Adversarial Video Generation on Complex Datasets
Open accessAbstract
Generative models of natural images have progressed towards high fidelity samples by the strong leveraging of scale. We attempt to carry this success to the field of video modeling by showing that large Generative Adversarial Networks trained on the complex Kinetics-600 dataset are able to produce video samples of substantially higher complexity and fidelity than previous work. Our proposed model, Dual Video Discriminator GAN (DVD-GAN), scales to longer and higher resolution videos by leveraging a computationally efficient decomposition of its discriminator. We evaluate on the related tasks of video synthesis and video prediction, and achieve new state-of-the-art Fréchet Inception Distance for prediction for Kinetics-600, as well as state-of-the-art Inception Score for synthesis on the UCF-101 dataset, alongside establishing a strong baseline for synthesis on Kinetics-600.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
DVD-GAN outperformed previous methods such as TGAN-v2 and MoCoGAN on the UCF-101 dataset in terms of IS score, although DVD-GAN conditioned its generation on class labels whereas the other approaches were unconditional.
“It outperformed previous methods such as TGAN-v2 and MoCoGAN on the UCF-101 dataset in terms of IS score, although DVD-GAN conditioned its generation on class labels, whereas the other approaches were unconditional.”
From Video Diffusion Models: A Survey (2024) · cites this paper as Clark et al., 2019
Table 2 in §4.1.2 (p. 6) reports a higher UCF-101 Inception Score for DVD-GAN (32.97) than for TGANv2 (24.34) or MoCoGAN (12.42). Section 4.1 (p. 5) identifies DVD-GAN’s results as class-conditional, but our copy does not say that the TGANv2 and MoCoGAN results in the comparison were unconditional. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation
Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., & Brox, T. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28 · Cited by 99,404 · see citing works
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946 · see citing works
A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networks
Karras, T., Laine, S., & Aila, T. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00453 · Cited by 11,714 · see citing works
Learning Spatiotemporal Features with 3D Convolutional Networks
Tran, D., Bourdev, L., Fergus, R., Torresani, L., & Paluri, M. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.510 · Cited by 9,593 · see citing works
Quo Vadis, Action Recognition? A New Model and the Kinetics Dataset
Carreira, J., & Zisserman, A. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.502 · Cited by 9,570 · see citing works
GANs Trained by a Two Time-Scale Update Rule Converge to a Local Nash Equilibrium
Heusel, M., Ramsauer, H., Unterthiner, T., Nessler, B., & Hochreiter, S. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.08500 · Cited by 8,365 · see citing works
Large Scale GAN Training for High Fidelity Natural Image Synthesis
Brock, A., Donahue, J., & Simonyan, K. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1809.11096 · Cited by 3,717 · see citing works
Self-citationSelf-Attention Generative Adversarial Networks
Zhang, H., Goodfellow, I., Metaxas, D., & Odena, A. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1805.08318 · Cited by 3,353 · see citing works
Unsupervised Learning of Video Representations using LSTMs
Srivastava, N., Mansimov, E., & Salakhutdinov, R. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1502.04681 · Cited by 1,861 · see citing works
Wang, T.-C., Liu, M.-Y., Zhu, J.-Y., Liu, G., Tao, A., Kautz, J., & Catanzaro, B. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1808.06601 · Cited by 594 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 53
- Dinesh Acharya, Zhiwu Huang, Danda Pani Paudel, and Luc Van Gool. Towards high resolution video generation with progressive growing of sliced Wasserstein GANs. arXiv:1810.02419 , 2018. · arXiv
- Martin Arjovsky, Soumith Chintala, and Léon Bottou. Wasserstein GAN. arXiv:1701.07875 , 2017. · arXiv
- Mohammad Babaeizadeh, Chelsea Finn, Dumitru Erhan, Roy H Campbell, and Sergey Levine. Stochastic variational video prediction. ICLR , 2018.
- Nicolas Ballas, Li Yao, Chris Pal, and Aaron Courville. Delving deeper into convolutional networks for learning video representations. arXiv:1511.06432 , 2015. · arXiv
- Aayush Bansal, Shugao Ma, Deva Ramanan, and Yaser Sheikh. Recycle-GAN: Unsupervised video retargeting. In ECCV , September 2018.
- Shane Barratt and Rishi Sharma. A note on the Inception Score. arXiv:1801.01973 , 2018. · arXiv
- Moshe Blank, Lena Gorelick, Eli Shechtman, Michal Irani, and Ronen Basri. Actions as space-time shapes. In ICCV , 2005.
- Joao Carreira, Eric Noland, Andras Banki-Horvath, Chloe Hillier, and Andrew Zisserman. A short note about Kinetics-600. arXiv:1808.01340 , 2018. · arXiv
- Harm De Vries, Florian Strub, Jérémie Mary, Hugo Larochelle, Olivier Pietquin, and Aaron C Courville. Modulating early visual processing by language. In NeurIPS , 2017.
- Emily Denton and Rob Fergus. Stochastic video generation with a learned prior. ICML , 2018.
