The DOI matches its DataCite record; 15 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.
InterpretML: A Unified Framework for Machine Learning Interpretability
Open accessAbstract
InterpretML is an open-source Python package which exposes machine learning interpretability algorithms to practitioners and researchers. InterpretML exposes two types of interpretability - glassbox models, which are machine learning models designed for interpretability (ex: linear models, rule lists, generalized additive models), and blackbox explainability techniques for explaining existing systems (ex: Partial Dependence, LIME). The package enables practitioners to easily compare interpretability algorithms by exposing multiple methods under a unified API, and by having a built-in, extensible visualization platform. InterpretML also includes the first implementation of the Explainable Boosting Machine, a powerful, interpretable, glassbox model that can be as accurate as many blackbox models. The MIT licensed source code can be downloaded from github.com/microsoft/interpret.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Various toolboxes have been released in the past years to assist the algorithm experimentation and software development to enhance AI trustworthiness in different aspects such as fairness [12, 13, 71], XAI [56, 1, 8], and adversarial robustness [55, 2].”
From Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practices (2023) · cites this paper as [56]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Therefore, only features that are related to other features are considered relevant for anomaly detection.”
From A Survey on Explainable Anomaly Detection (2024) · cites this paper as [154]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“They assume that anomalies are those instances that violate the normal dependencies between features.”
From A Survey on Explainable Anomaly Detection (2024) · cites this paper as [154]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Meanwhile, Noto et al. [154] and Paulheim & Meusel [167] try to find a relevant feature subset for anomaly detection by exploring the correlations between features.”
From A Survey on Explainable Anomaly Detection (2024) · cites this paper as [154]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Only explores”
From A Survey on Explainable Anomaly Detection (2024) · cites this paper as [154]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Robust to noisy”
From A Survey on Explainable Anomaly Detection (2024) · cites this paper as [154]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python
Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Müller, A., Nothman, J., Louppe, G., et al. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1201.0490 · Cited by 71,016
Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine
Friedman, J. H. (2001) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1013203451 · Cited by 30,731
A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions
Lundberg, S., & Lee, S.-I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1705.07874 · Cited by 23,707
"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier
Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., & Guestrin, C. (2016) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2939672.2939778 · Cited by 17,555
Intelligible Models for HealthCare: Predicting Pneumonia Risk and Hospital 30-day Readmission
Caruana, R., Lou, Y., Gehrke, J., Koch, P., Sturm, M., & Elhadad, N. (2015) · Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2783258.2788613 · Cited by 1,685
Self-citationSALib: An open-source Python library for Sensitivity Analysis
Herman, J. D., & Usher, W. (2017) · The Journal of Open Source Software · doi:10.21105/joss.00097 · Cited by 1,549
Interpretable Machine Learning in Healthcare
Ahmad, M. A., Eckert, C., & Teredesai, A. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 ACM International Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, and Health Informatics · doi:10.1145/3233547.3233667 · Cited by 583
Accurate intelligible models with pairwise interactions
Lou, Y., Caruana, R., Gehrke, J., & Hooker, G. (2013) · Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/2487575.2487579 · Cited by 564 · cited 2×
“EBM is a fast implementation of the GA 2 M algorithm (Lou et al., 2013), written in C++ and Python.”
