The DOI matches its DataCite record; 15 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.
InterpretML: A Unified Framework for Machine Learning Interpretability
Open accessAbstract
InterpretML is an open-source Python package which exposes machine learning interpretability algorithms to practitioners and researchers. InterpretML exposes two types of interpretability - glassbox models, which are machine learning models designed for interpretability (ex: linear models, rule lists, generalized additive models), and blackbox explainability techniques for explaining existing systems (ex: Partial Dependence, LIME). The package enables practitioners to easily compare interpretability algorithms by exposing multiple methods under a unified API, and by having a built-in, extensible visualization platform. InterpretML also includes the first implementation of the Explainable Boosting Machine, a powerful, interpretable, glassbox model that can be as accurate as many blackbox models. The MIT licensed source code can be downloaded from github.com/microsoft/interpret.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Various toolboxes have been released in the past years to assist the algorithm experimentation and software development to enhance AI trustworthiness in different aspects such as fairness [12, 13, 71], XAI [56, 1, 8], and adversarial robustness [55, 2].”
From Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practices (2023) · cites this paper as [56]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Therefore, only features that are related to other features are considered relevant for anomaly detection.”
From A Survey on Explainable Anomaly Detection (2024) · cites this paper as [154]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“They assume that anomalies are those instances that violate the normal dependencies between features.”
From A Survey on Explainable Anomaly Detection (2024) · cites this paper as [154]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Meanwhile, Noto et al. [154] and Paulheim & Meusel [167] try to find a relevant feature subset for anomaly detection by exploring the correlations between features.”
From A Survey on Explainable Anomaly Detection (2024) · cites this paper as [154]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Only explores”
From A Survey on Explainable Anomaly Detection (2024) · cites this paper as [154]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Robust to noisy”
From A Survey on Explainable Anomaly Detection (2024) · cites this paper as [154]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python
Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Müller, A., Nothman, J., Louppe, G., et al. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1201.0490 · Cited by 71,016
Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine
Friedman, J. H. (2001) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1013203451 · Cited by 30,731
A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions
Lundberg, S., & Lee, S.-I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1705.07874 · Cited by 23,707
"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier
Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., & Guestrin, C. (2016) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2939672.2939778 · Cited by 17,555
Intelligible Models for HealthCare: Predicting Pneumonia Risk and Hospital 30-day Readmission
Caruana, R., Lou, Y., Gehrke, J., Koch, P., Sturm, M., & Elhadad, N. (2015) · Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2783258.2788613 · Cited by 1,685
Self-citationSALib: An open-source Python library for Sensitivity Analysis
Herman, J. D., & Usher, W. (2017) · The Journal of Open Source Software · doi:10.21105/joss.00097 · Cited by 1,549
Interpretable Machine Learning in Healthcare
Ahmad, M. A., Eckert, C., & Teredesai, A. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 ACM International Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, and Health Informatics · doi:10.1145/3233547.3233667 · Cited by 583
Accurate intelligible models with pairwise interactions
Lou, Y., Caruana, R., Gehrke, J., & Hooker, G. (2013) · Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/2487575.2487579 · Cited by 564 · cited 2×
“EBM is a fast implementation of the GA 2 M algorithm (Lou et al., 2013), written in C++ and Python.”
