The DOI matches its DataCite record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conformalized Quantile Regression
Open accessAbstract
Conformal prediction is a technique for constructing prediction intervals that attain valid coverage in finite samples, without making distributional assumptions. Despite this appeal, existing conformal methods can be unnecessarily conservative because they form intervals of constant or weakly varying length across the input space. In this paper we propose a new method that is fully adaptive to heteroscedasticity. It combines conformal prediction with classical quantile regression, inheriting the advantages of both. We establish a theoretical guarantee of valid coverage, supplemented by extensive experiments on popular regression datasets. We compare the efficiency of conformalized quantile regression to other conformal methods, showing that our method tends to produce shorter intervals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This approach maintains the coverage guarantee of CP while often producing tighter, more locally adaptive intervals compared to residual-based methods, particularly in heteroscedastic settings [8].”
From ConfIC-RCA: Statistically Grounded Efficient Estimation of Segmentation Quality (2025) · cites this paper as [8]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“At the core of our approach is Conformal RCA , which leverages split conformal prediction [6]-[8] to produce statistically grounded confidence intervals for segmentation quality scores.”
From ConfIC-RCA: Statistically Grounded Efficient Estimation of Segmentation Quality (2025) · cites this paper as [8]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Assuming exchangeability between the test sample and calibration set, the constructed interval provides the marginal coverage guarantee stated in Theorem 3, as shown in [8].”
From ConfIC-RCA: Statistically Grounded Efficient Estimation of Segmentation Quality (2025) · cites this paper as [8]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946
Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine
Friedman, J. H. (2001) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1013203451 · Cited by 30,731
Koenker, R. W., & Bassett, G. W. (1978) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913643 · Cited by 14,611
Dropout as a bayesian approximation: Representing model uncertainty in deep learning
Gal, Y., & Ghahramani, Z. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1506.02142 · Cited by 6,471
Koenker, R. W., & Hallock, K. F. (2001) · The Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.15.4.143 · Cited by 4,571
Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensembles
Lakshminarayanan, B., Pritzel, A., & Blundell, C. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1612.01474 · Cited by 3,666
Meinshausen, N. (2006) · Cited by 1,522
Algorithmic Learning in a Random World
(2005) · doi:10.1007/b106715 · Cited by 1,119
Distribution-Free Predictive Inference for Regression
Lei, J., G’Sell, M., Rinaldo, A., Tibshirani, R. J., & Wasserman, L. (2018) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.2017.1307116 · Cited by 1,049
Distribution‐free prediction bands for non‐parametric regression
Lei, J., & Wasserman, L. (2014) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology) · doi:10.1111/rssb.12021 · Cited by 525
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- [7][7] Harris Papadopoulos, Alex Gammerman, and Volodya Vovk. Normalized nonconformity measures for regression conformal prediction. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Applications , pages 64-69, 2008. -
- [20][20] James W. Taylor. A quantile regression neural network approach to estimating the conditional density of multiperiod returns. Journal of Forecasting , 19(4):299-311, 2000. -
- [35][35] Nitish Srivastava, Geoffrey E. Hinton, Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Ruslan Salakhutdinov. Dropout: A simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. Journal of Machine Learning Research , 15(1):1929-1958, 2014. -
- [37][37] Victor Chernozhukov, Iván Fernández-Val, and Alfred Galichon. Quantile and probability curves without crossing. Econometrica , 78(3):1093-1125, 2010. -
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–239 of 239
Distributional Robust Kelly Gambling: Optimal Strategy under Uncertainty in the Long-RunPreprint
Sun, Q., & Boyd, S. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1812.10371 · Cited by 1
Deep Distributionally Robust Learning for Calibrated Uncertainties under Domain ShiftPreprint
Wang, H., Liu, A., Yu, Z., Yan, J., Yue, Y., & Anandkumar, A. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 1
Reliable Anti-Cancer Drug Sensitivity Prediction and PrioritizationPreprint
Lenhof, K., Eckhart, L., Rolli, L.-M., Volkamer, A., & Lenhof, H. (2023) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3542373/v1 · Cited by 1
Reliable Anti-Cancer Drug Sensitivity Prediction and PrioritizationPreprint
Lenhof, K., Eckhart, L., Rolli, L.-M., Volkamer, A., & Lenhof, H. (2023) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3542373/v2 · Cited by 1
PostForecasts.jl: A Julia package for probabilistic forecasting by postprocessing point predictions
Lipiecki, A., & Weron, R. (2025) · SoftwareX · doi:10.1016/j.softx.2025.102200 · Cited by 1
ConfIC-RCA: Statistically Grounded Efficient Estimation of Segmentation Quality
Cosarinsky, M., Billot, R., Mansilla, L., Jimenez, G., Gaggión, N., Fu, G., Tirer, T., & Ferrante, E. (2025) · arXiv
“…[35], we base our conformal prediction framework on Confor-malized Quantile Regression (CQR), leveraging its ability to produce tighter prediction intervals than alternative conformal approaches commonly used for regression [8], and introducing novel modifications tailored to the RCA procedure.”
