CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 27Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Revival of the Deser-Woodard nonlocal gravity model: Comparison of the original nonlocal form and a localized formulation

Open access
Park, Sohyun·2017·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1711.08759arXiv 1711.08759
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

We examine the origin of two opposite results for the growth of perturbations in the Deser-Woodard (DW) nonlocal gravity model. One group previously analyzed the model in its original nonlocal form and showed that the growth of structure in the DW model is enhanced compared to general relativity (GR) and thus concluded that the model was ruled out. Recently, however, another group has reanalyzed it by localizing the model and found that the growth in their localized version is suppressed even compared to the one in GR. The question was whether the discrepancy originates from an intrinsic difference between the nonlocal and localized formulations or is due to their different implementations of the sub-horizon limit. We show that the nonlocal and local formulations give the same solutions for the linear perturbations as long as the initial conditions are set the same. The different implementations of the sub-horizon limit lead to different transient behaviors of some perturbation variables; however, they do not affect the growth of matter perturbations at the sub-horizon scale much. In the meantime, we also report an error in the numerical calculation code of the former group and verify that after fixing the error the nonlocal version also gives the suppressed growth. Finally, we discuss two alternative definitions of the effective gravitational constant taken by the two groups and some open problems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1711.08759

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is now agreed that the Deser-Woodard model is consistent with the growth of large-scale structure data.

    “This was confirmed in Park (2017) so it is agreed now that the model is consistent with the growth of large-scale structure data.”

    From Testing general relativity in cosmology (2019) · cites this paper as Park (2017)

    The Discussion (p. 13) confirms that the original and localized Deser–Woodard formulations predict the same, lower matter-growth rate relative to ΛCDM. It does not establish agreement with large-scale-structure growth data or a consensus that the model is consistent with those data; instead, it says the model deserves further consideration. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 74

