CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 29Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Testing gravity on cosmological scales with cosmic shear, cosmic microwave background anisotropies, and redshift-space distortions

Open access
Ferté, Agnès, Kirk, Donnacha, Liddle, Andrew R., Zuntz, Joe·2017·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1712.01846arXiv 1712.01846
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

We use a range of cosmological data to constrain phenomenological modifications to general relativity on cosmological scales, through modifications to the Poisson and lensing equations. We include cosmic microwave background anisotropy measurements from the Planck satellite, cosmic shear from CFHTLenS and DES-SV, and redshift-space distortions from BOSS data release 12 and the 6dF galaxy survey. We find no evidence of departures from general relativity, with the modified gravity parameters constrained to $Σ_0 = 0.05^{+0.05}_{-0.07}$ and $μ_0 = -0.10^{+0.20}_{-0.16}$, where $Σ_0$ and $μ_0$ refer to deviations from general relativity today and are defined to be zero in general relativity. We also forecast the sensitivity to those parameters of the full five-year Dark Energy Survey and of an experiment like the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope, showing a substantial expected improvement in the constraint on $Σ_0$.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1712.01846

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ferté et al. (2017) found that ignoring intrinsic alignments shifts constraints toward lower values of the modified gravity parameter and that including intrinsic alignments leads to higher values.

    “However, ignoring intrinsic alignments shifts the constraints toward lower values of . They found thus a degeneracy between the amplitude of IA and the MG parameter leading to higher values of when IA is included.”

    From Testing general relativity in cosmology (2019) · cites this paper as Ferté et al. (2017)

    In “Impact of systematics” (p. 4), the paper says that ignoring intrinsic alignments in the CFHTLenS analysis favors a higher, not lower, value of Σ₀. The statement in Section IV (p. 7) that a positive intrinsic-alignment amplitude leads to higher Σ₀ concerns the DES-SV analysis; it does not establish the claimed direction of the shift when alignments are ignored. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • Ferté et al. (2017) found that ignoring calibration bias or photometric redshift bias significantly affects constraints on modified gravity parameters.

    “They found that ignoring the effect of calibration bias or photometric redshift bias does affect significantly the constraints on MG parameters.”

    From Testing general relativity in cosmology (2019) · cites this paper as Ferté et al. (2017)

    The ‘Impact of systematics’ section (p. 4) says the opposite: ignoring shear calibration bias or photometric redshift bias does not significantly affect constraints on the modified-gravity parameters Σ₀ and µ₀. It identifies intrinsic alignment, rather than either bias, as shifting the constraints. (LLM, conf=0.95)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • Ferté et al. (2017) found that including intrinsic alignments increases uncertainties on modified gravity parameters in DES 5-year forecasts.

    “including IA increases the uncertainties on MG parameters as shown in their figure 11”

    From Testing general relativity in cosmology (2019) · cites this paper as Ferté et al. (2017)

    In “B. Intrinsic Alignment” (p. 8), the paper reports that accounting for intrinsic alignments yields wider constraints on modified-gravity parameters in a DES Y5-like forecast. The finding is supported, but the citing sentence points to Figure 11; the paper identifies Figure 10 as the relevant figure. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • Ferté et al. (2017) derived constraints using CMB Planck, RSD BOSS DR12, and CFHTLenS cosmic shear on Sigma_0 and mu_0 at 68% confidence level, which are among the tightest current constraints on MG parameters.

    “The constraints found using CMB Planck (TT lowP CMB Lensing), RSD data (BOSS DR12), and CFHTLenS cosmic shear are: and (68 % confidence level) which are among tightest current constraints on MG parameters.”

    From Testing general relativity in cosmology (2019) · cites this paper as Ferté et al. (2017)

  • Ferté et al. (2017) found that GR is consistent with these tightened bounds, although there is still room for deviations, particularly for the mu parameter.

    “GR is consistent with these tightened bounds, although there is still room for deviations from it, in particular, for the parameter.”

