The DOI matches its DataCite record.
What do you learn from context? Probing for sentence structure in contextualized word representations
Open accessAbstract
Contextualized representation models such as ELMo (Peters et al., 2018a) and BERT (Devlin et al., 2018) have recently achieved state-of-the-art results on a diverse array of downstream NLP tasks. Building on recent token-level probing work, we introduce a novel edge probing task design and construct a broad suite of sub-sentence tasks derived from the traditional structured NLP pipeline. We probe word-level contextual representations from four recent models and investigate how they encode sentence structure across a range of syntactic, semantic, local, and long-range phenomena. We find that existing models trained on language modeling and translation produce strong representations for syntactic phenomena, but only offer comparably small improvements on semantic tasks over a non-contextual baseline.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Studies like Tenney et al. (2019) show that unidirectional models encode significant positional and sequential information, supporting the use of boundary vectors for span representation.
“Studies like Tenney et al. (2019) show that unidirectional models encode significant positional and sequential information, supporting the use of boundary vectors for span representation.”
From Can "consciousness" be observed from large language model (LLM) internal states? Dissecting LLM representations obtained from Theory of Mind test with Integrated Information Theory and Span Representation analysis (2025) · cites this paper as Tenney et al., 2019
Appendix D describes GPT as a left-to-right model, and §5 reports that its word representations help recover sentence structure. But the paper does not establish the specific claim about significant positional and sequential information in unidirectional models. Section 3.1 represents spans by pooling vectors from all tokens within them, not by using boundary vectors, so it does not support that proposed method. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 51
- Yossi Adi, Einat Kermany, Yonatan Belinkov, Ofer Lavi, and Yoav Goldberg. Fine-grained analysis of sentence embeddings using auxiliary prediction tasks. In Proceedings of ICLR, 2017.
- Yonatan Belinkov. On internal language representations in deep learning: An analysis of machine translation and speech recognition. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2018.
- Yonatan Belinkov, Nadir Durrani, Fahim Dalvi, Hassan Sajjad, and James Glass. What do neural machine translation models learn about morphology? In Proceedings of EMNLP, 2017a.
- Yonatan Belinkov, Lluís Màrquez, Hassan Sajjad, Nadir Durrani, Fahim Dalvi, and James Glass. Evaluating layers of representation in neural machine translation on part-of-speech and semantic tagging tasks. In Proceedings of IJCNLP, 2017b.
- Terra Blevins, Omer Levy, and Luke Zettlemoyer. Deep RNNs encode soft hierarchical syntax. In Proceedings of ACL, 2018.
- Ondřej Bojar, Christian Buck, Rajen Chatterjee, Christian Federmann, Yvette Graham, Barry Had- dow, Matthias Huck, Antonio Jimeno Yepes, Philipp Koehn, and Julia Kreutzer (eds.). Proceed- ings of the Second Conference on Machine Translation. 2017.
- Ciprian Chelba, Tomas Mikolov, Mike Schuster, Qi Ge, Thorsten Brants, Phillipp Koehn, and Tony Robinson. One billion word benchmark for measuring progress in statistical language modeling. In Proceedings of Interspeech, 2014.
- Alexis Conneau and Douwe Kiela. SentEval: An evaluation toolkit for universal sentence repre- sentations. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, 2018.
- Alexis Conneau, Douwe Kiela, Holger Schwenk, Loïc Barrault, and Antoine Bordes. Supervised learning of universal sentence representations from natural language inference data. In Proceed- ings of EMNLP, 2017.
- Alexis Conneau, Germán Kruszewski, Guillaume Lample, Loïc Barrault, and Marco Baroni. What you can cram into a single $&#* vector: Probing sentence embeddings for linguistic properties. In Proceedings of ACL, 2018.
- Ishita Dasgupta, Demi Guo, Andreas Stuhlmüller, Samuel J Gershman, and Noah D Goodman. Evaluating compositionality in sentence embeddings. arXiv preprint 1802.04302, 2018. · arXiv
- Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint 1810.04805, 2018. · arXiv
- Allyson Ettinger, Ahmed Elgohary, Colin Phillips, and Philip Resnik. Assessing composition in sentence vector representations. In Proceedings of COLING, 2018.
