Deep Learning is Robust to Massive Label Noise
Open accessAbstract
Deep neural networks trained on large supervised datasets have led to impressive results in image classification and other tasks. However, well-annotated datasets can be time-consuming and expensive to collect, lending increased interest to larger but noisy datasets that are more easily obtained. In this paper, we show that deep neural networks are capable of generalizing from training data for which true labels are massively outnumbered by incorrect labels. We demonstrate remarkably high test performance after training on corrupted data from MNIST, CIFAR, and ImageNet. For example, on MNIST we obtain test accuracy above 90 percent even after each clean training example has been diluted with 100 randomly-labeled examples. Such behavior holds across multiple patterns of label noise, even when erroneous labels are biased towards confusing classes. We show that training in this regime requires a significant but manageable increase in dataset size that is related to the factor by which correct labels have been diluted. Finally, we provide an analysis of our results that shows how increasing noise decreases the effective batch size.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474 · see citing works
ADADELTA: An Adaptive Learning Rate Method
Zeiler, M. D. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1212.5701 · Cited by 5,322 · see citing works
Building high-level features using large scale unsupervised learning
Le, Q. V. (2013) · 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp.2013.6639343 · Cited by 1,695 · see citing works
Unsupervised Learning of Visual Representations Using Videos
Wang, X., & Gupta, A. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.320 · Cited by 1,005 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Artificial intelligence in cancer imaging: Clinical challenges and applications
Bi, W. L., Hosny, A., Schabath, M. B., Giger, M. L., Birkbak, N. J., Mehrtash, A., Allison, T., Arnaout, O., Abbosh, C., Dunn, I. F., et al. (2019) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21552 · Cited by 1,846 · see citing works
Causability and explainability of artificial intelligence in medicine
Holzinger, A., Langs, G., Denk, H., Zatloukal, K., & Müller, H. (2019) · WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1002/widm.1312 · Cited by 1,885 · see citing works
The iNaturalist Species Classification and Detection Dataset
Van Horn, G., Mac Aodha, O., Song, Y., Cui, Y., Sun, C., Shepard, A., Adam, H., Perona, P., & Belongie, S. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00914 · Cited by 1,451 · see citing works
Self-citationBulten, W., Pinckaers, H., van Boven, H., Vink, R., de Bel, T., van Ginneken, B., van der Laak, J., Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, C., & Litjens, G. (2020) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30739-9 · Cited by 705 · see citing works
What do we need to build explainable AI systems for the medical domain?
Holzinger, A., Biemann, C., Pattichis, C. S., & Kell, D. B. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1712.09923 · Cited by 636 · see citing works
WoodScape: A Multi-Task, Multi-Camera Fisheye Dataset for Autonomous Driving
Yogamani, S., Hughes, C., Horgan, J., Sistu, G., Chennupati, S., Uricar, M., Milz, S., Simon, M., Amende, K., Witt, C., et al. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00940 · Cited by 303 · see citing works
“unately, due to the overwhelming success of deep learning, recently it does not get as much attention as it still deserves in our opinion. Deep learning was shown to be quite resistant to label noise [41]. However, at the same time, it was shown that careful inspection of the training sets for outliers improves the ro…”
BackgroundAnalysis of the ISIC image datasets: Usage, benchmarks and recommendations
Cassidy, B., Kendrick, C., Brodzicki, A., Jaworek-Korjakowska, J., & Yap, M. H. (2022) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2021.102305 · Cited by 307 · see citing works
The METRIC-framework for assessing data quality for trustworthy AI in medicine: A systematic review
Schwabe, D., Becker, K., Seyferth, M., Klaß, A., & Schaeffter, T. (2024) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-024-01196-4 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Data Evaluation and Enhancement for Quality Improvement of Machine Learning
Chen, H., Chen, J., & Ding, J. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Reliability · doi:10.1109/tr.2021.3070863 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Poisoning Web-Scale Training Datasets is Practical
Carlini, N., Jagielski, M., Choquette-Choo, C. A., Paleka, D., Pearce, W., Anderson, H., Terzis, A., Thomas, K., & Tramèr, F. (2024) · 2024 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) · doi:10.1109/sp54263.2024.00179 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Poisoning Web-Scale Training Datasets is Practical
Carlini, N., Jagielski, M., Choquette-Choo, C. A., Paleka, D., Pearce, W., Anderson, H., Terzis, A., Thomas, K., & Tramèr, F. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.10149 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
“This quantity-over-quality tradeoff has so far been deemed acceptable, both because modern neural networks are extremely resilient to large amounts of label noise [55, 83], and because”
BackgroundDeepDrug3D: Classification of ligand-binding pockets in proteins with a convolutional neural network
Pu, L., Govindaraj, R. G., Lemoine, J. M., Wu, H.-C., & Brylinski, M. (2019) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006718 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Learning Invariant Representations of Social Media Users
Andrews, N., & Bishop, M. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1178 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Estimating Labeling Quality with Deep Object Detectors
Haase-Schütz, C., Hertlein, H., & Wiesbeck, W. (2019) · 2019 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) · doi:10.1109/ivs.2019.8814144 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
A Semi-Supervised Learning Method for the Identification of Bad Exposures in Large Imaging Surveys
Luo, Y., Myers, A. D., Drlica-Wagner, A., Dematties, D., Borchani, S., Valdes, F., Dey, A., Schlegel, D., Zhou, R., & DESI Legacy Imaging Surveys Team (2026) · The Open Journal of Astrophysics · doi:10.33232/001c.158430 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Rolnick et al. (2018) has shown that ML algorithms can be robust in classification tasks where a small fraction of label noise (i.e., mislabeled data) exists.”
- Authors
- Rolnick, D., Veit, A., Belongie, S., & Shavit, N.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2017
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1705.10694
- OpenAlex
- W2618574054
- Cited by
- 402
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 92 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 64 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
- Keywords
- label noise, noisy training data, deep neural network, generalization, image classification, dataset size
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
