PreprintCited by 7,408Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsVisual Attention and Saliency DetectionAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques

Cascade R-CNN: Delving into High Quality Object Detection

Open access
Cai, Zhaowei, Vasconcelos, Nuno·2017·arXiv

Abstract

In object detection, an intersection over union (IoU) threshold is required to define positives and negatives. An object detector, trained with low IoU threshold, e.g. 0.5, usually produces noisy detections. However, detection performance tends to degrade with increasing the IoU thresholds. Two main factors are responsible for this: 1) overfitting during training, due to exponentially vanishing positive samples, and 2) inference-time mismatch between the IoUs for which the detector is optimal and those of the input hypotheses. A multi-stage object detection architecture, the Cascade R-CNN, is proposed to address these problems. It consists of a sequence of detectors trained with increasing IoU thresholds, to be sequentially more selective against close false positives. The detectors are trained stage by stage, leveraging the observation that the output of a detector is a good distribution for training the next higher quality detector. The resampling of progressively improved hypotheses guarantees that all detectors have a positive set of examples of equivalent size, reducing the overfitting problem. The same cascade procedure is applied at inference, enabling a closer match between the hypotheses and the detector quality of each stage. A simple implementation of the Cascade R-CNN is shown to surpass all single-model object detectors on the challenging COCO dataset. Experiments also show that the Cascade R-CNN is widely applicable across detector architectures, achieving consistent gains independently of the baseline detector strength. The code will be made available at https://github.com/zhaoweicai/cascade-rcnn.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1712.00726

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One recent bounding box refinement method is to iteratively feed the detection results into a BB regressor until the prediction converges to a correct location and size.

    “One recent method is to iteratively feed the detection results into a BB regressor until the prediction converges to a correct location and size [187-189].”

    From Object Detection in 20 Years: A Survey (2023) · cites this paper as [187]

    Section 3.1 (page not available) describes applying a bounding-box regressor iteratively to refine a box. It does not say the prediction converges to a correct location and size; instead, it says further iterations can degrade boxes and usually offer no benefit beyond two applications. Section 5.3 likewise reports that localization performance drops after repeated applications. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Some researchers claimed that bounding box refinement does not guarantee the monotonicity of localization accuracy and may degenerate localization if applied multiple times.

    “However, some researchers also claimed that this method does not guarantee the monotonicity of localization accuracy [187] and may degenerate the localization if the refinement is applied for multiple times.”