- Matt Gardner, Joel Grus, Mark Neumann, Oyvind Tafjord, Pradeep Dasigi, Nelson F Liu, Matthew Peters, Michael Schmitz, and Luke Zettlemoyer. AllenNLP: A deep semantic natural language processing platform. In Proceedings of Workshop for NLP Open Source Software (NLP-OSS), 2018.
- Daniel Gildea and Martha Palmer. The necessity of parsing for predicate argument recognition. In Proceedings of ACL, 2002.
- Kristina Gulordava, Piotr Bojanowski, Edouard Grave, Tal Linzen, and Marco Baroni. Colorless green recurrent networks dream hierarchically. In Proceedings of NAACL, 2018.
- Luheng He, Kenton Lee, Omer Levy, and Luke Zettlemoyer. Jointly predicting predicates and arguments in neural semantic role labeling. In Proceedings of ACL, 2018.
- Iris Hendrickx, Su Nam Kim, Zornitsa Kozareva, Preslav Nakov, Diarmuid Ó Séaghdha, Sebas- tian Padó, Marco Pennacchiotti, Lorenza Romano, and Stan Szpakowicz. SemEval-2010 task 8: Multi-way classification of semantic relations between pairs of nominals. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Semantic Evaluations: Recent Achievements and Future Directions, 2009.
- Jeremy Howard and Sebastian Ruder. Universal language model fine-tuning for text classification. In Proceedings of ACL, 2018.
- Diederik P. Kingma and Jimmy Ba. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. In Proceedings of ICLR, 2015.
- Ryan Kiros, Yukun Zhu, Ruslan R. Salakhutdinov, Richard Zemel, Raquel Urtasun, Antonio Tor- ralba, and Sanja Fidler. Skip-thought vectors. In Proceedings of NIPS, 2015.
- Nikita Kitaev and Dan Klein. Constituency parsing with a self-attentive encoder. In Proceedings of ACL, July 2018.
- Adhiguna Kuncoro, Chris Dyer, John Hale, Dani Yogatama, Stephen Clark, and Phil Blunsom. LSTMs can learn syntax-sensitive dependencies well, but modeling structure makes them better. In Proceedings of ACL, 2018.
- Kenton Lee, Luheng He, Mike Lewis, and Luke Zettlemoyer. End-to-end neural coreference reso- lution. In Proceedings of EMNLP, 2017.
- Kenton Lee, Luheng He, and Luke Zettlemoyer. Higher-order coreference resolution with coarse- to-fine inference. In Proceedings of NAACL, 2018.
- Hector J. Levesque, Ernest Davis, and Leora Morgenstern. The winograd schema challenge. In Pro- ceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, 2012.
- Tal Linzen, Emmanuel Dupoux, and Yoav Goldberg. Assessing the ability of LSTMs to learn syntax- sensitive dependencies. Transactions of the ACL, 2016.
- Rebecca Marvin and Tal Linzen. Targeted syntactic evaluation of language models. In Proceedings of EMNLP, 2018.
- Bryan McCann, James Bradbury, Caiming Xiong, and Richard Socher. Learned in translation: Contextualized word vectors. In Proceedings of NIPS, 2017.
- Tomas Mikolov, Ilya Sutskever, Kai Chen, Greg S. Corrado, and Jeff Dean. Distributed representa- tions of words and phrases and their compositionality. In Proceedings of NIPS, 2013.
- Adam Paszke, Sam Gross, Soumith Chintala, Gregory Chanan, Edward Yang, Zachary DeVito, Zeming Lin, Alban Desmaison, Luca Antiga, and Adam Lerer. Automatic differentiation in PyTorch. In Proceedings of NIPS, 2017.
- Jeffrey Pennington, Richard Socher, and Christopher Manning. GloVe: Global vectors for word representation. In Proceedings of EMNLP, 2014.
- Matthew Peters, Mark Neumann, Mohit Iyyer, Matt Gardner, Christopher Clark, Kenton Lee, and Luke Zettlemoyer. Deep contextualized word representations. In Proceedings of NAACL, 2018a.
- Matthew Peters, Mark Neumann, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Wen-tau Yih. Dissecting contextual word embeddings: Architecture and representation. In Proceedings of EMNLP, 2018b.
- Adam Poliak, Yonatan Belinkov, James Glass, and Benjamin Van Durme. On the evaluation of se- mantic phenomena in neural machine translation using natural language inference. In Proceedings of NAACL, 2018a.