    From Testing general relativity in cosmology (2019) · cites this paper as Ferté et al. (2017)

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. [5]Planck Collaboration, P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, M. Arnaud, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, A. J. Banday, R. B. Barreiro, N. Bartolo, et al., 'Planck 2015 results. XIV. Dark energy and modified gravity,' ArXiv e-prints, Feb. 2015.
  2. [6]E.-M. Mueller, W. Percival, E. Linder, S. Alam, G.-B. Zhao, A. G. S´ anchez, F. Beutler, and J. Brinkmann, 'The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: constraining modified gravity,' MNRAS, vol. 475, pp. 2122-2131, Apr 2018.
  3. [7]F. Simpson, C. Heymans, D. Parkinson, C. Blake, M. Kilbinger, J. Benjamin, T. Erben, H. Hildebrandt, H. Hoekstra, T. D. Kitching, Y. Mellier, L. Miller, L. Van Waerbeke, J. Coupon, L. Fu, J. Harnois-D´ eraps, M. J. Hudson, K. Kuijken, B. Rowe, T. Schrabback, E. Semboloni, S. Vafaei, and M. Velander, 'CFHTLenS: testing the laws of gravity with tomographic weak lensing and redshiftspace distortions,' MNRAS, vol. 429, pp. 2249-2263, Mar. 2013.
  4. [8]S. Joudaki, A. Mead, C. Blake, A. Choi, J. de Jong, T. Erben, I. Fenech Conti, R. Herbonnet, C. Heymans, H. Hildebrandt, H. Hoekstra, B. Joachimi, D. Klaes, F. K¨ ohlinger, K. Kuijken, J. McFarland, L. Miller, P. Schneider, and M. Viola, 'KiDS-450: testing exten- sions to the standard cosmological model,' MNRAS, vol. 471, pp. 1259-1279, Oct 2017.
  5. [9]S. Joudaki, C. Blake, A. Johnson, A. Amon, M. Asgari, A. Choi, T. Erben, K. Glazebrook, J. Harnois-D´ eraps, C. Heymans, H. Hildebrandt, H. Hoekstra, D. Klaes, K. Kuijken, C. Lidman, A. Mead, L. Miller, D. Parkinson, G. B. Poole, P. Schneider, M. Viola, and C. Wolf, 'KiDS-450 + 2dFLenS: Cosmological parameter constraints from weak gravitational lensing tomography and overlapping redshift-space galaxy clustering,' MNRAS, vol. 474, pp. 4894-4924, Mar. 2018.
  6. [10]R. Bean and M. Tangmatitham, 'Current constraints on the cosmic growth history,' Phys. Rev. D, vol. 81, p. 083534, Apr 2010.
  7. [11]J. N. Dossett, M. Ishak, D. Parkinson, and T. M. Davis, 'Constraints and tensions in testing general relativity from Planck and CFHTLenS data including intrinsic alignment systematics,' Phys. Rev. D, vol. 92, p. 023003, July 2015.
  8. [12]G. Gubitosi, F. Piazza, and F. Vernizzi, 'The effective field theory of dark energy,' Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, vol. 2013, no. 02, p. 032, 2013.
  9. [13]L. Pogosian and A. Silvestri, 'What can cosmology tell us about gravity? Constraining Horndeski gravity with Σ and µ ,' Phys. Rev. D, vol. 94, p. 104014, Nov. 2016.
  10. [14]S. Peirone, K. Koyama, L. Pogosian, M. Raveri, and A. Silvestri, 'Large-scale structure phenomenology of viable Horndeski theories,' Phys. Rev. D, vol. 97, p. 043519, Feb. 2018.
  11. [15]G.-B. Zhao, T. Giannantonio, L. Pogosian, A. Silvestri, D. J. Bacon, K. Koyama, R. C. Nichol, and Y.-S. Song, 'Probing modifications of general relativity using current cosmological observations,' Phys. Rev. D, vol. 81, p. 103510, May 2010.
