PreprintCited by 229Generative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisGaussian Processes and Bayesian InferenceModel Reduction and Neural Networks

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Disentangled Recognition and Nonlinear Dynamics Model for Unsupervised Learning

Open access
Fraccaro, Marco, Kamronn, Simon, Paquet, Ulrich, Winther, Ole·2017·arXiv

Abstract

This paper takes a step towards temporal reasoning in a dynamically changing video, not in the pixel space that constitutes its frames, but in a latent space that describes the non-linear dynamics of the objects in its world. We introduce the Kalman variational auto-encoder, a framework for unsupervised learning of sequential data that disentangles two latent representations: an object's representation, coming from a recognition model, and a latent state describing its dynamics. As a result, the evolution of the world can be imagined and missing data imputed, both without the need to generate high dimensional frames at each time step. The model is trained end-to-end on videos of a variety of simulated physical systems, and outperforms competing methods in generative and missing data imputation tasks.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1710.05741

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The hippocampal system and machine learning architectures that attempt to reproduce its functioning afford spatiotemporal trajectories.

    “as afforded by the hippocampal system and machine learning architectures that attempt to reproduce its functioning”

    From An Integrated World Modeling Theory (IWMT) of Consciousness (2020) · cites this paper as Fraccaro et al., 2017

  • According to IWMT, coherent self-world modeling likely requires organizing information into spatiotemporal trajectories.

    “According to IWMT, coherent self-world modeling likely also requires organizing this information into spatiotemporal trajectories”

    From An Integrated World Modeling Theory (IWMT) of Consciousness (2020) · cites this paper as Fraccaro et al., 2017

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Fraccaro, M., Kamronn, S., Paquet, U., & Winther, O.
Affiliations
  • Technical University of Denmark (DK)
  • Alphabet (United States) (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2017
Volume
30
Pages
3601-3610
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2751471435
Cited by
229
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 8 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • neural information processing systems
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Model Reduction and Neural Networks
Keywords
disentangled representations, unsupervised learning, nonlinear dynamics, latent space, temporal reasoning, video, missing data imputation, generative models, object recognition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review