Cited by 10
“e results to the original application of our model, which achieved perplexity of 23.7 on the Penn Treebank dataset, and the state-of-the-art performance benchmarks on the Google Billion Words dataset [7, 23, 14] (perplexity of 43.8, 28.0, and 24.29, respectively). We note that our model’s low perplexity score cannot b…”
ResultInfluentialNeural Network Language Model Compression With Product Quantization and Soft Binarization
Yu, K., Ma, R., Shi, K., & Liu, Q. (2020) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslp.2020.3015659 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“Factorized LSTM [3] applies SVD structure on LSTM’s weight matrices with little performance regression while using only 1/3 parameters.”
MethodA Lightweight Recurrent Network for Sequence Modeling
Zhang, B., & Sennrich, R. (2019) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1149 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Intrinsically Sparse Long Short-Term Memory Networks
Liu, S., Mocanu, D., & Pechenizkiy, M. (2019) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1901.09208 · Cited by 9
“…pruning, other approaches also make significant contribution to LSTMs compression, including distillation (Tian et al., 2017), matrix factorization (Kuchaiev & Ginsburg, 2017), parameter sharing (Lu et al., 2016), group Lasso regularization (Wen et al., 2017), weight quantization (Zen et al.,…”
BackgroundTrace norm regularization and faster inference for embedded speech recognition RNNs
Kliegl, M., Goyal, S., Zhao, K., Srinet, K., & Shoeybi, M. (2017) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1710.09026 · Cited by 9
“Low rank factorization of neural network weights in general has been the subject of many other works (Denil et al., 2013; Sainath et al., 2013; Ba & Caruana, 2014; Kuchaiev & Ginsburg, 2017).”
BackgroundResultCompressing RNNs to Kilobyte Budget for IoT Devices Using Kronecker Products
Thakker, U., Fedorov, I., Zhou, C., Gope, D., Mattina, M., Dasika, G., & Beu, J. (2021) · ACM Journal on Emerging Technologies in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3440016 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Greenformer: Factorization Toolkit for Efficient Deep Neural NetworksPreprint
Cahyawijaya, S., Winata, G. I., Lovenia, H., Wilie, B., Dai, W., Ishii, E., & Fung, P. (2021) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.06762 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“This method produces impressive results with the compressed model is not only smaller and faster but also able to outperform the uncompressed model (Winata et al. 2020; Cahyawijaya 2021; Kuchaiev and Ginsburg 2017).”
Thakker, U., Whatmough, P., Liu, Z.-G., Mattina, M., & Beu, J. G. (2021) · Conference on Machine Learning and Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2102.07071 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“Low-rank Matrix Factorization (LMF) (Kuchaiev & Ginsburg, 2017; Chen et al., 2018; Grachev et al., 2017; Thakker et al., 2019; Thakker et al., 2020a) can also be categorized under this topic.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAn efficient Long Short-Term Memory model based on Laplacian Eigenmap in artificial neural networks
Hu, F., Zhu, Y., Liu, J., & Li, L.-H. (2020) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106218 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Sampling Informative Training Data for RNN Language Models
Fernandez, J., & Downey, D. (2018) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p18-3002 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“Models trained on large, diverse benchmark corpora such as the Bil-lion Word Corpus and Wikitext-103 have seen re-ported perplexities as low as 23.7 and 37.2, respectively (Kuchaiev and Ginsburg, 2017; Dauphin et al., 2017).”
BackgroundInfluentialCompressing Language Models using Doped Kronecker Products
Thakker, U., Whatmough, P. N., Liu, Z.-G., Mattina, M., & Beu, J. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2001.08896 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“Recently, Kronecker Products (KP) were used to compress IoT applications by 15-38x compression factors (Thakker et al., 2019d;b) and achieves better accuracy than pruning (Zhu & Gupta, 2017), lowrank matrix factorization (LMF) and small baseline (SB).”
InfluentialFast LSTM by dynamic decomposition on cloud and distributed systems
You, Y., He, Y., Rajbhandari, S., Wang, W., Hsieh, C.-J., Keutzer, K., & Demmel, J. (2020) · Knowledge and Information Systems · doi:10.1007/s10115-020-01487-8 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“Low-rank techniques were also used to accelerate neural network training and reduce the number of parameters [13,18,29,40,50,51].”