InfluentialSynthesizing Machine Learning Programs with PAC Guarantees via Statistical SketchingPreprint
Bastani, O. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.05390
Proactive Application Rate Requirement Adaptation Mechanism for Sidelinks
Manjunath, R. P., Schubert, M., Cavalcante, R. L. G., Boban, M., Zhou, C., & Stańczak, S. (2021) · IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC) · doi:10.1109/pimrc50174.2021.9569371
Leveraging Error Patterns to Correct Prediction Intervals
Bonnier, T. (2023) · Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications · doi:10.3233/faia230282
Advanced Uncertainty Quantification and Novelty Detection for Random Forest Models
Merilinna, J. (2023) · doi:10.5121/csit.2023.131920 · Cited by 1
“Conformalized Quantile Regression [27] introduces a method that allows for locally varying confidence intervals, overcoming the fixed interval limitation of CP.”
MethodSmooth Multi-Period Forecasting With Application to Prediction of COVID-19 Cases
Tuzhilina, E., Hastie, T. J., McDonald, D. J., Tay, J. K., & Tibshirani, R. J. (2023) · Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics · doi:10.1080/10618600.2023.2285337
“Conformal prediction introduced by Vovk, Gammerman, and Shafer (2005) is a universal framework for constructing calibrated intervals, which has been applied with various statistical approaches, including quantile regression (Romano, Patterson, and Candès 2019).”
Regression Trees for Fast and Adaptive Prediction IntervalsPreprint
Cabezas, L. M. C., Otto, M. P., Izbicki, R., & Stern, R. B. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4729599
Reliable Anti-Cancer Drug Sensitivity Prediction and PrioritizationPreprint
Lenhof, K., Eckhart, L., Rolli, L.-M., Volkamer, A., & Lenhof, H. (2024) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3542373/v3
Kumar, B., Kumar, T., Nadakuditi, S., Patel, H., & Gupta, K. (2024) · International Journal of Computing and Engineering · doi:10.47941/ijce.1925
“Notably, the coverage obtained closely aligns with the theoretically expected coverage, indicating the reliability of both regression methods in estimating uncertainty [1], [4], [9], [10].”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialHarnessing Conformal Updating for Enhanced Risk PredictionPreprint
Rigana, K., Wit, E. C., & Cook, S. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4848752
Prediction in measurement error models
Jiang, F., & Yanyuan Ma, B. (2024) · Electronic Journal of Statistics · doi:10.1214/24-ejs2272
Fantazzini, D. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4867321
Improve ROI with Causal Learning and Conformal Prediction
Ai, M., Chen, Z., Wang, J., Shang, J., Tao, T., & Li, Z. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE) · doi:10.1109/icde60146.2024.00052
“A popular method is Conformalized Quantile Regression (CQR) [54].”
