Blockchained On-Device Federated Learning
Open accessAbstract
By leveraging blockchain, this letter proposes a blockchained federated learning (BlockFL) architecture where local learning model updates are exchanged and verified. This enables on-device machine learning without any centralized training data or coordination by utilizing a consensus mechanism in blockchain. Moreover, we analyze an end-to-end latency model of BlockFL and characterize the optimal block generation rate by considering communication, computation, and consensus delays.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
[223] leverages blockchain to exchange and verify model updates of local training, affecting learning completion latency.
“Leverage blockchain to exchange and verify model updates of local training Learning completion latency”
From Convergence of Edge Computing and Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Survey (2020) · cites this paper as [223]
Combining Blockchain and FL as BlockFL is proposed in [223] to realize locally global model updating at each edge device rather than a specific server, ensuring device malfunction cannot affect other local updates when updating the global model, and an appropriate reward mechanism for stimulating edge devices to participate in FL.
“Therefore, in [223], combining Blockchain and FL as BlockFL is proposed to realize 1) locally global model updating at each edge device rather a specific server, ensuring device malfunction cannot affect other local updates when updating the global model; 2) appropriate reward mechanism for stimulating edge devices to participate in FL.”
From Convergence of Edge Computing and Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Survey (2020) · cites this paper as [223]
BlockFL works for a fully decentralized network, where the ML model can be trained without any central coordination even when some devices lack their own training data samples.
“BlockFL also works for a fully decentralized network, where the ML model can be trained without any central coordination even when some devices lack their own training data samples.”
From Edge Intelligence: Paving the Last Mile of Artificial Intelligence With Edge Computing (2019) · cites this paper as [49]
Cites
Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Data
McMahan, H. B., Moore, E., Ramage, D., Hampson, S., & Arcas, B. A. Y. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1602.05629 · Cited by 14,215 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Edge Intelligence: Paving the Last Mile of Artificial Intelligence With Edge Computing
Zhou, Z., Chen, X., Li, E., Zeng, L., Luo, K., & Zhang, J. (2019) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2019.2918951 · Cited by 2,455 · see citing works
Convergence of Edge Computing and Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Survey
Wang, X., Han, Y., Leung, V. C. M., Niyato, D., Yan, X., & Chen, X. (2020) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2020.2970550 · Cited by 1,498 · see citing works
A review of applications in federated learning
Li, L., Fan, Y., Tse, M., & Lin, K.-Y. (2020) · Computers & Industrial Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cie.2020.106854 · Cited by 1,559 · see citing works
A Crowdsourcing Framework for On-Device Federated Learning
Pandey, S. R., Tran, N. H., Bennis, M., Tun, Y. K., Manzoor, A., & Hong, C. S. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · doi:10.1109/twc.2020.2971981 · Cited by 318 · see citing works
Self-citationWireless Network Intelligence at the Edge
Park, J., Samarakoon, S., Bennis, M., & Debbah, M. (2019) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2019.2941458 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Kim, H., Park, J., Bennis, M., & Kim, S.-L.
- Affiliations
- Yonsei University (KR)
- University of Oulu (FI)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2018
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1279-1283
- ISSN
- 1089-7798 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1808.03949
- OpenAlex
- W2951832089
- Cited by
- 882
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 80 · 2025: 113 · 2024: 159 · 2023: 173 · 2022: 147 · 2021: 130 · 2020: 70 · 2019: 10
- FWCI
- 111.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- IEEE Communications Letters (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (NRF-2017R1A2A2A05069810)
- National Research Foundation of Korea (2018-0-00170)
- Oulun Yliopisto
- Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea (2018-0-00170)
- Institute for Information and Communications Technology Promotion (2018-0-00170)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology in Education and Learning
- Keywords
- blockchain, on-device learning, consensus algorithms, decentralized learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