  12. [16]J. Zuntz, M. Paterno, E. Jennings, D. Rudd, A. Manzotti, S. Dodelson, S. Bridle, S. Sehrish, and J. Kowalkowski, 'CosmoSIS: Modular cosmological parameter estimation,' Astronomy and Computing, vol. 12, pp. 45-59, Sept. 2015.
  13. [17]G.-B. Zhao, L. Pogosian, A. Silvestri, and J. Zylberberg, 'Searching for modified growth patterns with tomographic surveys,' Phys. Rev. D, vol. 79, p. 083513, Apr. 2009.
  14. [18]A. Hojjati, L. Pogosian, and G.-B. Zhao, 'Testing gravity with CAMB and CosmoMC,' J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys., vol. 8, p. 005, Aug. 2011.
  15. [19]F. Feroz, M. P. Hobson, and M. Bridges, 'MULTINEST: an efficient and robust Bayesian inference tool for cosmology and particle physics,' MNRAS, vol. 398, pp. 16011614, Oct. 2009.
  16. [20]F. Feroz and M. P. Hobson, 'Multimodal nested sampling: an efficient and robust alternative to Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods for astronomical data analyses,' MNRAS, vol. 384, pp. 449-463, Feb. 2008.
  17. [21]F. Feroz, M. P. Hobson, E. Cameron, and A. N. Pettitt, 'Importance Nested Sampling and the MultiNest Algorithm,' ArXiv e-prints, June 2013.
  18. [22]C. Heymans, E. Grocutt, A. Heavens, M. Kilbinger, T. D. Kitching, F. Simpson, J. Benjamin, T. Erben, H. Hildebrandt, H. Hoekstra, Y. Mellier, L. Miller, L. Van Waerbeke, M. L. Brown, J. Coupon, L. Fu, J. Harnois-D´ eraps, M. J. Hudson, K. Kuijken, B. Rowe, T. Schrabback, E. Semboloni, S. Vafaei, and M. Velander, 'CFHTLenS tomographic weak lensing cosmological parameter constraints: Mitigating the impact of intrinsic galaxy alignments,' MNRAS, vol. 432, pp. 2433-2453, July 2013.
  19. [23]M. R. Becker, M. A. Troxel, N. MacCrann, E. Krause, T. F. Eifler, O. Friedrich, A. Nicola, A. Refregier, A. Amara, D. Bacon, G. M. Bernstein, C. Bonnett, S. L. Bridle, M. T. Busha, C. Chang, S. Dodelson, B. Erickson, A. E. Evrard, J. Frieman, E. Gaztanaga, D. Gruen, W. Hartley, B. Jain, M. Jarvis, T. Kacprzak, D. Kirk, A. Kravtsov, B. Leistedt, H. V. Peiris, E. S. Rykoff, C. Sabiu, C. S´ anchez, H. Seo, E. Sheldon, R. H. Wechsler, J. Zuntz, T. Abbott, F. B. Abdalla, S. Allam, R. Armstrong, M. Banerji, A. H. Bauer, A. Benoit-L´ evy, E. Bertin, D. Brooks, E. Buckley-Geer, D. L. Burke, D. Capozzi, A. Carnero Rosell, M. Carrasco Kind, J. Carretero, F. J. Castander, M. Crocce, C. E. Cunha, C. B. D'Andrea, L. N. da Costa, D. L. DePoy, S. Desai, H. T. Diehl, J. P. Dietrich, P. Doel, A. Fausti Neto, E. Fernandez, D. A. Finley, B. Flaugher, P. Fosalba, D. W. Gerdes, R. A. Gruendl, G. Gutierrez, K. Honscheid, D. J. James, K. Kuehn, N. Kuropatkin, O. Lahav, T. S. Li, M. Lima, M. A. G. Maia, M. March, P. Martini, P. Melchior, C. J. Miller, R. Miquel, J. J. Mohr, R. C. Nichol, B. Nord, R. Ogando, A. A. Plazas, K. Reil, A. K. Romer, A. Roodman, M. Sako, E. Sanchez, V. Scarpine, M. Schubnell, I. Sevilla-Noarbe, R. C. Smith, M. Soares-Santos, F. Sobreira, E. Suchyta, M. E. C. Swanson, G. Tarle, J. Thaler, D. Thomas, V. Vikram, A. R. Walker, and Dark Energy Survey Collaboration, 'Cosmic shear measurements with Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data,' Phys. Rev. D, vol. 94, p. 022002, July 2016.