MethodSelf-citationIntelligible models for classification and regression
Lou, Y., Caruana, R., & Gehrke, J. (2012) · Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/2339530.2339556 · Cited by 547
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ali, S., Abuhmed, T., El-Sappagh, S., Muhammad, K., Alonso-Moral, J. M., Confalonieri, R., Guidotti, R., Del Ser, J., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., & Herrera, F. (2023) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101805 · Cited by 1,762
Interpretable machine learning: Fundamental principles and 10 grand challenges
Rudin, C., Chen, C., Chen, Z., Huang, H., Semenova, L., & Zhong, C. (2022) · Statistics Surveys · doi:10.1214/21-ss133 · Cited by 958
Interpretable Machine Learning – A Brief History, State-of-the-Art and Challenges
Molnar, C., Casalicchio, G., & Bischl, B. (2020) · Communications in Computer and Information Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-65965-3_28 · Cited by 677
Manipulating and Measuring Model Interpretability
Poursabzi-Sangdeh, F., Goldstein, D. G., Hofman, J. M., Wortman Vaughan, J. W., & Wallach, H. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411764.3445315 · Cited by 728
Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practices
Li, B., Qi, P., Liu, B., Di, S., Liu, J., Pei, J., Yi, J., & Zhou, B. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3555803 · Cited by 612
Interpretable and Explainable Machine Learning for Materials Science and Chemistry
Oviedo, F., Ferres, J. L., Buonassisi, T., & Butler, K. T. (2022) · Accounts of Materials Research · doi:10.1021/accountsmr.1c00244 · Cited by 435
Madaio, M. A., Stark, L., Wortman Vaughan, J., & Wallach, H. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3313831.3376445 · Cited by 436
Explainable Artificial Intelligence in CyberSecurity: A Survey
Capuano, N., Fenza, G., Loia, V., & Stanzione, C. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3204171 · Cited by 330
“The last analyzed work is [173], where the authors use LIME and Explainable Boosting Machine (EBM) [174].”
MethodBenchmarking and survey of explanation methods for black box models
Bodria, F., Giannotti, F., Guidotti, R., Naretto, F., Pedreschi, D., & Rinzivillo, S. (2023) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-023-00933-9 · Cited by 410
Interpretable machine learning with an ensemble of gradient boosting machines
Konstantinov, A. V., & Utkin, L. V. (2021) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2021.106993 · Cited by 299
Topçuoğlu, B. D., Lesniak, N. A., Ruffin, M. T., Wiens, J., & Schloss, P. D. (2020) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.00434-20 · Cited by 295
Trustworthy ai: A computational perspective
Liu, H., Wang, Y., Fan, W., Liu, X., Li, Y., Jain, S., Liu, Y., Jain, A., & Tang, J. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/3546872 · Cited by 261
Neural Additive Models: Interpretable Machine Learning with Neural NetsPreprint
Agarwal, R., Melnick, L., Frosst, N., Zhang, X., Lengerich, B. J., Caruana, R., & Hinton, G. E. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.13912 · Cited by 317
Self-citationInterpretable Machine Learning
Boehmke, B., & Greenwell, B. (2019) · Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks · doi:10.1201/9780367816377-16 · Cited by 276
Explainable AI for clinical and remote health applications: A survey on tabular and time series data
Di Martino, F., & Delmastro, F. (2023) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-022-10304-3 · Cited by 216
Kobayashi, K., Almutairi, B., Sakib, M. N., Chakraborty, S., & Alam, S. B. (2023) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2023.107620 · Cited by 202
Roadmap on Machine learning in electronic structure
Kulik, H. J., Hammerschmidt, T., Schmidt, J., Botti, S., Marques, M. A. L., Boley, M., Scheffler, M., Todorović, M., Rinke, P., Oses, C., et al. (2022) · Electronic Structure · doi:10.1088/2516-1075/ac572f · Cited by 197
Interpretability research of deep learning: A literature survey
Xu, B., & Yang, G. (2024) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2024.102721 · Cited by 176
A Comparative Analysis of LIME and SHAP Interpreters With Explainable ML-Based Diabetes Predictions
Ahmed, S., Kaiser, M. S., Hossain, M. S., & Andersson, K. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3422319 · Cited by 173
Ethical Considerations in AI-Based Recruitment
Mujtaba, D. F., & Mahapatra, N. R. (2019) · IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS) · doi:10.1109/istas48451.2019.8937920 · Cited by 178
Tenney, I., Wexler, J., Bastings, J., Bolukbasi, T., Coenen, A., Gehrmann, S., Jiang, E., Pushkarna, M., Radebaugh, C., Reif, E., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-demos.15 · Cited by 138
“Many are general-purpose, such as the What-If Tool (Wexler et al., 2020), Cap-tum (Kokhlikyan et al., 2019), Manifold (Zhang et al., 2018), or InterpretML (Nori et al., 2019), while others focus on specific applications like fairness, including FairVis (Cabrera et al., 2019) and FairSight (Ahn and Lin, 2019).”