MethodLow Rank Factorization for Compact Multi-Head Self-AttentionPreprint
Mehta, S., Rangwala, H., & Ramakrishnan, N. (2019) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1912.00835 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“r approach to reduce the size of the hidden layers [4, 38]. Recent work has achieved signifi- cant improvements in computational efficiency through factorization tricks [35] and conditional computation [20]. Recently, factorization was also employed at the embedding layer of large pretrained language models such as BERT…”
MethodCommit Messages Generation Based on Core Changes
Huang, Y., Tang, Z., Chen, X.-P., Yang, C.-M., Zheng, Z.-B., & Zhou, X.-C. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3750039 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“To solve this problem, a lot of work has achieved significant improvement in computational efficiency through factorization tricks [31] and conditional computation [50].”
Probabilistic Individual Short-Term Load Forecasting Using Conditional Variational Autoencoder
Khazeiynasab, S. R., Iyengar, R., & Leow, W. L. (2023) · IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting · doi:10.1109/pesgm52003.2023.10252364 · Cited by 5
Tiny RNN Model with Certified Robustness for Text Classification
Qiang, Y., Kumar, S. T. S., Brocanelli, M., & Zhu, D. (2022) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn55064.2022.9892117 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“The number of parameters in LSTM layer can be calculated as: 4 × h × (( d +1)+ h ) [45], where h is the size of hidden state and d is the input size.”
BackgroundAttention-based Contextual Language Model Adaptation for Speech Recognition
Martinez, R. D., Novotney, S., Bulyko, I., Rastrow, A., Stolcke, A., & Gandhe, A. (2021) · Findings · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.01451 · Cited by 5
“Methods that apply low-rank matrix factorization to RNNs are somewhat newer, and were first explored by Kuchaiev and Ginsburg (2017).”
Automatic Garbage Classification Using YOLOV8
Urlamma, D., Amani, V., Mounika, G., & Devakumari, K. (2024) · IARJSET · doi:10.17148/iarjset.2024.11317 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Scale down Transformer by Grouping Features for a Lightweight Character-level Language Model
Park, S., Kim, G., Lee, J., Cha, J., Kim, J.-H., & Lee, H. (2020) · International Conference on Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.coling-main.607 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“(Kuchaiev and Ginsburg, 2017) proposed group-wise RNN as a special form of ensembled RNNs.”
Driving with Data in the Motor City: Understanding and Predicting Fleet Maintenance Patterns
Gardner, J., Mroueh, J., Jenuwine, N. M., Waverdyck, N., Krassenstein, S., Farahi, A., & Koutra, D. (2020) · International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics · doi:10.1109/dsaa49011.2020.00052 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“3 on the Google Billion Words dataset [17].”
MethodDriving with Data in the Motor City: Mining and Modeling Vehicle Fleet Maintenance DataPreprint
Gardner, J., Mroueh, J., Jenuwine, N. M., Weaverdyck, N., Krassenstein, S., Farahi, A., & Koutra, D. (2020) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2002.10010 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“For comparison, we note that the architecture used here has also achieved perplexity score of 23.7 on the Penn Treebank dataset and 24.3 on the Google Billion Words dataset [17].”
MethodInfluentialOnline additive updates with FFT-IFFT operator on the GRU neural networks
Mirza, A. (2018) · Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference · doi:10.1109/siu.2018.8404456 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“We use the idea form [15] and apply to our model.”
BackgroundMethodDeFINE: DEep Factorized INput Token Embeddings for Neural Sequence ModelingPreprint
Mehta, S., Koncel-Kedziorski, R., Rastegari, M., & Hajishirzi, H. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1911.12385 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
“Group linear transformations (GLT), originally introduced to improve the efficiency of the LSTM, also sparsify the connections in fully connected layers and significantly reduce computational costs (Kuchaiev & Ginsburg, 2017; Mehta et al., 2018).”
A Survey of Distributed Learning in Cloud, Mobile, and Edge Settings
Threadgill, M., & Gerstlauer, A. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.15079 · Cited by 3
“Moreover, the work in [39] tackles the challenge of training large LSTM networks by proposing Factorized LSTM (F-LSTM), which decomposes the LSTM weight matrix ( W ) into the product of two smaller matrices ( W 1 and W 2 ), reducing the total parameter count and computational complexity.”
