The DOI matches its DataCite record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
The fate of large-scale structure in modified gravity after GW170817 and GRB170817A
Open accessAbstract
The coincident detection of gravitational waves (GW) and a gamma-ray burst from a merger of neutron stars has placed an extremely stringent bound on the speed of GW. We showed previously that the presence of gravitational slip ($η$) in cosmology is intimately tied to modifications of GW propagation. This new constraint implies that the only remaining viable source of gravitational slip is a conformal coupling to gravity in scalar-tensor theories, while viable vector-tensor theories cannot now generate gravitational slip at all. We discuss structure formation in the remaining viable models, demonstrating that (i) the dark-matter growth rate must now be at least as fast as in GR, with the possible exception of the beyond Horndeski model. (ii) If there is any scale-dependence at all in the slip parameter, it is such that it takes the GR value at large scales. We show a consistency relation which must be violated if gravity is modified.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Surviving vector-tensor theories cannot have any slip at all, so detecting any slip parameter will rule all of them out.
“They also showed that the surviving vector–tensor theories cannot have any slip at all so detecting any slip parameter will rule all of them out.”
From Testing general relativity in cosmology (2019) · cites this paper as Amendola et al. (2017)
Amendola et al. noted that the presence of a slip MG parameter in scalar-tensor theories can be attributed to only a conformal coupling to gravity.
“Amendola et al. (2017) noted that this result in combination with the constraint from GW170817/GRB170817A implies that the presence of a slip MG parameter in scalar–tensor theories can be attributed to only a conformal coupling to gravity.”
From Testing general relativity in cosmology (2019) · cites this paper as Amendola et al. (2017)
The growth rate in the surviving models must be at least as fast as that of GR except possibly for beyond Horndeski theories.
“They demonstrated then that the growth rate in the surviving models must be at least as fast as that of GR except possibly for beyond Horndeski theories.”
From Testing general relativity in cosmology (2019) · cites this paper as Amendola et al. (2017)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 64 · Cited by 120
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- [40]C. Deffayet, G. Esposito-Farese, and D. A. Steer, 'Counting the degrees of freedom of generalized Galileons,' Phys. Rev. D92 (2015) 084013, arXiv:1506.01974 [gr-qc] . · arXiv
- [41]M. Crisostomi, M. Hull, K. Koyama, and G. Tasinato, 'Horndeski: beyond, or not beyond?,' JCAP 1603 no. 03, (2016) 038, arXiv:1601.04658 [hep-th] . · arXiv
- [42]G. D'Amico, Z. Huang, M. Mancarella, and F. Vernizzi, 'Weakening Gravity on Redshift-Survey Scales with Kinetic Matter Mixing,' JCAP 1702 (2017) 014, arXiv:1609.01272 [astro-ph.CO] . · arXiv
- [43]L. Hart and J. Chluba, 'New constraints on time-dependent variations of fundamental constants using Planck data,' arXiv:1705.03925 [astro-ph.CO] . · arXiv
- [44]T. G. Zlosnik, P. G. Ferreira, and G. D. Starkman, 'The Vector-tensor nature of Bekenstein's relativistic theory of modified gravity,' Phys. Rev. D74 (2006) 044037, arXiv:gr-qc/0606039 [gr-qc] . · arXiv
- [45]L. Heisenberg, R. Kase, and S. Tsujikawa, 'Beyond generalized Proca theories,' Phys. Lett. B760 (2016) 617-626, arXiv:1605.05565 [hep-th] . · arXiv
- [47]E. A. Lim, 'Can we see Lorentz-violating vector fields in the CMB?,' Phys. Rev. D71 (2005) 063504, arXiv:astro-ph/0407437 [astro-ph] . · arXiv
- [48]J. Zuntz, T. G. Zlosnik, F. Bourliot, P. G. Ferreira, and G. D. Starkman, 'Vector field models of modified gravity and the dark sector,' Phys. Rev. D81 (2010) 104015, arXiv:1002.0849 [astro-ph.CO] . · arXiv
- [49]T. G. Zlosnik, P. G. Ferreira, and G. D. Starkman, 'Growth of structure in theories with a dynamical preferred frame,' Phys. Rev. D77 (2008) 084010, arXiv:0711.0520 [astro-ph] . · arXiv
- [50]E. Allys, P. Peter, and Y. Rodriguez, 'Generalized Proca action for an Abelian vector field,' JCAP 1602 no. 02, (2016) 004, arXiv:1511.03101 [hep-th] . · arXiv
- [51]J. Beltran Jimenez and L. Heisenberg, 'Derivative self-interactions for a massive vector field,' Phys. Lett. B757 (2016) 405-411, arXiv:1602.03410 [hep-th] . · arXiv
- [52]E. Allys, J. P. Beltran Almeida, P. Peter, and Y. Rodríguez, 'On the 4D generalized Proca action for an Abelian vector field,' JCAP 1609 no. 09, (2016) 026, arXiv:1605.08355 [hep-th] . · arXiv
- [53]A. De Felice, L. Heisenberg, R. Kase, S. Mukohyama, S. Tsujikawa, and Y.-l. Zhang, 'Effective gravitational couplings for cosmological perturbations in generalized Proca theories,' Phys. Rev. D94 no. 4, (2016) 044024, arXiv:1605.05066 [gr-qc] . · arXiv
- [54]P. Zhang, M. Liguori, R. Bean, and S. Dodelson, 'Probing Gravity at Cosmological Scales by Measurements which Test the Relationship between Gravitational Lensing and Matter Overdensity,' Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007) 141302, arXiv:0704.1932 [astro-ph] . · arXiv
- [55]W. J. Percival and M. White, 'Testing cosmological structure formation using redshift-space distortions,' Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 393 (2009) 297, arXiv:0808.0003 [astro-ph] . · arXiv
Metadata
- Authors
- Amendola, L., Kunz, M., Saltas, I. D., & Sawicki, I.
- Affiliations
- Heidelberg University (DE)
- University of Geneva (CH)
- Czech Academy of Sciences (CZ)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2017
- Volume
- 120
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 131101-131101
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1711.04825
- OpenAlex
- W2768639862
- Cited by
- 120
- References
- 64
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 24
- FWCI
- 10.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (TRR 33)
- Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
- Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy (CoGraDS -CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/15_003/0000437)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Keywords
- modified gravity, gravitational slip, GW170817, GRB 170817A, neutron star mergers, gravitational wave speed, structure formation, scalar-tensor gravity, vector-tensor theories, consistency relations, large-scale structure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