BackgroundLung cancer survival period prediction and understanding: Deep learning approaches
Doppalapudi, S., Qiu, R. G., & Badr, Y. (2020) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104371 · Cited by 140
A Survey of Deep Learning for Scientific DiscoveryPreprint
Raghu, M., & Schmidt, E. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2003.11755 · Cited by 221
A Survey on Explainable Anomaly Detection
Li, Z., Zhu, Y., & Van Leeuwen, M. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data · doi:10.1145/3609333 · Cited by 139
Guo, R., Yang, B., Guo, Y., He, L., Li, Z., Zhou, B., Hong, B., & Wang, F. (2024) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111301 · Cited by 134
Explainable Predictive Maintenance: A Survey of Current Methods, Challenges and Opportunities
Cummins, L., Sommers, A., Ramezani, S. B., Mittal, S., Jabour, J. E., Seale, M. A., & Rahimi, S. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3391130 · Cited by 163
EXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)—From Theory to Methods and Applications
Ortigossa, E. S., Gonçalves, T., & Nonato, L. G. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3409843 · Cited by 124
Lin, M., Yan, C., Wang, W., Dong, G., Meng, J., & Wu, J. (2023) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2023.127675 · Cited by 122
Khare, S. K., & Acharya, U. R. (2023) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.106676 · Cited by 116
Land-surface parameters for spatial predictive mapping and modeling
Maxwell, A. E., & Shobe, C. M. (2022) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.103944 · Cited by 105
Robustness Gym: Unifying the NLP Evaluation Landscape
Goel, K., Rajani, N. F., Vig, J., Taschdjian, Z., Bansal, M., & Ré, C. (2021) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-demos.6 · Cited by 145
COGAM: Measuring and Moderating Cognitive Load in Machine Learning Model Explanations
Abdul, A., von der Weth, C., Kankanhalli, M., & Lim, B. Y. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3313831.3376615 · Cited by 96
Aberrant splicing prediction across human tissues
Wagner, N., Çelik, M. H., Hölzlwimmer, F. R., Mertes, C., Prokisch, H., Yépez, V. A., & Gagneur, J. (2023) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-023-01373-3 · Cited by 92
Interpretable Machine Learning Tools: A Survey
Agarwal, N., & Das, S. (2020) · IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI) · doi:10.1109/ssci47803.2020.9308260 · Cited by 92
Methodology and evaluation in sports analytics: challenges, approaches, and lessons learned
Davis, J., Bransen, L., Devos, L., Jaspers, A., Meert, W., Robberechts, P., Haaren, J. V., & Roy, M. V. (2024) · Machine-mediated learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-024-06585-0 · Cited by 94
Analyzing and assessing explainable AI models for smart agriculture environments
Cartolano, A., Cuzzocrea, A., & Pilato, G. (2024) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-023-17978-z · Cited by 92
TextFlint: Unified Multilingual Robustness Evaluation Toolkit for Natural Language Processing
Wang, X., Liu, Q., Gui, T., Zhang, Q., Zou, Y., Zhou, X., Ye, J., Zhang, Y., Zheng, R., Pang, Z., et al. (2021) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations (ACL Demo) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-demo.41 · Cited by 92
dalex: Responsible Machine Learning with Interactive Explainability and Fairness in PythonPreprint
Baniecki, H., Kretowicz, W., Piątyszek, P., Wisniewski, J., & Biecek, P. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.14406 · Cited by 105
Petersen, E., Potdevin, Y., Mohammadi, E., Zidowitz, S., Breyer, S., Nowotka, D., Henn, S., Pechmann, L., Leucker, M., Rostalski, P., et al. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3178382 · Cited by 92
A survey on artificial intelligence in histopathology image analysis
Abdelsamea, M. M., Zidan, U., Senousy, Z., Gaber, M. M., Rakha, E. A., & Ilyas, M. (2022) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1002/widm.1474 · Cited by 84