  20. [24]H. Hildebrandt, M. Viola, C. Heymans, S. Joudaki, K. Kuijken, C. Blake, T. Erben, B. Joachimi, D. Klaes, L. Miller, C. B. Morrison, R. Nakajima, G. Verdoes Kleijn, A. Amon, A. Choi, G. Covone, J. T. A. de Jong, A. Dvornik, I. Fenech Conti, A. Grado, J. HarnoisD´ eraps, R. Herbonnet, H. Hoekstra, F. K¨ ohlinger, J. McFarland, A. Mead, J. Merten, N. Napolitano, J. A. Peacock, M. Radovich, P. Schneider, P. Simon, E. A. Valentijn, J. L. van den Busch, E. van Uitert, and L. Van Waerbeke, 'KiDS-450: cosmological parameter constraints from tomographic weak gravitational lensing,' MNRAS, vol. 465, pp. 1454-1498, Feb. 2017.
  21. [25]The Dark Energy Survey Collaboration, 'The Dark Energy Survey,' ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints, Oct. 2005.
  22. [26]R. Mandelbaum, H. Miyatake, T. Hamana, M. Oguri, M. Simet, R. Armstrong, J. Bosch, R. Murata, F. Lanusse, A. Leauthaud, J. Coupon, S. More, M. Takada, S. Miyazaki, J. S. Speagle, M. Shirasaki, C. Sif´ on, S. Huang, A. J. Nishizawa, E. Medezinski, Y. Okura, N. Okabe, N. Czakon, R. Takahashi, W. R. Coulton, C. Hikage, Y. Komiyama, R. H. Lupton, M. A. Strauss, M. Tanaka, and Y. Utsumi, 'The firstyear shear catalog of the Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategic Program Survey,' Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, vol. 70, p. S25, Jan 2018.
  23. [27]R. Laureijs, J. Amiaux, S. Arduini, J. . Augu` eres, J. Brinchmann, R. Cole, M. Cropper, C. Dabin, L. Duvet, A. Ealet, et al., 'Euclid Definition Study Report,' ArXiv e-prints, Oct. 2011.
  24. [28]LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration, 'Large Synoptic Survey Telescope: Dark Energy Science Collaboration,' ArXiv e-prints, Nov. 2012.
  25. [29]J. Green, P. Schechter, C. Baltay, R. Bean, D. Bennett, R. Brown, C. Conselice, M. Donahue, X. Fan, B. S. Gaudi, C. Hirata, J. Kalirai, T. Lauer, B. Nichol, N. Padmanabhan, S. Perlmutter, B. Rauscher, J. Rhodes, T. Roellig, D. Stern, T. Sumi, A. Tanner, Y. Wang, D. Weinberg, E. Wright, N. Gehrels, R. Sambruna, W. Traub, J. Anderson, K. Cook, P. Garnavich, L. Hillenbrand, Z. Ivezic, E. Kerins, J. Lunine, P. McDonald, M. Penny, M. Phillips, G. Rieke, A. Riess, R. van der Marel, R. K. Barry, E. Cheng, D. Content, R. Cutri, R. Goullioud, K. Grady, G. Helou, C. Jackson, J. Kruk, M. Melton, C. Peddie, N. Rioux, and M. Seiffert, 'WideField InfraRed Survey Telescope (WFIRST) Final Report,' ArXiv e-prints, Aug. 2012.
  26. [30]T. Abbott, F. B. Abdalla, S. Allam, A. Amara, J. Annis, R. Armstrong, D. Bacon, M. Banerji, A. H. Bauer, E. Baxter, M. R. Becker, A. Benoit-L´ evy, R. A. Bernstein, G. M. Bernstein, E. Bertin, J. Blazek, C. Bonnett, S. L. Bridle, D. Brooks, C. Bruderer, E. Buckley-Geer, D. L. Burke, M. T. Busha, D. Capozzi, A. Carnero Rosell, M. Carrasco Kind, J. Carretero, F. J. Castander, C. Chang, J. Clampitt, M. Crocce, C. E. Cunha, C. B. D'Andrea, L. N. da Costa, R. Das, D. L. DePoy, S. Desai, H. T. Diehl, J. P. Dietrich, S. Dodelson, P. Doel, A. Drlica-Wagner, G. Efstathiou, T. F. Eifler, B. Erickson, J. Estrada, A. E. Evrard, A. Fausti