PreprintCited by 2Computability, Logic, AI AlgorithmsEvolutionary Algorithms and ApplicationsAI-based Problem Solving and Planning

A Formulation of Recursive Self-Improvement and Its Possible Efficiency

Open access
Wang, Wenyi·2018·arXiv

Abstract

Recursive self-improving (RSI) systems have been dreamed of since the early days of computer science and artificial intelligence. However, many existing studies on RSI systems remain philosophical, and lacks clear formulation and results. In this paper, we provide a formal definition for one class of RSI systems, and then demonstrate the existence of computable and efficient RSI systems on a restricted version. We use simulation to empirically show that we achieve logarithmic runtime complexity with respect to the size of the search space, and these results suggest it is possible to achieve an efficient recursive self-improvement.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1805.06610

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gödel Agent can theoretically make increasingly better modifications over time through recursive self-update.

    “G¨ odel Agent can theoretically make increasingly better modifications over time through recursively self-update (Wang, 2018).”

    From Gödel Agent: A Self-Referential Agent Framework for Recursive Self-Improvement (2024) · cites this paper as Wang, 2018

    The Introduction (p. 1) describes recursive self-improving systems that iteratively create better software, and the mathematical example (p. 2) shows a program updating to better-scored programs. The paper does not establish this claim specifically for a “Gödel Agent”; it mentions Gödel machines only in its references (p. 8). (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [1]1. Chalmers, D.J.: The singularity. Science Fiction and Philosophy: From Time Travel to Superintelligence, Second Edition pp. 171-224 (2010)
  2. [2]2. Fallenstein, B., Kumar, R.: Proof-producing reflection for hol. In: International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving. pp. 170-186. Springer (2015)
  3. [4]4. Myhill, J.: The abstract theory of self-reproduction. Views on general systems theory pp. 106-118 (1964)
  4. [6]6. Schmidhuber, J.: Godel machines: Self-referential universal problem solvers making provably optimal self-improvements. arXiv preprint cs.LO/0309048 (2003) · arXiv
  5. [7]7. Steunebrink, B.R., Schmidhuber, J.: Towards an actual g¨ odel machine implementation: A lesson in self-reflective systems. In: Theoretical Foundations of Artificial General Intelligence, pp. 173-195. Springer (2012)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, W.
Corresponding author
Wang, Wenyi
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2018
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2803264000
Cited by
0
References
2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Evolutionary Algorithms and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
Keywords
recursive self-improvement, self-improving systems, formal definitions, computability, runtime complexity, logarithmic time complexity, search space

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review