Big data analytics for default prediction using graph theory
Yıldırım, M., Okay, F. Y., & Özdemi̇r, S. (2021) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2021.114840 · Cited by 77
Hasib, K. M., Tanzim, A., Shin, J., Faruk, K. O., Mahmud, J. A., & Mridha, M. F. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3213818 · Cited by 73
Duell, J., Fan, X., Burnett, B., Gert Aarts, A., & Zhou, S. (2021) · IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics (BHI ...) · doi:10.1109/bhi50953.2021.9508618 · Cited by 74
Gurmessa, D. K., & Jimma, W. (2024) · BMJ Health & Care Informatics · doi:10.1136/bmjhci-2023-100954 · Cited by 81
Koshiyama, A., Kazim, E., & Treleaven, P. (2022) · Computer · doi:10.1109/mc.2021.3067225 · Cited by 55
PsychBERT: A Mental Health Language Model for Social Media Mental Health Behavioral Analysis
Vajre, V., Naylor, M., Kamath, U., & Shehu, A. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM) · doi:10.1109/bibm52615.2021.9669469 · Cited by 60
Ride-sourcing compared to its public-transit alternative using big trip data
Liao, Y. J. (2021) · Journal of Transport Geography · doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103135 · Cited by 53
Gongane, V. U., Munot, M. V., & Anuse, A. D. (2024) · Journal of Computational Social Science · doi:10.1007/s42001-024-00248-9 · Cited by 67
Esterhuizen, J. A., Goldsmith, B. R., & Linic, S. (2021) · Chem Catalysis · doi:10.1016/j.checat.2021.07.014 · Cited by 50
Extending the Tsetlin Machine With Integer-Weighted Clauses for Increased Interpretability
Abeyrathna, K. D., Granmo, O., & Goodwin, M. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3049569 · Cited by 48
Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Cotton Yield Prediction With Multisource Data
Çelik, M. F., Ișık, M. S., Taşkın, G., Erten, E., & Camps‐Valls, G. (2023) · IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters · doi:10.1109/lgrs.2023.3303643 · Cited by 51
An Explainable AI Approach for the Rapid Diagnosis of COVID-19 Using Ensemble Learning Algorithms
Gong, H., Wang, M., Zhang, H., Elahe, M. F., & Jin, M. (2022) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.874455 · Cited by 43
Coding energy knowledge in constructed responses with explainable NLP models
Gombert, S., Mitri, D. D., Karademir, O., Kubsch, M., Kolbe, H., Tautz, S., Grimm, A., Bohm, I., Neumann, K., & Drachsler, H. (2022) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12767 · Cited by 57
Jamei, M., Ali, M., Karbasi, M., Karimi, B., Jahannemaei, N., Farooque, A. A., & Yaseen, Z. M. (2023) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121512 · Cited by 44
Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Cybersecurity: A Brief Review
Hariharan, S., Velicheti, A., Anagha, A. S., Thomas, C., & Balakrishnan, N. (2021) · doi:10.1109/isea-isap54304.2021.9689765 · Cited by 45
The grammar of interactive explanatory model analysis
Baniecki, H., Parzych, D., & Biecek, P. (2023) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-023-00924-w · Cited by 50
Wang, H., Huang, Z., Zhang, D., Arief, J., Tiewei, L., & Tian, J. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2996302 · Cited by 42
Cheminformatics and artificial intelligence for accelerating agrochemical discovery
Djoumbou-Feunang, Y., Wilmot, J. T., Kinney, J., Chanda, P., Yu, P., Sader, C. A., Sharifi, M., Smith, S., Ou, J., Hu, J. K., et al. (2023) · Frontiers in Chemistry · doi:10.3389/fchem.2023.1292027 · Cited by 47
AI Regulation Is (not) All You Need
Lucaj, L., van der Smagt, P., & Benbouzid, D. (2023) · 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3593013.3594079 · Cited by 40
Responsible AI: A Primer for the Legal Community
Golbin, I., Rao, A. S., Hadjarian, A., & Krittman, D. (2020) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata50022.2020.9377738 · Cited by 38
Joy, U. G., Hoque, K. E., Uddin, M. N., Chowdhury, L., & Park, S.-B. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3401247 · Cited by 50
Phishing Detection Using URL-based XAI Techniques
