PreprintCited by 16,515Digital Humanities and ScholarshipComputational and Text Analysis MethodsTopic Modeling

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach

Open access
Liu, Yinhan, Ott, Myle, Goyal, Naman, Du, Jingfei, Joshi, Mandar, Chen, Danqi, Levy, Omer, Lewis, Mike, Zettlemoyer, Luke, Stoyanov, Veselin·2019·arXiv

Abstract

Language model pretraining has led to significant performance gains but careful comparison between different approaches is challenging. Training is computationally expensive, often done on private datasets of different sizes, and, as we will show, hyperparameter choices have significant impact on the final results. We present a replication study of BERT pretraining (Devlin et al., 2019) that carefully measures the impact of many key hyperparameters and training data size. We find that BERT was significantly undertrained, and can match or exceed the performance of every model published after it. Our best model achieves state-of-the-art results on GLUE, RACE and SQuAD. These results highlight the importance of previously overlooked design choices, and raise questions about the source of recently reported improvements. We release our models and code.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1907.11692

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 45 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Eneko Agirre, Llu'is M'arquez, and Richard Wicentowski, editors. 2007. Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Semantic Evaluations (SemEval-2007) .
  2. Bryan McCann, James Bradbury, Caiming Xiong, and Richard Socher. 2017. Learned in translation: Contextualized word vectors. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS) , pages 62976308.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 1,101–1,200 of 1,308

Metadata

Authors
Liu, Y., Ott, M., Goyal, N., Du, J., Joshi, M., Chen, D., Levy, O., Lewis, M., Zettlemoyer, L., & Stoyanov, V.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2019
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2965373594
Cited by
16,515
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 437 · 2025: 1521 · 2024: 2366 · 2023: 4159 · 2022: 2861 · 2021: 3287 · 2020: 1704 · 2019: 176
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1122374)
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • Mirowski Family Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (MH106933, 1122374)
  • Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (825627)
  • Office of Naval Research (N00014‐19‐1‐2620, N00014)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (P50MH106933)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (U54HG007963)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (K23NS121520)
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine (T15LM007092)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Digital Humanities and Scholarship
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Computational and Text Analysis Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
Keywords
combinatorial optimization, Transformer encoder, automated problem solving, sociocultural change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review