CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 373Face recognition and analysisAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsFace Recognition and Perception

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

BlazeFace: Sub-millisecond Neural Face Detection on Mobile GPUs

Open access
Bazarevsky, Valentin, Kartynnik, Yury, Vakunov, Andrey, Raveendran, Karthik, Grundmann, Matthias·2019·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1907.05047arXiv 1907.05047
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

We present BlazeFace, a lightweight and well-performing face detector tailored for mobile GPU inference. It runs at a speed of 200-1000+ FPS on flagship devices. This super-realtime performance enables it to be applied to any augmented reality pipeline that requires an accurate facial region of interest as an input for task-specific models, such as 2D/3D facial keypoint or geometry estimation, facial features or expression classification, and face region segmentation. Our contributions include a lightweight feature extraction network inspired by, but distinct from MobileNetV1/V2, a GPU-friendly anchor scheme modified from Single Shot MultiBox Detector (SSD), and an improved tie resolution strategy alternative to non-maximum suppression.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1907.05047

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [6][6] Ross Girshick. Fast R-CNN. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision , pages 1440-1448, 2015. 1 -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–373 of 373

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Bazarevsky, V., Kartynnik, Y., Vakunov, A., Raveendran, K., & Grundmann, M.
Affiliations
Google (United States) (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2019
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1907.05047
arXiv
1907.05047
OpenAlex
W2962134292
Cited by
264
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 69 · 2023: 77 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
face detection, real-time object detection, lightweight neural networks, anchor-based detection, SSD, MobileNet, non-maximum suppression, augmented reality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review