PreprintCited by 9Advanced Statistical Methods and ModelsStatistical Methods and ApplicationsStatistical Methods and Inference

Model-free Study of Ordinary Least Squares Linear Regression

Open access
Kuchibhotla, Arun K., Brown, Lawrence D., Buja, Andreas·2018·arXiv

Abstract

Ordinary least squares (OLS) linear regression is one of the most basic statistical techniques for data analysis. In the main stream literature and the statistical education, the study of linear regression is typically restricted to the case where the covariates are fixed, errors are mean zero Gaussians with variance independent of the (fixed) covariates. Even though OLS has been studied under misspecification from as early as the 1960's, the implications have not yet caught up with the main stream literature and applied sciences. The present article is an attempt at a unified viewpoint that makes the various implications of misspecification stand out.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1809.10538

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Under standard assumptions, as N approaches infinity, Var(γj)^-1/2 (γj - γj) converges in distribution to N(0,1), where Var(γj)^1/2 is a consistent estimator of the White standard error.

    “Under standard assumptions [Wooldridge, 2010], as N → ∞ we have Var(γ j ) -1/2 γj -γ j d → N (0, 1), where Var(γ j ) 1/2 is a consistent estimator of the White standard error of γe [Kuchibhotla et al., 2018, Fogliato et al., 2021].”

    From Play Favorites: A Statistical Method to Measure Self-Bias in LLM-as-a-Judge (2025) · cites this paper as Kuchibhotla et al., 2018

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Abadie, A., Imbens, G. W., and Zheng, F. (2014). Inference for misspecified models with fixed regressors. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. , 109(508):1601-1614.
  2. Bachoc, F., Preinerstorfer, D., and Steinberger, L. (2016). Uniformly valid confidence intervals post-model-selection. ArXiv e-prints .
  3. Buja, A., Berk, R., Brown, L., George, E., Pitkin, E., Traskin, M., Zhan, K., and Zhao, L. (2014). Models as Approximations, Part I: A Conspiracy of Nonlinearity and Random Regressors in Linear Regression. ArXiv e-prints .
  4. DasGupta, A. (2008). Asymptotic theory of statistics and probability . Springer Texts in Statistics. Springer, New York.
  5. Durrett, R. (2010). Probability: theory and examples , volume 31 of Cambridge Series in Statistical and Probabilistic Mathematics . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, fourth edition.
  6. Fahrmeir, L. (1990). Maximum likelihood estimation in misspecified generalized linear models. Statistics , 21(4):487-502.
  7. Kuchibhotla, A. K., Brown, L. D., Buja, A., George, E. I., and Zhao, L. (2018). A Model Free Perspective for Linear Regression: Uniform-in-model Bounds for Post Selection Inference. ArXiv e-prints .
  8. Levit, B. Y. (1976). On the efficiency of a class of non-parametric estimates. Theory of Probability & Its Applications , 20(4):723-740.
  9. Liu, R. Y. and Singh, K. (1995). Using i.i.d. bootstrap inference for general noni.i.d. models. J. Statist. Plann. Inference , 43(1-2):67-75.
  10. McNeney, W. B. (1998). Asymptotic efficiency in semiparametric models with non-i.i.d. data . ProQuest LLC, Ann Arbor, MI. Thesis (Ph.D.)-University of Washington.
  11. Newey, W. (1990). Semiparametric efficiency bounds. Journal of Applied Econometrics , 5(2):99-135.
  12. Pollard, D. (1984). Convergence of stochastic processes . Springer Series in Statistics. Springer-Verlag, New York.
  13. van der Vaart, A. W. and Wellner, J. A. (1996). Weak convergence and empirical processes . Springer Series in Statistics. Springer-Verlag, New York. With applications to statistics.
  14. White, H. (2001). Asymptotic Theory for Econometricians . Economic theory, econometrics, and mathematical economics. Academic Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kuchibhotla, A. K., Brown, L. D., & Buja, A.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2018
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2893291735
Cited by
8
References
15
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
Keywords
ordinary least squares, linear regression, model misspecification, model-independent analysis, heteroscedastic errors, non-Gaussian errors, statistical inference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review