MethodSelf-citationIntelligible models for classification and regression
Lou, Y., Caruana, R., & Gehrke, J. (2012) · Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/2339530.2339556 · Cited by 547
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 331
modelStudio: Interactive Studio with Explanations for ML Predictive Models
Baniecki, H., & Biecek, P. (2019) · The Journal of Open Source Software · doi:10.21105/joss.01798 · Cited by 19
Confronting Machine Learning with Financial Research
Lommers, K., Harzli, O. E., & Kim, J. (2021) · The Journal of Financial Data Science · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3788349 · Cited by 28
Translational NLP: A New Paradigm and General Principles for Natural Language Processing Research
Newman-Griffis, D. R., Lehman, J. F., Rosé, C. P., & Hochheiser, H. (2021) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.325 · Cited by 18
Micromodels for Efficient, Explainable, and Reusable Systems: A Case Study on Mental Health
Lee, A. S., Kummerfeld, J. K., An, L. C., & Mihalcea, R. F. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-emnlp.360 · Cited by 23
Koca, M. B., Nouranı, E., ABBASOĞLU, F., Karadenız, İ., & Sevilgen, F. E. (2022) · Computational Biology and Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2022.107755 · Cited by 18
Véran, T., Portier, P.-É., & Fouquet, F. (2022) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105534 · Cited by 18
Yao, L., Yang, Z., Zhang, Z., Tang, S., Shen, B., & Zeng, J. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · doi:10.1109/tim.2023.3323006 · Cited by 18
Cai, J., Hu, W., Ma, J., Si, A., Chen, S., Gong, L., Zhang, Y., Yan, H., Chen, F., & Initiative, A. D. N. (2023) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci13111535 · Cited by 18
Peng, L., Gao, P., Xiong, W., Li, Z., & Chen, X. (2024) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108110 · Cited by 21
Accuracy, Interpretability, and Differential Privacy via Explainable BoostingPreprint
Nori, H., Caruana, R., Bu, Z., Shen, J. H., & Kulkarni, J. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.09680 · Cited by 18
Self-citationAdvancing accountability in AI
OECD (2023) · OECD digital economy papers · doi:10.1787/2448f04b-en · Cited by 42
Zhai, W., Han, Q. K., Chen, L., & Shi, X. (2024) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Automation Control (AIAC) · doi:10.1109/aiac63745.2024.10899729 · Cited by 17
NODE-GAM: Neural Generalized Additive Model for Interpretable Deep LearningPreprint
Chang, C., Caruana, R., & Goldenberg, A. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.01613 · Cited by 17
Self-citationJayasundara, S., Indika, A., & Herath, D. (2022) · International Conference on Advanced Research in Computing (ICARC) · doi:10.1109/icarc54489.2022.9753867 · Cited by 16
Enhancing Hate Speech Detection through Explainable AI
Mittal, D. L., & Singh, H. (2023) · International Conference on Smart Data Intelligence (ICSMDI) · doi:10.1109/icsmdi57622.2023.00028 · Cited by 16
Ambre, D., Sheyyab, M., Lynch, P. T., Mayhew, E. K., & Brezinsky, K. (2024) · Talanta · doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2024.125635 · Cited by 17
TextFlint: Unified Multilingual Robustness Evaluation Toolkit for Natural Language ProcessingPreprint
Gui, T., Wang, X., Zhang, Q., Liu, Q., Zou, Y., Zhou, X., Zheng, R., Zhang, C., Wu, Q., Ye, J., et al. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.11441 · Cited by 31
Kundu, R. K., & Hoque, K. A. (2023) · Annual Conference of the PHM Society · doi:10.36001/phmconf.2023.v15i1.3472 · Cited by 19
A Novel Multi-step Finite-State Automaton for Arbitrarily Deterministic Tsetlin Machine Learning
Abeyrathna, K. D., Granmo, O., Shafik, R., Yakovlev, A., Wheeldon, A., Lei, J., & Goodwin, M. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-63799-6_8 · Cited by 15
Fooling Partial Dependence via Data Poisoning
Baniecki, H., Kretowicz, W., & Biecek, P. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-26409-2_8 · Cited by 21