    From Object Detection in 20 Years: A Survey (2023) · cites this paper as [187]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Z. Cai, Q. Fan, R. S. Feris, and N. Vasconcelos. A unified multi-scale deep convolutional neural network for fast object detection. In ECCV, pages 354-370, 2016. 2, 3
  2. X. Cao, Y. Wei, F. Wen, and J. Sun. Face alignment by ex- plicit shape regression. In CVPR, pages 2887-2894, 2012.
  3. J. Dai, K. He, and J. Sun. Instance-aware semantic segmenta- tion via multi-task network cascades. In CVPR, pages 3150- 3158, 2016. 3
  4. J. Dai, Y. Li, K. He, and J. Sun. R-FCN: object detection via region-based fully convolutional networks. In NIPS, pages 379-387, 2016. 2, 3, 5, 8
  5. J. Dai, H. Qi, Y. Xiong, Y. Li, G. Zhang, H. Hu, and Y. Wei. Deformable convolutional networks. In ICCV, 2017. 8
  6. P. Dollár, P. Welinder, and P. Perona. Cascaded pose regres- sion. In CVPR, pages 1078-1085, 2010. 5
  7. C. Elkan. The foundations of cost-sensitive learning. In IJ- CAI, pages 973-978, 2001. 2
  8. P. F. Felzenszwalb, R. B. Girshick, D. A. McAllester, and D. Ramanan. Object detection with discriminatively trained part-based models. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 32(9):1627-1645, 2010. 2, 3
  9. S. Gidaris and N. Komodakis. Object detection via a multi- region and semantic segmentation-aware CNN model. In ICCV, pages 1134-1142, 2015. 3
  10. S. Gidaris and N. Komodakis. Attend refine repeat: Active box proposal generation via in-out localization. In BMVC, 2016. 3, 8
  11. R. B. Girshick. Fast R-CNN. In ICCV, pages 1440-1448, 2015. 1, 2, 3, 5
  12. R. B. Girshick, J. Donahue, T. Darrell, and J. Malik. Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. In CVPR, pages 580-587, 2014. 1, 2, 3
  13. S. Han, J. Pool, J. Tran, and W. J. Dally. Learning both weights and connections for efficient neural network. In NIPS, pages 1135-1143, 2015. 6
  14. K. He, G. Gkioxari, P. Dollár, and R. Girshick. Mask r-cnn. In ICCV, 2017. 3, 6, 8
  15. K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun. Spatial pyramid pooling in deep convolutional networks for visual recognition. In ECCV, pages 346-361, 2014. 2
  16. J. Huang, V. Rathod, C. Sun, M. Zhu, A. Korattikara, A. Fathi, I. Fischer, Z. Wojna, Y. Song, S. Guadarrama, and K. Murphy. Speed/accuracy trade-offs for modern convolu- tional object detectors. CoRR, abs/1611.10012, 2016. 8 · arXiv
  17. Y. Jia, E. Shelhamer, J. Donahue, S. Karayev, J. Long, R. B. Girshick, S. Guadarrama, and T. Darrell. Caffe: Convolu- tional architecture for fast feature embedding. In MM, pages 675-678, 2014. 5
  18. H. Li, Z. Lin, X. Shen, J. Brandt, and G. Hua. A convolu- tional neural network cascade for face detection. In CVPR, pages 5325-5334, 2015. 3
  19. T. Lin, M. Maire, S. J. Belongie, J. Hays, P. Perona, D. Ra- manan, P. Dollár, and C. L. Zitnick. Microsoft COCO: com- mon objects in context. In ECCV, pages 740-755, 2014. 2, 5
  20. T.-Y. Lin, P. Goyal, R. Girshick, K. He, and P. Dollár. Focal loss for dense object detection. In ICCV, 2017. 3, 8
  21. W. Liu, D. Anguelov, D. Erhan, C. Szegedy, S. E. Reed, C. Fu, and A. C. Berg. SSD: single shot multibox detector. In ECCV, pages 21-37, 2016. 3, 8
  22. H. Masnadi-Shirazi and N. Vasconcelos. Cost-sensitive boosting. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 33(2):294-309, 2011.
  23. W. Ouyang, K. Wang, X. Zhu, and X. Wang. Learning chained deep features and classifiers for cascade in object detection. CoRR, abs/1702.07054, 2017. 3 · arXiv
  24. J. Redmon, S. K. Divvala, R. B. Girshick, and A. Farhadi. You only look once: Unified, real-time object detection. In CVPR, pages 779-788, 2016. 3, 8
  25. S. Ren, K. He, R. B. Girshick, and J. Sun. Faster R-CNN: towards real-time object detection with region proposal net- works. In NIPS, pages 91-99, 2015. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8
  26. A. Shrivastava, A. Gupta, and R. B. Girshick. Training region-based object detectors with online hard example min- ing. In CVPR, pages 761-769, 2016. 6
  27. K. Simonyan and A. Zisserman. Very deep convolu- tional networks for large-scale image recognition. CoRR, abs/1409.1556, 2014. 5 · arXiv
  28. J. R. R. Uijlings, K. E. A. van de Sande, T. Gevers, and A. W. M. Smeulders. Selective search for object recognition. International Journal of Computer Vision, 104(2):154-171, 2013. 4
  29. P. A. Viola and M. J. Jones. Robust real-time face detec- tion. International Journal of Computer Vision, 57(2):137- 154, 2004. 2, 3
  30. J. Yan, Z. Lei, D. Yi, and S. Li. Learn to combine multiple hypotheses for accurate face alignment. In ICCV Workshops, pages 392-396, 2013. 5
  31. B. Yang, J. Yan, Z. Lei, and S. Z. Li. CRAFT objects from images. In CVPR, pages 6043-6051, 2016. 3
  32. S. Zagoruyko, A. Lerer, T. Lin, P. O. Pinheiro, S. Gross, S. Chintala, and P. Dollár. A multipath network for object detection. In BMVC, 2016. 4

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cai, Z., & Vasconcelos, N.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2017
Pages
6154-6162
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2964241181
Cited by
7,408
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 663 · 2025: 1244 · 2024: 1338 · 2023: 1254 · 2022: 1084 · 2021: 960 · 2020: 566 · 2019: 275 · 2018: 24
FWCI
135.40
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
Keywords
Cascade R-CNN, positive sample selection, overfitting, false positive reduction, COCO benchmark

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review