PreprintCited by 4Advanced Materials and MechanicsTopology Optimization in EngineeringModular Robots and Swarm Intelligence

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Folding mechanisms at finite temperature

Open access

Abstract

Folding mechanisms are zero elastic energy motions essential to the deployment of origami, linkages, reconfigurable metamaterials and robotic structures. In this paper, we determine the fate of folding mechanisms when such structures are miniaturized so that thermal fluctuations cannot be neglected. First, we identify geometric and topological design strategies aimed at minimizing undesired thermal energy barriers that generically obstruct kinematic mechanisms at the microscale. Our findings are illustrated in the context of a quasi one-dimensional linkage structure that harbors a topologically protected mechanism. However, thermal fluctuations can also be exploited to deliberately lock a reconfigurable metamaterial into a fully expanded configuration, a process reminiscent of order by disorder transitions in magnetic systems. We demonstrate that this effect leads certain topological mechanical structures to exhibit an abrupt change in the pressure -- a bulk signature of the underlying topological invariant at finite temperature. We conclude with a discussion of anharmonic corrections and potential applications of our work to the the engineering of DNA origami devices and molecular robots.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1802.02704

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. [18]B. G. Chen, N. Upadhyaya, and V. Vitelli, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111 , 13004 (2014), ISSN 0027-8424.
  2. [19]O. M. Braun and Y. Kivshar, The Frenkel-Kontorova model: concepts, methods, and applications (Springer Science & Business Media, 2013).
  3. [20]D. Z. Rocklin, New Journal of Physics 19 , 065004 (2017).
  4. [21]A. S. Meeussen, J. Paulose, and V. Vitelli, Physical Review X 6 , 041029 (2016).
  5. [23]D. Z. Rocklin, B. G.-g. Chen, M. Falk, V. Vitelli, and T. Lubensky, Physical review letters 116 , 135503 (2016).
  6. [43]D. Zhou, L. Zhang, and X. Mao, arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.03935 (2017). · arXiv
  7. [44]L. Zhang and X. Mao, arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.08557 (2018). · arXiv
  8. [48]A. J. Liu and S. R. Nagel, The Jamming Transition and the Marginally Jammed Solid (2010), vol. 1 of Ann. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. , pp. 347-369.
  9. [50]J. Feng, H. Levine, X. Mao, and L. M. Sander, Physical Review E 91 , 042710 (2015).
  10. [54]D. Loi, S. Mossa, and L. F. Cugliandolo, Physical Review E 77 , 051111 (2008).
  11. [58]B. G. Chen, B. Liu, A. A. Evans, J. Paulose, I. Cohen, V. Vitelli, and C. D. Santangelo, Arxiv (2015).
  12. [60]O. Stenull, C. Kane, and T. Lubensky, Physical review letters 117 , 068001 (2016).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rocklin, D. Z., Vitelli, V., & Mao, X.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2018
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2786143481
Cited by
4
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2018: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1420709, 1308089, 1741618, 1609051)
  • Division of Materials Research (1420709., DMR-1609051, 1609051, 1308089, DMR 14- 20709)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Advanced Materials and Mechanics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Topology Optimization in Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence
Keywords
folding mechanism, thermal fluctuations, origami, linkage, reconfigurable metamaterials, order-by-disorder, topological invariants, anharmonic corrections, DNA origami, molecular robots

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review