Interpretations of Innovation: The Role of Technology in Explanation Seeking Related to Psychosis
Higgins, O., Short, B., Chalup, S. K., & Wilson, R. L. (2023) · Perspectives In Psychiatric Care · doi:10.1155/2023/4464934 · Cited by 19
Interpretable Predictive Models to Understand Risk Factors for Maternal and Fetal Outcomes
Bosschieter, T. M., Xu, Z., Lan, H., Lengerich, B. J., Nori, H., Painter, I. S., Souter, V., & Caruana, R. (2023) · Journal of Healthcare Informatics Research · doi:10.1007/s41666-023-00151-4 · Cited by 14
Self-citationGudigar, A., Kadri, N. A., Raghavendra, U., Samanth, J., Maithri, M., Inamdar, M. A., Prabhu, M. A., Hegde, A., Salvi, M., Yeong, C. H., et al. (2024) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108207 · Cited by 17
An Open API Architecture to Discover the Trustworthy Explanation of Cloud AI Services
Wang, Z., Liu, Y., & Huang, J. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing · doi:10.1109/tcc.2024.3398609 · Cited by 16
Explainable reinforcement learning for powertrain control engineering
Laflamme, C., Doppler, J., Pálvölgyi, B., Dominka, S., Viharos, Z. J., & Haeussler, S. (2025) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2025.110135 · Cited by 17
A Multi-layered Approach for Tailored Black-Box Explanations
Henin, C., & Métayer, D. L. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-68796-0_1 · Cited by 14
Messalas, A., Aridas, C. K., & Kanellopoulos, Y. (2020) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata50022.2020.9378034 · Cited by 14
Artificial Intelligence for Earth System Predictability (AI4ESP) (2021 Workshop Report)
Hickmon, N. L., Varadharajan, C., Hoffman, F. M., Wainwright, H. M., & Collis, S. (2022) · OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) · doi:10.2172/1888810 · Cited by 16
From point to probabilistic gradient boosting for claim frequency and severity prediction
Chevalier, D., & Côté, M. (2025) · European Actuarial Journal · doi:10.1007/s13385-025-00428-5 · Cited by 13
Gurina, E., Klyuchnikov, N., Antipova, K., & Koroteev, D. A. (2022) · Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.petrol.2022.111041 · Cited by 17
Interpretable machine learning algorithms to predict leaf senescence date of deciduous trees
Gao, C., Wang, H., & Ge, Q. (2023) · Agricultural and Forest Meteorology · doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2023.109623 · Cited by 14
Reliable feature selection for adversarially robust cyber-attack detection
Vitorino, J., Silva, M., Maia, E., & Praça, I. (2024) · Annals of Telecommunications · doi:10.1007/s12243-024-01047-z · Cited by 16
Zhou, J., Tse, G., Lee, S., Liu, T., Wu, W. K. K., Cao, Z., Zeng, D. D., Wong, I. C. K., Zhang, Q., & Cheung, B. M. Y. (2020) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2020.06.30.20143651 · Cited by 13
Tenney, I., Wexler, J., Bastings, J., Bolukbasi, T., Coenen, A., Gehrmann, S., Jiang, E., Pushkarna, M., Radebaugh, C., Reif, E., et al. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2008.05122 · Cited by 13
Xaitk-Saliency: An Open Source Explainable AI Toolkit for Saliency
Hu, B., Tunison, P., RichardWebster, B., & Hoogs, A. J. (2023) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v37i13.26871 · Cited by 12
Wahab, S., Khan, I. U., Khan, M. N. A., & Ashraf, M. (2024) · Construction and Building Materials · doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.137381 · Cited by 12
MLHOps: Machine Learning Health Operations
Khattak, F. K., Subasri, V., Krishnan, A., Pou-Prom, C., Koçak, S. A., Dolatabadi, E., Pandya, D., Seyyed-Kalantari, L., & Rudzicz, F. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3521279 · Cited by 31
Li, L., Cao, R., Zhao, L., Liu, N., Sun, H., Zhang, Z., & Sun, Y. (2025) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods14081293 · Cited by 12
Wang, D., Lee, S. H., Geng, H., Zhong, H., Plastaras, J. P., Wojcieszynski, A., Caruana, R. A., & Xiao, Y. (2022) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2022.1059033 · Cited by 12
Self-citationDoes Dataset Complexity Matters for Model Explainers?
