The DOI matches its DataCite record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach
Open accessAbstract
Language model pretraining has led to significant performance gains but careful comparison between different approaches is challenging. Training is computationally expensive, often done on private datasets of different sizes, and, as we will show, hyperparameter choices have significant impact on the final results. We present a replication study of BERT pretraining (Devlin et al., 2019) that carefully measures the impact of many key hyperparameters and training data size. We find that BERT was significantly undertrained, and can match or exceed the performance of every model published after it. Our best model achieves state-of-the-art results on GLUE, RACE and SQuAD. These results highlight the importance of previously overlooked design choices, and raise questions about the source of recently reported improvements. We release our models and code.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Latent sematic analysis does not fare well in this task; ALC, on the other hand, performs close to on par with transformer-based RoBERTa embeddings.”
From Embedding Regression: Models for Context-Specific Description and Inference (2023) · cites this paper as Liu et al. 2019
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“One is based on RoBERTa (Liu et al., 2019) and available as a website called 'GPT-2 Output Detector Demo.'”
From Tortured phrases: A dubious writing style emerging in science. Evidence of critical issues affecting established journals (2021) · cites this paper as Liu et al., 2019
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Liu et al. found that BERT was significantly undertrained, and they proposed an improved version for training BERT models, namely RoBERTa.”
From A Review on Deep-Learning-Based Cyberbullying Detection (2023) · cites this paper as [48]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Hence, we base our experiments on well-established large language models (LLM) from the general and scientific domain -RoBERTa (Liu et al., 2019), BioBERT (Lee et al., 2020) and SciBERT ( Beltagy et al., 2019) -with the recommended default hyperparameter settings.”
From NLPeer: A Unified Resource for the Computational Study of Peer Review (2023) · cites this paper as Liu et al., 2019
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Within the past five years, advancements in NLP have achieved huge gains in accuracy when tested against standard datasets [8, 18, 34, 56, 58, 60, 63], with state-ofthe-art accuracy in natural language processing models as high as 99% for certain tasks [8, 34].”
From A Mixed-Methods Approach to Understanding User Trust after Voice Assistant Failures (2023) · cites this paper as [34]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The computational models for detecting evidence of CAs in students' collaborative discourse consist of three fine-tuned utterance-level RoBERTa transformer models (Liu et al., 2019), which outperformed few-shot prompting of LLMs (Ganesh et al., 2024).”
From A Feasibility and Implementation Integrity Study of the Community Builder (CoBi): An AI-based Collaboration Support System in K-12 Classrooms (2025) · cites this paper as Liu et al., 2019
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“RoBERTa (Liu et al., 2019) showed, that the performance of BERT can further improved by small adaptations to the pre-training process.”
From Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks (2019) · cites this paper as Liu et al., 2019
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“BERT (Devlin et al., 2018) and RoBERTa (Liu et al., 2019) has set a new state-of-the-art performance on sentence-pair regression tasks like semantic textual similarity (STS).”
From Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks (2019) · cites this paper as Liu et al., 2019
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“We applied best practices for training BERT model recently proposed in Liu et al. [2019].”
From DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter (2019) · cites this paper as Liu et al., 2019
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“We then classified the sentences into positive, neutral or negative using a sentiment classifier based on RoBERTa49, which was fine-tuned for sentiment classification50.”
From Generative language models exhibit social identity biases (2024) · cites this paper as [49]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Bi-Real Net [164] introduces identity shortcuts connecting activations to activations in consecutive blocks, through which 32-bit activations can be propagated.”
From A Survey of Quantization Methods for Efficient Neural Network Inference (2022) · cites this paper as [164]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Color cooccurrence in VISION and LANGUAGE yields perceptual organization: Similar representations of color are obtained via, from LEFT to RIGHT, the perceptual layout from CIELAB color space, cooccurrence in CIFAR-10 images, and language cooccurrence modeling”
From The Platonic Representation Hypothesis (2024) · cites this paper as Liu et al. (2019)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“For any incoming completion prompt, this library waits about 10ms for to see if it can be batched together with other requests.”
From A Transformer-Based Approach for Smart Invocation of Automatic Code Completion (2024) · cites this paper as [23]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Neural network-based detectors, particularly those utilizing BERT, have proven effective in distinguishing between human-written texts and those generated by GPT-2 [Ippolito et al., 2020;Liu et al., 2019].”
