Cited by 928Digital Transformation in LawBlockchain Technology Applications and SecurityDigitalization, Law, and Regulation

Decentralized Blockchain Technology and the Rise of Lex Cryptographia

Open access
Wright, Aaron, De Filippi, Primavera·2015·SSRN Electronic Journal

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.2580664

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A transaction may represent the transfer or issuance of a cryptographic token through a smart contract transaction.

    “A transaction is not limited to the transfer of a crypto-asset such as a Bitcoin or Ether, but may also represent the transfer or issuance of a cryptographic token through a smart contract transaction (Wright and De Filippi, 2015).”
  • The lack of any single point of failure and control contributes to increasing the resilience of blockchain-based systems, while also making it more difficult for national laws to be enforced on them.

    “In other words, the lack of any single point of failure and control (such as ICANN in the context of Internet governance) contributes to increasing the resilience of blockchain-based systems, while also making it more difficult for national laws to be enforced on them [91].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wright, A., & De Filippi, P.
Affiliations
Yeshiva University (US)
Corresponding author
Wright, Aaron
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015
ISSN
1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4400945
Cited by
928
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 61 · 2024: 97 · 2023: 86 · 2022: 110 · 2021: 118 · 2020: 141 · 2019: 119 · 2018: 102 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 3
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Digital Transformation in Law
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
Keywords
blockchain, smart contracts, decentralized autonomous organizations, decentralized governance, decentralization (distributed systems), self-executing contracts, legal theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review