Ribeiro, J., da Silva, R. L. S., Cardoso, L., & Alves, R. C. D. O. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata52589.2021.9671630 · Cited by 12
Chen, C. L. P., Xia, H., Zhou, W., Xia, C., Liu, M., Hao, R., & Wang, T. (2026) · Applied Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s10489-026-07102-7 · Cited by 11
Supporting Law-Enforcement to Cope with Blacklisted Websites: Framework and Case Study
Pritom, M. M. A., & Xu, S. (2022) · IEEE Conference on Communications and Network Security · doi:10.1109/cns56114.2022.9947260 · Cited by 11
Khattak, A., Chan, P. W., Chen, F., & Peng, H. (2023) · KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12205-023-0410-8 · Cited by 11
Cloud-Based XAI Services for Assessing Open Repository Models Under Adversarial Attacks
Wang, Z., & Liu, Y. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Software Services Engineering (SSE) · doi:10.1109/sse62657.2024.00031 · Cited by 11
Explainable Data-Driven QoE Modelling with XAI
Wehner, N., Seufert, A., Hoßfeld, T., & Seufert, M. (2023) · International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX) · doi:10.1109/qomex58391.2023.10178499 · Cited by 11
Impact of Accuracy on Model InterpretationsPreprint
Liu, B. S., & Udell, M. R. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.09903 · Cited by 11
MIRAD: A Method for Interpretable Ransomware Attack Detection
Marcinkowski, B., Goschorska, M., Wileńska, N., Siuta, J., & Kajdanowicz, T. J. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3461322 · Cited by 10
Beltiukov, R., Guo, W., Gupta, A. K., & Willinger, W. (2023) · ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS) · doi:10.1145/3576915.3623075 · Cited by 17
Biecek, P., Chlebuś, M., Gajda, J., Gosiewska, A., Kozak, A., Ogonowski, D., Sztachelski, J., & Wojewnik, P. (2021) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.06735 · Cited by 10
Martínez, M. A. M., Nadj, M., Langner, M., Toreini, P., & Maedche, A. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1145/3607145 · Cited by 12
Interpretable credit scoring based on an additive extreme gradient boosting
Zou, Y., Xia, M., & Lan, X. (2025) · Chaos Solitons & Fractals · doi:10.1016/j.chaos.2025.116216 · Cited by 9
Measuring Model Understandability by means of Shapley Additive Explanations
Mariotti, E., Alonso, J. M., & Albert Gatt, A. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE) · doi:10.1109/fuzz-ieee55066.2022.9882773 · Cited by 9
Non-monotonic relations of galaxy star formation, radius, and structure at fixed stellar mass
Stephenson, J., Rodríguez-Puebla, A., Faber, S. M., Primack, J. R., Ávila-Reese, V., Calette, A. R., Cannarozzo, C., Kakos, J., Cano-Díaz, M., Koo, D. C., et al. (2024) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1735 · Cited by 9
Interpretability of machine-learning models in physical sciencesPreprint
Ghiringhelli, L. M. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.10443 · Cited by 13
Explainable AI for medical applications
Rao, N. M., Sivaraman, J., Pal, K., & Neelapu, B. C. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-19073-5.00020-3 · Cited by 8
Automation of quantum dot measurement analysis via explainable machine learning
Schug, D., Kovach, T. J., Wolfe, M. A., Benson, J. H., Park, S., Dodson, J. P., Corrigan, J. D., Eriksson, M. A., & Zwolak, J. P. (2024) · Machine Learning Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2632-2153/ada087 · Cited by 8
Can mood primitives predict apparent personality?