Neto, E. Fernandez, D. A. Finley, B. Flaugher, P. Fosalba, O. Friedrich, J. Frieman, C. Gangkofner, J. Garcia-Bellido, E. Gaztanaga, D. W. Gerdes, D. Gruen, R. A. Gruendl, G. Gutierrez, W. Hartley, M. Hirsch, K. Honscheid, E. M. Huff, B. Jain, D. J. James, M. Jarvis, T. Kacprzak, S. Kent, D. Kirk, E. Krause, A. Kravtsov, K. Kuehn, N. Kuropatkin, J. Kwan, O. Lahav, B. Leistedt, T. S. Li, M. Lima, H. Lin, N. MacCrann, M. March, J. L. Marshall, P. Martini, R. G. McMahon, P. Melchior, C. J. Miller, R. Miquel, J. J. Mohr, E. Neilsen, R. C. Nichol, A. Nicola, B. Nord, R. Ogando, A. Palmese, H. V. Peiris, A. A. Plazas, A. Refregier, N. Roe, A. K. Romer, A. Roodman, B. Rowe, E. S. Rykoff, C. Sabiu, I. Sadeh, M. Sako, S. Samuroff, E. Sanchez, C. S´ anchez, H. Seo, I. Sevilla-Noarbe, E. Sheldon, R. C. Smith, M. SoaresSantos, F. Sobreira, E. Suchyta, M. E. C. Swanson, G. Tarle, J. Thaler, D. Thomas, M. A. Troxel, V. Vikram, A. R. Walker, R. H. Wechsler, J. Weller, Y. Zhang, and J. Zuntz, 'Cosmology from cosmic shear with dark energy survey science verification data,' Phys. Rev. D, vol. 94, p. 022001, Jul 2016.
  27. [31]P. Catelan, M. Kamionkowski, and R. D. Blandford, 'Intrinsic and extrinsic galaxy alignment,' MNRAS, vol. 320, pp. L7-L13, Jan. 2001.
  28. [32]B. Joachimi, R. Mandelbaum, F. B. Abdalla, and S. L. Bridle, 'Constraints on intrinsic alignment contamination of weak lensing surveys using the MegaZ-LRG sample,' Astron. & Astrophys., vol. 527, p. A26, Mar. 2011.
  29. [33]D. Kirk, A. Rassat, O. Host, and S. Bridle, 'The cosmological impact of intrinsic alignment model choice for cosmic shear,' MNRAS, vol. 424, pp. 1647-1657, Aug. 2012.
  30. [34]E. Krause, T. Eifler, and J. Blazek, 'The impact of intrinsic alignment on current and future cosmic shear surveys,' Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 456, no. 1, pp. 207-222, 2016.
  31. [35]S. Bridle and L. King, 'Dark energy constraints from cosmic shear power spectra: impact of intrinsic alignments on photometric redshift requirements,' New Journal of Physics, vol. 9, p. 444, Dec. 2007.
  32. [36]C. M. Hirata and U. c. v. Seljak, 'Intrinsic alignmentlensing interference as a contaminant of cosmic shear,' Phys. Rev. D, vol. 70, p. 063526, Sep 2004.
  33. [37]R. E. Smith, J. A. Peacock, A. Jenkins, S. D. M. White, C. S. Frenk, F. R. Pearce, P. A. Thomas, G. Efstathiou, and H. M. P. Couchman, 'Stable clustering, the halo model and non-linear cosmological power spectra,' MNRAS, vol. 341, pp. 1311-1332, June 2003.
  34. [38]S. Casas, M. Kunz, M. Martinelli, and V. Pettorino, 'Linear and non-linear Modified Gravity forecasts with future surveys,' Physics of the Dark Universe, vol. 18, pp. 73104, Dec 2017.
  35. [39]N. Kaiser, 'Clustering in real space and in redshift space,' Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 227, pp. 1-21, 07 1987.
  36. [40]H. Gil-Mar´ ın, W. J. Percival, J. R. Brownstein, C.-H. Chuang, J. N. Grieb, S. Ho, F.-S. Kitaura, C. Maraston, F. Prada, S. Rodr´ ıguez-Torres, A. J. Ross, L. Samushia, D. J. Schlegel, D. Thomas, J. L. Tinker, and G.-B. Zhao, 'The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: RSD measurement from the LOS-dependent power spectrum of DR12 BOSS galaxies,' MNRAS, vol. 460, pp. 4188-4209, Aug. 2016.
