The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Least-Squares Temporal Difference Learning for the Linear Quadratic Regulator
Open accessAbstract
Reinforcement learning (RL) has been successfully used to solve many continuous control tasks. Despite its impressive results however, fundamental questions regarding the sample complexity of RL on continuous problems remain open. We study the performance of RL in this setting by considering the behavior of the Least-Squares Temporal Difference (LSTD) estimator on the classic Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) problem from optimal control. We give the first finite-time analysis of the number of samples needed to estimate the value function for a fixed static state-feedback policy to within $\varepsilon$-relative error. In the process of deriving our result, we give a general characterization for when the minimum eigenvalue of the empirical covariance matrix formed along the sample path of a fast-mixing stochastic process concentrates above zero, extending a result by Koltchinskii and Mendelson in the independent covariates setting. Finally, we provide experimental evidence indicating that our analysis correctly captures the qualitative behavior of LSTD on several LQR instances.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A recent work [117] has shown that Meta-RL can generalise in environments totally different from those used during training.
“A recent work [117] has shown the great ability of this approach to generalise in environments totally different from those used during the training.”
From Crossing the Reality Gap: A Survey on Sim-to-Real Transferability of Robot Controllers in Reinforcement Learning (2021) · cites this paper as [117]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Salvato, E., Fenu, G., Medvet, E., & Pellegrino, F. A. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3126658 · Cited by 200
Metadata
- Authors
- Tu, S., & Recht, B.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2017
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1712.08642
- OpenAlex
- W2776811469
- Cited by
- 74
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 9
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Adaptive Dynamic Programming Control
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research
- Keywords
- linear quadratic regulator, sample complexity, continuous control, finite-time analysis, value function estimation, stochastic processes, reinforcement learning, optimal control
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review