  1. [18]S. Park and S. Dodelson, Phys. Rev. D 87 , 024003 (2013), arXiv:1209.0836. · arXiv
  2. [19]A. O. Barvinsky and Y. V. Gusev, Phys. Part. Nucl. 44 , 213 (2013), arXiv:1209.3062. · arXiv
  3. [20]E. Elizalde, E. O. Pozdeeva and S. Yu. Vernov, Class. Quant. Grav. 30 , 035002 (2013), arXiv:1209.5957. · arXiv
  4. [21]E. Elizalde, E. O. Pozdeeva, S. Yu. Vernov and Y.-l. Zhang, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2013) 034, arXiv:1302.4330. · arXiv
  5. [22]M. Maggiore, Phys. Rev. D 89 , 043008 (2014), arXiv:1307.3898. · arXiv
  6. [23]S. Deser and R. P. Woodard, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2013) 036, arXiv:1307.6639. · arXiv
  7. [24]S. Dodelson and S. Park, Phys. Rev. D 90 , 043535 (2014), arXiv:1310.4329. · arXiv
  8. [25]S. Foffa, M. Maggiore, and E. Mitsou, Phys. Lett. B 733 , 76 (2014), arXiv:1311.3421. · arXiv
  9. [26]S. Foffa, M. Maggiore, and E. Mitsou, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 29 , 1450116 (2014), arXiv:1311.3435. · arXiv
  10. [27]R. P. Woodard, Found. Phys. 44 , 213 (2014), arXiv:1401.0254. · arXiv
  11. [28]A. Kehagias and M. Maggiore, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2014) 029, arXiv:1401.8289. · arXiv
  12. [29]M. Maggiore and M. Mancarella, Phys. Rev. D 90 , 023005 (2014), arXiv: 1402.0448. · arXiv
  13. [30]Y. Dirian, S. Foffa, N. Khosravi, M. Kunz, and M. Maggiore, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 06 (2014) 033, arXiv:1403.6068. · arXiv
  14. [31]A. Conroy, T. Koivisto, A. Mazumdar, and A. Teimouri, Class. Quant. Grav. 32 , 015024 (2015), arXiv:1406.4998. · arXiv
  15. [32]A. Barreira, B. Li, W. A. Hellwing, C. M. Baugh, and S. Pascoli, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2014) 031, arXiv:1408.1084. · arXiv
  16. [33]Y. Dirian and E. Mitsou, JCAP 1410 (2014) 065, arXiv:1408.5058. · arXiv
  17. [34]Y. Dirian, S. Foffa, M. Kunz, M. Maggiore, and V. Pettorino, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04 (2015) 044, arXiv:1411.7692. · arXiv
  18. [35]X. Zhang, Y. Wu, S. Li, Y. Liu, B. Chen, Y. Chai, and S. Shu, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2016) 003, arXiv:1511.05238. · arXiv
  19. [36]G. Cusin, S. Foffa, M. Maggiore, and M. Mancarella, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 043006, arXiv:1512.06373. · arXiv
  20. [37]Y.-l. Zhang, K. Koyama, M. Sasaki, and G. Zhao, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2016) 039, arXiv:1601.03808. · arXiv
  21. [38]G. Cusin, S. Foffa, M. Maggiore, and M. Mancarella, Phys. Rev. D 93 , 083008 (2016), arXiv:1602.01078. · arXiv
  22. [39]Y. Dirian, S. Foffa, M. Kunz, M. Maggiore, and V. Pettorino, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2016) 068, arXiv:1602.03558. · arXiv
  23. [40]M. Maggiore, Phys. Rev. D 93 , 063008 (2016), arXiv:1603.01515. · arXiv
  24. [41]H. Nersisyan, Y. Akrami, L. Amendola, T. S. Koivisto, and J. Rubio, Phys. Rev. D 94 , 043531 (2016), arXiv:1606.04349. · arXiv
  25. [42]M. Maggiore, Fundam. Theor. Phys. 187 , 221 (2017), arXiv:1606.08784. · arXiv
  26. [43]S. Park and A. Shafieloo, Phys. Rev. D 95 , 064061 (2017), arXiv:1608.02541. · arXiv
  27. [44]Y. Wu, X. Zhang, M. Wu, N. Zhang, and B. Chen, Chin. Phys. Lett. 34 , 079801 (2017), arXiv:1611.07209. · arXiv
  28. [45]H. Nersisyan, A. F. Cid, and L. Amendola, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04 (2017) 046, arXiv:1701.00434. · arXiv
  29. [46]I. Dimitrijevic, B. Dragovich, J. Stankovic, A. S. Koshelev, and Z. Rakic, Springer Proc. Math. Stat. 191 , 35 (2016), arXiv:1701.02090. · arXiv
  30. [47]V. Vardanyan, Y. Akrami, L. Amendola, and A. Silvestri, arXiv:1702.08908. · arXiv
  31. [48]Y. Dirian, Phys. Rev. D 96 , 083513 (2017), arXiv:1704.04075. · arXiv
  32. [49]L. Amendola, N. Burzilla, and H. Nersisyan, Phys. Rev. D 96 , 084031 (2017), arXiv:1707.04628. · arXiv
  33. [52]S. Bahamonde, S. Capozziello, and K. F. Dialektopoulos, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 , 722 (2017), arXiv:1708.06310. · arXiv
  34. [53]S. Bahamonde, S. Capozziello, M. Faizal, and R. C. Nunes, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 , 628 (2017), arXiv:1709.02692. · arXiv
  35. [54]K. Bamba, D. Momeni, and M. A. Ajmi, arXiv:1711.10475. · arXiv
  36. [57]C. Wetterich, Gen. Rel. Grav. 30 , 159 (1998), gr-qc/9704052. · arXiv
  37. [58]A. O. Barvinsky, Phys. Lett. B 572 , 109 (2003), hep-th/0304229. · arXiv
  38. [59]H. W. Hamber and R. M. Williams, Phys. Rev. D 72 , 044026 (2005), hep-th/0507017. · arXiv
  39. [60]T. Biswas, A. Mazumdar, and W. Siegel, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2006) 009, hep-th/0508194. · arXiv