  37. [41]C. Blake, S. Brough, M. Colless, C. Contreras, W. Couch, S. Croom, T. Davis, M. J. Drinkwater, K. Forster, D. Gilbank, M. Gladders, K. Glazebrook, B. Jelliffe, R. J. Jurek, I.-H. Li, B. Madore, D. C. Martin, K. Pimbblet, G. B. Poole, M. Pracy, R. Sharp, E. Wisnioski, D. Woods, T. K. Wyder, and H. K. C. Yee, 'The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: the growth rate of cosmic structure since redshift z=0.9,' MNRAS, vol. 415, pp. 2876-2891, Aug. 2011.
  38. [42]E. V. Linder and A. Jenkins, 'Cosmic structure growth and dark energy,' MNRAS, vol. 346, pp. 573-583, Dec. 2003.
  39. [43]S. Alam, M. Ata, S. Bailey, F. Beutler, D. Bizyaev, J. A. Blazek, A. S. Bolton, J. R. Brownstein, A. Burden, C.-H. Chuang, J. Comparat, A. J. Cuesta, K. S. Dawson, D. J. Eisenstein, S. Escoffier, H. Gil-Mar´ ın, J. N. Grieb, N. Hand, S. Ho, K. Kinemuchi, D. Kirkby, F. Kitaura, E. Malanushenko, V. Malanushenko, C. Maraston, C. K. McBride, R. C. Nichol, M. D. Olmstead, D. Oravetz, N. Padmanabhan, N. Palanque-Delabrouille, K. Pan, M. Pellejero-Ibanez, W. J. Percival, P. Petitjean, F. Prada, A. M. Price-Whelan, B. A. Reid, S. A. Rodr´ ıguez-Torres, N. A. Roe, A. J. Ross, N. P. Ross, G. Rossi, J. A. Rubi˜ no-Mart´ ın, S. Saito, S. SalazarAlbornoz, L. Samushia, A. G. S´ anchez, S. Satpathy, D. J. Schlegel, D. P. Schneider, C. G. Sc´ occola, H.-J. Seo, E. S. Sheldon, A. Simmons, A. Slosar, M. A. Strauss, M. E. C. Swanson, D. Thomas, J. L. Tinker, R. Tojeiro, M. V. Maga˜ na, J. A. Vazquez, L. Verde, D. A. Wake, Y. Wang, D. H. Weinberg, M. White, W. M. WoodVasey, C. Y` eche, I. Zehavi, Z. Zhai, and G.-B. Zhao, 'The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: cosmological analysis of the DR12 galaxy sample,' MNRAS, vol. 470, pp. 2617-2652, Sep 2017.
  40. [44]F. Beutler, C. Blake, M. Colless, D. H. Jones, L. StaveleySmith, G. B. Poole, L. Campbell, Q. Parker, W. Saunders, and F. Watson, 'The 6df galaxy survey: z ≈ 0 measurements of the growth rate and σ 8 ,' Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 423, no. 4, p. 3430, 2012.
  41. M. Arnaud, F. Arroja, M. Ashdown, et al., 'Planck 2015 results. I. Overview of products and scientific results,' Astron. & Astrophys., vol. 594, p. A1, Sept. 2016.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ferté, A., Kirk, D., Liddle, A. R., & Zuntz, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
  • Perimeter Institute (CA)
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2017
Volume
99
Issue
8
ISSN
2470-0010 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1712.01846
arXiv
1712.01846
OpenAlex
W2773669387
Cited by
29
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3
FWCI
2.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • Physical review. D/Physical review. D. (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Government of Canada
  • Industry Canada
  • Institut Périmètre de physique théorique
  • Science and Technology Facilities Council (ST/K006606/1)
  • Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
  • H2020 European Research Council (FP7/291329)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Keywords
modified gravity, tests of general relativity, cosmic shear, cosmic microwave background anisotropies, redshift-space distortions, Poisson equation, gravitational lensing, cosmological constraints, LSST, Dark Energy Survey, forecast sensitivity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review