- Vincent Dumoulin, Jonathon Shlens, and Manjunath Kudlur. A learned representation for artistic style. In ICLR , 2017.
- Frederik Ebert, Chelsea Finn, Alex X Lee, and Sergey Levine. Self-supervised visual planning with temporal skip connections. arXiv:1710.05268 , 2017. · arXiv
- Ian Goodfellow, Jean Pouget-Abadie, Mehdi Mirza, Bing Xu, David Warde-Farley, Sherjil Ozair, Aaron Courville, and Yoshua Bengio. Generative adversarial nets. In NeurIPS , 2014.
- Ishaan Gulrajani, Faruk Ahmed, Martin Arjovsky, Vincent Dumoulin, and Aaron C Courville. Improved training of Wasserstein GANs. In NeurIPS , 2017.
- Jun-Ting Hsieh, Bingbin Liu, De-An Huang, Li Fei-Fei, and Juan Carlos Niebles. Learning to decompose and disentangle representations for video prediction. In NeurIPS . 2018.
- Sergey Ioffe and Christian Szegedy. Batch normalization: Accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift. arXiv:1502.03167 , 2015. · arXiv
- Nal Kalchbrenner, Aäron van den Oord, Karen Simonyan, Ivo Danihelka, Oriol Vinyals, Alex Graves, and Koray Kavukcuoglu. Video pixel networks. In ICML , 2017.
- Will Kay, Joao Carreira, Karen Simonyan, Brian Zhang, Chloe Hillier, Sudheendra Vijayanarasimhan, Fabio Viola, Tim Green, Trevor Back, Paul Natsev, Mustafa Suleyman, and Andrew Zisserman. The Kinetics human action video dataset. arXiv:1705.06950 , 2017. · arXiv
- Durk P Kingma and Prafulla Dhariwal. Glow: Generative flow with invertible 1x1 convolutions. In NeurIPS , 2018.
- Manoj Kumar, Mohammad Babaeizadeh, Dumitru Erhan, Chelsea Finn, Sergey Levine, Laurent Dinh, and Durk Kingma. VideoFlow: A flow-based generative model for video. arXiv:1903.01434 , 2019. · arXiv
- Alex X Lee, Richard Zhang, Frederik Ebert, Pieter Abbeel, Chelsea Finn, and Sergey Levine. Stochastic adversarial video prediction. arXiv:1804.01523 , 2018. · arXiv
- Jimmy Lei Ba, Jamie Ryan Kiros, and Geoffrey E Hinton. Layer normalization. arXiv:1607.06450 , 2016. · arXiv
- Yitong Li, Martin Renqiang Min, Dinghan Shen, David Carlson, and Lawrence Carin. Video generation from text. In Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , 2018.
- Jae Hyun Lim and Jong Chul Ye. Geometric GAN. arXiv:1705.02894 , 2017. · arXiv
- Michael Mathieu, Camille Couprie, and Yann LeCun. Deep multi-scale video prediction beyond mean square error. arXiv:1511.05440 , 2015. · arXiv
- Jacob Menick and Nal Kalchbrenner. Generating high fidelity images with subscale pixel networks and multidimensional upscaling. In ICLR , 2019.
- Takeru Miyato and Masanori Koyama. cGANs with projection discriminator. arXiv:1802.05637 , 2018. · arXiv
- Takeru Miyato, Toshiki Kataoka, Masanori Koyama, and Yuichi Yoshida. Spectral normalization for generative adversarial networks. arXiv:1802.05957 , 2018. · arXiv
- Katsunori Ohnishi, Shohei Yamamoto, Yoshitaka Ushiku, and Tatsuya Harada. Hierarchical video generation from orthogonal information: Optical flow and texture. In AAAI , 2018.
- Marc'Aurelio Ranzato, Arthur Szlam, Joan Bruna, Michaël Mathieu, Ronan Collobert, and Sumit Chopra. Video (language) modeling: a baseline for generative models of natural videos. arXiv:1412.6604 , 2014. · arXiv
- Ali Razavi, Aaron van den Oord, and Oriol Vinyals. Generating diverse high-fidelity images with VQ-VAE-2. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.00446 , 2019. · arXiv
- Masaki Saito and Shunta Saito. TGANv2: Efficient training of large models for video generation with multiple subsampling layers. arXiv:1811.09245 , 2018. · arXiv
- Masaki Saito, Eiichi Matsumoto, and Shunta Saito. Temporal generative adversarial nets with singular value clipping. In ICCV , 2017.
- Mehdi SM Sajjadi, Olivier Bachem, Mario Lucic, Olivier Bousquet, and Sylvain Gelly. Assessing generative models via precision and recall. In NeurIPS , 2018.
- Tim Salimans, Ian Goodfellow, Wojciech Zaremba, Vicki Cheung, Alec Radford, and Xi Chen. Improved techniques for training GANs. In NeurIPS , 2016.