  40. [61]D. Lopez Nacir and F. D. Mazzitelli, Phys. Rev. D 75 , 024003 (2007), hep-th/0610031. · arXiv
  41. [62]P. G. Ferreira and A. L. Maroto, Phys. Rev. D 88 , 123502 (2013), arXiv:1310.1238. · arXiv
  42. [63]J. F. Donoghue and B. K. El-Menoufi, Phys. Rev. D 89 , 104062 (2014), arXiv:1402.3252. · arXiv
  43. [64]X. Calmet, D. Croon, and C. Fritz, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 , 605 (2015), arXiv:1505.04517. · arXiv
  44. [65]J. F. Donoghue and B. K. El-Menoufi, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2015) 044, arXiv:1507.06321. · arXiv
  45. [66]I. Oda, Phys. Rev. D 95 , 104020 (2017), arXiv:1704.05619. · arXiv
  46. [67]I. Oda, Phys. Rev. D 96 , 024027 (2017), arXiv:1706.01683. · arXiv
  47. [68]I. Oda, arXiv:1709.08189. · arXiv
  48. [69]M. Elias, F. D. Mazzitelli, and L.G. Trombetta, Phys. Rev. D 96 , 105007 (2017), arXiv:1709.10435. · arXiv
  49. [70]T. Bautista, A. Benevides, and A. Dabholkar, arXiv:1711.00135. · arXiv
  50. [71]S. O. Alexeyev, X. Calmet, and B. N. Latosh, Phys. Lett. B 776 , 111 (2018), arXiv:1711.06085. · arXiv
  51. [72]I. Oda, arXiv:1711.10476. · arXiv
  52. [73]N. C. Tsamis and R. P. Woodard, Phys. Rev. D 80 , 083512 (2009), arXiv:0904.2368. · arXiv
  53. [74]N. C. Tsamis and R. P. Woodard, Phys. Rev. D 82 , 063502 (2010), arXiv:1006.4834. · arXiv
  54. [75]N. C. Tsamis and R. P. Woodard, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2014) 008, arXiv:1405.4470. · arXiv
  55. [76]A. S. Koshelev, K. S. Kumar, and P. V. Moniz, Phys. Rev. D 96 , 103503 (2017), arXiv:1604.01440. · arXiv
  56. [77]N. C. Tsamis and R. P. Woodard, Phys. Rev. D 94 , 043508 (2016), arXiv:1606.06967. · arXiv
  57. [78]M. E. Soussa and R. P. Woodard, Class. Quant. Grav. 20 , 2737 (2003), astro-ph/0302030. · arXiv
  58. [79]C. Deffayet, G. Esposito-Farese, and R. P. Woodard, Phys. Rev. D 84 , 124054 (2011), arXiv:1106.4984. · arXiv
  59. [80]R. P. Woodard, Can. J. Phys. 93 , 242 (2015), arXiv:1403.6763. · arXiv
  60. [81]C. Deffayet, G. Esposito-Farese, and R. P. Woodard, Phys. Rev. D 90 , 064038 (2014), Addendum: Phys.Rev. D 90 , 089901 (2014), arXiv:1405.0393 · arXiv
  61. [82]M. Kim, M.H. Rahat, M. Sayeb, L. Tan, R. P. Woodard, and B. Xu, Phys. Rev. D 94 , 104009 (2016), arXiv:1608.07858. · arXiv
  62. [83]E. Bertschinger, Astrophys. J. 648 , 797 (2006), astro-ph/0604485. · arXiv
  63. [84]W. Hu and I. Sawicki, Phys. Rev. D 76 , 104043 (2007), arXiv:0708.1190. · arXiv
  64. [85]T. Baker, P. G. Ferreira, and C. Skordis, Phys. Rev. D 87 , 024015 (2013), arXiv:1209.2117. · arXiv
  65. [86]D. Huterer, D. Kirkby, R. Bean, A. Connolly, K. Dawson, et al., Astropart. Phys. 63 , 23 (2015), arXiv:1309.5385. · arXiv
  66. [87]J. Dunkley et al. [WMAP Collaboration], Astrophys. J. Suppl. 180 , 306 (2009), arXiv:0803.0586. E. Komatsu et al. · arXiv
  67. [WMAP Collaboration], Astrophys. J. Suppl. 180 , 330 (2009), arXiv:0803.0547. · arXiv
  68. [88]Planck Collaboration, Astron. Astrophys. 594 , A13 (2015), arXiv:1502.01589. · arXiv
  69. [89]C.-P. Ma and E. Bertschinger, Astrophys. J. 455 , 7 (1995), arXiv:astro-ph/9506072. · arXiv
  70. [90]S. Dodelson, Modern Cosmology (Academic Press, San Diego, 2003).
  71. [91]L. Amendola and S. Tsujikawa, Dark Energy: Theory and Observations (Cambridge University Press, 2010).
  72. [92]F. Simpson, C. Heymans, D. Parkinson, C. Blake, M. Kilbinger, et al., Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 429 , 2249 (2013), arXiv:1212.3339. · arXiv
  73. [93]L. Amendola, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 , 181102 (2004), hep-th/0409224. · arXiv
  74. [95]D. Blas, J. Lesgourgues, and T. Tram, JCAP 07 (2011) 034, arXiv:1104.2933. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Park, S.
Affiliations
FZU - Institute of Physics of the Czech Academy of Sciences (CZ)
Corresponding author
Park, Sohyun
ORCID
Park, Sohyun
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2017
Volume
97
Issue
4
ISSN
2470-0010 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1711.08759
arXiv
1711.08759
OpenAlex
W2768735838
Cited by
27
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • Physical review. D/Physical review. D. (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007 - 2013)
  • H2020 European Research Council (617656)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
nonlocal gravity, structure growth, matter perturbations, linear perturbations, effective gravitational constant, modified gravity, structure formation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review