Parametrizing theories of gravity on large and small scales in cosmology
Open accessAbstract
We present a link between parametrizations of alternative theories of gravity on large and small scales in cosmology. This relationship is established using theoretical consistency conditions only. We find that in both limits the "slip" and "effective Newton's constant" can be written in terms of a set of four functions of time, two of which are direct generalizations of the $α$ and $γ$ parameters from post-Newtonian physics. This generalizes previous work that has constructed frameworks for testing gravity on small scales, and is to the best of our knowledge the first time that a link between parametrizations of gravity on such very different scales has been established. We expect our result to facilitate the imposition of observational constraints, by drastically reducing the number of functional degrees of freedom required to consistently test gravity on multiple scales in cosmology.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Clifton and Sanghai (2018) proposed a set of 4 parameters to model minimal deviations from GR in metric theories, usable from solar-system and galactic scales to cosmological and super-horizon scales.
“Finally, we conclude this section by a most recent work of Clifton and Sanghai (2018) where the authors proposed a set of 4 parameters to model minimal deviations from GR (metric theories) that can be used to cover scales at solar systems, galactic, and cosmological scales all the way to super-horizon.”
From Testing general relativity in cosmology (2019) · cites this paper as Clifton and Sanghai (2018)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 39 · Cited by 21
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- [2]Will, C. M., Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics , CUP (Cambridge) (1993).
- [6]Will, C. M., Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (US) 108 5938 (2011).
- [12]Sanghai, V. A. A., Post-Newtonian Gravity in Cosmology , arXiv:1710.03518 (2017). · arXiv
- [26]Battye, R. A. & Pearson, J. A., J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 1207 019 (2012).
- [27]Battye, R. A. & Pearson, J. A., Phys. Rev. D 88 061301 (2013).
- Authors
- Clifton, T., & Sanghai, V. A. A.
- Affiliations
- Queen Mary University of London (GB)
- Dalhousie University (CA)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2018
- Volume
- 122
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 011301-011301
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1803.01157
- OpenAlex
- W2793333372
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 1.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Science and Technology Facilities Council (ST/M001202/1, ST/P000592/1, 1361804)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
- Keywords
- modified gravity, slip parameter, effective Newton's constant, post-Newtonian parameters, large-scale structure, observational constraints
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
