Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 5

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Train longer, generalize better: closing the generalization gap in large batch training of neural networks

Hoffer, Elad, Hubara, Itay, Soudry, Daniel·2017·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1705.08741arXiv 1705.08741
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Background: Deep learning models are typically trained using stochastic gradient descent or one of its variants. These methods update the weights using their gradient, estimated from a small fraction of the training data. It has been observed that when using large batch sizes there is a persistent degradation in generalization performance - known as the "generalization gap" phenomena. Identifying the origin of this gap and closing it had remained an open problem. Contributions: We examine the initial high learning rate training phase. We find that the weight distance from its initialization grows logarithmically with the number of weight updates. We therefore propose a "random walk on random landscape" statistical model which is known to exhibit similar "ultra-slow" diffusion behavior. Following this hypothesis we conducted experiments to show empirically that the "generalization gap" stems from the relatively small number of updates rather than the batch size, and can be completely eliminated by adapting the training regime used. We further investigate different techniques to train models in the large-batch regime and present a novel algorithm named "Ghost Batch Normalization" which enables significant decrease in the generalization gap without increasing the number of updates. To validate our findings we conduct several additional experiments on MNIST, CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100 and ImageNet. Finally, we reassess common practices and beliefs concerning training of deep models and suggest they may not be optimal to achieve good generalization.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1705.08741

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Amodei, D., Anubhai, R., Battenberg, E., et al. Deep speech 2: End-to-end speech recognition in english and mandarin. arXiv preprint arXiv:1512.02595, 2015. · arXiv
  2. Bottou, L. Large-scale machine learning with stochastic gradient descent. In Proceedings of COMPSTAT'2010, pp. 177-186. Springer, 2010.
  3. Bray, A. J. and Dean, D. S. Statistics of critical points of Gaussian fields on large-dimensional spaces. Physical Review Letters, 98(15):1-5, 2007.
  4. Das, D., Avancha, S., Mudigere, D., et al. Distributed deep learning using synchronous stochastic gradient descent. arXiv preprint arXiv:1602.06709, 2016. · arXiv
  5. Dauphin, Y., de Vries, H., Chung, J., and Bengio, Y. Rmsprop and equilibrated adaptive learning rates for non-convex optimization. corr abs/1502.04390 (2015). · arXiv
  6. Dauphin, Y., Pascanu, R., and Gulcehre, C. Identifying and attacking the saddle point problem in high- dimensional non-convex optimization. In NIPS, pp. 1-9, 2014.
  7. Dean, J., Corrado, G., Monga, R., et al. Large scale distributed deep networks. In NIPS, pp. 1223-1231, 2012.
  8. Dinh, L., Pascanu, R., Bengio, S., and Bengio, Y. Sharp minima can generalize for deep nets. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.04933, 2017. · arXiv
  9. Duchi, J., Hazan, E., and Singer, Y. Adaptive subgradient methods for online learning and stochastic optimization. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12(Jul):2121-2159, 2011.
  10. Durrett, R. Multidimensional random walks in random environments with subclassical limiting behavior. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 104(1):87-102, 1986.
  11. Ge, R., Huang, F., Jin, C., and Yuan, Y. Escaping from saddle points-online stochastic gradient for tensor decomposition. In COLT, pp. 797-842, 2015.
  12. Girosi, F., Jones, M., and Poggio, T. Regularization theory and neural networks architectures. Neural computation, 7(2):219-269, 1995.
  13. Glorot, X. and Bengio, Y. Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks. In Aistats, volume 9, pp. 249-256, 2010.
  14. Goyal, P., Dollár, P., Girshick, R., et al. Accurate, large minibatch sgd: Training imagenet in 1 hour. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.02677, 2017. · arXiv
  15. Hardt, M., Recht, B., and Singer, Y. Train faster, generalize better: Stability of stochastic gradient descent. ICML, pp. 1-24, 2016.
  16. Ioffe, S. and Szegedy, C. Batch normalization: Accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift. arXiv preprint arXiv:1502.03167, 2015. · arXiv
  17. Keskar, N. S., Mudigere, D., Nocedal, J., Smelyanskiy, M., and Tang, P. T. P. On large-batch training for deep learning: Generalization gap and sharp minima. In ICLR, 2017.
  18. Krizhevsky, A. One weird trick for parallelizing convolutional neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1404.5997, 2014. · arXiv
  19. LeCun, Y., Bottou, L., and Orr, G. Efficient backprop in neural networks: Tricks of the trade (orr, g. and müller, k., eds.). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1524, 1998a.
  20. Li, M. Scaling Distributed Machine Learning with System and Algorithm Co-design. PhD thesis, Intel, 2017.
  21. Li, M., Zhang, T., Chen, Y., and Smola, A. J. Efficient mini-batch training for stochastic optimization. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pp. 661-670. ACM, 2014.
  22. Marinari, E., Parisi, G., Ruelle, D., and Windey, P. Random Walk in a Random Environment and 1f Noise. Physical Review Letters, 50(1):1223-1225, 1983.
  23. Mnih, V., Kavukcuoglu, K., Silver, D., et al. Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning. Nature, 518(7540):529-533, 2015.
  24. Ruder, S. An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithms. CoRR, abs/1609.04747, 2016. · arXiv
  25. Simonyan, K. e. a. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556, 2014. · arXiv
  26. Soudry, D., Hoffer, E., and Srebro, N. The Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Separable Data. ArXiv e-prints, October 2017.
  27. Soudry, D. and Hoffer, E. Exponentially vanishing sub-optimal local minima in multilayer neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.05777, 2017. · arXiv
  28. Srivastava, N., Hinton, G. E., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., and Salakhutdinov, R. Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 15(1):1929-1958, 2014.
  29. Sutskever, I., Martens, J., Dahl, G., and Hinton, G. On the importance of initialization and momentum in deep learning. In International conference on machine learning, pp. 1139-1147, 2013.
  30. Wan, L., Zeiler, M., Zhang, S., LeCun, Y., and Fergus, R. Regularization of neural networks using dropconnect. ICML'13, pp. III-1058-III-1066. JMLR.org, 2013.
  31. Wu, Y., Schuster, M., Chen, Z., et al. Google's neural machine translation system: Bridging the gap between human and machine translation. CoRR, abs/1609.08144, 2016. · arXiv
  32. You, Y., Gitman, I., and Ginsburg, B. Scaling sgd batch size to 32k for imagenet training. arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.03888, 2017. · arXiv
  33. Zhang, C., Bengio, S., Hardt, M., Recht, B., and Vinyals, O. Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalization. In ICLR, 2017.
  34. Zhang, S., Choromanska, A. E., and LeCun, Y. Deep learning with elastic averaging sgd. In NIPS, pp. 685-693, 2015.

Cited by

See all 5

Metadata

Authors
Hoffer, E., Hubara, I., & Soudry, D.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2017
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1705.08741
arXiv
1705.08741
References
10
Type
Preprint
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review