- Andrew M Saxe, James L McClelland, and Surya Ganguli. Exact solutions to the nonlinear dynamics of learning in deep linear neural networks. arXiv:1312.6120 , 2013. · arXiv
- Khurram Soomro, Amir Roshan Zamir, and Mubarak Shah. UCF101: A dataset of 101 human actions classes from videos in the wild. arXiv:1212.0402 , 2012. · arXiv
- Concetto Spampinato, Sergio Palazzo, P D'Oro, Francesca Murabito, Daniela Giordano, and M Shah. VOS-GAN: Adversarial learning of visual-temporal dynamics for unsupervised dense prediction in videos. arXiv:1803.09092 , 2018. · arXiv
- Ximeng Sun, Huijuan Xu, and Kate Saenko. A two-stream variational adversarial network for video generation. arXiv:1812.01037 , 2018. · arXiv
- Ilya Sutskever, James Martens, and Geoffrey E Hinton. Generating text with recurrent neural networks. In ICML , 2011.
- Christian Szegedy, Vincent Vanhoucke, Sergey Ioffe, Jonathon Shlens, and Zbigniew Wojna. Rethinking the Inception architecture for computer vision. In CVPR , 2016.
- Seiya Tokui, Kenta Oono, Shohei Hido, and Justin Clayton. Chainer: a next-generation open source framework for deep learning. In Workshop on Systems for ML and Open Source Software at NeurIPS , 2015.
- Sergey Tulyakov, Ming-Yu Liu, Xiaodong Yang, and Jan Kautz. MoCoGAN: Decomposing motion and content for video generation. In CVPR , 2018.
- Dmitry Ulyanov, Andrea Vedaldi, and Victor Lempitsky. Instance normalization: The missing ingredient for fast stylization. arXiv:1607.08022 , 2016. · arXiv
- Thomas Unterthiner, Sjoerd van Steenkiste, Karol Kurach, Raphael Marinier, Marcin Michalski, and Sylvain Gelly. Towards accurate generative models of video: A new metric & challenges. arXiv:1812.01717 , 2018. · arXiv
- Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. Attention is all you need. In NeurIPS , 2017.
- Ruben Villegas, Jimei Yang, Yuliang Zou, Sungryull Sohn, Xunyu Lin, and Honglak Lee. Learning to generate long-term future via hierarchical prediction. In ICML , 2017.
- Carl Vondrick, Hamed Pirsiavash, and Antonio Torralba. Generating videos with scene dynamics. In NeurIPS , 2016.
- Jacob Walker, Kenneth Marino, Abhinav Gupta, and Martial Hebert. The pose knows: Video forecasting by generating pose futures. In ICCV , 2017.
- Dirk Weissenborn, Oscar Täckström, and Jakob Uszkoreit. Scaling autoregressive video models. arXiv:1906.02634 , 2019. · arXiv
- Yuxin Wu and Kaiming He. Group normalization. In ECCV , 2018.
- Ceyuan Yang, Zhe Wang, Xinge Zhu, Chen Huang, Jianping Shi, and Dahua Lin. Pose guided human video generation. In ECCV , 2018.
- Yipin Zhou, Zhaowen Wang, Chen Fang, Trung Bui, and Tamara L Berg. Dance dance generation: Motion transfer for internet videos. arXiv:1904.00129 , 2019. · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Generative Adversarial Networks in Computer Vision: A Survey and Taxonomy
Wang, Z., She, Q., & Ward, T. E. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3439723 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
VideoGPT: Video Generation using VQ-VAE and Transformers
Yan, W., Zhang, Y., Abbeel, P., & Srinivas, A. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.10157 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Behavioral Use Licensing for Responsible AI
Contractor, D., McDuff, D., Haines, J. K., Lee, J., Hines, C., Hecht, B., Vincent, N., & Li, H. (2022) · 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533143 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Self-Supervised Video GANs: Learning for Appearance Consistency and Motion Coherency
Hyun, S., Kim, J., & Heo, J.-P. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.01068 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Genie: Generative Interactive Environments
Bruce, J., Dennis, M., Edwards, A., Parker-Holder, J., Shi, Y., Hughes, E., Lai, M., Mavalankar, A., Steigerwald, R., Apps, C., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.15391 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
“…, which typically condition on initial frames (or text) and predict the remaining frames in a video (Blattmann et al., 2023b; Brooks et al., 2024; Clark et al., 2019; Finn et al., 2016; Ho et al., 2022a,b; Höppe et al., 2022; Kalchbrenner et al., 2017; Le Moing et al., 2021; Lotter et al., 2017;…”
BackgroundVideo Diffusion Models: A Survey
Melnik, A., Ljubljanac, M., Lu, C., Yan, Q., Ren, W., & Ritter, H. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.03150 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Clark, A., Donahue, J., & Simonyan, K.
- Affiliations
- Google (United States) (US)
- ORCID
- Simonyan, Karen
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1907.06571
- OpenAlex
- W2976617189
- Cited by
- 157
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 3
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image Processing Techniques
- Keywords
- video generation, generative adversarial networks, video prediction, UCF101, Fréchet Inception Distance, Inception Score
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review