From Authorship Attribution in the Era of LLMs: Problems, Methodologies, and Challenges (2025) · cites this paper as Liu et al., 2019
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“ROBERTA attains better performance on an assortment of tasks than its predecessors, making it our baseline of choice.”
From Don’t Stop Pretraining: Adapt Language Models to Domains and Tasks (2020) · cites this paper as Liu et al., 2019
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · Cited by 120,404
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.04805 · Cited by 73,173
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 54,325
Deep Contextualized Word Representations
Peters, M., Neumann, M., Iyyer, M., Gardner, M., Clark, C., Lee, K., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1202 · Cited by 11,983
Self-citation(2017) · Cited by 11,625
Recursive Deep Models for Semantic Compositionality Over a Sentiment Treebank
Socher, R., Perelygin, A., Wu, J., Chuang, J., Manning, C. D., Ng, A., & Potts, C. (2013) · Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d13-1170 · Cited by 6,878
XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understanding
Yang, Z., Dai, Z., Yang, Y., Carbonell, J., Salakhutdinov, R., & Le, Q. V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1906.08237 · Cited by 6,687
SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text
Rajpurkar, P., Zhang, J., Lopyrev, K., & Liang, P. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1264 · Cited by 6,208
GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understanding
Wang, A., Singh, A., Michael, J., Hill, F., Levy, O., & Bowman, S. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 EMNLP Workshop BlackboxNLP: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP · doi:10.18653/v1/w18-5446 · Cited by 4,222
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Eneko Agirre, Llu'is M'arquez, and Richard Wicentowski, editors. 2007. Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Semantic Evaluations (SemEval-2007) .
- Bryan McCann, James Bradbury, Caiming Xiong, and Richard Socher. 2017. Learned in translation: Contextualized word vectors. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS) , pages 62976308.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,301–1,308 of 1,308
The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modeling
Gao, L., Biderman, S., Black, S., Golding, L., Hoppe, T., Foster, C., Phang, J., He, H., Thite, A., Nabeshima, N., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2101.00027 · Cited by 492
Fine-Tuning Pretrained Language Models: Weight Initializations, Data Orders, and Early Stopping
Dodge, J., Ilharco, G., Schwartz, R., Farhadi, A., Hajishirzi, H., & Smith, N. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2002.06305 · Cited by 412
Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generation
Li, X. L., & Liang, P. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2101.00190 · Cited by 289
On the Stability of Fine-tuning BERT: Misconceptions, Explanations, and Strong Baselines
Mosbach, M., Andriushchenko, M., & Klakow, D. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.04884 · Cited by 220
Evaluation of Text Generation: A Survey
Celikyilmaz, A., Clark, E., & Gao, J. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.14799 · Cited by 207
I-BERT: Integer-only BERT Quantization
Kim, S., Gholami, A., Yao, Z., Mahoney, M. W., & Keutzer, K. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2101.01321 · Cited by 186
Training with Quantization Noise for Extreme Model Compression
Fan, A., Stock, P., Graham, B., Grave, E., Gribonval, R., Jegou, H., & Joulin, A. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.07320 · Cited by 145
Improving Code Autocompletion with Transfer Learning
Zhou, W., Kim, S., Murali, V., & Aye, G. A. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2105.05991
“Transfer learning has revolutionized natural language processing (NLP) since the seminal papers on models such as GPT-2 [9], BERT [10] and RoBERTa [23].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, Y., Ott, M., Goyal, N., Du, J., Joshi, M., Chen, D., Levy, O., Lewis, M., Zettlemoyer, L., & Stoyanov, V.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1907.11692
- OpenAlex
- W2965373594
- Cited by
- 16,515
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 437 · 2025: 1521 · 2024: 2366 · 2023: 4159 · 2022: 2861 · 2021: 3287 · 2020: 1704 · 2019: 176
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1122374)
- University of Pennsylvania
- Mirowski Family Foundation
- National Institutes of Health (MH106933, 1122374)
- Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (825627)
- Office of Naval Research (N00014‐19‐1‐2620, N00014)
- National Institute of Mental Health (P50MH106933)
- National Human Genome Research Institute (U54HG007963)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (K23NS121520)
- U.S. National Library of Medicine (T15LM007092)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Digital Humanities and Scholarship
- Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Computational and Text Analysis Methods
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Keywords
- combinatorial optimization, Transformer encoder, automated problem solving, sociocultural change
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