Hernandes, P. R. G., Floret, C. P., Almeida, K. F. C. D., Silva, V. C. D., Papa, J. P., & da Costa, K. A. P. (2021) · IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI) · doi:10.1109/ssci50451.2021.9659981 · Cited by 38
Arya, V., Bellamy, R., Chen, P., Dhurandhar, A., Hind, M., Hoffman, S. C., Houde, S., Liao, Q. V., Luss, R., Mojsilović, A., et al. (2020) · Joint International Conference on Data Science & Management of Data (CODS-COMAD) · doi:10.1145/3430984.3430987 · Cited by 37
Locally interpretable tree boosting: An application to house price prediction
Hjort, A., Scheel, I., Sommervoll, D. E., & Pensar, J. (2023) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2023.114106 · Cited by 37
Pramanik, P., Jana, R. K., & Ghosh, I. (2024) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123482 · Cited by 41
Considerations when learning additive explanations for black-box models
Tan, S., Hooker, G., Koch, P., Gordo, A., & Caruana, R. (2023) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-023-06335-8 · Cited by 88
Self-citationJiang, S., Liang, Y., Shi, S., Wu, C., & Shi, Z. (2023) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166623 · Cited by 36
Explainability of Subfield Level Crop Yield Prediction Using Remote Sensing
Najjar, H., Miranda, M., Nuske, M., Roscher, R., & Dengel, A. R. (2025) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/jstars.2025.3528068 · Cited by 43
Qu, Y., Deng, X., Lin, S., Han, F., Chang, H. H., Ou, Y., Nie, Z., Mai, J., Wang, X., Gao, X., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine · doi:10.3389/fcvm.2021.797002 · Cited by 33
SurvNAM: The machine learning survival model explanation
Utkin, L. V., Satyukov, E. D., & Konstantinov, A. V. (2021) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2021.12.015 · Cited by 35
Explainable artificial intelligence models in intrusion detection systems
Al, S., & Sağıroğlu, Ş. (2025) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2025.110145 · Cited by 47
epitope1D: accurate taxonomy-aware B-cell linear epitope prediction
Silva¹, B. F. D., Ascher, D. B., & Pires, D. E. V. (2023) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbad114 · Cited by 29
FAT Forensics: A Python toolbox for algorithmic fairness, accountability and transparency
Sokol, K., Santos‐Rodríguez, R., & Flach, P. A. (2022) · Software Impacts · doi:10.1016/j.simpa.2022.100406 · Cited by 15
Combining ChatGPT and knowledge graph for explainable machine learning-driven design: a case study
Hu, X., Liu, A., & Dai, Y. (2024) · Journal of Engineering Design · doi:10.1080/09544828.2024.2355758 · Cited by 31
Explainable artificial intelligence in orthopedic surgery
Oettl, F. C., Oeding, J. F., & Samuelsson, K. (2024) · Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics · doi:10.1002/jeo2.12103 · Cited by 27
Spielvogel, C. P., Schindler, N., Schröder, C., Stellnberger, S. L., Wadsak, W., Mitterhauser, M., Papp, L., Hacker, M., Pichler, V., & Vraka, C. (2025) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.4c02212 · Cited by 27
Interactive Data Visualization in Jupyter Notebooks
Ono, J. P., Freire, J., & Silva, C. T. (2021) · Computing in Science & Engineering · doi:10.1109/mcse.2021.3052619 · Cited by 27
Revisiting Popularity and Demographic Biases in Recommender Evaluation and Effectiveness
Neophytou, N., Mitra, B., & Stinson, C. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-99736-6_43 · Cited by 36
van den Berg, M., Medina, O. A. G., Loohuis, I., van der Flier, M., Dudink, J., Benders, M. J. N. L., Bartels, R., & Vijlbrief, D. C. (2023) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107156 · Cited by 26
Machine Learning With Computer Networks: Techniques, Datasets, and Models
Afifi, H., Pochaba, S., Boltres, A., Laniewski, D., Haberer, J., Paeleke, L., Poorzare, R., Stolpmann, D., Wehner, N., Redder, A., et al. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3384460 · Cited by 36
StickyLand: Breaking the Linear Presentation of Computational Notebooks
Wang, Z. J., Dai, K., & Edwards, W. K. (2022) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3491101.3519653 · Cited by 25