- Adam Poliak, Aparajita Haldar, Rachel Rudinger, J. Edward Hu, Ellie Pavlick, Aaron Steven White, and Benjamin Van Durme. Collecting diverse natural language inference problems for sentence representation evaluation. In Proceedings of EMNLP, 2018b.
- Vasin Punyakanok, Dan Roth, and Wen-tau Yih. The importance of syntactic parsing and inference in semantic role labeling. Computational Linguistics, 34(2):257-287, 2008.
- Altaf Rahman and Vincent Ng. Resolving complex cases of definite pronouns: The Winograd schema challenge. In Proceedings of EMNLP, 2012.
- Rachel Rudinger, Adam Teichert, Ryan Culkin, Sheng Zhang, and Benjamin Van Durme. Neural Davidsonian semantic proto-role labeling. In Proceedings of EMNLP, 2018.
- Rico Sennrich, Barry Haddow, and Alexandra Birch. Neural machine translation of rare words with subword units. In Proceedings of ACL, 2016.
- Xing Shi, Inkit Padhi, and Kevin Knight. Does string-based neural MT learn source syntax? In Proceedings of EMNLP, 2016.
- Natalia Silveira, Timothy Dozat, Marie-Catherine de Marneffe, Samuel Bowman, Miriam Connor, John Bauer, and Christopher D. Manning. A gold standard dependency corpus for English. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, 2014.
- Emma Strubell, Patrick Verga, Daniel Andor, David Weiss, and Andrew McCallum. Linguistically- informed self-attention for semantic role labeling. In Proceedings of EMNLP, 2018.
- Ilya Sutskever, Oriol Vinyals, and Quoc V. Le. Sequence to sequence learning with neural networks. In Proceedings of NIPS, 2014.
- Adam Teichert, Adam Poliak, Benjamin Van Durme, and Matthew Gormley. Semantic proto-role labeling. In Proceedings of AAAI, 2017.
- Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. Attention is all you need. In Proceedings of NIPS, 2017.
- Alex Wang, Amanpreet Singh, Julian Michael, Felix Hill, Omer Levy, and Samuel Bowman. Glue: A multi-task benchmark and analysis platform for natural language understanding. In Proceedings of the 2018 EMNLP Workshop BlackboxNLP: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP, 2018.
- Aaron Steven White, Pushpendre Rastogi, Kevin Duh, and Benjamin Van Durme. Inference is everything: Recasting semantic resources into a unified evaluation framework. In Proceedings of IJCNLP, 2017.
- Yonghui Wu, Mike Schuster, Zhifeng Chen, Quoc V Le, Mohammad Norouzi, Wolfgang Macherey, Maxim Krikun, Yuan Cao, Qin Gao, Klaus Macherey, et al. Google's neural machine translation system: Bridging the gap between human and machine translation. arXiv preprint 1609.08144, 2016. · arXiv
- Kelly Zhang and Samuel Bowman. Language modeling teaches you more than translation does: Lessons learned through auxiliary syntactic task analysis. In Proceedings of the 2018 EMNLP Workshop BlackboxNLP: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP, 2018.
- Yukun Zhu, Ryan Kiros, Rich Zemel, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, Raquel Urtasun, Antonio Torralba, and Sanja Fidler. Aligning books and movies: Towards story-like visual explanations by watching movies and reading books. In Proceedings of ICCV, 2015.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
How Multilingual is Multilingual BERT?