Soğancıoğlu, G., Kaya, H., & Salah, A. A. (2021) · International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction and workshops · doi:10.1109/acii52823.2021.9597444 · Cited by 8
Filho, J. D. S. R., Cardoso, L. F. F., da Silva, R. L. S., Carneiro, N., Santos, V. C. A., & Alves, R. C. D. O. (2023) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122986 · Cited by 8
Cali, Ü., Kuzlu, M., Pipattanasomporn, M., Kempf, J., & Bai, L. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-83301-5_6 · Cited by 11
Technologies for Trustworthy Machine Learning: A Survey in a Socio-Technical ContextPreprint
Toreini, E., Aitken, M., Coopamootoo, K., Elliott, K., González-Zelaya, V., Missier, P., Ng, M., & van Moorsel, A. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.08911 · Cited by 24
XAI Method Properties: A (Meta-)study.Preprint
Schwalbe, G., & Finzel, B. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 10
RecRec: Algorithmic Recourse for Recommender Systems
Verma, S., Singh, A., Boonsanong, V., Dickerson, J. P., & Shah, C. S. (2023) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/3583780.3615181 · Cited by 7
Intermediate Layer Attention Mechanism for Multimodal Fusion in Personality and Affect Computing
Sreevidya, P., Aravinth, J., & Samiappan, S. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3442377 · Cited by 7
Enhancing concrete frost resistance prediction with an explainable neural network
Sun, B., Zheng, H., Zhao, Q., Zhao, W., Fu, W., & Liu, G. (2024) · Case Studies in Construction Materials · doi:10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03648 · Cited by 7
Zeitlin, J. H., Fontana, M. A., Parides, M. K., Nawabi, D. H., Wickiewicz, T. L., Pearle, A. D., Beynnon, B. D., & Imhauser, C. W. (2023) · Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/23259671231163627 · Cited by 7
Explainable Machine Learning for Crop Recommendation from Agriculture Sensor Data- a New Paradigm
Das, S., & Chatterjee, S. (2023) · International Conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT) · doi:10.1109/icccnt56998.2023.10308154 · Cited by 7
Explainable artificial intelligence-based evidential inferencing on process faults in plasma etching
Choi, J. E., An, S., Lee, Y., Lee, Y., Kim, D., & Hong, S. J. (2024) · Journal of Physics D Applied Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6463/ad2339 · Cited by 7
FXAM: A Unified and Fast Interpretable Model for Predictive Analytics
Jiang, Y., Ding, R., Qiao, T., Zhu, Y., Han, S., & Zhang, D. (2023) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.123890 · Cited by 8
Visual Analytics and Human Involvement in Machine Learning
Eisler, S., & Meyer, J. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-24628-9_40 · Cited by 7
Liu, B. S., Xie, M., & Udell, M. R. (2021) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3447548.3467387 · Cited by 9
IOGOD: An interpretable outlier generation-based outlier detector for categorical databases
Galaz, M. A. Z., Loyola‐González, O., & Medina‐Pérez, M. A. (2022) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2022.116570 · Cited by 7
Super-resolution and uncertainty estimation from sparse sensors of dynamical physical systems
Collins, A. M., Rivera-Casillas, P., Dutta, S., Cecil, O. M., Trautz, A. C., & Farthing, M. W. (2023) · Frontiers in Water · doi:10.3389/frwa.2023.1137110 · Cited by 7
Attention-like feature explanation for tabular data
Konstantinov, A. V., & Utkin, L. V. (2022) · International Journal of Data Science and Analytics · doi:10.1007/s41060-022-00351-y · Cited by 7
VirtualXAI: A User-Centric Framework for Explainability Assessment Leveraging GPT-Generated Personas
Makridis, G., Koukos, V., Fatouros, G., Kotios, D., Separdani, M. M., Kyriazis, D., & Soldatos, J. K. (2025) · International Conference on Distributed Computing in Smart Systems and the Internet of Things (DCOSS-IoT) · doi:10.1109/dcoss-iot65416.2025.00156 · Cited by 6
Lee, S. H., Geng, H., & Xiao, Y. (2021) · Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.clon.2021.11.020 · Cited by 6
Bottlenecks in Secure Adoption of Deep Neural Networks in Safety-Critical Applications
Das, S. K., Kundu, S., & Basu, K. (2023) · IEEE International Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems (MWSCAS) · doi:10.1109/mwscas57524.2023.10406035 · Cited by 6
On marginal feature attributions of tree-based models
Filom, K., Miroshnikov, A., Kotsiopoulos, K., & Kannan, A. R. (2024) · Foundations of Data Science · doi:10.3934/fods.2024021 · Cited by 9
