PreprintCited by 1Modular Robots and Swarm IntelligenceDistributed Control Multi-Agent SystemsCryptography and Data Security

Secure and secret cooperation in robotic swarms

Open access
Ferrer, Eduardo Castelló, Hardjono, Thomas, Pentland, Alex 'Sandy', Dorigo, Marco·2019·arXiv

Preprint — published as 10.1126/scirobotics.abf1538

Abstract

The importance of swarm robotics systems in both academic research and real-world applications is steadily increasing. However, to reach widespread adoption, new models that ensure the secure cooperation of large groups of robots need to be developed. This work introduces a novel method to encapsulate cooperative robotic missions in an authenticated data structure known as Merkle tree. With this method, operators can provide the "blueprint" of the swarm's mission without disclosing its raw data. In other words, data verification can be separated from data itself. We propose a system where robots in a swarm, to cooperate towards mission completion, have to "prove" their integrity to their peers by exchanging cryptographic proofs. We show the implications of this approach for two different swarm robotics missions: foraging and maze formation. In both missions, swarm robots were able to cooperate and carry out sequential operations without having explicit knowledge about the mission's high-level objectives. The results presented in this work demonstrate the feasibility of using Merkle trees as a cooperation mechanism for swarm robotics systems in both simulation and real-robot experiments, which has implications for future decentralized robotics applications where security plays a crucial role such as environmental monitoring, infrastructure surveillance, and disaster management.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1904.09266

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Human-swarm interaction will be necessary to provide the swarm with information about goals to be achieved or tasks to be performed.

    “Human-swarm interaction (HSI) will be necessary to provide the swarm with information about goals to be achieved or tasks to be performed [103], [104].”

    From Swarm Robotics: Past, Present, and Future [Point of View] (2021) · cites this paper as [104]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ferrer, E. C., Hardjono, T., Pentland, A. '., & Dorigo, M.
Affiliations
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2019
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3145530379
Cited by
0
References
1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Distributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptography and Data Security
Keywords
swarm robotics, Merkle trees, cryptographic proofs, data integrity verification, foraging, environmental monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review