CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 97Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningTopic ModelingData Stream Mining Techniques

Episodic Memory in Lifelong Language Learning

Open access
d'Autume, Cyprien de Masson, Ruder, Sebastian, Kong, Lingpeng, Yogatama, Dani·2019·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1906.01076arXiv 1906.01076
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

We introduce a lifelong language learning setup where a model needs to learn from a stream of text examples without any dataset identifier. We propose an episodic memory model that performs sparse experience replay and local adaptation to mitigate catastrophic forgetting in this setup. Experiments on text classification and question answering demonstrate the complementary benefits of sparse experience replay and local adaptation to allow the model to continuously learn from new datasets. We also show that the space complexity of the episodic memory module can be reduced significantly (~50-90%) by randomly choosing which examples to store in memory with a minimal decrease in performance. We consider an episodic memory component as a crucial building block of general linguistic intelligence and see our model as a first step in that direction.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1906.01076

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rehearsal-based methods are not suitable for scenarios with data privacy concerns.

    “Rehearsal-based methods (de Masson D'Autume et al., 2019; Huang et al., 2021), which rely on storing past task data in a buffer and replaying it during training, are not suitable for scenarios with data privacy concerns.”

    From Orthogonal Subspace Learning for Language Model Continual Learning (2023) · cites this paper as de Masson D'Autume et al., 2019

    The Introduction (p. 2) and Training and Inference (p. 4) describe storing past examples in memory and replaying them during training. The paper does not address data privacy or say that rehearsal-based methods are unsuitable when privacy is a concern; its stated concern about storage is memory capacity (Episodic Memory, p. 4). (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • Non-parametric episodic memory can serve as rehearsal samples to alleviate catastrophic forgetting in parametric memory.

    “Additionally, non-parametric episodic memory can serve as rehearsal samples to alleviate catastrophic forgetting in parametric memory [138, 139, 141].”

    From Human-inspired Perspectives: A Survey on AI Long-term Memory (2024) · cites this paper as [141]

  • Rehearsal-based approaches allow access to a memory buffer with examples from prior tasks and train the model jointly with the current task.

    “Rehearsalbased approaches (Lopez-Paz and Ranzato, 2017; de Masson D'Autume et al., 2019) allow access to a memory buffer with examples from prior tasks and train the model jointly with the current task.”

    From Orthogonal Subspace Learning for Language Model Continual Learning (2023) · cites this paper as de Masson D'Autume et al., 2019

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Chaudhry, A., Ranzato, M., Rohrbach, M., and Elhoseiny, M. Efficient lifelong learning with A-GEM. In Proc. of ICLR , 2019.
  2. Howard, J. and Ruder, S. Universal language model fine-tuning for text classification. In Proc. of ACL , 2018.
  3. Kingma, D. P. and Ba, J. L. Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. In Proc. of ICLR , 2015.
  4. Kitaev, N. and Klein, D. Constituency parsing with a self-attentive encoder. In Proc. of ACL , 2018.
  5. Lee, K., He, L., and Zettlemoyer, L. Higher-order coreference resolution with coarse-to-fine inference. In Proc. of NAACL , 2018.
  6. Lopez-Paz, D. and Ranzato, M. Gradient episodic memory for continuum learning. In Proc. of NIPS , 2017.
  7. McCann, B., Keskar, N. S., Xiong, C., and Socher, R. The natural language decathlon: Multitask learning as question answering. arXiv preprint 1806.08730 , 2018. · arXiv
  8. McGaugh, J. L. Memory-a century of consolidation. Science , 287(5451):248-251, 2000.
  9. Miconi, T., Clune, J., and Stanley, K. O. Differentiable plasticity: training plastic neural networks with backpropagation. In Proc. of ICML , 2018.
  10. Rajpurkar, P., Zhang, J., Lopyrev, K., and Liang, P. SQuAD: 100,000+ questions for machine comprehension of text. In Proc. of EMNLP , 2016.
  11. Ramalho, T. and Garnelo, M. Adaptive posterior learning: few-shot learning with a surprise-based memory module. In Proc. of ICLR , 2019.
  12. Ratcliff, R. Connectionist models of recognition memory: constraints imposed by learning and forgetting functions. Psychological Review , 97(2):285, 1990.
  13. Ruder, S. An overview of multi-task learning in deep neural networks. arXiv preprint 1706.05098 , 2017. · arXiv
  14. Schwarz, J., Luketina, J., Czarnecki, W. M., Grabska-Barwinska, A., Teh, Y. W., Pascanu, R., and Hadsell, R. Progress and compress: A scalable framework for continual learning. In Proc. of ICML , 2018.
  15. Sprechmann, P., Jayakumar, S. M., Rae, J. W., Pritzel, A., Uria, B., and Vinyals, O. Memory-based parameter adaptation. In Proc. of ICLR , 2018.
  16. Srivastava, N., Hinton, G., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., and Salakhutdinov, R. Dropout: A simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. Journal of Machine Learning Research , 15: 1929-1958, 2014.
  17. Toneva, M., Sordoni, A., des Combes, R. T., Trischler, A., Bengio, Y., and Gordon, G. J. An empirical study of example forgetting during deep neural network learning. In Proc. of ICLR , 2019.
  18. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., and Polosukhin, I. Attention is all you need. In Proc. of NIPS , 2017.
  19. Wang, H., Xiong, W., Yu, M., Guo, X., Chang, S., and Wang, W. Y. Sentence embedding alignment for lifelong relation extraction. In Proc. of NAACL , 2019.
  20. Yogatama, D., de Masson d'Autume, C., Connor, J., Kocisky, T., Chrzanowski, M., Kong, L., Lazaridou, A., Ling, W., Yu, L., Dyer, C., and Blunsom, P. Learning and evaluating general linguistic intelligence. arXiv preprint 1901.11373 , 2019. · arXiv
  21. Zenke, F., Poole, B., and Ganguli, S. Continual learning through synaptic intelligence. In Proc. of ICML , 2017.
  22. Zhang, X., Zhao, J., and LeCun, Y. Character-level convolutional networks for text classification. In Proc. of NIPS , 2015.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
d'Autume, C. D. M., Ruder, S., Kong, L., & Yogatama, D.
ORCID
Kong, Lingpeng
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2019
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1906.01076
arXiv
1906.01076
OpenAlex
W4288336773
Cited by
95
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 5
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Data Stream Mining Techniques
Keywords
episodic memory, lifelong learning, catastrophic forgetting, local adaptation, text classification, question answering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review