MethodŞimşek, A. İ., & Bulut, E. (2024) · Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi · doi:10.25287/ohuiibf.1341552
Magazine Supply Optimization: A Case-Study
Nguyen, D., Ulianovici, A., Achour, S., Aubry, S., & Chesneau, N. (2024) · International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics · doi:10.1109/dsaa61799.2024.10722827
Jiang, S., & Hui, H. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Communications, Control, and Computing Technologies for Smart Grids (SmartGridComm) · doi:10.1109/smartgridcomm60555.2024.10738104
Prediction sets and conformal inference with censored outcomes
Liu, W., de Paula, Á., & Tamer, E. T. (2025) · doi:10.47004/wp.cem.2025.0425
Robust Quantile Regression Under Unreliable Data
Shoji, Y., & Yukawa, M. (2024) · Asia-Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA ASC) · doi:10.1109/apsipaasc63619.2025.10849248
Survival Conformal Prediction Under Random Censoring
Yi, M., Xiao, Z.-L., Wang, H. J., & Tang, Y.-L. (2025) · Stat · doi:10.1002/sta4.70052 · Cited by 8
Reliable Uncertainty Quantification in Machine Learning via Conformal Prediction
Shi, Y. (2025) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v39i28.35227
Conformal Inference of Individual Treatment Effects Using Conditional Density Estimates
Wang, B., & Qiao, X. (2025) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v39i20.35397
Extended fiducial inference for individual treatment effects via deep neural networks
Kim, S., & Liang, F. (2025) · Statistics and computing · doi:10.1007/s11222-025-10624-8 · Cited by 2
“Forcomparison,thecon-formal quantile regression (CQR) method (Romano et al. 2019; Lei and Candès 2021) was applied to this example, where the outcome function was approximated using different machine learning methods, including BART (Chipman et al. 2010), Boosting (Schapire 1990; Breiman 1998), and…”
InfluentialBeyond Point Predictions: Quantifying Uncertainty in E. Coli Ml-Based MonitoringPreprint
Abert-Fernández, D., Aguilera, E., Emiliano, P., Valero, F., & Monclús, H. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5345878
Mollaali, A., Zufferey, G., Constante‐Flores, G. E., Moya, C., Li, C., Meng, Y., & Lin, G. (2025) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2025.107809 · Cited by 1
Hu, L., & Liu, Y. (2025) · Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy · doi:10.1063/5.0233770
CoCAI: Copula-Based Conformal Anomaly Identification for Multivariate Time-Series
Pearson, N. A., Zanello, F., Russo, D., Bortolussi, L., & Cairoli, F. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-05435-7_17
“For a generic real-valued random variable T , the quantile function Q is formally defined as In quantile regression problems [26], where the model outputs a quantile range, i.e., ˆ f ( x ) = [ˆ q l ( x ) , ˆ q u ( x )] ⊆ R , a common NCF is ncf ( x i , y i ) = max { ˆ q l ( x i ) − y i , y i − ˆ q…”
Conformal prediction for multivariate responses with Euclidean likelihood
Gan, F., & Liu, Y. (2025) · Journal of Multivariate Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.jmva.2025.105494
Laguna, J., Janal, Y., Reder, M., & Melero, J. J. (2026) · Journal of Physics Conference Series · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/3224/6/062054
“The conformal framework could benefit from advanced techniques like Conformalized Quantile Regression [22] for asymmetric intervals, Ensemble Batch Prediction Intervals [23] for capturing model variability, and HopCPT [24] for improved temporal adaptation.”
Lan, D., Deng, G., & Ou, Y. (2026) · Frontiers in Earth Science · doi:10.3389/feart.2026.1904391
Roca-Nasser, E. A., Cabeza-Rodríguez, C., Arroyo-Cerezo, A., Tello-Liébana, M., Cuadros-Rodrı́guez, L., & Jiménez-Carvelo, A. M. (2026) · ACS Measurement Science Au · doi:10.1021/acsmeasuresciau.6c00118
Assessing Uncertainty in Performance Modeling: Conformal Prediction vs. Bayesian Regression
Jahns, S., Dorn, J., Weber, M., Apel, S., & Siegmund, N. (2026) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE) · doi:10.1145/3832783.3837425
A gentle introduction to conformal prediction and distribution-free uncertainty quantification
Angelopoulos, A. N., & Bates, S. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.07511 · Cited by 240
“We will next show how to incorporate uncertainty into regression problems with a continuous output, following the algorithm in [7].”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Romano, Y., Patterson, E., & Candès, E. J.
- Affiliations
- Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL)
- Stanford University (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- Volume
- 32
- Pages
- 3538-3548
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1905.03222
- OpenAlex
- W2946063682
- Semantic Scholar
- 6f9dc6f8519e927d948a13aa7ae0df336f443eb9
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 3
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- ISEF Foundation
- Iran Science Elites Federation
- Office of Naval Research (N00014-16-1-2712, N00014)
- Army Research Office (W911NF-17, W911NF-17-1-0304, W911NF)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Forecasting Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
- Keywords
- conformal prediction, quantile regression, prediction intervals, heteroscedasticity, coverage guarantees, interval length, nonparametric inference, conformalized quantile regression
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