Tijani, I. A., Dauda, J. A., Kareem, M. A., & Lawal, A. I. (2025) · Structural Concrete · doi:10.1002/suco.70232 · Cited by 6
Evaluating Neural Model Robustness for Machine Comprehension
Wu, W. M. C., Arendt, D., & Volkova, S. (2021) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-main.210 · Cited by 6
Explanation of Siamese Neural Networks for Weakly Supervised Learning
Utkin, L. V., Kovalev, M. S., & Kasimov, E. M. (2020) · Computing and Informatics · doi:10.31577/cai_2020_6_1172 · Cited by 6
Smart interpretable model (SIM) enabling subject matter experts in rule generation
Christianto, H., Lee, G. K. K., Jair, Z. W., Kasim, H., & Rajan, D. (2022) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117945 · Cited by 6
FLAN: feature-wise latent additive neural models for biological applications
Nguyen, A.-P., Vasilaki, S., & Martínez, M. R. (2023) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbad056 · Cited by 8
Decker, T. W., Gross, R., Koebler, A., Lebacher, M., Schnitzer, R., & Weber, S. H. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-35891-3_13 · Cited by 7
Marzouk, M., Zitoun, C., Belghith, O., & Skhiri, S. (2023) · IEEE Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1109/mis.2023.3320438 · Cited by 6
Hou, Y., Zhu, Y. S., Wu, X., Li, Y., Lucas, T. H., Richardson, A. G., & Liu, X. (2024) · Digest of technical papers/Digest of technical papers - IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference · doi:10.1109/isscc49657.2024.10454413 · Cited by 6
Graham-Knight, J. B., Bond, C., Najjaran, H., Lucet, Y., & Lasserre, P. (2022) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2022.119101 · Cited by 6
XAI-based Data Visualization in Multimodal Medical DataPreprint
Sharma, S., Singh, M., Mcdaid, L. J., & Bhattacharyya, S. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.07.11.664302 · Cited by 7
Targeting resources efficiently and justifiably by combining causal machine learning and theory
Ali, Ö. G. (2022) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2022.1015604 · Cited by 7
Byun, J., Lee, J., Lee, H. W., & Son, B. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3523967 · Cited by 5
Explainable Mapping of the Irregular Land Use Parcel With a Data Fusion Deep-Learning Model
Yao, Y., Gao, R., Wu, H., Dong, A., Hu, Z., Ma, Y., Guan, Q., & Luo, P. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2025.3542628 · Cited by 5
An Explainable AI approach for detecting failures in air pressure systems
Farea, S. M., Mumcuoğlu, M. E., & Ünel, M. (2025) · Engineering Failure Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2025.109441 · Cited by 5
Moghaddasi, M., Moradi, M., Ghaleni, M. M., & Jamei, M. (2025) · Journal of Hydrology Regional Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ejrh.2025.102382 · Cited by 5
Jeong, J., Jeong, J.-H., Moon, G.-M., Seo, Y.-D., & Lee, E. (2025) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110855 · Cited by 5
Wallsberger, R., Knauer, R., & Matzka, S. (2023) · International Conference on Transdisciplinary AI (TransAI) · doi:10.1109/transai60598.2023.00032 · Cited by 5
Khattak, A., Zhang, J., Chan, P. W., Chen, F., & Matara, C. M. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28569 · Cited by 5
Will you Buy it Now?: Predicting Passengers that Purchase Premium Promotions Using the PAX Model
Emadi, N. A., Thirumuruganathan, S., Robillos, D. R., & Jansen, B. J. J. (2021) · Journal of Smart Tourism · doi:10.52255/smarttourism.2021.1.1.7 · Cited by 5
Logic-based AI for Interpretable Board Game Winner Prediction with Tsetlin Machine
Giri, C., Granmo, O., van Hoof, H., & Blakely, C. D. (2022) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn55064.2022.9892796 · Cited by 5
Barbado, A., & Corcho, Ó. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.06031 · Cited by 9
Faucher, M., Chetty, S. C., Shokouhi, S., Barnes, G., Rahmani, K., Calvert, J. S., & Mao, Q. (2022) · Preprints.org · doi:10.20944/preprints202206.0149.v1 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Nori, H., Jenkins, S., Koch, P., & Caruana, R.
- Affiliations
- Microsoft (United States) (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1909.09223
- OpenAlex
- W2973631113
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 4
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
- Keywords
- model interpretability, explainable AI, partial dependence, lime, explainable boosting machine, model visualization, Python library
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