Explainable machine learning models to analyse maternal health
Patel, S. S. (2023) · Data & Knowledge Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.datak.2023.102198 · Cited by 30
Automated Assessment of Psychiatric Disorders Using Speech: A Systematic ReviewPreprint
Low, D. M., Bentley, K. H., & Ghosh, S. (2019) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/5pwze · Cited by 30
Barbado, A., & Corcho, Ó. (2022) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105222 · Cited by 33
Morgan, H. E., Wang, K., Dohopolski, M. J., Liang, X., Folkert, M. R., Sher, D. J., & Wang, J. (2021) · Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery · doi:10.21037/qims-21-274 · Cited by 24
Liu, X., Shi, X.-Q., Peng, Z., & He, H.-D. (2023) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2023.104524 · Cited by 24
Quillivic, R., Gayraud, F., Auxéméry, Y., Vanni, L., Peschanski, D., Eustache, F., Dayan, J., & Mesmoudi, S. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-61557-7 · Cited by 24
Interpretable machine learning for creditor recovery rates
Nazemi, A., & Fabozzi, F. J. (2024) · Journal of Banking & Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2024.107187 · Cited by 24
Kuźba, M., & Biecek, P. (2020) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-65965-3_30 · Cited by 23
Zeitlin, J. H., Parides, M. K., Lane, J. M., Russell, L., & Kunze, K. N. (2023) · Archives of Osteoporosis · doi:10.1007/s11657-023-01292-0 · Cited by 24
Çil, A. E., & Yıldız, K. (2025) · Internet of Things · doi:10.1016/j.iot.2025.101696 · Cited by 33
Interpretability, Then What? Editing Machine Learning Models to Reflect Human Knowledge and Values
Wang, Z. J., Kale, A. M., Nori, H., Stella, P., Nunnally, M., Chau, D. H., Vorvoreanu, M., Vaughan, J. W., & Caruana, R. (2022) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3534678.3539074 · Cited by 21
Self-citationTruVR: Trustworthy Cybersickness Detection using Explainable Machine Learning
Kundu, R. K., Islam, R., Calyam, P. P., & Hoque, K. A. (2022) · Proceedings - International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, ISMAR · doi:10.1109/ismar55827.2022.00096 · Cited by 21
Wahab, S., Salami, B. A., Danish, H., Nisar, S., AlAteah, A. H., & Alsubeai, A. (2025) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2025.110458 · Cited by 21
Calibrate: Interactive Analysis of Probabilistic Model Output
Xenopoulos, P., Rulff, J., Nonato, L. G., Barr, B., & Silva, C. T. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2022.3209489 · Cited by 21
GAM Coach: Towards Interactive and User-centered Algorithmic Recourse
Wang, Z. J., Vaughan, J. W., Caruana, R., & Chau, D. H. (2023) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3580816 · Cited by 20
Self-citationCaleca, F., Confuorto, P., Raspini, F., Segoni, S., Tofani, V., Casagli, N., & Moretti, S. (2024) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175277 · Cited by 21
Coalesced Multi-Output Tsetlin Machines with Clause SharingPreprint
Glimsdal, S., & Granmo, O. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.07594 · Cited by 20
Rule extraction with guarantees from regression models
Johansson, U., Sönströd, C., Löfström, T., & Boström, H. (2022) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2022.108554 · Cited by 19
Yao, H., Derksen, H., Golbus, J. R., Zhang, J., Aaronson, K. D., Gryak, J., & Najarian, K. (2022) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2022.3211765 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Nori, H., Jenkins, S., Koch, P., & Caruana, R.
- Affiliations
- Microsoft (United States) (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1909.09223
- OpenAlex
- W2973631113
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 4
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
- Keywords
- model interpretability, explainable AI, partial dependence, lime, explainable boosting machine, model visualization, Python library
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
