PreprintCited by 732Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum many-body systemsQuantum Information and Cryptography

PennyLane: Automatic differentiation of hybrid quantum-classical computations

Open access
Bergholm, Ville, Izaac, Josh, Schuld, Maria, Gogolin, Christian, Ahmed, Shahnawaz, Ajith, Vishnu, Alam, M. Sohaib, Alonso-Linaje, Guillermo +60 more·2018·arXiv

Abstract

PennyLane is a Python 3 software framework for differentiable programming of quantum computers. The library provides a unified architecture for near-term quantum computing devices, supporting both qubit and continuous-variable paradigms. PennyLane's core feature is the ability to compute gradients of variational quantum circuits in a way that is compatible with classical techniques such as backpropagation. PennyLane thus extends the automatic differentiation algorithms common in optimization and machine learning to include quantum and hybrid computations. A plugin system makes the framework compatible with any gate-based quantum simulator or hardware. We provide plugins for hardware providers including the Xanadu Cloud, Amazon Braket, and IBM Quantum, allowing PennyLane optimizations to be run on publicly accessible quantum devices. On the classical front, PennyLane interfaces with accelerated machine learning libraries such as TensorFlow, PyTorch, JAX, and Autograd. PennyLane can be used for the optimization of variational quantum eigensolvers, quantum approximate optimization, quantum machine learning models, and many other applications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1811.04968

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adam adapts the size of the steps taken during optimization to allow for more efficient and precise solutions than those obtained through basic SGD.

    “One SGD method that has been imported from the machine learning community is Adam, which adapts the size of the steps taken during the optimization to allow for more efficient and precise solutions than those obtained through basic SGD [95].”

    From Variational quantum algorithms (2021) · cites this paper as [95]

    The Optimization section (p. 9) lists Adam among optimizers from classical machine learning, and Computing gradients (p. 4) says a learning rate can be adapted at each step. The paper does not specifically explain Adam’s step-size adaptation or say it produces more efficient or precise solutions than basic SGD. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • General support for cold atom quantum computers in QML frameworks like PennyLane or Tensorflow Quantum does not seem to be en par with hardware offered by large commercial vendors.

    “the general support for cold atom quantum computers in QML frameworks like Penny-Lane [119] or Tensorflow Quantum [120], which are often used in exploratory research, does not seem to be en par with hardware offered by large commercial vendors.”

    From Neutral atom quantum computing hardware: performance and end-user perspective (2023) · cites this paper as [119]

    The Introduction (p. 2) identifies PennyLane as a framework for quantum machine learning, and the Conclusion (p. 16) describes its use for exploratory research. The Writing a plugin device section (p. 12) lists available hardware plugins, but does not assess cold-atom support or compare it with support for hardware from large commercial vendors. That comparative part of the claim is unsupported by our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 39 · Cited by 732

Authors
Bergholm, V., Izaac, J., Schuld, M., Gogolin, C., Ahmed, S., Ajith, V., Alam, M. S., Alonso-Linaje, G., AkashNarayanan, B., Asadi, A., Arrazola, J. M., Azad, U., Banning, S., Blank, C., Bromley, T. R., Cordier, B. A., Ceroni, J., Delgado, A., Di Matteo, O., Dusko, A., Garg, T., Guala, D., Hayes, A., Hill, R., Ijaz, A., Isacsson, T., Ittah, D., Jahangiri, S., Jain, P., Jiang, E., Khandelwal, A., Kottmann, K., Lang, R. A., Lee, C., Loke, T., Lowe, A., McKiernan, K., Meyer, J. J., Montañez-Barrera, J. A., Moyard, R., Niu, Z., O'Riordan, L. J., Oud, S., Panigrahi, A., Park, C.-Y., Polatajko, D., Quesada, N., Roberts, C., Sá, N., Schoch, I., Shi, B., Shu, S., Sim, S., Singh, A., Strandberg, I., Soni, J., Száva, A., Thabet, S., Vargas-Hernández, R. A., Vincent, T., Vitucci, N., Weber, M., Wierichs, D., Wiersema, R., Willmann, M., Wong, V., Zhang, S., & Killoran, N.
Affiliations
  • Xanadu Quantum Technologies (Canada) (CA)
  • Chalmers University of Technology (SE)
  • Indian Institute of Information Technology Kottayam (IN)
  • Ames Research Center (US)
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
  • Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee (IN)
  • Indian Institute of Science Bangalore (IN)
  • Institute of Photonic Sciences (ES)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • DUG Technology (Australia) (AU)
  • Rigetti Computing (United States) (US)
  • Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
  • Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE)
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • National Institute of Science Education and Research (IN)
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • Zapata (United States) (US)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • University of Cologne (DE)
  • University of Waterloo (CA)
  • TRIUMF (CA)
  • BMW (Germany) (DE)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2018
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2901859177
Cited by
732
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 136 · 2024: 185 · 2023: 133 · 2022: 103 · 2021: 104 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2014: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
Keywords
PennyLane, differentiable programming, automatic differentiation, hybrid quantum-classical computation, variational quantum circuits, gradient computation, backpropagation, variational quantum eigensolver, quantum machine learning, continuous-variable quantum computing, quantum simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review