PreprintCited by 21Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsAdaptive Dynamic Programming ControlAdvanced Control Systems Optimization

ADAPT: Zero-Shot Adaptive Policy Transfer for Stochastic Dynamical Systems

Open access
Harrison, James, Garg, Animesh, Ivanovic, Boris, Zhu, Yuke, Savarese, Silvio, Fei-Fei, Li, Pavone, Marco·2017·arXiv

Abstract

Model-free policy learning has enabled robust performance of complex tasks with relatively simple algorithms. However, this simplicity comes at the cost of requiring an Oracle and arguably very poor sample complexity. This renders such methods unsuitable for physical systems. Variants of model-based methods address this problem through the use of simulators, however, this gives rise to the problem of policy transfer from simulated to the physical system. Model mismatch due to systematic parameter shift and unmodelled dynamics error may cause sub-optimal or unsafe behavior upon direct transfer. We introduce the Adaptive Policy Transfer for Stochastic Dynamics (ADAPT) algorithm that achieves provably safe and robust, dynamically-feasible zero-shot transfer of RL-policies to new domains with dynamics error. ADAPT combines the strengths of offline policy learning in a black-box source simulator with online tube-based MPC to attenuate bounded model mismatch between the source and target dynamics. ADAPT allows online transfer of policy, trained solely in a simulation offline, to a family of unknown targets without fine-tuning. We also formally show that (i) ADAPT guarantees state and control safety through state-action tubes under the assumption of Lipschitz continuity of the divergence in dynamics and, (ii) ADAPT results in a bounded loss of reward accumulation relative to a policy trained and evaluated in the source environment. We evaluate ADAPT on 2 continuous, non-holonomic simulated dynamical systems with 4 different disturbance models, and find that ADAPT performs between 50%-300% better on mean reward accrual than direct policy transfer.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1707.04674

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Harrison et al. (2017) and Higgins et al. (2017b) study problems within this class but don't formalise the entire class of problems as we do here, instead focusing on presenting methods for improving performance in the empirical settings they investigate.

    “They both study problems within this class but don't formalise the entire class of problems as we do here, instead focusing on presenting methods for improving performance in the empirical settings they investigate.”

    From A Survey of Zero-shot Generalisation in Deep Reinforcement Learning (2023) · cites this paper as Harrison et al. (2017)

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 28 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. [2][2] K. Bousmalis, A. Irpan, P. Wohlhart, Y. Bai, M. Kelcey, M. Kalakrishnan, L. Downs, J. Ibarz, P. Pastor, K. Konolige, et al. , 'Using simulation and domain adaptation to improve efficiency of deep robotic grasping', ArXiv preprint arXiv:1709.07857 , 2017. - · arXiv
  2. [3][3] G. Brockman, V. Cheung, L. Pettersson, J. Schneider, J. Schulman, J. Tang, and W. Zaremba, 'OpenAI Gym', ArXiv preprint arXiv:1606.01540 , 2016. - · arXiv
  3. [4][4] P. Christiano, Z. Shah, I. Mordatch, J. Schneider, T. Blackwell, J. Tobin, P. Abbeel, and W. Zaremba, 'Transfer from simulation to real world through learning deep inverse dynamics model', ArXiv preprint arXiv:1610.03518 , 2016. - · arXiv
  4. [5][5] M. Deisenroth and C. E. Rasmussen, 'PILCO: A model-based and data-efficient approach to policy search', in Proc. of the 28th Int'l Conf. on Machine Learning (ICML-11) , 2011. -
  5. [6][6] C. Devin, A. Gupta, T. Darrell, P. Abbeel, and S. Levine, 'Learning modular neural network policies for multi-task and multi-robot transfer', ArXiv preprint arXiv:1609.07088 , 2016. - · arXiv
  6. [7][7] F. Farshidian, D. Pardo, and J. Buchli, 'Sequential linear quadratic optimal control for nonlinear switched systems', ArXiv preprint arXiv:1609.02198 , 2016. - · arXiv
  7. [8][8] S. Gu, T. Lillicrap, I. Sutskever, and S. Levine, 'Continuous deep q-learning with modelbased acceleration', ICML , 2016. -
  8. [9][9] N. Heess, G. Wayne, D. Silver, T. Lillicrap, T. Erez, and Y. Tassa, 'Learning continuous control policies by stochastic value gradients', in NIPS , 2015. -
  9. [10][10] G. Kahn, T. Zhang, S. Levine, and P. Abbeel, 'Plato: Policy learning using adaptive trajectory optimization', ArXiv preprint arXiv:1603.00622 , 2016. - · arXiv
  10. [24][24] A. A. Rusu, N. C. Rabinowitz, G. Desjardins, H. Soyer, J. Kirkpatrick, K. Kavukcuoglu, R. Pascanu, and R. Hadsell, 'Progressive neural networks', ArXiv preprint arXiv:1606.04671 , 2016. - · arXiv
  11. [25][25] J. Schulman, S. Levine, P. Moritz, M. Jordan, and P. Abbeel, 'Trust Region Policy Optimization', ICML , 2015. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harrison, J., Garg, A., Ivanovic, B., Zhu, Y., Savarese, S., Fei-Fei, L., & Pavone, M.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Harrison, James
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2017
Pages
437-453
ISSN
2511-1256 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2739211902
Cited by
21
References
28
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2
FWCI
3.44
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Springer proceedings in advanced robotics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Adaptive Dynamic Programming Control
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Advanced Control Systems Optimization
Keywords
stochastic dynamical systems, model mismatch, tube-based model predictive control, offline policy learning, model-free reinforcement learning, unmodeled dynamics, nonholonomic systems, robust control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review