PreprintCited by 166Generative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisMultimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsAdvanced Neural Network Applications

VideoGPT: Video Generation using VQ-VAE and Transformers

Open access
Yan, Wilson, Zhang, Yunzhi, Abbeel, Pieter, Srinivas, Aravind·2021·arXiv

Abstract

We present VideoGPT: a conceptually simple architecture for scaling likelihood based generative modeling to natural videos. VideoGPT uses VQ-VAE that learns downsampled discrete latent representations of a raw video by employing 3D convolutions and axial self-attention. A simple GPT-like architecture is then used to autoregressively model the discrete latents using spatio-temporal position encodings. Despite the simplicity in formulation and ease of training, our architecture is able to generate samples competitive with state-of-the-art GAN models for video generation on the BAIR Robot dataset, and generate high fidelity natural videos from UCF-101 and Tumbler GIF Dataset (TGIF). We hope our proposed architecture serves as a reproducible reference for a minimalistic implementation of transformer based video generation models. Samples and code are available at https://wilson1yan.github.io/videogpt/index.html

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2104.10157

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several two-stage approaches use autoregressive models to model a compressed latent image space instead of raw pixels to scale to higher resolutions.

    “To scale to higher resolutions, several two-stage approaches [23,67,101,103] use ARMs to model a compressed latent image space instead of raw pixels.”

    From High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Models (2022) · cites this paper as [101]

    The Introduction (pp. 2–3) describes a two-stage approach that trains an autoregressive transformer on compressed latents rather than raw pixels, reducing computation for high-resolution inputs. The cited approach models video latents across space and time, however, not specifically a latent image space. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • VideoGPT did not outperform the best GAN-based models at the time, namely TGAN-v2 and DVD-GAN.

    “While VideoGPT did not outperform the best GAN-based models at the time, namely TGAN-v2 and DVD-GAN, it achieved a respectable IS score on the UCF-101 benchmark considering its simple architecture.”

    From Video Diffusion Models: A Survey (2024) · cites this paper as Yan et al., 2021

  • VQ-VAEs use autoregressive models to learn an expressive prior over a discretized latent space.

    “VQ-VAEs [67, 101] use autoregressive models to learn an expressive prior over a discretized latent space.”

    From High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Models (2022) · cites this paper as [101]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 73 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Ba, J. L., Kiros, J. R., and Hinton, G. E. Layer normalization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.06450 , 2016. · arXiv
  2. Goodfellow, I., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S., Courville, A., and Bengio, Y. Generative adversarial nets. In Advances in neural information processing systems , pp. 2672-2680, 2014.
  3. Kalchbrenner, N., Oord, A. v. d., Simonyan, K., Danihelka, I., Vinyals, O., Graves, A., and Kavukcuoglu, K. Video pixel networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.00527 , 2016. · arXiv
  4. Kalchbrenner, N., Oord, A., Simonyan, K., Danihelka, I., Vinyals, O., Graves, A., and Kavukcuoglu, K. Video pixel networks. In International Conference on Machine Learning , pp. 1771-1779. PMLR, 2017.
  5. Kingma, D. P. and Dhariwal, P. Glow: Generative flow with invertible 1x1 convolutions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.03039 , 2018. · arXiv
  6. Kingma, D. P., Salimans, T., Jozefowicz, R., Chen, X., Sutskever, I., and Welling, M. Improving variational inference with inverse autoregressive flow. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 2016.
  7. Le Gall, D. Mpeg: A video compression standard for multimedia applications. Communications of the ACM , 34(4): 46-58, 1991.
  8. Mittal, G., Marwah, T., and Balasubramanian, V. N. Syncdraw: Automatic video generation using deep recurrent attentive architectures. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM international conference on Multimedia , pp. 1096-1104, 2017.
  9. Parmar, N., Vaswani, A., Uszkoreit, J., Kaiser, Ł., Shazeer, N., and Ku, A. Image transformer. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.05751 , 2018. · arXiv
  10. Radford, A., Wu, J., Child, R., Luan, D., Amodei, D., and Sutskever, I. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI Blog , 1(8):9, 2019.
  11. Zhang, H., Goodfellow, I., Metaxas, D., and Odena, A. Selfattention generative adversarial networks. In International Conference on Machine Learning , pp. 7354-7363. PMLR, 2019.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yan, W., Zhang, Y., Abbeel, P., & Srinivas, A.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2021
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3152733922
Cited by
156
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 7
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
video generation, vector quantized variational autoencoder, discrete latent representations, 3D convolution, autoregressive models, UCF101

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review