Raziel: Private and Verifiable Smart Contracts on Blockchains
Open accessAbstract
Raziel combines secure multi-party computation and proof-carrying code to provide privacy, correctness and verifiability guarantees for smart contracts on blockchains. Effectively solving DAO and Gyges attacks, this paper describes an implementation and presents examples to demonstrate its practical viability (e.g., private and verifiable crowdfundings and investment funds). Additionally, we show how to use Zero-Knowledge Proofs of Proofs (i.e., Proof-Carrying Code certificates) to prove the validity of smart contracts to third parties before their execution without revealing anything else. Finally, we show how miners could get rewarded for generating pre-processing data for secure multi-party computation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Shocard is blockchain agnostic and uses private parallel sidechains to speed up the transactions in the ledger.
“Shocard is blockchain agnostic and uses private parallel sidechains to speed up the transactions in the ledger.”
From Privacy-Preserving Solutions for Blockchain: Review and Challenges (2019) · cites this paper as [141]
Shocard uses the ledger as a repository of certifications that maintains signatures-of-hashes of each personal data along with a code to avoid brute-force discovery.
“Shocard [141] uses the ledger as repository of certi cations that maintains signatures-of-hashes-of each personal data along with with a code to avoid brute-force discovery.”
From Privacy-Preserving Solutions for Blockchain: Review and Challenges (2019) · cites this paper as [141]
Cites
Decentralized Blockchain Technology and the Rise of Lex Cryptographia
Wright, A., & De Filippi, P. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2580664 · Cited by 928 · see citing works
Ligero: Lightweight Sublinear Arguments Without a Trusted Setup
Ames, S., Hazay, C., Ishai, Y., & Venkitasubramaniam, M. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security · doi:10.1145/3133956.3134104 · Cited by 305 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Privacy-Preserving Solutions for Blockchain: Review and Challenges
Bernal Bernabe, J., Canovas, J. L., Hernandez-Ramos, J. L., Torres Moreno, R., & Skarmeta, A. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2950872 · Cited by 430 · see citing works
“In this sense, [88] follows an inter-disciplinary approach based on cryptography and formal verification using SMPC and proof-carrying code to enhance privacy in smart contracts.”
Method
- Authors
- Sánchez, D. C.
- Corresponding author
- Sánchez, David Cerezo
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2018
- Volume
- 2017
- Pages
- 878
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1807.09484
- OpenAlex
- W2794771961
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 4
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptography and Data Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, programming, and type systems
- Keywords
- smart contracts, blockchain, secure multi-party computation, proof-carrying code, zero-knowledge proofs, privacy-preserving computation, verifiable computation, crowdfunding, investment funds
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