Pires, T., Schlinger, E., & Garrette, D. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1493 · Cited by 1,351
Climbing towards NLU: On Meaning, Form, and Understanding in the Age of Data
Bender, E. M., & Koller, A. (2020) · Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.463 · Cited by 1,082
“…agreement (Goldberg, 2019; Jawahar et al., 2019), constituent types, dependency labels, NER, and (core) semantic role types (again, all in English) (Tenney et al., 2019).4 Hewitt and Manning (2019) find information analogous to unlabeled dependency structures in the word vectors provided by ELMo…”
BackgroundMoverScore: Text Generation Evaluating with Contextualized Embeddings and Earth Mover Distance
Zhao, W., Peyrard, M., Liu, F., Gao, Y., Meyer, C. M., & Eger, S. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1053 · Cited by 490
Designing and Interpreting Probes with Control Tasks
Hewitt, J., & Liang, P. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1275 · Cited by 393
Measuring Bias in Contextualized Word Representations
Kurita, K., Vyas, N., Pareek, A., Black, A. W., & Tsvetkov, Y. (2019) · Proceedings of the First Workshop on Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/w19-3823 · Cited by 348
Large pre-trained language models contain human-like biases of what is right and wrong to do
Schramowski, P., Turan, C., Andersen, N., Rothkopf, C. A., & Kersting, K. (2022) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-022-00458-8 · Cited by 291
Factual Probing Is [MASK]: Learning vs. Learning to Recall
Zhong, Z., Friedman, D., & Chen, D. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.398 · Cited by 274
exBERT: A Visual Analysis Tool to Explore Learned Representations in Transformer Models
Hoover, B., Strobelt, H., & Gehrmann, S. (2020) · Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-demos.22 · Cited by 151
Amnesic Probing: Behavioral Explanation with Amnesic Counterfactuals
Elazar, Y., Ravfogel, S., Jacovi, A., & Goldberg, Y. (2021) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00359 · Cited by 126
Investigating Gender Bias in BERT
Bhardwaj, R., Majumder, N., & Poria, S. (2021) · Cognitive Computation · doi:10.1007/s12559-021-09881-2 · Cited by 112
Guo, W., & Caliskan, A. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society · doi:10.1145/3461702.3462536 · Cited by 180
When Do You Need Billions of Words of Pretraining Data?
Zhang, Y., Warstadt, A., Li, X., & Bowman, S. R. (2021) · Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.90 · Cited by 85
Self-citationDoes ChatGPT have semantic understanding? A problem with the statistics-of-occurrence strategy
Titus, L. M. (2024) · Cognitive Systems Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2023.101174 · Cited by 82
Assessing Phrasal Representation and Composition in Transformers
Yu, L., & Ettinger, A. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.397 · Cited by 58
Roles and Utilization of Attention Heads in Transformer-based Neural Language Models
Jo, J.-Y., & Myaeng, S.-H. (2020) · Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.311 · Cited by 33
Probing Pretrained Models of Source Codes
Troshin, S., & Chirkova, N. (2022) · Proceedings of the Fifth BlackboxNLP Workshop on Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.blackboxnlp-1.31 · Cited by 23
The Life Cycle of Knowledge in Big Language Models: A Survey
Cao, B., Lin, H., Han, X., & Sun, L. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.07616 · Cited by 18
Trained on 100 million words and still in shape: BERT meets British National Corpus
Samuel, D., Kutuzov, A., Øvrelid, L., & Velldal, E. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EACL 2023 · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-eacl.146 · Cited by 14
Quantifying gender bias towards politicians in cross-lingual language models
Stańczak, K., Ray Choudhury, S., Pimentel, T., Cotterell, R., & Augenstein, I. (2023) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0277640 · Cited by 13
Are Emergent Abilities in Large Language Models just In-Context Learning?
Lu, S., Bigoulaeva, I., Sachdeva, R., Madabushi, H. T., & Gurevych, I. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.01809 · Cited by 12
How Context Affects Language Models' Factual Predictions
Fabio Petroni, P. L. (2020) · Automated Knowledge Base Construction (AKBC) · doi:10.24432/c5201w · Cited by 4
“…2018, Hewitt and Manning, 2019, Vig and Belinkov, 2019], negative polarity items [Warstadt and Bowman, 2019, Warstadt et al., 2019], semantic fragments [Richardson et al., 2019], function words [Kim et al., 2019], and many other linguistic phenomena [Tenney et al., 2019a,b, De Cao et al., 2020].”
BackgroundLi, J. (2025) · Natural Language Processing Journal · doi:10.1016/j.nlp.2025.100163 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Tenney, I., Xia, P., Chen, B., Wang, A., Poliak, A., McCoy, R. T., Kim, N., Van Durme, B., Bowman, S. R., Das, D., & Pavlick, E.
- Affiliations
- Google (United States) (US)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Swarthmore College (US)
- New York University (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1905.06316
- OpenAlex
- W2908854766
- Cited by
- 698
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 115 · 2022: 128 · 2021: 141 · 2020: 121 · 2019: 52
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Johns Hopkins University
- Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories
- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
- Keywords
- contextualized word representations, sentence structure, ELMo, BERT, syntactic structure, semantic structure, long-range dependencies, language modeling, machine translation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