BackgroundGuided attention mechanism: Training network more efficiently
Wang, C., Li, H., Li, X., Hou, F., & Hu, X. (2020) · Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.3233/jifs-191257 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
On Finer Control of Information Flow in LSTMs
Gao, H., & Oates, T. (2018) · ECML/PKDD · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-10925-7_32 · Cited by 3
“, Convolutional LSTM [14], Dynamic Cortex Memory [15] and Group LSTM [16].”
A highly efficient recurrent neural network architecture for data regression
Ergen, T., & Ceyani, E. (2018) · Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference · doi:10.1109/siu.2018.8404708 · Cited by 3
“Karmaşıklığı ve öğrenilecek parametre sayısını daha da düşürmek amacıyla, UKSB parametrelerine matris ayrıştırması yöntemi [8] uygulanmaktadır.”
Band Matrices in Recurrent Neural Networks for Long Memory Tasks
Langer, J. (2018) · doi:10.5282/ubm/epub.59112 · Cited by 3
“Recurrent neural networks (RNNs) and especially long short-term memory networks (LSTMs) [HS97], designed to work with sequential data, were widely successful in speech recognition [BK15] and machine translation [AR15].”
BackgroundMethodIMSSA: Deploying modern state-space models on memristive in-memory compute hardware
Siegel, S., Yang, M.-J., & Strachan, J. (2024) · International Symposium on Circuits and Systems · doi:10.1109/iscas56072.2025.11043527 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Processing long temporal sequences presents a significant challenge for many deep learning algorithms [1], [2].”
Low Complexity CSI Feedback Method Using Reformer
Saito, Y., Bouazizi, M., & Ohtsuki, T. (2024) · 2024 IEEE 100th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2024-Fall) · doi:10.1109/vtc2024-fall63153.2024.10757649 · Cited by 2
Enhancing the performance measure of sentiment analysis through deep learning approach
Nair, R., Jain, V., & Nair, P. (2022) · International Journal of Computing and Digital Systems · doi:10.12785/ijcds/1101114 · Cited by 2
“The implemented deep learning for sentiment analysis is RNN with LSTM [40] and Deep Chrome Convolutional Neural Network (DCCNN) will be applied on the above three datasets and it has shown improved performance than other traditional machine algorithms like SVM, Naïve Bayes, Random Forest, and…”
MethodFast LSTM Inference by Dynamic Decomposition on Cloud Systems
You, Y., He, Y., Rajbhandari, S., Wang, W., Hsieh, C.-J., Keutzer, K., & Demmel, J. (2019) · Industrial Conference on Data Mining · doi:10.1109/icdm.2019.00085 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Low-rank techniques were also used to accelerate neural network training and reduce the number of parameters [8], [11], [19], [28], [33], [34].”
MethodResearches based on neural network about optimizing combination of speaker verification
Chenm, T., & Liu, G. (2017) · 2017 3rd IEEE International Conference on Computer and Communications (ICCC) · doi:10.1109/compcomm.2017.8322880 · Cited by 2
“In this paper, we propose combining traditional feature parameters with identity vectors as input [2].”
MethodYuan, Y.-Q., Zhou, S.-T., Zhou, D., & Zhang, R. (2025) · Asian journal of control · doi:10.1002/asjc.3621 · Cited by 1
“Kuchaiev and Ginsburg [26] introduce a Matrix Factorization (MF) to further reduce the overall complexity of the network, in which the weight matrices of each gate unit of the network are decomposed into two matrices.”
Cognitive Large Language Model in Social Media with Local Memory
Vigneshwaran, N., Vijayaraj, A., Murugan, V. P., Kumar, R., Mageshkumar, N., & Megavannan, R. (2025) · 2025 International Conference on Data Science, Agents & Artificial Intelligence (ICDSAAI) · doi:10.1109/icdsaai65575.2025.11011588 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kuchaiev, O., & Ginsburg, B.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2017
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1703.10722
- OpenAlex
- W2605203995
- Cited by
- 99
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- International Conference on Learning Representations
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
- Keywords
- long short-term memory networks, matrix factorization, parameter reduction, training acceleration, recurrent neural networks, matrix partitioning, state partitioning, perplexity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review